Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home


Previous Contests

What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018
Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discusswinners

Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.
read/discusswinners

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discusswinners

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discusswinners

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discusswinners

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Jayakar Joseph: on 10/4/12 at 5:34am UTC, wrote Dear Marek Adam Michalski, In Coherently-cyclic cluster-matter paradigm of...

Sergey Fedosin: on 10/4/12 at 4:33am UTC, wrote If you do not understand why your rating dropped down. As I found ratings...

Sergey Fedosin: on 10/2/12 at 7:37am UTC, wrote After studying about 250 essays in this contest, I realize now, how can I...

Hoang Hai: on 10/1/12 at 3:24am UTC, wrote Dear Marek Adam Michalski Very interesting to see your essay. Perhaps...

Benjamin Dribus: on 9/27/12 at 15:57pm UTC, wrote Dear Marek, I enjoyed reading your essay, and I agree with a lot of what...

Marek Michalski: on 9/11/12 at 21:11pm UTC, wrote Dear Sergey, The speed of light in Michelson-Morley experiment is...

Frank Makinson: on 9/10/12 at 18:17pm UTC, wrote Marek, Introducing the concept of a "Primary Structure" is difficult to do...

Sergey Fedosin: on 9/8/12 at 16:04pm UTC, wrote In the previous post there is a mistake in the name, it was written for...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

isabell ella: "If you are facing Cash app related problems and want to get support..." in Cosmic Dawn, Parallel...

Georgina Woodward: "Quite right Lorraine, ( to be clear perhaps I should have said..." in Cosmological Koans

Lorraine Ford: "Honestly Georgina, Wake up! Change of number is NOT energy." in Cosmological Koans

Joe Fisher: "Dear Dr. Kuhn, Today’s Closer To Truth Facebook page contained this..." in Can Time Be Saved From...

Michael Hussey: "https://www.google.com" in New Nuclear "Magic...

Michael Hussey: "it is really difficult to understand what is all about all the things..." in New Nuclear "Magic...

Stefan Weckbach: "I have a problem with the notion of time in the multiverse scenario that..." in First Things First: The...

Roger Granet: "By the way, this post was from Roger." in First Things First: The...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

First Things First: The Physics of Causality
Why do we remember the past and not the future? Untangling the connections between cause and effect, choice, and entropy.

Can Time Be Saved From Physics?
Philosophers, physicists and neuroscientists discuss how our sense of time’s flow might arise through our interactions with external stimuli—despite suggestions from Einstein's relativity that our perception of the passage of time is an illusion.

Thermo-Demonics
A devilish new framework of thermodynamics that focuses on how we observe information could help illuminate our understanding of probability and rewrite quantum theory.

Gravity's Residue
An unusual approach to unifying the laws of physics could solve Hawking's black-hole information paradox—and its predicted gravitational "memory effect" could be picked up by LIGO.

Could Mind Forge the Universe?
Objective reality, and the laws of physics themselves, emerge from our observations, according to a new framework that turns what we think of as fundamental on its head.


FQXi FORUM
July 18, 2019

CATEGORY: Questioning the Foundations Essay Contest (2012) [back]
TOPIC: Two Levels of Universe and the Old Physical Experiment by Marek Adam Michalski [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Author Marek Adam Michalski wrote on Sep. 4, 2012 @ 15:39 GMT
Essay Abstract

The current essay attempts to discuss the vision of the Universe with the material, spatial, discrete geometric structure of its primary level and the immaterial space of emergent excitations, generated by the evolving Basic Structure. It proposes a new interpretation of the classic Michelson-Morley experiment. I came to the new interpretation after having found, that the original interpretation contradicts the predictions based on my model of Basic Structure.

Author Bio

The author is an independent researcher.

Download Essay PDF File

Bookmark and Share



Yuri Danoyan wrote on Sep. 4, 2012 @ 20:05 GMT
Do yo now Stefan Marinov?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stefan_Marinov

http://ww
w.ptep-online.com/index_files/2007/PP-08-05.PDF

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Gurcharn Singh Sandhu wrote on Sep. 5, 2012 @ 13:06 GMT
Dear Marek,

I appreciate your bold attempt at formulating the 'vision' of Universe by postulating the existence of 'Basic Structure'. What are the physical properties of this 'Basic Structure' and how does it differ from the poor old aether? Anyway, I appreciate your bold attempt. Good luck.

All authors in this contest have presented their viewpoints in different styles. In the grand maze of the unknown it is important to consider all possible alternatives and different viewpoints for building a consolidated common approach.

You know, with arbitrary assumptions we can build wonderful fantasies. But to come close to building a model of reality, we must use barest minimum of assumptions and such assumptions that are used must be plausible and compatible with physical reality. For this reason I think FQXi has chosen a most appropriate topic for this contest.

Kindly read my essay titled,"Wrong Assumptions of Relativity Hindering Fundamental Research in Physical Space".

Best Wishes

G S Sandhu

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Sergey G Fedosin wrote on Sep. 8, 2012 @ 15:57 GMT
Dear Saibal,

What do you think about the speed of light in Michelson-Morley experiment? In the article Metric theory of relativity is supposed formula for absolute speed of light depending on the speed of interferometer.

