Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home


Previous Contests

What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018
Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discusswinners

Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.
read/discusswinners

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discusswinners

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discusswinners

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discusswinners

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Anonymous: on 10/4/12 at 22:04pm UTC, wrote Many thanks for your personel review, Prof. Bob! Indeed, one could easily...

Renate Quehenberger: on 10/4/12 at 20:42pm UTC, wrote Thanks Han, if so, you may find more Nietzsche here: ...

Han Geurdes: on 10/4/12 at 12:47pm UTC, wrote Cheers Reni. Like the Nietsche quote.

Anonymous: on 10/4/12 at 12:34pm UTC, wrote good text

Sergey Fedosin: on 10/4/12 at 4:27am UTC, wrote If you do not understand why your rating dropped down. As I found ratings...

Bob Coecke: on 10/3/12 at 19:08pm UTC, wrote Hey Renate, love the prose and historical intertwines. Great piece. A...

Hoang Hai: on 10/1/12 at 3:14am UTC, wrote Dear Renate Quehenberger Your proposal is very interesting, wish you...

Jayakar Joseph: on 9/30/12 at 7:52am UTC, wrote Dear Quehenberger, In the conjecture of Tetrahedral-branes in...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Georgina Woodward: "'Energy' can be a measurable. Measured or calculated, number value assigned..." in Cosmological Koans

Lorraine Ford: "Georgina, Energy is merely a category of information in the same sense..." in Cosmological Koans

Joe Fisher: "Dear Reality Fans, The real VISIBLE Universe never “started out.”..." in First Things First: The...

isabell ella: "If you are facing Cash app related problems and want to get support..." in Cosmic Dawn, Parallel...

Joe Fisher: "Dear Dr. Kuhn, Today’s Closer To Truth Facebook page contained this..." in Can Time Be Saved From...

Michael Hussey: "https://www.google.com" in New Nuclear "Magic...

Michael Hussey: "it is really difficult to understand what is all about all the things..." in New Nuclear "Magic...

Stefan Weckbach: "I have a problem with the notion of time in the multiverse scenario that..." in First Things First: The...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

First Things First: The Physics of Causality
Why do we remember the past and not the future? Untangling the connections between cause and effect, choice, and entropy.

Can Time Be Saved From Physics?
Philosophers, physicists and neuroscientists discuss how our sense of time’s flow might arise through our interactions with external stimuli—despite suggestions from Einstein's relativity that our perception of the passage of time is an illusion.

Thermo-Demonics
A devilish new framework of thermodynamics that focuses on how we observe information could help illuminate our understanding of probability and rewrite quantum theory.

Gravity's Residue
An unusual approach to unifying the laws of physics could solve Hawking's black-hole information paradox—and its predicted gravitational "memory effect" could be picked up by LIGO.

Could Mind Forge the Universe?
Objective reality, and the laws of physics themselves, emerge from our observations, according to a new framework that turns what we think of as fundamental on its head.


FQXi FORUM
July 19, 2019

CATEGORY: Questioning the Foundations Essay Contest (2012) [back]
TOPIC: Revising Space Time Geometry: A Proposal for a New Romance in Many Dimensions by Renate C.-Z. Quehenberger [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Author Renate C.-Z. Quehenberger wrote on Sep. 5, 2012 @ 11:38 GMT
Essay Abstract

The ontological positioning of our existence, deeply connected with the hierarchy problem concerning the dimensions of space and time, is one of the major problems for our understanding of the “ultimate” nature of reality. The resulting problem is that mathematical concepts that need so-called “extra-dimensions” have been widely disregarded owing to a lack of physical interpretation. This article reviews conventions, imaginations and assumptions about the non-imaginative by starting at the origins of the of 4D and 5D space-time concepts and proposing a new geometrical approach via a hyper-Euclidian path for a mentally accessible vision of continuous AND discrete complex space configuration in dimensions up to higher order.

Author Bio

R.C.-Z. Quehenberger. I‘m currently working as a scientific researcher on the art-based research project funded by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) in the framework of the PEEK programm established in the Department of Mediatheory, head Peter Weibel, at the University of applied Arts Vienna, and in parallel on my thesis in philosophy on the Penrose Tilings in the Department of Art and Science Transfer at the same University. Within the last years various art-reviews were published on www. artmagazine.cc

Download Essay PDF File

Bookmark and Share



Vladimir Rogozhin wrote on Sep. 6, 2012 @ 15:15 GMT
Dear Renate! Excellent essay. It looks like we're going with you in one direction. Sincerely, Vladimir Rogozhin

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Vladimir Rogozhin wrote on Sep. 6, 2012 @ 15:31 GMT
Added: New Romance with a New Ontology ... I call it - OntoTopoLogia

Best Regards, Vladimir

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Renate Quehenberger replied on Sep. 16, 2012 @ 18:20 GMT
Thanks for the flowers, Vladimir!

