Dear Kumar, (I enjoyed your article and have some comments, questions)
Your attempt to connect conciousness information to the neutrino is bold. What is lacking is the means to test such a theory due to the severe lack of our ability to get information from neutrinos, thus, how reliably can we measure this correlation?
You had stated: "The mind, which is the ultimate container and processor of information, is the reflection of consciousness in our body, operating via the brain."
Reflection, yes. All the information that "lights" our conciousness is physically tied to light ... literally. I challange anyone to describe an experiment in where the information that feeds the concious observer is not provided by light - NOT POSSIBLE. Take electromagnetic interaction away and you take away all your physical senses that physically feed your conciousness - right? If we simply consider everything existing as measurable information (forget the names neutrino, photon, lepton, etc., and just think of the degrees of freedom for information to originate and disseminate) our conciousness need physically only to derive information from light ... that would appear to be our only physical measurable.
Anti-neutrinos come hand in hand with neutron decay ... anti .... implying that the Proton and Electron emerge and each is "given" information by the neutrino on how to physically emerge from the decay - the "anti" information of the neutrino comes from the future "just" prior to the decay ... precisely as a thought is contemplated prior to an action. Therefore, sure, information from concious though might be attributed to anti-neutrinos, however, we are required to "measure" the Electron and Proton actions (the Neutron's decay constituents physical aftermath) to discern the anti-neutrinos presence (the anti-neutrino conserves momentum information - to obey the physical laws - the profit particle of pending electromagnetic action). The physical measures of the Electron and Proton to determine what the Electron Anti-Neutrino momentum need be is as if we have to work backwards through our measured actions to dicern one's concious thoughts (the thoughts being turned into the actions handed to the decay elements of the Electron and the Proton from the anti-neutrino) ... OK .... that sounds good also!
Information gained from this tiny lepton may very well fall in the realm of concious thought. In my article, I proposed the Kiode lepton mass axis for providing the bases elements for modeling concious thought. The Muon, Taon and Electron rest mass are the Mirror entities envisioned as the Energy generated by the M^2 element (the frame of reference of a string in string theory as light speed is approached Energy becomes proportional to M^2 and not M) as supplying the information for concious thought. This basis also applies to the evasive neutrinos of each charged lepton particle. Are neutrinos going light speed or not? This question is an ongoing inquiry. If we consider the neutrino existing in the "velocity of light limiting frame" and therefore supplying information solely from the Energy ~ M^2 term .... we may derive thought information here. This is not rest energy information and this is not kinetic energy information. The neutrino may be due to to purely the M^2 information ... when energy becomes proportional to Mass^2 .... thought information.... a quanta of thought ... It would still need to be converted to light to measure.... Interesting stuff.
What is also attractive about using the Kiode basis for conciousness is the 2/3 ratio .... could this correlate to the average time we spend awake and concious and the other 1/3 the time we sleep?
Best regards,
Tony