CATEGORY:
Questioning the Foundations Essay Contest (2012)
[back]
TOPIC:
Is Dimensionality Has a Beginning or in Eternity? by Jayakar Johnson Joseph
[refresh]
Login or
create account to post reply or comment.
Author Jayakar Johnson Joseph wrote on Jul. 30, 2012 @ 16:28 GMT
Essay AbstractIn this article, the scenario of dimensionality is claimed as the key foundation of nature to describe matter, space, energy and mass of the universe, in that, we explain that ‘dimensionality’ is not only to describes the dimensions of quantity but also the phenomena by which dimensions emerge, that is not described with our current assumptions. Non-expressiveness of, Quantum universe and Hierarchy of universe fails to describe a segmental universe for adapting the laws of thermodynamics and expresses the inability to unify gravitation with other fundamental interactions, in that, the current scenario of dimensionality on an inflationary universe predicts Gravitational collapse. Thus another scenario of dimensionality by ‘Coherently-cyclic cluster-matter universe model’ is adopted to investigate the foundations of nature in that the, ‘dimensionality’ appears by the eigen-rotations of cluster-matter strings is as three-dimensional tetrahedral-branes; and in this the fundamental matters are considered as string like structures rather than point like particles. Besides, ‘time’ is defined as discrete quantum time in reference with the flow of time that emerges from, eigen-rotations of cluster-matter strings in holarchy, in that Chiral symmetry descriptions is significant. Dark matter and Dark energy in relation with Neutrino, is considered to define a generic wave mechanics from Neutrino oscillation. Consistently, we recommend Parton as a string segment of quark and gluon that emerges new physics in accordance with the search of Higgs boson and evolve new assumptions on the foundations of nature. With these arguments, incompleteness of different cosmological models in reference with the causality of beginning, is explored and concluded that our Basic physical assumptions that are wrong in the foundations of nature is the ‘dimensionality’ and thus, adaptations on the existing scenario of dimensionality, is recommend.
Author Bio1977: Completion of medical graduation, 1979–1995: Private medical practice and software designing in Healthcare, 1995 onwards: Research in alternative cosmology, 2000: developed a generic methodology, ‘Triplet clustering and computing the Heterogeneous-matters of Universe’, 2006 onwards: Teaching faculty in Medical Radiological Physics, 2009: Completed a course on Diploma in Astronomy and Astrophysics, on 2010 onwards: Published patent applications on ‘Coherently-cyclic Cluster-matter universe model’ and waiting for the granting of patent. Work abstract at, http://www.clustermatteruniverse.net
Download Essay PDF File
Jeff Baugher wrote on Aug. 22, 2012 @ 15:15 GMT
Jayakar,
Much of the terminology I am unfamiliar with, but can you elaborate on what you mean by "cosmic consciousness" within the following paragraph as related to anthropic principles?
"Fine-tuned universe that supports anthropic principle arising from the existence of many undefined dimensionless fundamental physical constants is supportive of variable cosmic potency in locality that describes cosmic consciousness and biophysical determinants that are causal for the biological evolution in locality, in that our assumptions needs adaptations on 'dimensionality' to support the emerging new physics Beyond Standard Model."
report post as inappropriate
Author Jayakar Johnson Joseph wrote on Aug. 23, 2012 @ 19:50 GMT
Dear Jeff Baugher,
Thank you for your interest on this article.
Consciousness of a system is the sense of awareness of its own.
In this context, we may assume that cosmic consciousness is similar to biological consciousness, as the system itself is the universe.
When we define the unit of consciousness, it is the function of information flux for the static information in unit volume.
In accordance with thermodynamics, energy flux is the information flux and entropy is the static information, in that entropy is relativistic in a segmental universe.
As entropy state function in a locality is related with chemical potential and the entropic gravity of that locality, the combination of chemical potential with gravitational potential is defined as the cosmic potential of that location.
Abundance of this cosmic potential in organic materials of the biological system is indicative of the specific biological evolution in locality, by a homeomorphic segmental-fluctuation of the universe.
