Dear amazigh

Looking forward to your "Science today has an urgent need for a evolutionary theory, logical and qualitative, on the Functioning of the Univers and affects all aspects: mathematics, physics, philosophical, cosmological, sociological,economic, political, etc. ." also as what I have mentioned - a specific and detailed manner - at :http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1802...

view entire post

Dear amazigh

Looking forward to your "Science today has an urgent need for a evolutionary theory, logical and qualitative, on the Functioning of the Univers and affects all aspects: mathematics, physics, philosophical, cosmological, sociological,economic, political, etc. ." also as what I have mentioned - a specific and detailed manner - at :http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1802

I appreciate your essay and will to rate it when the rating system continues to operate.

And to change the atmosphere "abstract" of the competition along with demonstrate for the real preeminent possibility of the Absolute theory as well as to clarify the issues I mentioned in the essay and to avoid duplicate questions after receiving the opinion of you , I will add a reply to you :

THE ADDITIONAL ARTICLES AND A SMALL TEST FOR MUTUAL BENEFIT

1 . THE ADDITIONAL ARTICLES

A. What thing is new and the difference in the absolute theory than other theories?

The first is concept of "Absolute" in my absolute theory is defined as: there is only one - do not have any similar - no two things exactly alike.

The most important difference of this theory is to build on the entirely new basis and different platforms compared to the current theory.

B. Why can claim: all things are absolute - have not of relative ?

It can be affirmed that : can not have the two of status or phenomenon is the same exists in the same location in space and at the same moment of time - so thus: everything must be absolute and can not have any of relative . The relative only is a concept to created by our .

C. Why can confirm that the conclusions of the absolute theory is the most specific and detailed - and is unique?

Conclusion of the absolute theory must always be unique and must be able to identify the most specific and detailed for all issues related to a situation or a phenomenon that any - that is the mandatory rules of this theory.

D. How the applicability of the absolute theory in practice is ?

The applicability of the absolute theory is for everything - there is no limit on the issue and there is no restriction on any field - because: This theory is a method to determine for all matters and of course not reserved for each area.

E. How to prove the claims of Absolute Theory?

To demonstrate - in fact - for the above statement,we will together come to a specific experience, I have a small testing - absolutely realistic - to you with title:

2 . A SMALL TEST FOR MUTUAL BENEFIT :

“Absolute determination to resolve for issues reality”

That is, based on my Absolute theory, I will help you determine by one new way to reasonable settlement and most effective for meet with difficulties of you - when not yet find out to appropriate remedies - for any problems that are actually happening in reality, only need you to clearly notice and specifically about the current status and the phenomena of problems included with requirements and expectations need to be resolved.

I may collect fees - by percentage of benefits that you get - and the commission rate for you, when you promote and recommend to others.

Condition : do not explaining for problems as impractical - no practical benefit - not able to determine in practice.

To avoid affecting the contest you can contact me via email : hoangcao_hai@yahoo.com

Hope will satisfy and bring real benefits for you along with the desire that we will find a common ground to live together in happily.

Add another problem, which is:

USE OF THE EQUATIONS AND FORMULA IN ESSAY

There have been some comments to me to questions is: why in my essay did not use the equations and formulas to interpret?

The reason is:

1. The currently equations and formulas are not able to solve all problems for all concerned that they represent.

2. Through research, I found: The application of the equations and formulas when we can not yet be determined the true nature of the problem will create new problems - there is even more complex and difficult to resolve than the original.

I hope so that : you will sympathetic and consideration to avoid misunderstanding my comments.

Hải.Caohoàng

view post as summary

Dear Hannou,

Thank you for presenting your nice essay. I saw the abstract and will post my comments soon. You put DNA in this . It is very good. And you can produce matter from your thinking or from information description of that matter. . . . ?

I am requesting you to go through my essay also. And I take this opportunity to say, to come to reality and base your arguments on...

view entire post

Dear Hannou,

Thank you for presenting your nice essay. I saw the abstract and will post my comments soon. You put DNA in this . It is very good. And you can produce matter from your thinking or from information description of that matter. . . . ?

I am requesting you to go through my essay also. And I take this opportunity to say, to come to reality and base your arguments on experimental results.

I failed mainly because I worked against the main stream. The main stream community people want magic from science instead of realty especially in the subject of cosmology. We all know well that cosmology is a subject where speculations rule.

Hope to get your comments even directly to my mail ID also. . . .

