Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home


Previous Contests

What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018
Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discusswinners

Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.
read/discusswinners

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discusswinners

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discusswinners

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discusswinners

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Sergey Fedosin: on 10/4/12 at 4:18am UTC, wrote If you do not understand why your rating dropped down. As I found ratings...

Sergey Fedosin: on 10/2/12 at 7:21am UTC, wrote After studying about 250 essays in this contest, I realize now, how can I...

Hoang Hai: on 9/27/12 at 16:13pm UTC, wrote Dear Khalil Shahlai Very interesting to see your essay. Perhaps all of us...

Jayakar Joseph: on 9/20/12 at 18:43pm UTC, wrote Dear Khalil Shahlai, As per Coherently-cyclic cluster-matter paradigm of...

Khalil Shahlai: on 9/7/12 at 17:49pm UTC, wrote Dear Sergey, thank you for bringing to my attention some similarities...

Sergey Fedosin: on 9/7/12 at 15:32pm UTC, wrote Dear Khalil, I found in your essay relations for the energy of planets of...

Khalil Shahlai: on 9/5/12 at 15:22pm UTC, wrote Essay Abstract Abstract: Close examination of a nondimensionalized...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Joe Fisher: "Today’s Closer To Truth Facebook page contained this peculiar piece of..." in First Things First: The...

Joe Fisher: "Today’s Closer To Truth Facebook page contained this peculiar piece of..." in First Things First: The...

Eckard Blumschein: "Isn't symmetry simply closely related to redundancy even if physicist may..." in Will A.I. Take Over...

Robert Rise: "Meet many types of women on ihookup. Some dates better than others. It is..." in Time in Physics & Entropy...

Steve Dufourny: "FQXI you too I need your help, come all too we have a work to do there..." in Will A.I. Take Over...

Steve Dufourny: "lol REVOLUTION SPHERISATION everywhere at all scales,REVOLUTION..." in Alternative Models of...

Georgina Woodward: "The kind of time required, over which the material change is happening, (to..." in Schrödinger’s Zombie:...

Steve Dufourny: "after all like Borh has made,this universe and its spheres for me are like..." in Alternative Models of...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

First Things First: The Physics of Causality
Why do we remember the past and not the future? Untangling the connections between cause and effect, choice, and entropy.

Can Time Be Saved From Physics?
Philosophers, physicists and neuroscientists discuss how our sense of time’s flow might arise through our interactions with external stimuli—despite suggestions from Einstein's relativity that our perception of the passage of time is an illusion.

Thermo-Demonics
A devilish new framework of thermodynamics that focuses on how we observe information could help illuminate our understanding of probability and rewrite quantum theory.

Gravity's Residue
An unusual approach to unifying the laws of physics could solve Hawking's black-hole information paradox—and its predicted gravitational "memory effect" could be picked up by LIGO.

Could Mind Forge the Universe?
Objective reality, and the laws of physics themselves, emerge from our observations, according to a new framework that turns what we think of as fundamental on its head.


FQXi FORUM
October 24, 2019

CATEGORY: Questioning the Foundations Essay Contest (2012) [back]
TOPIC: Watching a Falling Apple Atom by Atom, a Classical Unification Scheme by Khalil Shahlai [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Author Khalil Shahlai wrote on Sep. 5, 2012 @ 15:22 GMT
Essay Abstract

Abstract: Close examination of a nondimensionalized Newton's equation for universal gravitation written for the Bohr hydrogen atom provided the basis for the assumption that F = GmM/r2 may be a reduced form of a more complex equation. This assumption lead eventually to the discovery (invention?) of a previously unknown, fundamental equation in classical gravitation. The fundamental nature of the equation is demonstrated by: •Deriving the equation for Newton's law of universal gravitation, revealing the mathematical origin of the universal gravitational constant G, and the peculiar dimensionality of this constant. •Deriving the exact solution (Schwarzchild solution) of Einstein's General Relativity equations. •Establishing a relationship between nuclear and gravitational potential energies, showing that nuclear and gravitational potential forces are the same, and are differentiated only by the virtue of their distances. •Deducing Einstein's mass-energy equivalence equation. •Proving that the nuclear and the Planck forces are the same and should be considered a basic universal constant, rather than a derived quantity. •Deriving some of the Planck units using Fplanck, ħ, and c without G. •Demonstrating that the gravitational potential energy of the solar system planets may be proportional to the sum of the potential energy of their constituent atoms.

