Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the blogger are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

William Orem: on 3/29/08 at 19:58pm UTC, wrote Anonymous, I laughed out loud when I read this--you have correctly...

Anonymous: on 3/26/08 at 16:45pm UTC, wrote Having read your "dark energy" blog and now this one on UFO's, I can't help...

Tim: on 3/5/08 at 3:45am UTC, wrote Perhaps we make too many assumptions when considering the possibility of...

Christopher Gronbeck: on 2/29/08 at 20:10pm UTC, wrote Christopher's test post

paul valletta: on 2/28/08 at 9:53am UTC, wrote Of course there is a special case for vehicle's that have trancended across...

William Orem: on 2/27/08 at 18:56pm UTC, wrote The thing I respond to most strongly in these posts is the passion with...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Steve Dufourny: "Hi Jim, yes I understand you interpretation and indeed seen like this it is..." in The Nature of Time

Jim Snowdon: "Hi Steve, We are inclined to feel that time exists as some kind..." in The Nature of Time

barry gilbert: "Dear all. My observations have lead me to the notion that people can be..." in Is Causality Fundamental?

Ulla Mattfolk: "I would like to see physics added to math, like time. space, density..." in Understanding...

Ulla Mattfolk: "Thanks. I am no mathematician, but This is how I have understood it. 1)..." in Understanding...

Jonathan Dickau: "On a kinder note.. My thought is that you are pointing out an obvious..." in Towards the unification...

Jonathan Dickau: "Wait... So you are saying the universe is NOT a symbol for its Cosmology? ..." in Towards the unification...

Steve Dufourny: "This is an enormous problem this reality of normality. And furthermore the..." in Global Collaboration


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

The Quantum Refrigerator
A tiny cooling device could help rewrite the thermodynamic rule book for quantum machines.

Time to Think
Philosopher Jenann Ismael invokes the thermodynamic arrow of time to explain how human intelligence emerged through culture.

Lockdown Lab Life
Grounded physicists are exploring the use of online and virtual-reality conferencing, and AI-controlled experiments, to maintain social distancing. Post-pandemic, these positive innovations could make science more accessible and environmentally-friendly.

Is Causality Fundamental?
Untangling how the human perception of cause-and-effect might arise from quantum physics, may help us understand the limits and the potential of AI.

Building Agency in the Biology Lab
Physicists are using optogenetics techniques to make a rudimentary agent, from cellular components, which can convert measurements into actions using light.


FQXi BLOGS
February 27, 2021

CATEGORY: Blog [back]
TOPIC: Unidentified Foundational Objects [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Blogger William Orem wrote on Feb. 27, 2008 @ 18:56 GMT


The thing I respond to most strongly in these posts is the passion with which the issue is regarded on all sides. Whether we come down for or against counting UFO stories as credible evidence (of something), whether we hear about aberrant lights in the night sky and think “atmospheric phenomena” or “psychological phenomena” or “cosmic phenomena,” few of us are flat-out...

view entire post


Bookmark and Share
this post has been edited by the author since its original submission

report post as inappropriate


paul valletta wrote on Feb. 28, 2008 @ 09:53 GMT
Of course there is a special case for vehicle's that have trancended across a vast open "space", this case is one of limitation?..The craft must be unoccupied, the logistics of feeding just say 7 "aliens" would be astronomical! The craft would have to be huge just for the supply of food, even if it grown in transit.

Then there is maintenance supply, a few hundred spare parts etc..etc. and of course the craft would have to have some stealth technology for the craft it would be easily visible in the pure vacuum of space between Galaxies, and would be really easy to detect?.. I mean, a friendly civilized planet such as Earth may be uncommon !

I tend to think that wormhole propagation would be the likeliest mode of travel, doing away with huge crafts, lots of supllies and replacements, plus it would partly explain the lack of exhuast trace, or thermal trace, most sightings appear to "appear" out of nowhere, there is no traceable aspects of crafts over great distances?

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


FQXi Administrator Christopher E. Gronbeck wrote on Feb. 29, 2008 @ 20:10 GMT
Christopher's test post



Bookmark and Share


Tim wrote on Mar. 5, 2008 @ 03:45 GMT
Perhaps we make too many assumptions when considering the possibility of interstellar visitors.(Or interstellar travel by something like our species) Is there any 'a priori' reason why an alien species would be limited by our current lifespans:consider a species that lived 1000 earth years; or 1,000,000 yrs. Trips of a mere 100 or 1000 years may not seem so extraordinary! What are the ultimate limits, if any exist?

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Anonymous wrote on Mar. 26, 2008 @ 16:45 GMT
Having read your "dark energy" blog and now this one on UFO's, I can't help but suggest: perhaps all of these putative civilizations have built Dyson spheres around 90% of the stars, or 90% of the galaxies, which is why we don't see 90 % of the matter! Ha! How's that for two birds with one stone?

;-)

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Blogger William Orem wrote on Mar. 29, 2008 @ 19:58 GMT
Anonymous,

I laughed out loud when I read this--you have correctly anticipated my April 1st posting! You know what they say about great minds . . .

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.