What about a toplogy dinner ? : http://quantumcinema.uni-ak.ac.at/site/qc-goes-public/qc_art
s-birthday-2012/

Sorry for the late response: I got lost in France: http://membres-liglab.imag.fr/nesme/founqi2/

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


M. V. Vasilyeva wrote on Sep. 6, 2012 @ 17:15 GMT
Renate, loved your essay. I too argue for the 4th spatial dimension. I am glad that in the end I limited the history review to just one paragraph, for I could never match your exhaustive research into the area. Well done!

I am here: The Nature of Space

So far I counted 4 people referencing Abbott's Flatland, us included. I wonder how Flatlanders will react, lol.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Renate Quehenberger replied on Sep. 16, 2012 @ 18:27 GMT
Very interesting that flatland is still so much around, M. V. Vasilyeva

... if we consider that the idea was fist mentioned by Gustav T. Fechner (1846) too.

You see how much one story, - or two- may evoke !

Good luck with your story !

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Stephen M Sycamore wrote on Sep. 8, 2012 @ 18:16 GMT
Renate,

Congratulations on a nicely written essay. I too agree that quaternions, and the algebra they represent, SU(2), have the potential to reveal certain physical relationships are are essential. It's no accident that very much work in elementary particles is done according to that.

Higher dimensional forms for relativity, such as Kaluza-Klein theory are an interesting alternative to look into. I believe the "capu nili" difficulty you mention is related to the splitting of the Lorentz transformation into parity classes depending on whether the transformation is proper and orthochronous. That is dealt with in the essay Is Kinematics Compatible With Field Symmetries?

Now the especially interesting thing you can see in that essay is that the higher dimension of mass normally associated with Kaluza-Klein type approaches collapses the common space-time relativistic relations back into equations of 3 dimensional space showing the dispersion of energy while at the same time being equivalent to the 4 dimensional expressions!

Best regards,

Steve Sycamore

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Renate Quehenberger replied on Sep. 16, 2012 @ 18:54 GMT
Dear Steven,

I must well return your compilmets towards your article. Thank you very much for your link!

It provides deeper inights into the relevant mathematical structures.

I see, your conclusion that only"c^2 is the invariant (...)

[and] "not c as it is in Special Relativity and Lorentz theory " meets well the quaternionic approach,- isn't it ?

Good luck and best regards,

Renate

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Yuri Danoyan wrote on Sep. 8, 2012 @ 18:41 GMT
Dear Renate

Plato's cave = holographic universe?

See my essay http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1413

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Renate Quehenberger replied on Sep. 16, 2012 @ 19:00 GMT
Dear Yuri, may I correct: Plato's world ideas meets the higher dimensional quantum world, David Bohm's holographic universe on level-1

Plato's cave demonstrates our 3D perception

Good luck!

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Yuri Danoyan replied on Sep. 16, 2012 @ 20:11 GMT
Just in case

My advice to read

http://www.galiulin.narod.ru/ufn022f.pdf

http://www.galiu
lin.narod.ru/crys03_6.pdf.pdf

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Renate Quehenberger replied on Sep. 29, 2012 @ 01:18 GMT
Thank you so much for this invaluable links, Yuri!

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Rick Lockyer wrote on Sep. 10, 2012 @ 05:56 GMT
Renate,

You really should read my essay The Algebra of Everything. I think I do a reasonable job of tying physical reality to the 8 dimensions of Octonion Algebra. The Quaternions you like manifest themselves within their 7 subalgebras of O. Their chiral choices determine the full variability in the definition for O. This variability and the easy assumption it should have no impact on the description of physically observable phenomenon mandates the form the mathematical description of reality must take. Electrodynamics is best and most fundamentally demonstrated in an O framework, not an H or Minkowski space-time. Take a look, it will be worth your time.

Rick

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Renate Quehenberger replied on Sep. 16, 2012 @ 22:18 GMT
Dear Rick,

many thanks for your link to your fascinating essay!

Now I guess, I understand why octonionic algera exceeds he Hilbert space ...

Here you might find the preliminaries for a geometry of a diecrete space using grid Z5 which should support the geometric visualisation octonions (- work in progress).

www.researchcatalogue.net/view/22616/22617

I wish to proceed far enough to visualize one day soon your complex field equations;-)



Best wishes !

Renate

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Member Benjamin F. Dribus wrote on Sep. 26, 2012 @ 21:26 GMT
Dear Renate,

I enjoyed reading your essay! The historical context is very interesting. It’s nice to have this all in one place. A couple of questions and remarks.

1. I think Maxwell’s poem was referring to the fact that all (one-dimensional) knots come undone in four-dimensional space. Is this what you were referring to on page 8?

2. The quaternions and octonions (defined by Cayley) are related to Hopf fibrations, which are geometrically beautiful and also physically relevant (for instance, in quantum information theory).



3. You mention Klein’s program in regard to covariance (i.e. “Lorentz invariance.”) I think it’s interesting to consider the possibility that this is only an approximate concept. This is one of the topics I discuss in my essay On the Foundational Assumptions of Modern Physics.

