Search FQXi

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home

Previous Contests

What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018
Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation

Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008

Forum Home
Introduction

Order posts by:
chronological order
most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Sergey Fedosin: on 10/4/12 at 6:32am UTC, wrote If you do not understand why your rating dropped down. As I found ratings...

leo vuyk: on 10/2/12 at 23:34pm UTC, wrote Thanks Sergey for your 1.0 rating, the highest! Yes all particles are...

Sergey Fedosin: on 10/2/12 at 10:35am UTC, wrote After studying about 250 essays in this contest, I realize now, how can I...

Sergey Fedosin: on 9/20/12 at 8:15am UTC, wrote It is last post at the page: http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1410 ...

leo vuyk: on 9/20/12 at 7:56am UTC, wrote Dear Sergey, What is the date or name of the last post you are pointing...

Sergey Fedosin: on 9/20/12 at 6:30am UTC, wrote Dear Leo, Please see last post at my page about Higgs and other...

Leo Vuyk: on 8/30/12 at 18:16pm UTC, wrote Support for the primordial Black Hole evaporating Big Bang. Millions of...

Leo Vuyk: on 8/25/12 at 17:09pm UTC, wrote Thanks Ted, However: I think that there is complete symmetry if the big...

RECENT FORUM POSTS

Georgina Woodward: "State latency is an explanation for the results of Stern Gerlach experiment..." in Schrödinger’s Zombie:...

Joe Fisher: "Today’s Closer To Truth Facebook page contained this peculiar piece of..." in First Things First: The...

Joe Fisher: "Today’s Closer To Truth Facebook page contained this peculiar piece of..." in First Things First: The...

Eckard Blumschein: "Isn't symmetry simply closely related to redundancy even if physicist may..." in Will A.I. Take Over...

Robert Rise: "Meet many types of women on ihookup. Some dates better than others. It is..." in Time in Physics & Entropy...

Steve Dufourny: "FQXI you too I need your help, come all too we have a work to do there..." in Will A.I. Take Over...

Steve Dufourny: "lol REVOLUTION SPHERISATION everywhere at all scales,REVOLUTION..." in Alternative Models of...

Georgina Woodward: "The kind of time required, over which the material change is happening, (to..." in Schrödinger’s Zombie:...

RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

First Things First: The Physics of Causality
Why do we remember the past and not the future? Untangling the connections between cause and effect, choice, and entropy.

Can Time Be Saved From Physics?
Philosophers, physicists and neuroscientists discuss how our sense of time’s flow might arise through our interactions with external stimuli—despite suggestions from Einstein's relativity that our perception of the passage of time is an illusion.

Thermo-Demonics
A devilish new framework of thermodynamics that focuses on how we observe information could help illuminate our understanding of probability and rewrite quantum theory.

Gravity's Residue
An unusual approach to unifying the laws of physics could solve Hawking's black-hole information paradox—and its predicted gravitational "memory effect" could be picked up by LIGO.

Could Mind Forge the Universe?
Objective reality, and the laws of physics themselves, emerge from our observations, according to a new framework that turns what we think of as fundamental on its head.

FQXi FORUM
October 24, 2019

CATEGORY: Questioning the Foundations Essay Contest (2012) [back]
TOPIC: The Bouncing CP Symmetrical Multiverse, Based on a Massless but Energetic Oscillating (Non SM Higgs) Vacuum Particle System by Leo Vuyk [refresh]

Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Author Leo Vuyk wrote on Aug. 22, 2012 @ 11:34 GMT
Essay Abstract

This essay presents some features of a non Standard Model philosophy called the Quantum Function Follows Form model (Q-FFF). It is assumed that the different Functions in nature are based on Form differences of real particles with different internal and external structure and that the Higgs is the origin of all basic singular particles by its convertibility. Quarks are supposed to be compound particles with one, two or three electrons or positrons as a base merged with one or two real Gluons. In the Q-FFF model, mass is interpreted as the capacity of real shaped and spinning Fermions to produce gravitons, as the resulting (form) information products of collisions with an alternative (non-Standard Model) Higgs vacuum lattice system. Consequently the Higgs system itself can have no mass, it is supposed to be the transportation device for graviton- and other photonic information. Thus the Higgs mass found in the LHC at Geneva of 126 GeV, is interpreted as pure oscillatory energy of real “new Higgs” vacuum particles. The new Higgs particles are supposed to be convertible by an internal rotational structure they are responsible for the creation of “Something” out of “Nothing” and a counter balance for all forces in nature.