Best

=snp

snp.gupta@gmail.com

http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.b
logspot.com/

Pdf download:

http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/essay-downloa
d/1607/__details/Gupta_Vak_FQXi_TABLE_REF_Fi.pdf

Part of abstract:

- -Material objects are more fundamental- - is being proposed in this paper; It is well known that there is no mental experiment, which produced material. . . Similarly creation of matter from empty space as required in Steady State theory or in Bigbang is another such problem in the Cosmological counterpart. . . . In this paper we will see about CMB, how it is generated from stars and Galaxies around us. And here we show that NO Microwave background radiation was detected till now after excluding radiation from Stars and Galaxies. . . .

Some complements from FQXi community. . . . .

A

Anton Lorenz Vrba wrote on May. 4, 2013 @ 13:43 GMT

……. I do love your last two sentences - that is why I am coming back.

Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta replied on May. 6, 2013 @ 09:24 GMT

. . . . We should use our minds to down to earth realistic thinking. There is no point in wasting our brains in total imagination which are never realities. It is something like showing, mixing of cartoon characters with normal people in movies or people entering into Game-space in virtual reality games or Firing antimatter into a black hole!!!. It is sheer a madness of such concepts going on in many fields like science, mathematics, computer IT etc. . . .

B.

Francis V wrote on May. 11, 2013 @ 02:05 GMT

Well-presented argument about the absence of any explosion for a relic frequency to occur and the detail on collection of temperature data……

C

Robert Bennett wrote on May. 14, 2013 @ 18:26 GMT

"Material objects are more fundamental"..... in other words "IT from Bit" is true.

Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta replied on May. 14, 2013 @ 22:53 GMT

1. It is well known that there is no mental experiment, which produced material.

2. John Wheeler did not produce material from information.

3. Information describes material properties. But a mere description of material properties does not produce material.

4. There are Gods, Wizards, and Magicians, allegedly produced material from nowhere. But will that be a scientific experiment?

D

Hoang cao Hai wrote on Jun. 16, 2013 @ 16:22 GMT

It from bit - where are bit come from?

Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta replied on Jun. 17, 2013 @ 06:10 GMT

….And your question is like asking, -- which is first? Egg or Hen?— in other words Matter is first or Information is first? Is that so? In reality there is no way that Matter comes from information.

Matter is another form of Energy. Matter cannot be created from nothing. Any type of vacuum cannot produce matter. Matter is another form of energy. Energy is having many forms: Mechanical, Electrical, Heat, Magnetic and so on..

E

Antony Ryan wrote on Jun. 23, 2013 @ 22:08 GMT

…..Either way your abstract argument based empirical evidence is strong given that "a mere description of material properties does not produce material". While of course materials do give information.

I think you deserve a place in the final based on this alone. Concise - simple - but undeniable.

===============

Please try Dynamic Universe Model with some numerical values, give initial values of velocities, take gravitation into consideration( because you can not experiment in ISOLATION). complete your numerical experiment.

later try changing values of masses and initial values of velocities....

Calculate with different setups and compare your results, if you have done a physical experiment.

I sincerely feel it is better to do experiment physically, or numerically instead of breaking your head on just logic. This way you will solve your problem faster.....

Best

=snp

view post as summary

show all replies (1 not shown)

hide replies

Dear Amazigh and all,

Thank you for posting in my essay. Here is some work I am doing to achieve what you are trying to do as well.

eUniverse = iSphere

Simple mathematical truth of zero=I=infinity, iSphere and iSeries as described below can explain all the aspects of reality mathematically.

I am attaching the iDNASeries.bmp that I have envisioned and how it shows...

view entire post

Dear Amazigh and all,

Thank you for posting in my essay. Here is some work I am doing to achieve what you are trying to do as well.

eUniverse = iSphere

Simple mathematical truth of zero=I=infinity, iSphere and iSeries as described below can explain all the aspects of reality mathematically.

I am attaching the iDNASeries.bmp that I have envisioned and how it shows the DNA structure in its sequence.

I give you all a cosmological iSeries which spans the entire numerical spectrum from -infinity through 0 to +infinity and the simple principle underlying it is sum of any two consecutive numbers is the next number in the series. 0 is the base seed and i can be any seed between 0 and infinity.

iSeries always yields two sub semi series, each of which has 0 as a base seed and 2i as the first seed.

One of the sub series is always defined by the equation

Sn = 2 * Sn-1 + Sigma (i=2 to n) Sn-i

where S0 = 0 and S1 = 2 * i

the second sub series is always defined by the equation

Sn = 3 * Sn-1 -Sn-2

where S0 = 0 and S1 = 2 * i

Division of consecutive numbers in each of these subseries always eventually converges on 2.168 which is the Square of 1.618.