As consciousness is expressional as a function of, ‘information’, the anthropic principle that describes the physical universe in compatible with ‘conscious life’ of the biological systems, may have some similarities with the description of biological consciousness within the scenario of, ‘cosmic consciousness’, by this paradigm of universe.
With best regards,
Jayakar
Alan Lowey wrote on Aug. 25, 2012 @ 11:54 GMT
Dear Jayakar,
I've read some of your recent posts on others' essay entries and was impressed by the imagery that I received because it seemed similar to my own ideas. I would be grateful if you would read my idea on condensed string-like irregular matter produced at the centre of stars and then distributted to the planets via supernovae. I have linked the problems with Milankovitch Theory Ice Age problms with the gravity problem. It works beautifully imo.
Newtons Isotropy and Equivalence Is Simplicity That Has Led to Modern Day Mass Misconceptions of RealityBest wishes,
Alan
report post as inappropriate
Author Jayakar Johnson Joseph replied on Aug. 25, 2012 @ 16:01 GMT
Dear Alan Lowey,
Thank you for your interest on this essay and some of my posts at other’s essays.
As strings are in continuum, mass is not defined as the number of strings in a volume and it is a quantity of string lengths in that volume.
Orbital eccentricity and axial tilt of earth described in Milankovitch theory indicates the possibility of holarchial clustering of the universe in that the astrodynamics of each planet in the observable orbital are extended in the celestial sphere.
With best regards,
Jayakar
Yuri Danoyan wrote on Sep. 6, 2012 @ 23:39 GMT
Dear Jayakar
I invent notion "tetrahedron logic" and then made conclusion
Read my essay http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1413
report post as inappropriate
Author Jayakar Johnson Joseph replied on Sep. 7, 2012 @ 04:46 GMT
Dear Yuri Danoyan,
Thank you for your interest on this article.
In this paradigm, quantization of universe is expressional by tetrahedral-brane, in that Planck constant to be redefined.
With best regards,
Jayakar
Yuri Danoyan replied on Sep. 9, 2012 @ 19:09 GMT
About tetrahedral logic
http://www.fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/946
report post as inappropriate
Author Jayakar Johnson Joseph replied on Sep. 10, 2012 @ 03:35 GMT
Dear Yuri Danoyan,
3-D Tetrahedral-brane is a geometric object from a primitive of 1-D string between two points, when eigen-rotation of that string is expressional in time.
With best regards,
Jayakar
Yuri Danoyan replied on Sep. 10, 2012 @ 05:20 GMT
Javakar
When are you going to read my essay?
http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1413#addPost
report post as inappropriate
Author Jayakar Johnson Joseph replied on Sep. 10, 2012 @ 13:29 GMT
Dear Yuri Danoyan,
I have gone through your essay and posted my opinion.
With best regards,
Jayakar
Yuri Danoyan replied on Sep. 11, 2012 @ 16:31 GMT
Jayakar,
Don't forget about rotational symmetry groups of the tetrahedron, finite group = 12.
I guess it connected with number of fermions in Standart model.
See also my article about number 12.
http://vixra.org/abs/0907.0014
report post as inappropriate
Author Jayakar Johnson Joseph replied on Sep. 12, 2012 @ 07:21 GMT
Dear Yuri Danoyan,
Thank you for your reply.
Tetrahedral symmetry and transformations are applicable for the quantization and dynamics of tetrahedral-brane in string continuum, whereas law of sines for tetrahedra is imperative.
As there is restructuring of atomic analogy predicted in this paradigm, integration of all fermions of Standard Model with this paradigm to be investigated for the adaptation of this paradigm with mainstream physics.
With best regards,
Jayakar
Yuri Danoyan replied on Sep. 14, 2012 @ 16:56 GMT
Hi Joseph
Could you please help me.
I want to read about tetrahedron -brane etc
Can you give me references?
I don't undertand you transparently
i need more details.
Thank you for advance
Yuri Danoyan
report post as inappropriate
Author Jayakar Johnson Joseph replied on Sep. 15, 2012 @ 06:01 GMT
Dear Yuri Danoyan,
Thank you for the reply.