Author Bio

Leo Vuyk studied at the Technical University of Delft grade : Engineer (Ir, = Msc) in 1971 (architecture). Interests: Quantum- and Astro physics, Philosophy.

Ted Erikson wrote on Aug. 23, 2012 @ 21:09 GMT
Not up to date. Does nature recognize fancy mathematics? My essay is perhaps overly simplified, but addresses the real problem of Physics. Wherein lies "consciousness"? Very murky, but emergentism (growth) and panpsychism (memory are properties suggested that aligns them with probabilities of a 1-D, 2-D, and 3-D geometric world.Activity of sphere and tetrahedron are identical in model proposed. See:

To Seek Unknown Shores

http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1409

report post as inappropriate

Leo Vuyk replied on Aug. 25, 2012 @ 17:09 GMT
Thanks Ted,

However:

I think that there is complete symmetry if the big bang produced “fully entangled CP symmetric copy universe bubbles at a long distance”

Entangled even down to the Planck scale.

Then our universe is not any more unique and even humans have to deal with a shared consciousness with our anti-matter copy brothers and sisters over there ( inside the raspberry shaped multiverse)

report post as inappropriate

Leo Vuyk replied on Aug. 30, 2012 @ 18:16 GMT
Support for the primordial Black Hole evaporating Big Bang.

Millions of galactic Black holes found by WISE.

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/WISE/news/wise2012082
9.html

Black Hole 'Bonanza': Millions Found by NASA Space Telescope called “Galactic hot DOGs”

report post as inappropriate

Sergey G Fedosin wrote on Sep. 20, 2012 @ 06:30 GMT
Dear Leo,

Please see last post at my page about Higgs and other particles.

Sergey Fedosin

report post as inappropriate

leo vuyk replied on Sep. 20, 2012 @ 07:56 GMT
Dear Sergey,

What is the date or name of the last post you are pointing at?

report post as inappropriate

Sergey G Fedosin wrote on Sep. 20, 2012 @ 08:15 GMT
It is last post at the page:

http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1410

Author Sergey G Fedosin replied on Sep. 19, 2012 @ 19:00 GMT

report post as inappropriate

Sergey G Fedosin wrote on Oct. 2, 2012 @ 10:35 GMT
After studying about 250 essays in this contest, I realize now, how can I assess the level of each submitted work. Accordingly, I rated some essays, including yours.

Cood luck.

Sergey Fedosin

report post as inappropriate

leo vuyk replied on Oct. 2, 2012 @ 23:34 GMT
Thanks Sergey for your 1.0 rating, the highest!

Yes all particles are nested in some way according to my Q-FFF theory.

The Higgs is the only 2D particle the rest is 3D and often nested (merged ) with other converted Higgs particles.

so the multiverse is based on only Higgses converted or not.

report post as inappropriate

Sergey G Fedosin wrote on Oct. 4, 2012 @ 06:32 GMT
If you do not understand why your rating dropped down. As I found ratings in the contest are calculated in the next way. Suppose your rating is
$R_1$
and
$N_1$
was the quantity of people which gave you ratings. Then you have
$S_1=R_1 N_1$
of points. After it anyone give you
$dS$
of points so you have
$S_2=S_1+ dS$
of points and
$N_2=N_1+1$
is the common quantity of the people which gave you ratings. At the same time you will have
$S_2=R_2 N_2$
of points. From here, if you want to be R2 > R1 there must be:
$S_2/ N_2>S_1/ N_1$
or
$(S_1+ dS) / (N_1+1) >S_1/ N_1$
or
$dS >S_1/ N_1 =R_1$
In other words if you want to increase rating of anyone you must give him more points
$dS$
then the participant`s rating
$R_1$
was at the moment you rated him. From here it is seen that in the contest are special rules for ratings. And from here there are misunderstanding of some participants what is happened with their ratings. Moreover since community ratings are hided some participants do not sure how increase ratings of others and gives them maximum 10 points. But in the case the scale from 1 to 10 of points do not work, and some essays are overestimated and some essays are drop down. In my opinion it is a bad problem with this Contest rating process. I hope the FQXI community will change the rating process.

Sergey Fedosin

report post as inappropriate

Login or create account to post reply or comment.