Union of these series always yields another series which is just a new iSeries of a 2i first seed and can be defined by the universal equation

Sn = Sn-1 + Sn-2

where S0 = 0 and S1 = 2*i

Division of consecutive numbers in the merged series always eventually converges on 1.618 which happens to be the golden ratio "Phi".

Fibonacci series is just a subset of the iSeries where the first seed or S1 =1.

Examples

starting iSeries governed by Sn = Sn-1 + Sn-2

where i = 0.5, S0 = 0 and S1 = 0.5

-27.5 17 -10.5 6.5 -4 2.5 -1.5 1 -.5 .5 0 .5 .5 1 1.5 2.5 4 6.5 10.5 17 27.5

Sub series governed by Sn = 2 * Sn-1 + Sigma (i=2 to n) Sn-i

where S0 = 0 and S1 = 2i = 1

0 1 2 5 13 34 ...

Sub series governed by Sn = 3 * Sn-1 - Sn-2

where S0 = 0 and S1 = 2i = 1

0 1 3 8 21 55 ...

Merged series governed by Sn = Sn-1 + Sn-2 where S0 = 0 and S1 = 2i = 1

0 1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 ...... (Fibonacci series is a subset of iSeries)

The above equations hold true for any value of I.

As per Antony Ryan's suggestion, I searched google to see how Fibonacci type series can be used to explain Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity and found an interesting article.

http://msel-naschie.com/pdf/The-Fibonacci-code-behin
d-super.pdf

Now that I split the Fibonacci series in to two semi series, seems like each of the sub semi series corresponds to QM and GR and together they explain the Quantum Gravity. Seems like this duality is a commonality in nature once relativity takes effect or a series is kicked off from a basic singularity. The only commonality between the two series is at the base seed 0 (singularity) and first seed 1, which are the bits in our binary system.

Its also interesting to see the singularity is in the base seed of zero and how it is all pervasive all through out the DNA structure in the attached image. I have been telling that I is that nothing which dwells in everything and this DNA structure seems to prove that notion. Singularity is right with in the duality. Absolute is right with in the relativity. This proves that both of these states of singularity and duality are interconnected and are the source of life.

Love,

Sridattadev.

view post as summary

Having read so many insightful essays, I am probably not the only one to find that my views have crystallized, and that I can now move forward with growing confidence. I cannot exactly say who in the course of the competition was most inspiring - probably it was the continuous back and forth between so many of us. In this case, we should all be grateful to each other.

If I may, I'd like to...

view entire post

Having read so many insightful essays, I am probably not the only one to find that my views have crystallized, and that I can now move forward with growing confidence. I cannot exactly say who in the course of the competition was most inspiring - probably it was the continuous back and forth between so many of us. In this case, we should all be grateful to each other.

If I may, I'd like to express some of my newer conclusions - by themselves, so to speak, and independently of the logic that justifies them; the logic is, of course, outlined in my essay.

I now see the Cosmos as founded upon positive-negative charges: It is a binary structure and process that acquires its most elemental dimensional definition with the appearance of Hydrogen - one proton, one electron.

There is no other interaction so fundamental and all-pervasive as this binary phenomenon: Its continuance produces our elements – which are the array of all possible inorganic variants.

Once there exists a great enough correlation between protons and electrons - that is, once there are a great many Hydrogen atoms, and a great many other types of atoms as well - the continuing Cosmic binary process arranges them all into a new platform: Life.

This phenomenon is quite simply inherent to a Cosmos that has reached a certain volume of particles; and like the Cosmos from which it evolves, life behaves as a binary process.

Life therefore evolves not only by the chance events of natural selection, but also by the chance interactions of its underlying binary elements.

This means that ultimately, DNA behaves as does the atom - each is a particle defined by, and interacting within, its distinct Vortex - or 'platform'.

However, as the cosmic system expands, simple sensory activity is transformed into a third platform, one that is correlated with the Organic and Inorganic phenomena already in existence: This is the Sensory-Cognitive platform.

Most significantly, the development of Sensory-Cognition into a distinct platform, or Vortex, is the event that is responsible for creating (on Earth) the Human Species - in whom the mind has acquired the dexterity to focus upon itself.

Humans affect, and are affected by, the binary field of Sensory-Cognition: We can ask specific questions and enunciate specific answers - and we can also step back and contextualize our conclusions: That is to say, we can move beyond the specific, and create what might be termed 'Unified Binary Fields' - in the same way that the forces acting upon the Cosmos, and holding the whole structure together, simultaneously act upon its individual particles, giving them their motion and structure.

The mind mimics the Cosmos - or more exactly, it is correlated with it.