Author Bio

I am a retired professional with a Ph.D. in organic chemistry. I am keenly interested in philosophy and cosmology.

Download Essay PDF File

Bookmark and Share



Sergey G Fedosin wrote on Sep. 7, 2012 @ 15:32 GMT
Dear Khalil,

I found in your essay relations for the energy of planets of Solar System which close in form to quantum relations. In article Similarity of matter levels , there are some relations on the quantum base for the planets, where n is the number of planet and quantum number. I hope it may be useful for you. My essay is devoted to theory of Infinite Nesting of Matter. And I found too, that the proper gravitational energy per nucleon of a planet is of the same order as gravitational energy per nucleon of the planet in the field of Sun. The same for the Moon rotated near the Earth, and so on. The reason for it is scenario of formation of planets from protoplanet cloud and redistribution of energy in substance of cloud during this formation. See my essay on review of the theory.

Sergey Fedosin Essay

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Khalil Shahlai replied on Sep. 7, 2012 @ 17:49 GMT
Dear Sergey,

thank you for bringing to my attention some similarities between your essay and mine. I have not found the time to read the other essays yet. Hopefuuly, I will get a chance to read your essay soon. Wish you the best in the contest.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Jayakar Johnson Joseph wrote on Sep. 20, 2012 @ 18:43 GMT
Dear Khalil Shahlai,

As per Coherently-cyclic cluster-matter paradigm of universe, the inverse proportionality of gravity with the distance between two objects of dense tetrahedral-branes is by the lesser proportion of eigen-rotational string conjunctions between them as the distance between them increases.

With best wishes,

Jayakar

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Hoang cao Hai wrote on Sep. 27, 2012 @ 16:13 GMT
Dear Khalil Shahlai

Very interesting to see your essay.

Perhaps all of us are convinced that: the choice of yourself is right!That of course is reasonable.

So may be we should work together to let's the consider clearly defined for the basis foundations theoretical as the most challenging with intellectual of all of us.

Why we do not try to start with a real challenge is very close and are the focus of interest of the human science: it is a matter of mass and grain Higg boson of the standard model.

Knowledge and belief reasoning of you will to express an opinion on this matter:

You have think that: the Mass is the expression of the impact force to material (definition from the ABSOLUTE theory of me) - so no impact force, we do not feel the Higg boson - similar to the case of no weight outside the Earth's atmosphere.

Does there need to be a particle with mass for everything have volume? If so, then why the mass of everything change when moving from the Earth to the Moon? Higg boson is lighter by the Moon's gravity is weaker than of Earth?

The LHC particle accelerator used to "Smashed" until "Ejected" Higg boson, but why only when the "Smashed" can see it,and when off then not see it ?

Can be "locked" Higg particles? so when "released" if we do not force to it by any the Force, how to know that it is "out" or not?

You are should be boldly to give a definition of weight that you think is right for us to enjoy, or oppose my opinion.

Because in the process of research, the value of "failure" or "success" is the similar with science. The purpose of a correct theory be must is without any a wrong point ?

Glad to see from you comments soon,because still have too many of the same problems.

Kind Regards !

Hải.Caohoàng of THE INCORRECT ASSUMPTIONS AND A CORRECT THEORY

August 23, 2012 - 11:51 GMT on this essay contest.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Sergey G Fedosin wrote on Oct. 2, 2012 @ 07:21 GMT
After studying about 250 essays in this contest, I realize now, how can I assess the level of each submitted work. Accordingly, I rated some essays, including yours.

Cood luck.

Sergey Fedosin

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Sergey G Fedosin wrote on Oct. 4, 2012 @ 04:18 GMT
If you do not understand why your rating dropped down. As I found ratings in the contest are calculated in the next way. Suppose your rating is
and
was the quantity of people which gave you ratings. Then you have
of points. After it anyone give you
of points so you have
of points and
is the common quantity of the people which gave you ratings. At the same time you will have
of points. From here, if you want to be R2 > R1 there must be:
or
or
In other words if you want to increase rating of anyone you must give him more points
then the participant`s rating
was at the moment you rated him. From here it is seen that in the contest are special rules for ratings. And from here there are misunderstanding of some participants what is happened with their ratings. Moreover since community ratings are hided some participants do not sure how increase ratings of others and gives them maximum 10 points. But in the case the scale from 1 to 10 of points do not work, and some essays are overestimated and some essays are drop down. In my opinion it is a bad problem with this Contest rating process.

Sergey Fedosin

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.