Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home


Previous Contests

What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018
Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discusswinners

Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.
read/discusswinners

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discusswinners

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discusswinners

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discusswinners

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Sergey Fedosin: on 10/4/12 at 6:22am UTC, wrote If you do not understand why your rating dropped down. As I found ratings...

Benjamin Dribus: on 9/20/12 at 5:43am UTC, wrote Dear Eric, I agree with the statement that what we call "particles" have...

Hoang Hai: on 9/19/12 at 16:06pm UTC, wrote Dear Very interesting to see your essay. Perhaps all of us are convinced...

ABRAHAM: on 8/26/12 at 6:09am UTC, wrote Eric, Firstly, congrats on a well-worded essay highlighting the often...

Eric Brunhouse: on 8/24/12 at 12:07pm UTC, wrote Essay Abstract I define geometric and nongeometric interaction of...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Hanvi jobs: "Yes i am totally agreed with this article and i just want say that this..." in Can Time Be Saved From...

Joe Fisher: "Dear Dr. Kuhn, Today’s Closer To Truth Facebook page contained this..." in Can Time Be Saved From...

Robert McEachern: ""all experiments have pointed towards this and there is no way to avoid..." in Review of "Foundations of...

James Putnam: "Light bends because it is accelerating. It accelerates toward an object..." in Black Hole Photographed...

Robert McEachern: "Lorenzo, The nature of "information" is well understood outside of..." in Review of "Foundations of...

Georgina Woodward: "Steve, Lorraine is writing about a simpler "knowing " rather than the..." in The Nature of Time

Steve Agnew: "Knowing information necessarily means neural action potentials. Atom and..." in The Nature of Time


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

Can Time Be Saved From Physics?
Philosophers, physicists and neuroscientists discuss how our sense of time’s flow might arise through our interactions with external stimuli—despite suggestions from Einstein's relativity that our perception of the passage of time is an illusion.

Thermo-Demonics
A devilish new framework of thermodynamics that focuses on how we observe information could help illuminate our understanding of probability and rewrite quantum theory.

Gravity's Residue
An unusual approach to unifying the laws of physics could solve Hawking's black-hole information paradox—and its predicted gravitational "memory effect" could be picked up by LIGO.

Could Mind Forge the Universe?
Objective reality, and the laws of physics themselves, emerge from our observations, according to a new framework that turns what we think of as fundamental on its head.

Dissolving Quantum Paradoxes
The impossibility of building a perfect clock could help explain away microscale weirdness.


FQXi FORUM
May 22, 2019

CATEGORY: Questioning the Foundations Essay Contest (2012) [back]
TOPIC: Geometric and Nongeometric Interaction by Eric Frederick Brunhouse [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Author Eric Frederick Brunhouse wrote on Aug. 24, 2012 @ 12:07 GMT
Essay Abstract

I define geometric and nongeometric interaction of particles and then relate how those definitions apply in detail to physical phenomena at the foundations of general relativity and quantum mechanics, rigorously fleshing out assumptions of fundamental geometry. The geometric equivalence law is stated, and it is shown how symmetry in gauge theory necessarily follows directly from it. The presence of the imaginary number in quantum physics is then explained as a necessary physical consequence of geometric and nongeometric interaction. I present the case the classification is a more empirical, constructive, and general view of facts rigorous, modern experiments direct us to make and opens opportunities for new experiments in the future here to not fully considered, that are not self-contradicting as they appear with the contemporary view.

Author Bio

I was first stricken by the lack of clarity in derivations of quantum mechanics when I was 16. The credibility of my interest resulted in an internship with Professor Saul Adelman while I was in high school who graciously published me with him on a paper, uvby Photometry of HR 2722 and Nonmagnetic Chemically Peculiar Stars. I then studied physics at Rutgers eventually mentored with Professor Avy Soffer. I became interested in beginning a lifelong career in a different field, but I have worked seriously on foundational problems in physics for over 16 years.

Download Essay PDF File

Bookmark and Share



ABRAHAM wrote on Aug. 26, 2012 @ 06:09 GMT
Eric,

Firstly, congrats on a well-worded essay highlighting the often under-estimated role of geometry in Physics.