Thus, it transpires that the role of chance decreases with evolution, because this dual activity (by which we 'particularize' binary elements, while also unifying them into fields) clearly increases our control over the foundational binary process itself.

This in turn signifies that we are evolving, as life in general has always done, towards a new interaction with the Cosmos.

Clearly, the Cosmos is participatory to a far greater degree than Wheeler imagined - with the evolution of the observer continuously re-defining the system.

You might recall the logic by which these conclusions were originally reached in my essay, and the more detailed structure that I also outline there. These elements still hold; the details stated here simply put the paradigm into a sharper focus, I believe.

With many thanks and best wishes,

John

jselye@gmail.com

view post as summary

Dear Amazigh,

You concluded:

"The first principle that governs the universe is Duality. The principle of conservation has come after. Give the same interest to duality that to motion, and things will better.

-We know matter is dual as well as the light is. So if duality is everywhere, how to recognize this fact, as we did for the motion ?

-The Duality is the common...

view entire post

Dear Amazigh,

You concluded:

"The first principle that governs the universe is Duality. The principle of conservation has come after. Give the same interest to duality that to motion, and things will better.

-We know matter is dual as well as the light is. So if duality is everywhere, how to recognize this fact, as we did for the motion ?

-The Duality is the common language by excellence, the integral link between all the elements of nature, the machine code of the universe.

-Science today has an urgent need for a revolutionary theory, logical and qualitative, on the Functioning of the Univers and affects all aspects: mathematics, physics, philosophical, cosmological, sociological, economic, political, etc. "

Thanks for inviting me to your blog, I agree in general and if I may promote my theory based on this duality in answering your call for a new theory: KQID please comment my essay Child of Qbit in time and hope you give me a raise in ranking if you approve it. If I may introduce KQID with a long summary.

In summary, quoting my answer to Michel Planat and please forgive me for being respectfully and humbly boastful to counter the doubtful: First, KQID Qbit is (00,1,-1) which is singularity Qbit Multiverse in zeroth dimension at absolute zero temperature that computes and projects Einstein complex coordinates (Pythagoras complex triangles or Fu Xi's gua or Fibonacci numbers) onto the 2D Minkowski Null geodesics and then instantaneously into the 3D in Lm, our Multiverse timeline to allows Existence to move around 360 degree and its arrows of time or ψτ(iLx,y,z, Lm). New informations are created and distributed per ≤10^-1000 seconds. No information is ever deleted. KQID is the only theory out there that can calculate the dark energy of our Multiverse ≤10^-153Pm/Pv and the minimum bits as the lower bound ≥ 10^153 bits in our Multiverse. KQID is the only theory that I know here that proves bit = it; KQID calculates Sun lights into Sun bits; calculates electron, proton and neutron in terms of bits; set up equivalent principle of bits with energy and matter. Therefore, Wheeler's it from bit and bit from it. Please correct me if I am wrong. And, KQID is the only theory in this universe has the mechanism on how Holographic Principle works. Also answer the mother of all questions, the why, how and what Existence.

KQID's Origin of Mass:

Furthermore, KQID is the only theory that can explain the origin of mass as A+S=E=ψI(CTE) that Wilczek said admittedly in 2012 after the discovery of Higgs boson mH ≈ 125 GeV in his tour the force article Origins of Mass arXiv:1206.7114v2 that human beings do not yet know the origins of mass and it is not even in sight. He concluded on page 32/35 and lamented like Einstein 51 years before: "We’ve passed some milestones, but the end of the road is not in sight." Einstein, after his landmark article 107 years ago on m=E/c^2 showing mass in terms of energy in 1905, “Does the Inertia of a Body Depend on Its Energy Content?” But this equation required us to know what is energy before we can define the origin of mass. Einstein truly like Socrates before him as the wisest man in Athens according to the Oracle simply because Socrates claims that he does not know anything, Einstein the wise similarly stated his own ignorance of energy in 1951: "All these fifty years of pondering have not brought me closer to answering the question, what is light quanta?"

KQID's origin of mass is simply A + S = E = ψI(CTE) that is Dao's Wuwei (the least action moves) maximizing the flow of A, anti-entropic time-future bits-waves function moving from future to time-present bits-waves function E in optimizing the E flow and minimizing the flow of S, entropic time-past bits-waves function moving from time-past to time-present in terms of both bits and joules SI. That also leads to Pauli's exclusion principle and the lowest amount of energy arrangement required in an atomic system. See KQID Ouroboros Equations of Existence.

Michel asked the heart of KQID: "Where is the FAPAMA concept coming from in your frame? I mean who is the influencial thinker?"

