Search FQXi

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home

Previous Contests

What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018
Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation

Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008

Forum Home
Introduction

Order posts by:
chronological order
most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Allen Wood: on 9/23/17 at 10:01am UTC, wrote There is only one real 1 of anything once. One real Universe can only obey...

Sergey Fedosin: on 10/4/12 at 5:38am UTC, wrote If you do not understand why your rating dropped down. As I found ratings...

Joe Fisher: on 9/2/12 at 15:41pm UTC, wrote Dear Peter van Gaalen, Unfortunately, due to my lack of education, I was...

Sergey Fedosin: on 9/2/12 at 7:42am UTC, wrote Dear Peter, When I saw your essay and a lot of Tables in it I want say: it...

Peter van Gaalen: on 8/31/12 at 12:06pm UTC, wrote Essay Abstract Two basic assumptions about the working of the...

RECENT FORUM POSTS

Joe Fisher: "Today’s Closer To Truth Facebook page contained this peculiar piece of..." in First Things First: The...

Joe Fisher: "Today’s Closer To Truth Facebook page contained this peculiar piece of..." in First Things First: The...

Eckard Blumschein: "Isn't symmetry simply closely related to redundancy even if physicist may..." in Will A.I. Take Over...

Robert Rise: "Meet many types of women on ihookup. Some dates better than others. It is..." in Time in Physics & Entropy...

Steve Dufourny: "FQXI you too I need your help, come all too we have a work to do there..." in Will A.I. Take Over...

Steve Dufourny: "lol REVOLUTION SPHERISATION everywhere at all scales,REVOLUTION..." in Alternative Models of...

Georgina Woodward: "The kind of time required, over which the material change is happening, (to..." in Schrödinger’s Zombie:...

Steve Dufourny: "after all like Borh has made,this universe and its spheres for me are like..." in Alternative Models of...

RECENT ARTICLES

First Things First: The Physics of Causality
Why do we remember the past and not the future? Untangling the connections between cause and effect, choice, and entropy.

Can Time Be Saved From Physics?
Philosophers, physicists and neuroscientists discuss how our sense of time’s flow might arise through our interactions with external stimuli—despite suggestions from Einstein's relativity that our perception of the passage of time is an illusion.

Thermo-Demonics
A devilish new framework of thermodynamics that focuses on how we observe information could help illuminate our understanding of probability and rewrite quantum theory.

Gravity's Residue
An unusual approach to unifying the laws of physics could solve Hawking's black-hole information paradox—and its predicted gravitational "memory effect" could be picked up by LIGO.

Could Mind Forge the Universe?
Objective reality, and the laws of physics themselves, emerge from our observations, according to a new framework that turns what we think of as fundamental on its head.

FQXi FORUM
October 24, 2019

CATEGORY: Questioning the Foundations Essay Contest (2012) [back]
TOPIC: Assumptions About Quantities and Dimensions by Peter van Gaalen [refresh]

Author Peter van Gaalen wrote on Aug. 31, 2012 @ 12:06 GMT
Essay Abstract

Two basic assumptions about the working of the physical world are Relativity and Quantum Mechanics. There are more basic assumptions. A lot of them we are even unaware of. For example another assumption is that there must be a coherent theory that ts all forces. We haven't found such an all encompassing theory that fits all forces. Because of that assumption and the fact that we haven't found yet an encompassing theory that explains the forces and the working of the universe, we can question our basic assumptions. Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?

Author Bio

A lifeform from planet Earth. By accident gained consciousness and became very curious about the world arround him. Named Peter van Gaalen.

Sergey G Fedosin wrote on Sep. 2, 2012 @ 07:42 GMT
Dear Peter,

When I saw your essay and a lot of Tables in it I want say: it is great!

I have some ideas to add to your essay. From the point of view of Infinite Hierarchical Nesting of Matter and Similarity of matter levels , at every main level of matter there are their own gravitational constant and Planck constant. For the level of star such constants are described in Stellar constants . At the level of particles is supposed strong gravitation .

Now I want say that Planck units must be corrected. If for the particles level of matter we will use not common gravitational constant, but instead of it take Strong gravitational constant , we find good coinciding with the parameters of nucleons. To use correctly Planck units at the level of stars we must to use stellar Planck constant. After such changes your Tables will be very informative.

Please see and evaluate my essay.

Sergey Fedosin Essay

report post as inappropriate

Joe Fisher wrote on Sep. 2, 2012 @ 15:41 GMT
Dear Peter van Gaalen,

Unfortunately, due to my lack of education, I was unable to fully grasp much of the vital information about physical assumptions the essay indubitably contained. I did have a problem with the”quantities” and “dimensions” mentioned in the title. In my opinion, one real appearing Universe can only be perpetually occurring in one real here for one real now holding in one real dimension once. All real stuff has to always stay in one real dimension. There is only one real 1 of anything once. One real Universe can only obey one real law once.

report post as inappropriate

Sergey G Fedosin wrote on Oct. 4, 2012 @ 05:38 GMT
If you do not understand why your rating dropped down. As I found ratings in the contest are calculated in the next way. Suppose your rating is
$R_1$
and
$N_1$
was the quantity of people which gave you ratings. Then you have
$S_1=R_1 N_1$
of points. After it anyone give you
$dS$
of points so you have
$S_2=S_1+ dS$
of points and
$N_2=N_1+1$
is the common quantity of the people which gave you ratings. At the same time you will have
$S_2=R_2 N_2$
of points. From here, if you want to be R2 > R1 there must be:
$S_2/ N_2>S_1/ N_1$
or
$(S_1+ dS) / (N_1+1) >S_1/ N_1$
or
$dS >S_1/ N_1 =R_1$
In other words if you want to increase rating of anyone you must give him more points
$dS$
then the participant`s rating
$R_1$
was at the moment you rated him. From here it is seen that in the contest are special rules for ratings. And from here there are misunderstanding of some participants what is happened with their ratings. Moreover since community ratings are hided some participants do not sure how increase ratings of others and gives them maximum 10 points. But in the case the scale from 1 to 10 of points do not work, and some essays are overestimated and some essays are drop down. In my opinion it is a bad problem with this Contest rating process. I hope the FQXI community will change the rating process.

Sergey Fedosin

report post as inappropriate

Allen Wood wrote on Sep. 23, 2017 @ 10:01 GMT
There is only one real 1 of anything once. One real Universe can only obey one real law once. [url=https://www.examsleader.com/300-101-exam.html]ccnp dumps 300-101[/url]

report post as inappropriate