Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home


Previous Contests

What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018
Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discusswinners

Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.
read/discusswinners

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discusswinners

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discusswinners

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discusswinners

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Paul Borrill: on 8/7/13 at 19:11pm UTC, wrote Dear Domenico, I have now finished reviewing all 180 essays for the...

Georgina Woodward: on 7/28/13 at 22:43pm UTC, wrote Dear Domenico, I wanted to let you know that I have read your essay. I...

Vladimir Tamari: on 7/18/13 at 1:54am UTC, wrote Dear Dominico. Hello, and apologies if this does not apply to you. I have...

Peter Jackson: on 7/10/13 at 15:21pm UTC, wrote Dominico, Your last line "Interesting thoughts' summed your essay up well,...

Akinbo Ojo: on 7/5/13 at 11:27am UTC, wrote Saluti Domenico, You are welcome to submit your unpublishable ideas and...

James Hoover: on 7/3/13 at 18:42pm UTC, wrote Domenico, If given the time and the wits to evaluate over 120 more...

Vladimir Tamari: on 6/30/13 at 1:38am UTC, wrote Dear Domenico What a nice essay! Like a unique cuisine nouveau salad one...

Hoang Hai: on 6/27/13 at 3:31am UTC, wrote Send to all of you THE ADDITIONAL ARTICLES AND A SMALL TEST FOR MUTUAL...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Joe Fisher: "Dear Dr. Kuhn, Today’s Closer To Truth Facebook page contained this..." in Can Time Be Saved From...

Jorma Seppaenen: "Dear Georgina, I think you are perfectly right about the estimate of age..." in Why Time Might Not Be an...

Joe Fisher: "Dear Dr. Kuhn, Today’s Closer To Truth Facebook page contained this..." in Can Time Be Saved From...

Georgina Woodward: "Yes. The estimate of age of the visible universe, and age of stars, other..." in Why Time Might Not Be an...

akash hasan: "Some students have an interest in researching and space exploration. I..." in Announcing Physics of the...

Michael Jordan: "Excellent site. Plenty of helpful information here. I am sending it to some..." in Review of "Foundations of...

Anonymous: "Excellent site. Plenty of helpful information here. I am sending it to some..." in Constructing a Theory of...

Robert McEachern: ""all experiments have pointed towards this and there is no way to avoid..." in Review of "Foundations of...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

Can Time Be Saved From Physics?
Philosophers, physicists and neuroscientists discuss how our sense of time’s flow might arise through our interactions with external stimuli—despite suggestions from Einstein's relativity that our perception of the passage of time is an illusion.

Thermo-Demonics
A devilish new framework of thermodynamics that focuses on how we observe information could help illuminate our understanding of probability and rewrite quantum theory.

Gravity's Residue
An unusual approach to unifying the laws of physics could solve Hawking's black-hole information paradox—and its predicted gravitational "memory effect" could be picked up by LIGO.

Could Mind Forge the Universe?
Objective reality, and the laws of physics themselves, emerge from our observations, according to a new framework that turns what we think of as fundamental on its head.

Dissolving Quantum Paradoxes
The impossibility of building a perfect clock could help explain away microscale weirdness.


FQXi FORUM
May 25, 2019

CATEGORY: It From Bit or Bit From It? Essay Contest (2013) [back]
TOPIC: letter by Domenico Oricchio [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Author Domenico Oricchio wrote on Apr. 19, 2013 @ 10:09 GMT
Essay Abstract

a letter to friends, to transmit my random thoughts on entropy and information

Author Bio

graduation: mechanical engineering degree: physics thesis: deterministic neural network and fuzzy neural netwoek master: advanced technology in communication and information research: -Genova,fractal dimensionality and experimental discrete equation -Marina di Ravenna, fluid dynamic and bacteria grow equation -Vietri sul mare, fluido dynamic model applied to soil pollution and associate bioremediation -Manchester (interrupted), Natural Gradient Descent and Indipendent Component Analysis

Download Essay PDF File

Bookmark and Share



Domenico Oricchio wrote on Apr. 19, 2013 @ 17:39 GMT
I wish correct some evident errors.