Tetrahedral transformation of eigen-rotational string, is the formalism of tetrahedral-brane and coherently-cyclic matter-strings of such tetrahedral-branes are clustered into
non-propagating compound tetrahedral-branes, that is conjugational.With best regards,
Jayakar
attachments:
Eigenrotational_string.jpg
Yuri Danoyan replied on Sep. 15, 2012 @ 18:06 GMT
Dear Jayakar
I would like to show my other works.
i hope we can find out bridge between as
http://vixra.org/abs/0907.0022
An attempt of interpretation and application in modern physics "recipe" of Pauli: "Division and reduction of symmetry this then is the kernel of the brut!"
It is really up-down approach
report post as inappropriate
Yuri Danoyan replied on Sep. 15, 2012 @ 18:10 GMT
My other work
http://vixra.org/abs/0907.0012
If trigonometric tangent covered interval (0 to 1 to infinity) I try count the proton mass as imaginative unit of the Universe? Then reveal where to go other particles. Result-interesting phenomenon 18 degrees for pseudoscalar mesons.
report post as inappropriate
Author Jayakar Johnson Joseph replied on Sep. 16, 2012 @ 11:34 GMT
Dear Yuri Danoyan,
With reference to your post on Sep. 15, 2012; 18:06 GMT, I would like to express the fractal dimension of holarchial clustering, describing the coherent and incoherent cluster-matters in this paradigm; by an attached diagram herewith.
With best regards,
Jayakar
attachments:
Fractal_dimension_of_holarchial_clustering.jpg
Author Jayakar Johnson Joseph replied on Sep. 16, 2012 @ 14:39 GMT
Dear Yuri Danoyan,
In relevant to your post, on Sep. 15, 2012, 18:10 GMT, the following may explain your enquiry:
To express the string nature of matters from particles; a minimum of two quarks are required to describe a string segment with a gluon in between to glue them. Thereby a compound tetrahedral-brane contains six quarks. I think, the 18 observational angles on observing a meson is indicative of describing the structure of the meson in analogy with a cluster of compound tetrahedral-branes that contains 9 string segments of 18 quarks as vertices, with gluons in between them.
With best regards,
Jayakar
Yuri Danoyan replied on Sep. 17, 2012 @ 17:00 GMT
My interpretation is different: i saw here something like resonances around proton-major tone,other particles like undertones and overtones.
report post as inappropriate
Author Jayakar Johnson Joseph replied on Sep. 18, 2012 @ 01:24 GMT
Dear Yuri Danoyan,
String of matters: including air columns, is requisite for acoustic resonance. If we define a generic wave mechanics, NMR is also expressional by string dynamics as the nucleus of an element is a defined domain of dense tetrahedral-branes, as per this paradigm.
I think the causality of earthquake is the resonance of gravitational waves that have frequency lesser than Infrasound, travelling across the universe in periodicity, causal by homeomorphic segmental-fluctuations.
With best regards,
Jayakar
hide replies
George Rajna wrote on Sep. 8, 2012 @ 13:47 GMT
Excellent!
report post as inappropriate
Author Jayakar Johnson Joseph replied on Sep. 8, 2012 @ 18:59 GMT
Thanks a lot, dear George.
Jayakar
George Rajna replied on Sep. 8, 2012 @ 19:20 GMT
This is my community rating on your essay.
report post as inappropriate
Author Jayakar Johnson Joseph replied on Sep. 8, 2012 @ 19:33 GMT
Viraj Fernando replied on Sep. 10, 2012 @ 03:01 GMT
Hi Jayakar,
I read your essay. However, it was difficult for me to understand the full scope of what you are saying because I am unfamiliar with most of the terminology you use. I wish I had a better grasp of your concepts.
Best regards,
Viraj
report post as inappropriate
Author Jayakar Johnson Joseph replied on Sep. 10, 2012 @ 14:34 GMT
Dear Viraj Fernando,
Thank you for your interest on this essay.