First from Fu Xi's gua(trigrams) Ξ ☷ as DIRECT representations of nature, from Pythagoras's all things are numbers, from Jesus's Trinity of Father, Son and Holy Ghost, from Hindu's Trinity of Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva, from Planck's intelligent mind as the matrix of all matter and from Maxwell's infinite being with infinite storage capacity who computes in bits/qbits to create and distributes energy that does works, and from Landauer who teaches us that information is physical and nature can freely create and distribute bits/qbits but to erase/deletes the created bits/qbits must incur entropy cost somewhere else in Multiverse. That is why our Ancestor FAPAMA Qbit does not and can not erase any information. The computation of Holographic Principle must be within the one and only Qbit(00,1,-1) showing that Existence origin is from Non-existence and the calculations of Einstein complex coordinates can only be done at absolute zero temperature in which Bose-Einstein superconductivity perfectly happens without resistance or entropy. From Susskind and Hooft, who got the idea from Beckenstein-Hawking black hole entropy, proposed/discovered Holographic Principle and Hooft's quantum entanglements must be from the beginning. Thus FAPAMA Qbit must be there from the beginning (Hooft) and splits freely without cost (Landauer and Guth) to itself and Multiverse infinitely every absolute digital time T≤ 10^-1000 seconds. Moreover, every T-moment, our FAPAMA Qbit escapes extinction from its forever chasing companion Non-existence to be reunited only just barely by rebooting, resynchronizing, refreshing, renewing and reborn itself, so that it is forever just newly born evolved immortal baby. This gives us the arrow of time. Ξ00☷ = < S | E | A > = ψτ(iLx,y,z, Lm) ⊆ T. Time reemerges every digital T-moment. Every T-moment Qbit resynchronizes all Minkowski events in time-present. This is the KEY in re-entangling everything and keeping things in order and not crashing down. Complementarily, KQID also supports block Multiverse within T-moment in which all time-past-present-futures are forged into the NOW that in turn enabling resynchronization above! Time disappears. Yes, Einstein-KQID relativity rules (8πG/c^4)Tμν - Kqid(ΑΘ-ΘS)gμν = Τμν block Multiverse. Yes, Existence is the founder of creativity, it must invent new ways to escape from the grip of its Non-existence complementarity-companion. Dear Akinbo, KQID answers your immortal question if our founder is it or bit. The Founder Qbit is both bit and it simultaneously. Existence-Non-existence is one Qbit. This Qbit is It as Existence. FAPAMA: FA in Chinese means law like law of gravity that gives Existence order in time, PA from the concept of papa or the Holy Ghost or Brahma or Fu XI heaven Ξ that connects everything with everything else as one meaningful whole that manifests in quantum mechanics as Hooft's physical quantum entanglement. Yes, quantum entanglement phenomena must be instantaneous with infinite speed because it is within that one Qbit, there is no gap, no space, no time, no dimension, no locality but it is everywhere locally in physical forms that are derivative from MA as mama trigram earth ☷ that gives birth to mass and structure of Existence in ψτ(iLx,y,z, Lm) relativistic Multiverse in which time contracts, thus length contracts and mass/energy increases. So you see KQID gives picture of Existence as fantastically magical Disney's world, a holographic but physically relativistic fiction but real Multiverse. We are active game changers in our Wheeler's participatory magical kingdom, the Leibniz's happiest Multiverse possible. Because we are limited, we have choices to make including mistakes that lead to man/nature made miseries; so that we have free will to enjoy this wonderful make-believe holographic world. Let us sing and praise Xuan Yuan's Da Tong song and dance.

Amazigh, we do have similar idea not only as co-passenger on timeship earth but also co-mind sharing adventurers.

Best wishes,

LeoKoGuan

view post as summary

Dear Amazigh,

Thank you for your visit.

Some your observations :

'… the duality was obvious to the Egyptians, Greeks, etc.. , And especially the Chinese…

For me the question is quite different : why we do not have yet flushed the irrefutable arguments that prove that the universe is binary, dualistic…

Today, Einstein's relativity is well understood in the...

view entire post

Dear Amazigh,

Thank you for your visit.

Some your observations :

'… the duality was obvious to the Egyptians, Greeks, etc.. , And especially the Chinese…

For me the question is quite different : why we do not have yet flushed the irrefutable arguments that prove that the universe is binary, dualistic…

Today, Einstein's relativity is well understood in the physical domain. It explains very well the two points of view of two people moving relative to each other…

Finally, I would like to conjecture that:

-The first principle that governs the universe is Duality. The principle of conservation has come after. Give the same interest to duality that to motion, and things will better.