I use a three-dimensional grid for entropy calculus, then:



the isoentropic discrete equation is:







then the entropy equation can be write



or



my search of this aesthetic beauty (simmetry, semplicity, etc), lead me to error in the differential equation.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


George Rajna wrote on Apr. 24, 2013 @ 15:17 GMT
Molto bene!

Saluti

George

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Jacek Safuta wrote on Apr. 27, 2013 @ 19:32 GMT
Ciao Domenico,

Hai cominciato con "Dear brothers Nicola and Michele".

Questo significa che tuoi elaborazione e' indirizzato solo a loro?

Non ho capito che posso leggere e commentare anche io?

Mi dispiace per il mio italiano, ma ho appena iniziato a imparare alcuni mesi fa.

Ci ascoltiamo presto!

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Domenico Oricchio replied on Apr. 27, 2013 @ 23:34 GMT
It is an idea, a literary invention (but I really sent the letter to my brothers: so that is true).

I publish the essay here, so it is commentable (usually I have not many comment, but good comment).

It is nice, and complex, attempting to learn Italian: if you are just learning a few months, the result is good (I tried a few years ago to learn German, and within a month I had gotten good results, but the languages easily forgotten).

I think that I am one of few to speak italian, so I reply in english.

In ogni caso, mi piacerebbe leggere qualche tuo commento sul mio saggio.

Avrei preferito più un saggio letterario, che scientifico: ma le formule, questa volta, erano necessarie.

Saluti

Domenico

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Jacek Safuta replied on Apr. 28, 2013 @ 10:46 GMT
Ciao Domenico,

I have read your essay carefully and it seems to me that I am not competent to comment and to rate. But it looks interesting and I could read more about it.

When you mention such things like the game of life, computer and biological life then the subject is closer to me and associated with Darwinian evolution in the sense of self-organized criticality. The structured criticality is a property of complex systems where small events may trigger larger events. This is a kind of chaos where the general behavior of the system can be modeled on one scale while smaller- and larger-scale behaviors remain unpredictable. The simple example of that phenomenon is a pile of sand. When QM and GR are computable and deterministic, the Universe evolution (naturally evolving self-organized critical system) is non-computable and non-deterministic. It does not mean that computability and determinism are related. Roger Penrose proves that computability and determinism are different things. Acc. to me the actual universe is computable during Lyapunov time but its evolution is non-computable.

I have even framed a concept that the matter and energy have evolved from a primordial, conformally flat spacetime (starting before the Planck Era). So I apply the theory of Darwinism beyond its original sphere of organic evolution on Earth.

If you are interested with details:

http://vixra.org/abs/1102.0026

http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1609

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Domenico Oricchio replied on Apr. 29, 2013 @ 09:55 GMT
The rate is not important, I consider important the comments.

You read my essay carefully, and the short part that I consider most important, though theorically weak (no formula).

I try to write my essays in such a way that anyone is competent, so you are showing me my one weakness; but reading your comment, I see that you have competence.

I want read your article (I have already read all the essays); I studied in the past chaotic system, so that it is interesting the study of the Plank Mission data, and the Visible Multi-object Spectrograph data for the galaxies distribution, to obtain information in the Plank epoch (if the chaos don't erase the initial information).

Saluti

Domenico

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Hoang cao Hai wrote on Jun. 16, 2013 @ 06:56 GMT
Dear Domenico Oricchio

The idea and your reasoning is great, pity that you did not really want to complete it more specific.

http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1802

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Hoang cao Hai wrote on Jun. 16, 2013 @ 07:01 GMT
10 points for what you have shown, because it is also my opinion on the matter.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Antony Ryan wrote on Jun. 23, 2013 @ 20:43 GMT
Hello Domenico,

I liked the sentence: - "An other meaning of the "It form bit" can be "Life from Bit". Also that you conclude that we are not alone in the Universe. Observation is surely key to the Bit/It question, so it makes sense to explore other life including artificial. The letter format was a nice approach too.