Big bang cosmology does not describe the emergence of dimensions for matters as the fundamental particles are described as 0 dimensional and thus we recommend
an alternative cosmological model in that the matters of universe are in continuum as strings rather than point like discrete particles.
I shall be much happy to answer any specific question on this paradigm, preferably in relevant to this essay.
With best regards,
Jayakar
Steve Dufourny replied on Sep. 17, 2012 @ 11:49 GMT
ahahaha hackers. Patrick Murphy and Hans Van Leunen,ahahah vanitious and envious yes with the friends of the bad team.ironical.You are how many in fact.Wait
between 10 and 15 I beleive. In fact your strategy is 1 not universal,2 bad,3 irrational,4 without real meaning in fact.In fact the global crisis is a reality and of course it lacks funds for labs and this and that.So in fact your comportments is logic for persons who are not really general. The monney interests you.ahahah me no.
Put it where I think band of comics. In team,and me alone, fortunally no? for your credibility . Ahahah irritating, full of hate, kill me band of comics.You are not really intresting in fact.You are just a kind of team from NY mixed with a kind of team of Netherlands. FqxI merits more, Mr Tegmark, Mr Aguire,Mr Witten merits a better team than these comics of sunday. A small team of a kind of limited extradimensionalists.Not general, not founfdamental, not universal. You make me think to a kind of young team of young mathematicians or physicists.With a kind of big vanity thinking that all is permitted just because you are unconsciousness in fact.I am persuaded that you laugh between you with a kind of hate shared between you. Ironical. Never adults, responsible will act like your team. a good team they say. I know all then names of people who were bad with me in the past due to my transparent critics. In fact they loose their time with the revenge of limited. In fact I have pity for these frustrated pseudo scientists.
Mr Verlinde, Mr Witten,MrTegmark,Mr Hooft , sort these persons of bad please, we are not in a circus here. business versus natural sciences,
Regards
report post as inappropriate
Author Jayakar Johnson Joseph replied on Sep. 17, 2012 @ 16:25 GMT
Hi, Dear Steve,
How do you do, I think you are fine.
So happy to hear from you after a long period, I think after 18 months.
During these hard days, I am happy that I am able to come out with some conclusions.
With best wishes and cheers,
Jayakar
hide replies
Thomas Wagner wrote on Sep. 11, 2012 @ 19:57 GMT
Jayakar
After reading you essay I am quite delighted you chose to post a comment on my essay. I am not nearly sufficiently conversant with string theory to offer a meaningful comment but I do have a couple of ideas about music and quantum mechanics.
It is sometimes said that when you study quantum mechanics you are studying music. Music theory can be difficult to study as in order to understand any of it you have to understand all of it. I wrote a series of papers titled Structural Resonance in which I defined the mathematics of music. I am surprised that many have difficulty understanding these papers as I feel they are quite simple.
The mathematics of harmonic structure and the mathematics of timbre are identical. Newton's thoughts about light suggest that the frequencies of light might also conform to these principles. I wonder if the frequencies of the vibrating strings of string theory do as well.
The vibrational structure that create music are non-linear and thus it is likely that all vibration is as well but the mathematics we use is linear. Because it deals with continuity and the resulting infinities I feel that the math we use hides the very structures of vibration and if string theory is correct vibration is the source of everything.
Einstein said this in 1954
I consider it quite possible that physics cannot be based
on the field concept, i.e., on continuous structures.
In that case, nothing remains of my entire castle in the air,
gravitation theory included, [and of] the rest of modern physics.
This could turn put to be the most significant thing he ever said.
report post as inappropriate
Author Jayakar Johnson Joseph wrote on Sep. 12, 2012 @ 14:39 GMT
Dear Thomas Wagner,
Thank you for your interest on this essay.
Classical string theory differs from the string mechanics described in this paradigm, in that the classical string theory is assigned to describe the oscillation of particles, whereas the oscillation of a defined length of matter as string has the probability of constructive interference with the strings of matters in isotropic oscillations and repetitive.
