Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home


Previous Contests

What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018
Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discusswinners

Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.
read/discusswinners

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discusswinners

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discusswinners

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discusswinners

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Vladimir Rogozhin: on 10/5/12 at 11:23am UTC, wrote Dear Evgeny! Very interesting and profound ideas in your essay. The idea...

Evgeny Rozovskiy: on 10/4/12 at 7:40am UTC, wrote HET

Evgeny Rozovskiy: on 10/4/12 at 7:37am UTC, wrote Dear Peter, I read your essay. The phenomenon, which you have shown is the...

Sergey Fedosin: on 10/4/12 at 6:10am UTC, wrote If you do not understand why your rating dropped down. As I found ratings...

Sergey Fedosin: on 10/2/12 at 9:18am UTC, wrote After studying about 250 essays in this contest, I realize now, how can I...

Felix Lev: on 10/1/12 at 2:08am UTC, wrote Dear Evgeny, Please excuse me for my question. I did not expect that a...

Felix Lev: on 10/1/12 at 2:04am UTC, wrote Уважаемый...

Sergey Fedosin: on 9/14/12 at 14:54pm UTC, wrote Dear Evgeny, See in my essay about gravitons ether and dark matter. There...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Joe Fisher: "Dear Dr. Kuhn, Today’s Closer To Truth Facebook page contained this..." in Can Time Be Saved From...

Jorma Seppaenen: "Dear Georgina, I think you are perfectly right about the estimate of age..." in Why Time Might Not Be an...

Joe Fisher: "Dear Dr. Kuhn, Today’s Closer To Truth Facebook page contained this..." in Can Time Be Saved From...

Georgina Woodward: "Yes. The estimate of age of the visible universe, and age of stars, other..." in Why Time Might Not Be an...

akash hasan: "Some students have an interest in researching and space exploration. I..." in Announcing Physics of the...

Michael Jordan: "Excellent site. Plenty of helpful information here. I am sending it to some..." in Review of "Foundations of...

Anonymous: "Excellent site. Plenty of helpful information here. I am sending it to some..." in Constructing a Theory of...

Robert McEachern: ""all experiments have pointed towards this and there is no way to avoid..." in Review of "Foundations of...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

Can Time Be Saved From Physics?
Philosophers, physicists and neuroscientists discuss how our sense of time’s flow might arise through our interactions with external stimuli—despite suggestions from Einstein's relativity that our perception of the passage of time is an illusion.

Thermo-Demonics
A devilish new framework of thermodynamics that focuses on how we observe information could help illuminate our understanding of probability and rewrite quantum theory.

Gravity's Residue
An unusual approach to unifying the laws of physics could solve Hawking's black-hole information paradox—and its predicted gravitational "memory effect" could be picked up by LIGO.

Could Mind Forge the Universe?
Objective reality, and the laws of physics themselves, emerge from our observations, according to a new framework that turns what we think of as fundamental on its head.

Dissolving Quantum Paradoxes
The impossibility of building a perfect clock could help explain away microscale weirdness.


FQXi FORUM
May 25, 2019

CATEGORY: Questioning the Foundations Essay Contest (2012) [back]
TOPIC: New Arguments for Galileo by Evgeny Rozovskiy [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Author Evgeny Rozovskiy wrote on Aug. 27, 2012 @ 17:40 GMT
Essay Abstract

It is known that the Einstein's space-time, dark matter / energy and Higgs's boson is modern progressive scientific theories. Aristotle's ether long ago will reject, as error. But if to think, in what distinction is characteristic?

Author Bio

I was educated at the University of Moscow. My specialty is energetic, calling - Physics. Now I work a power engineer in the engineering office in Berlin.

Download Essay PDF File

Bookmark and Share
post approved


Peter Jackson wrote on Aug. 29, 2012 @ 08:06 GMT
Evgeny

Allowing for the language issue I agree your essays theme has much to commend it. I hope I may have demonstrated some if it's truth in my own essay.