To that end I would like to offer you a solution that provides just such an answer that you hint at in your essay - namely my theory Tetryonics - the charged geometry of EM mass-ENERGY-Matter [as outlined in my essay of the same title].

Its priori foundation is that Energy has a equilateral [triangular] geometry and from that geometry all mass-Matter geometries arise along with our Forces and Constants etc. You will find a great deal more information on these processes on my YouTube channel [extending the outline offered in my essay].

I agree totally with you that it is the geometry that defines our mathematical formulations and without a geometrically defined model on which to base our Math we constantly need to refine it in order to better reflect observed physical phenomena.

Two illustrations are attached to that end highlighting geometric solutions to Bell's formulation and wave-functions [as they apply to the equilateral geometries of Charge and EM waves respectively]

Of note is the fact that the current Maths does not change [except where it is incorrectly formulated] only the underlying geometry changes [equilateral vs spherical]

To date I have applied Tetryonic geometry to QM, QED, Chemistry, Cosmology, SR & GR with outstanding results and I trust you will find then enlightening as well.

I know you will find common ground with Tetryonics and the principals you have outlined in your essay

attachments: Figure_24.04__Heisenberg_Uncertainty_Principle_800x600.jpg, 1_Figure_39.07__Matter_in_motion_800x600.jpg

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Hoang cao Hai wrote on Sep. 19, 2012 @ 16:06 GMT
Dear

Very interesting to see your essay.

Perhaps all of us are convinced that: the choice of yourself is right!That of course is reasonable.

So may be we should work together to let's the consider clearly defined for the basis foundations theoretical as the most challenging with intellectual of all of us.

Why we do not try to start with a real challenge is very close and are the focus of interest of the human science: it is a matter of mass and grain Higg boson of the standard model.

Knowledge and belief reasoning of you will to express an opinion on this matter:

You have think that: the Mass is the expression of the impact force to material - so no impact force, we do not feel the Higg boson - similar to the case of no weight outside the Earth's atmosphere.

Does there need to be a particle with mass for everything have volume? If so, then why the mass of everything change when moving from the Earth to the Moon? Higg boson is lighter by the Moon's gravity is weaker than of Earth?

The LHC particle accelerator used to "Smashed" until "Ejected" Higg boson, but why only when the "Smashed" can see it,and when off then not see it ?

Can be "locked" Higg particles? so when "released" if we do not force to it by any the Force, how to know that it is "out" or not?

You are should be boldly to give a definition of weight that you think is right for us to enjoy, or oppose my opinion.

Because in the process of research, the value of "failure" or "success" is the similar with science. The purpose of a correct theory be must is without any a wrong point ?

Glad to see from you comments soon,because still have too many of the same problems.

Regards !

Hải.Caohoàng of THE INCORRECT ASSUMPTIONS AND A CORRECT THEORY

August 23, 2012 - 11:51 GMT on this essay contest.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Member Benjamin F. Dribus wrote on Sep. 20, 2012 @ 05:43 GMT
Dear Eric,

I agree with the statement that what we call "particles" have "irreconcilable precedence over space, a concept unobservable by itself." I believe that spacetime is a way of talking about interactions. Take care,

Ben Dribus

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Sergey G Fedosin wrote on Oct. 4, 2012 @ 06:22 GMT
If you do not understand why your rating dropped down. As I found ratings in the contest are calculated in the next way. Suppose your rating is
and
was the quantity of people which gave you ratings. Then you have
of points. After it anyone give you
of points so you have
of points and
is the common quantity of the people which gave you ratings. At the same time you will have
of points. From here, if you want to be R2 > R1 there must be:
or
or
In other words if you want to increase rating of anyone you must give him more points
then the participant`s rating
was at the moment you rated him. From here it is seen that in the contest are special rules for ratings. And from here there are misunderstanding of some participants what is happened with their ratings. Moreover since community ratings are hided some participants do not sure how increase ratings of others and gives them maximum 10 points. But in the case the scale from 1 to 10 of points do not work, and some essays are overestimated and some essays are drop down. In my opinion it is a bad problem with this Contest rating process. I hope the FQXI community will change the rating process.

Sergey Fedosin

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.