Sergey Fedosin Essay

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author Marek Adam Michalski replied on Sep. 11, 2012 @ 21:11 GMT
Dear Sergey,

The speed of light in Michelson-Morley experiment is independent of the speed of interferometer. Such is the conclusion of my model of the Basic Structure.

Marek A. Michalski

Bookmark and Share



Sergey G Fedosin wrote on Sep. 8, 2012 @ 16:04 GMT
In the previous post there is a mistake in the name, it was written for Marek Adam Michalski.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Frank Makinson wrote on Sep. 10, 2012 @ 18:17 GMT
Marek,

Introducing the concept of a "Primary Structure" is difficult to do in nine pages. I will limit my comments to the Michelson-Morley (MM) experiment. This experiment was conducted in 1887, just after Heinrich Hertz demonstrated that electromagnetic (EM) waves propagated through the air, 1886. The "ancient scientists" of that era were unaware that we are constantly bathed in EM...

view entire post


Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Member Benjamin F. Dribus wrote on Sep. 27, 2012 @ 15:57 GMT
Dear Marek,

I enjoyed reading your essay, and I agree with a lot of what you say: the existence of a basic or primary structure, the emergence of familiar physical entities from this structure, and so forth. I have a few questions.

1. Could you be a bit more specific about the precise definition of the basic structure in your model? You say that there is a “high degree of similarity between the Basic Structure and the Turing machine with a fairly simple algorithm…” On the basis of this, I presume that your basic structure is something like a graph or a causal network?

2. Do you distinguish between classical and quantum theory, and if so, how?

If you are interested in my ideas about the “basic structure,” you might look at my essay here. I call it a “causal structure” or a “binary relation.”

Finally, I agree with you that relativity and quantum theory are not “wrong,” but I do believe they can be improved. Take care,

Ben Dribus

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Hoang cao Hai wrote on Oct. 1, 2012 @ 03:24 GMT
Dear Marek Adam Michalski

Very interesting to see your essay.

Perhaps all of us are convinced that: the choice of yourself is right!That of course is reasonable.

So may be we should work together to let's the consider clearly defined for the basis foundations theoretical as the most challenging with intellectual of all of us.

Why we do not try to start with a real challenge is very close and are the focus of interest of the human science: it is a matter of mass and grain Higg boson of the standard model.

Knowledge and belief reasoning of you will to express an opinion on this matter:

You have think that: the Mass is the expression of the impact force to material (definition from the ABSOLUTE theory of me) - so no impact force, we do not feel the Higg boson - similar to the case of no weight outside the Earth's atmosphere.

Does there need to be a particle with mass for everything have volume? If so, then why the mass of everything change when moving from the Earth to the Moon? Higg boson is lighter by the Moon's gravity is weaker than of Earth?

The LHC particle accelerator used to "Smashed" until "Ejected" Higg boson, but why only when the "Smashed" can see it,and when off then not see it ?

Can be "locked" Higg particles? so when "released" if we do not force to it by any the Force, how to know that it is "out" or not?

You are should be boldly to give a definition of weight that you think is right for us to enjoy, or oppose my opinion.

Because in the process of research, the value of "failure" or "success" is the similar with science. The purpose of a correct theory be must is without any a wrong point ?

Glad to see from you comments soon,because still have too many of the same problems.

Kind Regards !

Hải.Caohoàng of THE INCORRECT ASSUMPTIONS AND A CORRECT THEORY

August 23, 2012 - 11:51 GMT on this essay contest.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Sergey G Fedosin wrote on Oct. 2, 2012 @ 07:37 GMT
After studying about 250 essays in this contest, I realize now, how can I assess the level of each submitted work. Accordingly, I rated some essays, including yours.

Cood luck.

Sergey Fedosin

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Sergey G Fedosin wrote on Oct. 4, 2012 @ 04:33 GMT
If you do not understand why your rating dropped down. As I found ratings in the contest are calculated in the next way. Suppose your rating is
and
was the quantity of people which gave you ratings. Then you have
of points. After it anyone give you
of points so you have
of points and
is the common quantity of the people which gave you ratings. At the same time you will have
of points. From here, if you want to be R2 > R1 there must be:
or
or
In other words if you want to increase rating of anyone you must give him more points
then the participant`s rating
was at the moment you rated him. From here it is seen that in the contest are special rules for ratings. And from here there are misunderstanding of some participants what is happened with their ratings. Moreover since community ratings are hided some participants do not sure how increase ratings of others and gives them maximum 10 points. But in the case the scale from 1 to 10 of points do not work, and some essays are overestimated and some essays are drop down. In my opinion it is a bad problem with this Contest rating process.

Sergey Fedosin

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Jayakar Johnson Joseph wrote on Oct. 4, 2012 @ 05:34 GMT
Dear Marek Adam Michalski,

In Coherently-cyclic cluster-matter paradigm of universe, shift of spectral line is the effect of angular acceleration of eigen-rotational string the observer and source belongs. Observable redshift and blue-shift in the universe is indicative of the hierarchy of eigen-rotational strings the observer belongs in the holarchial clustering of universe.

With best wishes

Jayakar

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.