Best wishes

Peter

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author Evgeny Rozovskiy replied on Oct. 4, 2012 @ 07:37 GMT
Dear Peter,

I read your essay. The phenomenon, which you have shown is the visual manifestation of a more general, comprehensive law of nature. Many scientists from different sides came close to its opening. I also had some success in explaining the structure of the universe.

Unfortunately I have not so far translated into English a single work. I can offer you work in Russian and in German on www.derselber.ru

Sincerely Evgeny

Bookmark and Share



eAmazigh M. HANNOU wrote on Sep. 11, 2012 @ 02:19 GMT
Dear Evgeny,

I did a quick read but I chose this:

" To remove water from a cup, it is necessary to fill it instead of water by the air. Further, in my

interpretation to remove air from a cup, we should fill the cup instead of air by the ether. Thus,

the cup can not be empty, only one medium can be replaced by another. Ether, according to

Aristotle, "is more subtle substance" than the air."

See my essay : http://www.fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1552

All the best with your essay!

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Sergey G Fedosin wrote on Sep. 14, 2012 @ 14:54 GMT
Dear Evgeny,

See in my essay about gravitons ether and dark matter. There is another way to understand the reality.

Sergey Fedosin

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Felix M Lev wrote on Oct. 1, 2012 @ 02:04 GMT
Уважаемы
81; Евгений,

И
079;вините, если мой вопрос неподход
03;щий. Буду признате
83;ен, если ответите, являетес
00; ли Вы сыном Михаила Розовско
75;о, который учился в МФТИ в 1964-1970гг., а потом работал во Владивос
90;оке. Заранее благодар
77;н, Феликс Лев.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author Evgeny Rozovskiy replied on Oct. 4, 2012 @ 07:40 GMT
HET

Bookmark and Share



Felix M Lev wrote on Oct. 1, 2012 @ 02:08 GMT
Dear Evgeny,

Please excuse me for my question. I did not expect that a Russian text will not be converted correctly but hope that the question is clear. Thank you. Felix Lev.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Sergey G Fedosin wrote on Oct. 2, 2012 @ 09:18 GMT
After studying about 250 essays in this contest, I realize now, how can I assess the level of each submitted work. Accordingly, I rated some essays, including yours.

Cood luck.

Sergey Fedosin

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Sergey G Fedosin wrote on Oct. 4, 2012 @ 06:10 GMT
If you do not understand why your rating dropped down. As I found ratings in the contest are calculated in the next way. Suppose your rating is
and
was the quantity of people which gave you ratings. Then you have
of points. After it anyone give you
of points so you have
of points and
is the common quantity of the people which gave you ratings. At the same time you will have
of points. From here, if you want to be R2 > R1 there must be:
or
or
In other words if you want to increase rating of anyone you must give him more points
then the participant`s rating
was at the moment you rated him. From here it is seen that in the contest are special rules for ratings. And from here there are misunderstanding of some participants what is happened with their ratings. Moreover since community ratings are hided some participants do not sure how increase ratings of others and gives them maximum 10 points. But in the case the scale from 1 to 10 of points do not work, and some essays are overestimated and some essays are drop down. In my opinion it is a bad problem with this Contest rating process. I hope the FQXI community will change the rating process.

Sergey Fedosin

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Vladimir Rogozhin wrote on Oct. 5, 2012 @ 11:23 GMT
Dear Evgeny!

Very interesting and profound ideas in your essay. The idea of rotation, the idea of ​​vortices is not sufficiently advanced in fundamental physics. But it looks like a rock is moved. You probably know, there is a good article by Alexander Zenkin "Scientific counter-revolution in mathematics." He concluded: ".. he truth should be drawn and should be presented to" an unlimited circle "of spectators". Wonderful pictures! Highest score your ideas and your conclusions.

Sincerely, Vladimir

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.