With best regards,
Jayakar
M. V. Vasilyeva wrote on Sep. 13, 2012 @ 20:34 GMT
Dear Jayakar,
I replied in my own thread, not realizing that it should have been in yours. Here it comes:
your essay was somewhat difficult for me to read, but I agree with your main point that "our inadequate perceptions of 'dimensionality'" hinders the progress in our understanding of the universe. Multidimensional string theorists notwithstanding, most of us need to start somewhere in accepting the fact that space has more dimensions than the directly observable 3. For the benefit of an average layman I show how an addition of only one spatial dimension dispels paradoxes and reveals a coherent scheme of the world, in which we can fit our own experience.
I believe that once we figure out the question of what is space, we could move on to more difficult and at the same time more pertinent questions of what is information and consciousness. Ancient teachings defined the universe as "the play of mind in emptiness". Translated into modern terms, it means "interaction of information with spacetime".
The concept of holarchy was new to me and I thank you for introducing me to it!
report post as inappropriate
Author Jayakar Johnson Joseph replied on Sep. 14, 2012 @ 02:22 GMT
Dear Vasilyeva,
Thank you for your interest on this essay.
Scenario of dimensionality that emerges in dynamics differs in this paradigm as matters are defined as 1-D string continuum rather than discrete 0-D particles.
With best regards,
Jayakar
Yuri Danoyan wrote on Sep. 15, 2012 @ 19:45 GMT
To my opinion interesting for you
http://upcommons.upc.edu/revistes/bitstream/2099/1195/1/s
t10-04-a1-ocr.pdf
report post as inappropriate
Author Jayakar Johnson Joseph replied on Sep. 16, 2012 @ 15:46 GMT
Dear Yuri Danoyan,
Crystallography and profound study on the properties of various crystals, is required to validate many of the postulations of this paradigm after integrating the string scenario in particle physics.
With best regards,
Jayakar
Hoang cao Hai wrote on Sep. 26, 2012 @ 08:19 GMT
Dear 3J
Very interesting to see your essay.
Perhaps all of us are convinced that: the choice of yourself is right!That of course is reasonable.
So may be we should work together to let's the consider clearly defined for the basis foundations theoretical as the most challenging with intellectual of all of us.
Why we do not try to start with a real challenge is very close and are the focus of interest of the human science: it is a matter of mass and grain Higg boson of the standard model.
Knowledge and belief reasoning of you will to express an opinion on this matter:
You have think that: the Mass is the expression of the impact force to material (definition from the ABSOLUTE theory of me) - so no impact force, we do not feel the Higg boson - similar to the case of no weight outside the Earth's atmosphere.
Does there need to be a particle with mass for everything have volume? If so, then why the mass of everything change when moving from the Earth to the Moon? Higg boson is lighter by the Moon's gravity is weaker than of Earth?
The LHC particle accelerator used to "Smashed" until "Ejected" Higg boson, but why only when the "Smashed" can see it,and when off then not see it ?
Can be "locked" Higg particles? so when "released" if we do not force to it by any the Force, how to know that it is "out" or not?
You are should be boldly to give a definition of weight that you think is right for us to enjoy, or oppose my opinion.
Because in the process of research, the value of "failure" or "success" is the similar with science. The purpose of a correct theory be must is without any a wrong point ?
Glad to see from you comments soon,because still have too many of the same problems.
Kind Regards !
Hải.Caohoàng of THE INCORRECT ASSUMPTIONS AND A CORRECT THEORY
August 23, 2012 - 11:51 GMT on this essay contest.
report post as inappropriate
Author Jayakar Johnson Joseph replied on Sep. 26, 2012 @ 21:55 GMT
Dear Hoang Cao Hai,
Thanking you for your interest on this essay and seeking cooperation to work together.
As per this paradigm the mass of an object is the total length of all strings in that object, whereas its density is the quantity of strings per volume, that is the mass per volume.
As the universe is expressional in continuum, the weight of an object is the net gravitational pull by the strings that connects that object with another object that has greatest mass than that object and other relativistic objects.
