Dear Vladimir!
Connecting your posts written on my essay site and here...
I can deeply understand your stance "I would rather ...and leave to more specialised researchers like you the larger questions... ".
However, you write here "...we can continue to live and work in a new way...But do we really have time for that? Can the sort of problems my story-Einstein..."
I do not want to bother you with too much information...
But I think, you are a more specialised researcher than me, and also due to your story and deep empathy with Einstein...I feel a need to write these lines to you now.
My only catalysing task should be to draw to your attention, the political crisis on present physical Earth comes from much rather an ideology based war.
So what is urgent to reinstate the thoughts about our ideology seeing a healthy world or taking a necessary rough and ready tools humanity actions? (As Einstein meditated ...whom would you presume to place at the helm... and how about his role and why the H-bomb was necessary to set in before Hitler should have done that... This all about 'time-travel' truly there is not rocket involved ;)
How else if not one of Einsteins can understand this?
Do you think really there are calm and peace in Heaven?
Can be an idealized Heavenly peace reached on Earth? (e.g by The Cancellation of Diffraction in Wave Fields making a beautiful Universe by Fixing Physics. Perhaps printing 3d guns need to be prevented, however every invention can entail its counter effect ) Or "do we hope doing new life start on some other planet or star, merely transplanting our possible stupid mistakes somewhere else...?"
Its understanding is time-space, space-time separated yet in ones' higher and lower mind. Therefore ones cannot express this coherently using a given actual genetic sets arranged by a given space-time framework. As Einstein said - ...that could be dependent on the observers in the frame of reference.
Unfortunately, because man is able to create as a result he can change his own life supporting form. Thus there is a risk truly to transform a planet to be something else. But, that is also one's abstract view point this transformation is put into an else frame of reference i.e. creating meanings of else stars systems or planets, or all may happen in same space and no time.
On my essay illustration one can see the lower mind (123 folds) attached to an actual arrangement of bodily gene set with a given bodyIDl. The (567 folds) represents one's higher mind also attached to same bodyIDh, [this is why one's head cannot be so crudely attached to someone else body:)] There is a separation between 4-8,9 states [dividing the factually two 3-fold i.e branes or world volumes. Btw, should the cyclic model by Steinhardt-Turok speak about this using a very physical language set ?) Additionally: ."..in special relativity Elsewhere is the region between the two light cones. Points in an observer's elsewhere are inaccessible to her/him;the elsewhere is thick; it is not a 3-dimensional volume but is instead a 4-dimensional spacetime region. Included in "elsewhere" is the simultaneous hyperplane, which is defined for a given observer by a space which is hyperbolic-orthogonal to her/his world line. It is really three-dimensional. The present often means the single spacetime event being considered. Where ones' bodyIDl and bodyIDh presumably vibrate at same level and it should be extended by a general meaning as a collision between two branes as 3d parallel worlds, but not creating destructive singularity.
in general relativity: World lines of free-falling particles or objects (such as planets around the Sun or an astronaut in space) are called geodesics...World line. (2014) Retrieved 25 Feb 2014, from en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_line. So, go to Buckmister Fuller and his Spaceship Eart concept without a rocket. :))]
I do not know how you can contribute more to help the ideological development in your present life or wishes a new life one of yours, but I can see glancing over your personal site you have already vast specialised knowledge!!!
In what I'm sure we can continue to live and work in a new way...
But do we really have time for that?
Yes, we have as much time as we give or create for ourselves something to be almost well done. Because the time is not a natural things but a created one. Presumably, we need times only to apprehend we should act balanced in our PRESENT moment!
My only role is to push forward and catalysing the process of our understanding for every one of present us acting optimally balanced in his place right on Earth in the NOW!