My essayt also relies on observation, if you get chance please have a look at it.

Best wishes,

Antony

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Antony Ryan replied on Jun. 25, 2013 @ 00:47 GMT
Thanks for your comments over on my page - I've replied - all the best,

Antony

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Hoang cao Hai wrote on Jun. 27, 2013 @ 03:31 GMT
Send to all of you

THE ADDITIONAL ARTICLES AND A SMALL TEST FOR MUTUAL BENEFIT

To change the atmosphere "abstract" of the competition and to demonstrate for the real preeminent possibility of the Absolute theory as well as to clarify the issues I mentioned in the essay and to avoid duplicate questions after receiving the opinion of you , I will add a reply to you :

1 . THE...

view entire post


Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Vladimir F. Tamari wrote on Jun. 30, 2013 @ 01:38 GMT
Dear Domenico

What a nice essay! Like a unique cuisine nouveau salad one can enjoy it as it is, avoid some ingredients that are difficult to chew, and start asking about the delicious bits and dressing etc. Like a salad it is not a full meal, but a good introduction to the master chef's menu. Bravo.

The part I could not understand is why you start with differential equations - and...

view entire post


Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


James Lee Hoover wrote on Jul. 3, 2013 @ 18:42 GMT
Domenico,

If given the time and the wits to evaluate over 120 more entries, I have a month to try. My seemingly whimsical title, “It’s good to be the king,” is serious about our subject.

Jim

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Akinbo Ojo wrote on Jul. 5, 2013 @ 11:27 GMT
Saluti Domenico,

You are welcome to submit your unpublishable ideas and interesting thoughts. Do you consider my essay unpublishable as well?

Regards,

Akinbo

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Peter Jackson wrote on Jul. 10, 2013 @ 15:21 GMT
Dominico,

Your last line "Interesting thoughts' summed your essay up well, and also interesting presentation.

When loosing touch with the maths half way through I did have to wonder if I'd ever include any maths in a letter to my family, but I suppose that simply made it more unique.

I'm sure there are some truths in your writing. We must all wonder which! I hope you find or found some in mine. Do comment.

best wishes,

Peter

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Vladimir F. Tamari wrote on Jul. 18, 2013 @ 01:54 GMT
Dear Dominico. Hello, and apologies if this does not apply to you. I have read and rated your essay and about 50 others. If you have not rated my essay The Cloud of Unknowing please consider doing so. With best wishes.

Vladimir

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Georgina Woodward wrote on Jul. 28, 2013 @ 22:43 GMT
Dear Domenico,

I wanted to let you know that I have read your essay. I think it was a nice idea to write it as a letter. That is refreshingly different from the many other essays. There are a few English grammar mistakes but they are not obtrusive.I found the discussion of the possibility of evolving computer viruses into conscious 'lifeforms' interesting. I have had several engaging conversations with my eldest son along similar lines.

I appreciate the early comment about sharing ideas with equals rather than competing. I hope you get the kind of feedback that is helpful to you. Although you do mention it from bit, I have not really understood the connection between your essay and the set essay question. Unfortunately I am not able to evaluate the mathematics, which is quite a large part of the essay. An enjoyable read nonetheless, thanks for sharing your thoughts.

Regards Georgina

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Paul Borrill wrote on Aug. 7, 2013 @ 19:11 GMT
Dear Domenico,

I have now finished reviewing all 180 essays for the contest and appreciate your contribution to this competition.

I have been thoroughly impressed at the breadth, depth and quality of the ideas represented in this contest. In true academic spirit, if you have not yet reviewed my essay, I invite you to do so and leave your comments.

You can find the latest version of my essay here:

http://fqxi.org/data/forum-attachments/Borrill-TimeOne-
V1.1a.pdf

(sorry if the fqxi web site splits this url up, I haven’t figured out a way to not make it do that).

May the best essays win!

Kind regards,

Paul Borrill

paul at borrill dot com

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.