-We know matter is dual as well as the light is. So if duality is everywhere, how to recognize this fact, as we did for the motion ?

-The Duality is the common language by excellence, the integral link between all the elements of nature, the machine code of the universe '

may suggest some analogies with field findings of structural anthropologists. In particular,French anthropologist Levi-Strauss made reference to 353 duality based different myths in order to prove that the human brain does have a tendency to operate with binary oppositions in all sorts of situations. This result is foundation of structural anthropology and semantic algebra of myths today. However, the sceptics were right as well, because human brain can operate in other ways also. Thus, a fully satisfactory model of the human mind would contain many unknown features which do not occur merely in digital computers. I suppose you can improve your structural linguistic analysis of oppositions by Jakobson’s technique based on conjecture that ' in all the languages of the world the complex systems of oppositions between the phonemes are no more than a multi-directional elaboration of a more complex system which is common to all, namely the contrast between consonant and vowel, which through the working of double opposition between compact and diffuse, acute and grave…'

with the best wishes

Michael

view post as summary

Hello Amasigh from Margriet O'Regan from DownUnder

I enjoyed your essay but I felt it was a poem - a literary work of art rather than a scientific paper.

I also agree with Edwin Klingman's comments that daulism is certainly a major aspect of reality although I too do not believe that the world is binary.

Thank you for rating my essay. Here again is a synopsis of it...

view entire post

Hello Amasigh from Margriet O'Regan from DownUnder

I enjoyed your essay but I felt it was a poem - a literary work of art rather than a scientific paper.

I also agree with Edwin Klingman's comments that daulism is certainly a major aspect of reality although I too do not believe that the world is binary.

Thank you for rating my essay. Here again is a synopsis of it :

In the closing moments of this most auspicious event I feel driven to add the following remarks.

Some of the positive-rate-worthy features of my essay are the following:

(1) I provide a clear & easily understood definition of information, which is that it is the full set of real, not abstract nor hypothetical, geometrical objects present here in our universe;

(2) These (real) geometrical objects are properly observable phenomena – that is to say, easily observed, measured, quantified & verified phenomena. Therefore as such my hypothesis is a readily testable one. Even a well informed (sic) 8 year old child could verify it.

I demonstrate how these entities can be observed – measured, quantified, verified - & contrast this ease of verification to that of the essentially impossible task of observing & verifying any of the quantum phenomena suggested by many to be units of information.

(3) As David Deutsch puts it, ‘information’ is ‘something’ that can be transferred from medium, to medium, to medium & yet remain unchanged – see quote in my essay. One of the many proofs of my hypothesis – that information is geometrical objects – that I have marshaled in it defense is that they are not only something that can be transferred from medium to medium in this fashion, but are the only things which can be so transferred.

(4) Underneath its meaning each of our own human-made units of information – all of our own signs, codes, symbols, words, letters & languages – is a geometrical object plain & simple, or an assembly thereof. Which fact proves that geometrical objects are capable of carrying units of information on their backs. Literally.

(5) Each of the many & various left-over scratches, scars, dents, bump-marks, vibrations & residues still remaining on previously impacted solid bodies present here in our universe, is, one, single naturally-occurring geometrical object.

Geometric-cum-informational objects exist throughout the universe in several different grades or orders. It is useful to designate all of these left-over bump-marks as belonging to the class of ‘secondary geometrical objects’. (I itemize some of the other classes in my essay.)

Examples drawn from this secondary class of geometrical-cum-informational objects are : craters on the Moon, ripples in a pond, heat in a sun-warmed rock, vibrations in the air emanating from a bumped hollow log. And the biggest - & longest-lasting - bump-mark of all time has to be the Big Bang ripples still remaining in the MWBR.

No great difficulty attends the task of recognising that each & every one of these simple geometrical objects (all of these simple shapes), ‘carries’ some information on its back – each literally ‘tells’ ‘a story’ – a ‘tale’ not only concerning the identity of the solid object which created it, but where, when & from which direction the creating solid object approached the impacted one & how fast etc.

Which set of easily observed facts proves that, just as do all of our own human-made signs & symbols carry information on their backs, so also do all of the naturally-occurring geometrical objects ‘out there in the wild’ too.

To sum so far : Every unit of (known) information (as are our own signs & symbols) ‘sits’ on top of some one or another or ensemble of, geometrical object/s; & on each & every geometrical object here in our universe – human-made or naturally occurring – there ‘rides’ some one or another particular meaning – some one or another item of information.