As Standard Model does not include gravity, finding of many exotic Higgs bosons is conclusive of proceeding with BSM; whereas our interest on particle physics experimentations is to work on Parton model for having adaptations on that model to confirm the string nature of fundamental matters as per this noninflationary scenario of universe without any origin of mass.
In respect to your essay, I shall go through it and make my statement soon.
With best regards,
Jayakar
Sergey G Fedosin wrote on Sep. 27, 2012 @ 16:04 GMT
Dear Jayakar,
In the Theory of Infinite Nesting of Matter which is the subject of my essay is
Scale dimension . May be it will useful for your `dimensionality`.
Sergey Fedosin
report post as inappropriate
Author Jayakar Johnson Joseph replied on Sep. 27, 2012 @ 17:20 GMT
Dear Sergey Fedosin,
Thank you for your interest on this essay.
I shall go through your essay and make my statement at the earliest.
With best regards,
Jayakar
Sergey G Fedosin wrote on Sep. 29, 2012 @ 04:21 GMT
Dear Jayakar,
At the link http://www.clustermatteruniverse.net/description/hierarchy I found the geometrical picture of Universe hierarchy in the form of a cluster-matter of embedded holarchial clusters of randomly distributed heterogeneous-matters in triplets. And the minimal clustering algorithm applied on this model has been derived from a previous work on Quantum clustering and computing of information. I suppose you must now to connect your model to the real Universe hierarchy and compare them in details.
Sergey Fedosin
report post as inappropriate
Author Jayakar Johnson Joseph replied on Sep. 29, 2012 @ 17:37 GMT
Dear Sergey,
Thank you for your suggestion.
Compound tetrahedral-brane is the geometric representation for the coherent dynamics of the strings of a Cluster-matter holon, in that the tetrahedral-branes are the topological transformation of eigen-rotational phases of string-matter segments.
I think the three components of SP-Phi symmetry that represents transformation of speeds, transformation of scales and the transformation of masses; may be in analogue with the angular velocity of an eigen-rotational string, path-length variability of its peripheral-end and its string-length variability, as they have correlations in finite time. Thus I imagine that the homeomorphism expressional with a compound tetrahedral-brane of cluster-matter holon is descriptive with SP-Phi symmetry, with some adaptations.
With best regards,
Jayakar
Sergey G Fedosin wrote on Oct. 2, 2012 @ 16:49 GMT
After studying about 250 essays in this contest, I realize now, how can I assess the level of each submitted work. Accordingly, I rated some essays, including yours.
Cood luck.
Sergey Fedosin
report post as inappropriate
Author Jayakar Johnson Joseph replied on Oct. 2, 2012 @ 19:36 GMT
Thank you dear Sergey
With best regards,
Jayakar
Sergey G Fedosin wrote on Oct. 4, 2012 @ 07:53 GMT
If you do not understand why your rating dropped down. As I found ratings in the contest are calculated in the next way. Suppose your rating is
and
was the quantity of people which gave you ratings. Then you have
of points. After it anyone give you
of points so you have
of points and
is the common quantity of the people which gave you ratings. At the same time you will have
of points. From here, if you want to be R2 > R1 there must be:
or
or
In other words if you want to increase rating of anyone you must give him more points
then the participant`s rating
was at the moment you rated him. From here it is seen that in the contest are special rules for ratings. And from here there are misunderstanding of some participants what is happened with their ratings. Moreover since community ratings are hided some participants do not sure how increase ratings of others and gives them maximum 10 points. But in the case the scale from 1 to 10 of points do not work, and some essays are overestimated and some essays are drop down. In my opinion it is a bad problem with this Contest rating process. I hope the FQXI community will change the rating process.
Sergey Fedosin
report post as inappropriate
Author Jayakar Johnson Joseph replied on Oct. 4, 2012 @ 17:05 GMT
Dear Sergey,
I think you are using MathType 6.8 to paste
am I right?
With best wishes
Jayakar
Login or
create account to post reply or comment.