Search FQXi

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home

Current Essay Contest

Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American

Previous Contests

Undecidability, Uncomputability, and Unpredictability Essay Contest
December 24, 2019 - March 16, 2020
Contest Partners: Fetzer Franklin Fund, and The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation

What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018
Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation

Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008

Forum Home
Introduction

Order posts by:
chronological order
most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Sergey Fedosin: on 10/4/12 at 4:48am UTC, wrote If you do not understand why your rating dropped down. As I found ratings...

MICHAEL EVANS: on 10/1/12 at 15:05pm UTC, wrote michaelrevans.com

Hoang Hai: on 10/1/12 at 3:56am UTC, wrote Dear MICHAEL EVANS Creative and unique, your essay is worth to expand the...

MICHAEL R EVANS: on 9/29/12 at 2:42am UTC, wrote Iam afraid I cannot comment on formulas only images. michaelrevans.com

Peter Jackson: on 9/28/12 at 20:38pm UTC, wrote Michael Fascinating and original. A geometry with much potential, and as...

Yuri Danoyan: on 9/4/12 at 15:45pm UTC, wrote Michael Are you agree with my abstract? ...

MICHAEL EVANS: on 9/4/12 at 11:37am UTC, wrote Essay Abstract The Trion-ReG is a fundamental structural unit of...

RECENT FORUM POSTS

Lorraine Ford: "John, I would say that you need to think what you mean by “physical..." in Emergent Reality: Markus...

John Cox: "Lorraine, That clarifies, thanks. I'd be in the camp that argues for a..." in Emergent Reality: Markus...

Steve Dufourny: "We have a big philosophical problem with the strings and the photons like..." in Alternative Models of...

Steve Dufourny: "If my equation is correct, E=mc^2+Xl^2 , so how can we take this enormous..." in Alternative Models of...

Lorraine Ford: "Re "I tend to speed-read then review before scoring after reading a good..." in Undecidability,...

John Cox: "George, We shouldn't conflate contradiction with inconsistency. QM has a..." in Watching the Watchmen:...

John Cox: "Georgi, by and large I agree. Near the end of the discussion panel,..." in Watching the Watchmen:...

RECENT ARTICLES

First Things First: The Physics of Causality
Why do we remember the past and not the future? Untangling the connections between cause and effect, choice, and entropy.

Can Time Be Saved From Physics?
Philosophers, physicists and neuroscientists discuss how our sense of time’s flow might arise through our interactions with external stimuli—despite suggestions from Einstein's relativity that our perception of the passage of time is an illusion.

Thermo-Demonics
A devilish new framework of thermodynamics that focuses on how we observe information could help illuminate our understanding of probability and rewrite quantum theory.

Gravity's Residue
An unusual approach to unifying the laws of physics could solve Hawking's black-hole information paradox—and its predicted gravitational "memory effect" could be picked up by LIGO.

Could Mind Forge the Universe?
Objective reality, and the laws of physics themselves, emerge from our observations, according to a new framework that turns what we think of as fundamental on its head.

FQXi FORUM
January 21, 2020

CATEGORY: Questioning the Foundations Essay Contest (2012) [back]
TOPIC: Geometry of Light by Michael Robert Evans [refresh]

Author MICHAEL EVANS wrote on Sep. 4, 2012 @ 11:37 GMT
Essay Abstract

The Trion-ReG is a fundamental structural unit of 3-D space on the basis of which a new geometry of 3-D space can be built: namely, the 3-D space in which no straight lines exist. To account for the curvature of space, this modification shifts the rules for a platonic solid, making the Trion-ReG the sixth such regular solid and a unique structure of space/time. Traditionally, there are five Platonic Solids with congruent angles and equal, flat faces. However, we must modify the rule and include curved surfaces; in which case a new solid emerges more rudimentary than the tetrahedron. Henceforth called the Trion-ReG, this new solid is described as follows: 2-vertices, 3-flexible edges, 3-equal faces, an inside and an outside and spin ability. The Trion-ReG can be used to generate new versions of the other five Platonic Solids.

Author Bio

Fine Arts Degree, Laguna College of Art and Design. I am compelled to create and explore the world around me . I find myself in the space between intellect and emotion. It is almost like dying, a perspective of mortal and infinite, simultaneously revealed. Unknown information is revolutionary, confrontational, sometimes terrifying, always illuminating, and a transcendent experience... “An elegant state of being.” Publications: 2011 – TRANS-DIMENSIONAL UNIFIED FIELD THEORY ISBN: 978-14568-7110-9 2010 - NATURAL PHILOSOPHY ALLIANCE, Vol. 7 VISION IN ACTION – The Journal Of Integral Thinking Volume Three, http://www.via-visioninaction.org

Yuri Danoyan wrote on Sep. 4, 2012 @ 15:45 GMT
Michael

Are you agree with my abstract?

http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1413

report post as inappropriate

MICHAEL R EVANS replied on Sep. 29, 2012 @ 02:42 GMT
Iam afraid I cannot comment on formulas only images. michaelrevans.com

report post as inappropriate

Peter Jackson wrote on Sep. 28, 2012 @ 20:38 GMT
Michael

Fascinating and original. A geometry with much potential, and as valid as just about any others around. I can't believe I'm only the second to post here. Perhaps as I'm also trained as an Architect so have an affinity with geometry.

I do hope you'll read my own essay, though rather more about kinetis, you may also enjoy the theatre therein.

Best wishes

Peter

report post as inappropriate

Hoang cao Hai wrote on Oct. 1, 2012 @ 03:56 GMT
Dear MICHAEL EVANS

Creative and unique, your essay is worth to expand the research.

Kind Regards !

Hải.Caohoàng of THE INCORRECT ASSUMPTIONS AND A CORRECT THEORY

August 23, 2012 - 11:51 GMT on this essay contest.

report post as inappropriate

MICHAEL EVANS replied on Oct. 1, 2012 @ 15:05 GMT
michaelrevans.com

report post as inappropriate

Sergey G Fedosin wrote on Oct. 4, 2012 @ 04:48 GMT
If you do not understand why your rating dropped down. As I found ratings in the contest are calculated in the next way. Suppose your rating is
$R_1$
and
$N_1$
was the quantity of people which gave you ratings. Then you have
$S_1=R_1 N_1$
of points. After it anyone give you
$dS$
of points so you have
$S_2=S_1+ dS$
of points and
$N_2=N_1+1$
is the common quantity of the people which gave you ratings. At the same time you will have
$S_2=R_2 N_2$
of points. From here, if you want to be R2 > R1 there must be:
$S_2/ N_2>S_1/ N_1$
or
$(S_1+ dS) / (N_1+1) >S_1/ N_1$
or
$dS >S_1/ N_1 =R_1$
In other words if you want to increase rating of anyone you must give him more points
$dS$
then the participant`s rating
$R_1$
was at the moment you rated him. From here it is seen that in the contest are special rules for ratings. And from here there are misunderstanding of some participants what is happened with their ratings. Moreover since community ratings are hided some participants do not sure how increase ratings of others and gives them maximum 10 points. But in the case the scale from 1 to 10 of points do not work, and some essays are overestimated and some essays are drop down. In my opinion it is a bad problem with this Contest rating process. I hope the FQXI community will change the rating process.

Sergey Fedosin

report post as inappropriate