In this manner do geometrical objects show themselves to be ‘dual-purpose’ phenomena.

(6) Observation of the manner in which geometrical objects are USED within our cosmos quickly apprises one of the fact that they are not only used by interacting solid bodies to guide & direct their responses to one another during those interactions, but are so used in this fashion by every solid object every time it interacts with another solid body - & this obtains regardless of the size, shape, composition, location, animate status of the interacting solids.

This conclusion obtains due to the fact that attendant on any impact/contact event the bodily SHAPES (the geometricities) of the participants involved always play a critically-determining albeit not sufficient, role in the outcome of that impact/contact event.

This observation regarding the universality of the manner in which geometrical objects are USED within our cosmos – as guides for action – provides a definition of ‘thinking’ which is ‘using information to guide & direct action’; or in its long form – ‘thinking’ is ‘using information (which always exists as some one, another or assembly of geometrical objects) to guide & direct action, such action as taken by some properly thinking/acting agent specifically in regard to whatever object/s &/or event/s the information being so used, concerns’.

Although we ourselves use a very great deal more information than the rocks & stones beneath our feet & the atoms & molecules in the air nevertheless we are only doing exactly what they are in kind which is using information to guide & direct our every interactive encounter with whatever other solid body any of us encounters during our existential history here in our cosmos.

So then, this observation regarding the universality of the manner in which geometrical objects are USED within our cosmos – to guide & direct action - apprises us of the fact that ‘thought’ – as the use of information-as-geometrical-objects to guide action – is an innate capacity of solid matter & occurs ubiquitously here & on the most routine of bases, no less than each time any two solid objects interact with one another.

As such ‘thought’ is no longer a mysterious phenomenon, indeed, can be readily seen to be a ‘perfectly natural’ one – that is to say one which in no way requires either magic or miracles to execute. This realisation massively narrows ‘the God gap’ within our understanding of everything ‘inside’ our universe - if not quite entirely banishes ‘him’.

And although knowing all these (easily demonstrated) facts about information & as to all of these information-related phenomena, elucidates any number of presently highly mysterious phenomena including thought, mind & consciousness, this knowledge does not illuminate any of the so-called first & final causes – including why matter was made in such a manner so as to make ‘thought’ an innate capacity thereof. And this lack of knowledge as to all & any first & final causes exists in spite of the fact that coming to this understanding that everything thinks – some just at a ‘higher’ level than others – does verily indeed narrow the so-called ‘God Gap’ as it pertains to all inside phenomenon.

(7) The fact that geometrical objects are observable entities allows their involvement with, or their passage through the thinking-machinery of, any properly thinking entity to be ascertained.

Performing this particular ‘tracing’ exercise as to our own thinking process, with no great difficulty not only allows us to identify & define all thinking related phenomena such as thought, mind & consciousness, it also apprises us of the exact location of where our own most valued cognitive self-conscious awareness resides.

As there exists at this location ‘only’ a little bit of water – more usually designated ‘interstitial fluid’ – this discovery strongly compels the conclusion that we live in a panpsychic universe, that is to say, one in which ‘knowingness’ exists at the pen-ultimate quintessence of matter (at the quantum level ?), for, nothing other than its location marks out this small amount of interstitial fluid as being special in any way.

Moreover & due entirely to its location, it is the only thing here in our universe privy to each & every one of our own conscious thoughts, feelings, sensations, perceptions & imaginings.

(8) Observation of our own thinking process quickly alerts one to the fact that it – our own thinking process – is NOT digital, but wholly analogue; the thinking machinery of all higher (animal) thinkers – which thinking machinery includes all sensory equipment as well as all motor machinery & not just the assembly lines central processor – handles all of the information it does so handle in analogue format – specifically in individual geometrical objects or ensembles thereof .

I provide several more proofs that geometrical objects are information in my essay & again I here point out that these proofs – unlike any leveled at such difficult if not impossible to observe quantum phenomena – are easily recognised to be what they are – confirmations of my principle claims on information’s behalf.

These determinations rather unproblematically allow an understanding of, by any sufficiently careful (& objective) investigator, any number of information-related phenomena, one of which is the fact that ‘thinking’ is a completely different phenomenon from ‘computing’. Digits are quite suitable entities with which to compute – to count, calculate & compute, but are not at all suitable for real thinking – for the latter, information in the form of geometrical objects alone suffices. The particular devices which perform each of these different tasks are also very different.

As surprising as it may seem, thinking machines even our own, which phenomena being thinking machines obligately operate analogue-ly with geometrical objects as their ‘fodder’, are not, in & of themselves in any sense intelligent. Only the user/owner/operator can possess this particular quality.