4. Another interesting thing to consider is non-integer dimension (fractal dimension, emergent dimension, etc.). This is particularly relevant in discrete models.

Thanks again for the interesting read! Take care,

Ben Dribus

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Renate Quehenberger replied on Sep. 29, 2012 @ 01:15 GMT
Dear Ben,

many thanks for your interesting remarks:

ad 1) yes and I described it why,- ) Yes, one-dimensional strings if you like, but you may also take a thick rope which can be considered as a 3d dimensional knot, but if you make a knot into a 2D surface you get a pentagon and if you try to make a knot into a pentagon you get an epitahedron ...

ad 2 ) Here you may watch a 3-sphere, where the circle bundels of the Hopf fibration became hemispheres: http://quantumcinema.uni-ak.ac.at/site/

ad 3) I guess Kretschmann meant what you call: "The properties of Minkowski spacetime impose external symmetries described by the Poincaré group.

If you embed 4D space into a discrete higher dimensional space stucture, all problems with the socalled "incompatibility of general relativity with Quantum Mechanics "are vanishing.

ad 4) Higher dimensional spaces are complex configurations of 3 dimensional spaces, therefore I don't think we have to consider fractal dimensions as relevant for discrete space models, because usually they serve as the measure of a certain space-filling capacity in 2D patterns.

Best wishes!

Renate

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Jayakar Johnson Joseph wrote on Sep. 30, 2012 @ 07:52 GMT
Dear Quehenberger,

In the conjecture of Tetrahedral-branes in Coherently-cyclic cluster-matter paradigm of universe, reductionism of extra-dimensional expressions is by the non-descriptive complexity of the coordinates of configuration space, in that its generalized coordinates are time, string-length and the central angle of transformed eigen-rotation. Thus in this scenario of dimensionality, three-dimensional structures emerge with fractals.

With best wishes

Jayakar

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Hoang cao Hai wrote on Oct. 1, 2012 @ 03:14 GMT
Dear Renate Quehenberger

Your proposal is very interesting, wish you success.

Kind Regards !

Hải.Caohoàng of THE INCORRECT ASSUMPTIONS AND A CORRECT THEORY

August 23, 2012 - 11:51 GMT on this essay contest.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Member Bob Coecke wrote on Oct. 3, 2012 @ 19:08 GMT
Hey Renate, love the prose and historical intertwines. Great piece. A nice example of ScienceArt, both with capitals. Although to my personal taste there's a bit to much geometry here and a bit too little topology here. :) We all meanwhile know where babies come from, but where do dimensions come from? Where do lines come from?

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Anonymous replied on Oct. 4, 2012 @ 22:04 GMT
Many thanks for your personel review, Prof. Bob!

Indeed, one could easily draw a line of thoughts from the abolished Limbo, via the abandoned ether and Plato‘s forgotten „order of heavens“ to the hierarchy problem.

A topologist, could take a bundle (F) of hyperbolic spaces with some handles and loopholes in it, apply the Fourier transform, arrive in 6D and - wait for the babies.

A geameter exists already there,- in Plato's ideal world, filled with (Maxwell's and Faraday's) interfering lines of forces, forming triangles over and over, entangled towards manifolds of all possible higher order.

Didn‘t Klein tell, that all geometries and topology are merging in higher dimensions?

Good question; - can we realy explain „dimensions“ with "degrees of freedom" only ?

I guess they are necessary to avoid Hilberts trap and mix up a beer mug with ...

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Sergey G Fedosin wrote on Oct. 4, 2012 @ 04:27 GMT
If you do not understand why your rating dropped down. As I found ratings in the contest are calculated in the next way. Suppose your rating is
and
was the quantity of people which gave you ratings. Then you have
of points. After it anyone give you
of points so you have
of points and
is the common quantity of the people which gave you ratings. At the same time you will have
of points. From here, if you want to be R2 > R1 there must be:
or
or
In other words if you want to increase rating of anyone you must give him more points
then the participant`s rating
was at the moment you rated him. From here it is seen that in the contest are special rules for ratings. And from here there are misunderstanding of some participants what is happened with their ratings. Moreover since community ratings are hided some participants do not sure how increase ratings of others and gives them maximum 10 points. But in the case the scale from 1 to 10 of points do not work, and some essays are overestimated and some essays are drop down. In my opinion it is a bad problem with this Contest rating process.

Sergey Fedosin

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Anonymous wrote on Oct. 4, 2012 @ 12:34 GMT
good text

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Han Geurdes wrote on Oct. 4, 2012 @ 12:47 GMT
Cheers Reni.

Like the Nietsche quote.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Renate Quehenberger replied on Oct. 4, 2012 @ 20:42 GMT
Thanks Han,

if so, you may find more Nietzsche here:

http://quantumcinema.uni-ak.ac.at/site/wp-content/uploads/A_
Digital_Vision.pdf

- a prosecution referring to sociological and cognitive effects concerning the common agreement of the perceptions of higher dimensions touching the foundations of the current WELTBILD.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.