Search FQXi

If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Forum Home
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the blogger are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help


John Merryman: "The problem is that we do experience reality as those discrete flashes of..." in The Quantum...

Thomas Ray: "(reposted in correct thread) Lorraine, Nah. That's nothing like my view...." in 2015 in Review: New...

Lorraine Ford: "Clearly “law-of-nature” relationships and associated numbers represent..." in Physics of the Observer -...

Lee Bloomquist: "Information Channel. An example from Jon Barwise. At the workshop..." in Physics of the Observer -...

Lee Bloomquist: "Please clarify. I just tried to put a simple model of an observer in the..." in Alternative Models of...

Lee Bloomquist: "Footnote...for the above post, the one with the equation existence =..." in Alternative Models of...

Thomas Ray: "In fact, symmetry is the most pervasive physical principle that exists. ..." in “Spookiness”...

Thomas Ray: "It's easy to get wound around the axle with black hole thermodynamics,..." in “Spookiness”...

click titles to read articles

Why Time Might Not Be an Illusion
Einstein’s relativity pushes physicists towards a picture of the universe as a block, in which the past, present, and future all exist on the same footing; but maybe that shift in thinking has gone too far.

The Complexity Conundrum
Resolving the black hole firewall paradox—by calculating what a real astronaut would compute at the black hole's edge.

Quantum Dream Time
Defining a ‘quantum clock’ and a 'quantum ruler' could help those attempting to unify physics—and solve the mystery of vanishing time.

Our Place in the Multiverse
Calculating the odds that intelligent observers arise in parallel universes—and working out what they might see.

Sounding the Drums to Listen for Gravity’s Effect on Quantum Phenomena
A bench-top experiment could test the notion that gravity breaks delicate quantum superpositions.

March 17, 2018

CATEGORY: Blog [back]
TOPIC: The Eagle Has Flown [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Blogger William Orem wrote on Aug. 27, 2012 @ 14:32 GMT

Here's to Neil Armstrong, a hero not just for America, but for humanity. The next person to walk on the moon will no doubt be Chinese, but no matter; even though space travel was born in the Cold War, there's a definite "one world" quality to achievements of such magnitude. I'm still holding out hope that there will be bootprints on Mars within our lifetimes.

For anyone interested in the moon, here's a blog post I did a while back on the concern--not as crazy as it sounds!--that returning Apollo astronauts might infect the earth with lunar microbes.

A follow up: Is The Moon Alive?

Cosmos Magazine has a similar idea:

And, finally, some thoughts on the 40th anniversary of Armstrong's "giant leap":

Bookmark and Share
this post has been edited by the author since its original submission

report post as inappropriate

Steve Dufourny wrote on Sep. 1, 2012 @ 16:08 GMT
Hello to all,

the distribution of primes is relevant when we consider a finite sphere in evolution. Can we prove that the hypothesis of Riemann is correct.....

It seems relevant when we insert the fourier series and the finite groups. The serie of uniqueness seems universally linked with the primes and the sphere.

The distribution of primes is inside a sphere !!!

Bookmark and Share
this post has been edited by the author since its original submission

report post as inappropriate

Steve Dufourny replied on Sep. 2, 2012 @ 14:04 GMT

Let's take the number 1 for the central sphere of our universal sphere and the number 1 for the universal sphere. If we take a simple oscillation between these two 1. So we can have a specific finite number of primes.With a kind of maximum.It can be coorelated with the maximum volume and the other volumes of spheres.

Bookmark and Share
this post has been edited by the author since its original submission

report post as inappropriate

Steve Dufourny replied on Sep. 4, 2012 @ 11:00 GMT
The real difficulty is this number, universal. It is a number so important. And I don't speak about volumes and rotations. This number is the same for the uniqueness serie at the two scales, in 3D. It is like I sad that the quantum uniqueness is a relativistic foto of our universal sphere and its spheres. This cosmological number is the same that the quantum number of this uniqueness. It is relevant considering a specific unique oscillation of primes implying a kind of maximum. Paradoxal but logic. This number and its volumes more the rotations are the key of many things inside our pure physicality in evolution complexification spherization optimization.

See that the space, hv and m are in the same logic considering the uniqueness serie like this cosmological number. It is fascibnating when we extrapolate the maximum contact between enatngled spheres.indeed the lattices dissapear when the contact is maximum due to the serie begining from the main central sphere, 1.The fractal is relevant when the volumes decrease towards the smaller spheres.If the primes are correlated, it becomes very relevant with the rotating spherical volumes.

The infinity, the infinities and the finite groups can be classed with the primes like a chief orchestra. This period, this oscillation, this unique frequence is relevant.


Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Steve Dufourny replied on Sep. 4, 2012 @ 11:02 GMT
The surface of a sphere and its spheres is relevant considering the smallest sphers, see that the polarity m/hv is relevant with the volumes and the rotations for the synchros and sortings of evolutive complexification.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.