‘Intelligence’ is ‘using the available information in existentially efficacious ways; intelligence increases as the kind & amount of available information increases & also as to the efficacy to which that information it utilised’.

Although thinking machines (& straight-thinking rocks & stones, which do not need specially-built add-on machines to enable them to think) are different from computing devices, nevertheless some ‘overlaps’ exist. ‘Specially-built thinking machines such as our own, do verily indeed ‘process’ the information being ‘shunted’ through them. But ‘processing’ only means ‘sorting’; it does not mean ‘executing algorithmic contortions on whatever is being processed/sorted – which latter is something computing devices do very well.

That being said probably all specially built thinking machines also count, calculate & compute as to some of the operations they perform on whatever is passing through them – digits &/or geometrical (analogue) entities.

As false modesty has never been a vice of mine, I un-ashamedly hope that my essay receives high ratings all round. But with apologies . … ..

Margriet O’Regan.

view post as summary

Dear Amazigh,

It has taken some time for me to get a chance to honor your request to visit your essay, but things finally came together enough to allow me to do so now, so here I am. I read your paper and I found it to be overly general and vague in structure. Much is made of duality, but in fact many of the concepts that you give in your paper as examples of duality are not true duality...

view entire post

Dear Amazigh,

It has taken some time for me to get a chance to honor your request to visit your essay, but things finally came together enough to allow me to do so now, so here I am. I read your paper and I found it to be overly general and vague in structure. Much is made of duality, but in fact many of the concepts that you give in your paper as examples of duality are not true duality structures.

In some cases you label the extremes of a continuum as duality when in fact they are just two points on a continuously variable structure. An example of this is “plain, mountain”. You do not go directly from a plain to the top of the mountain. You must go up a distance that would of course vary according to the specific plain and mountain involved. In addition to that, the plain is actually the middle with valley at the bottom. Looked at this way, mountain, plain, valley is a trinity and not a duality. Also, “short, tall” and “short, long” are just the ends of a continuous range of size that would have medium at the middle of the range and “hot, cold” is similar with warm at the center of the range.

In some cases you used examples that actually are trinities as though they were dualities. When talking about time, “before, after” would have now as the center third member of the trinity and in, “past, future” present would be the center member of the trinity. In, “x-axis, y-axis”, there would also be z-axis in a three dimensional world such as this one presents to us visually. Of course, if one considers that this world could have other unseen dimensions also, then there could be more than three. In, “lower ()”, equal (=) is the center of a trinity of concept.

I know that many desire to justify the concept of duality as a basic and important part of the structure of the world because they desire to justify that concept to explain the supposed wave/particle duality of energy photons and matter particles, but in fact neither energy photons nor matter particles are truly waves or particles in the sense of the traditional concepts of water or sound waves and solid point or billiard ball type objects. Energy photons are motion structures that carry their own motion within themselves and can, therefore, travel through empty space where those other waves are merely motions propagating through the structural components of a medium and cannot travel outside of such a medium. Matter particles are composed of dynamic cyclical motion structures that can act in interactions with variable outcomes that can look somewhat like wave properties in some cases and also can act in ways that look like solid particles under other conditions of interaction. It just depends on the positions and interrelated phasing components, etc. of those dynamic cyclical motions at the point of interaction.

The world that we can see and perceive is composed of motions. Motions are very simple structures, so the structure of the world starts out simply. When you begin to combine various motions in various places in the dimensional system together to make energy photons and matter particles, etc. things get a little more complex, however. Wave functions work somewhat with energy photons and matter particles because traditional waves also possess cyclical motion components. This works pretty well for describing some aspects of energy photons, but matter particles also contain an additional cyclical motion component that acts simultaneously with the one that is also a part of it that it gets from the energy photon(s) trapped within it. Once this additional cyclical motion is taken into consideration the mystery of the multiple outcomes from interactions is solved and understood. Man in this world has just not mastered that concept yet, but all things must come in due time.

If you want the true duality of the visible structure of the universe it would be motion, no motion. This is synonymous with existence, non-existence, but from there everything branches out into multitudes of structures that increase at each higher level of motion structuring. I hope this will be of some help to you.

P.S.

In your comment on my page you mentioned eEnergy, eInfo, eUniverse, and eReality, but I did not see anything about them in your paper. Are they in some other paper of yours? I know that the answer may be somewhere in the comments on this page, but I have not yet had the time to read through them and I must now go to get other things done. If you give me the answer after my comment to you it will make it more likely that I will be able to get the time to look at those things also later.

Sincerely,

Paul B.

view post as summary