Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the blogger are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

William Orem: on 3/29/08 at 19:58pm UTC, wrote Anonymous, I laughed out loud when I read this--you have correctly...

Anonymous: on 3/26/08 at 16:45pm UTC, wrote Having read your "dark energy" blog and now this one on UFO's, I can't help...

Tim: on 3/5/08 at 3:45am UTC, wrote Perhaps we make too many assumptions when considering the possibility of...

Christopher Gronbeck: on 2/29/08 at 20:10pm UTC, wrote Christopher's test post

paul valletta: on 2/28/08 at 9:53am UTC, wrote Of course there is a special case for vehicle's that have trancended across...

William Orem: on 2/27/08 at 18:56pm UTC, wrote The thing I respond to most strongly in these posts is the passion with...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Lorraine Ford: "John, I would say that you need to think what you mean by “physical..." in Emergent Reality: Markus...

John Cox: "Lorraine, That clarifies, thanks. I'd be in the camp that argues for a..." in Emergent Reality: Markus...

Steve Dufourny: "We have a big philosophical problem with the strings and the photons like..." in Alternative Models of...

Steve Dufourny: "If my equation is correct, E=mc^2+Xl^2 , so how can we take this enormous..." in Alternative Models of...

Lorraine Ford: "Re "I tend to speed-read then review before scoring after reading a good..." in Undecidability,...

John Cox: "George, We shouldn't conflate contradiction with inconsistency. QM has a..." in Watching the Watchmen:...

John Cox: "Georgi, by and large I agree. Near the end of the discussion panel,..." in Watching the Watchmen:...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

First Things First: The Physics of Causality
Why do we remember the past and not the future? Untangling the connections between cause and effect, choice, and entropy.

Can Time Be Saved From Physics?
Philosophers, physicists and neuroscientists discuss how our sense of time’s flow might arise through our interactions with external stimuli—despite suggestions from Einstein's relativity that our perception of the passage of time is an illusion.

Thermo-Demonics
A devilish new framework of thermodynamics that focuses on how we observe information could help illuminate our understanding of probability and rewrite quantum theory.

Gravity's Residue
An unusual approach to unifying the laws of physics could solve Hawking's black-hole information paradox—and its predicted gravitational "memory effect" could be picked up by LIGO.

Could Mind Forge the Universe?
Objective reality, and the laws of physics themselves, emerge from our observations, according to a new framework that turns what we think of as fundamental on its head.


FQXi BLOGS
January 21, 2020

CATEGORY: Blog [back]
TOPIC: Unidentified Foundational Objects [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Blogger William Orem wrote on Feb. 27, 2008 @ 18:56 GMT


The thing I respond to most strongly in these posts is the passion with which the issue is regarded on all sides. Whether we come down for or against counting UFO stories as credible evidence (of something), whether we hear about aberrant lights in the night sky and think “atmospheric phenomena” or “psychological phenomena” or “cosmic phenomena,” few of us are flat-out...

view entire post


Bookmark and Share
this post has been edited by the author since its original submission

report post as inappropriate


paul valletta wrote on Feb. 28, 2008 @ 09:53 GMT
Of course there is a special case for vehicle's that have trancended across a vast open "space", this case is one of limitation?..The craft must be unoccupied, the logistics of feeding just say 7 "aliens" would be astronomical! The craft would have to be huge just for the supply of food, even if it grown in transit.

Then there is maintenance supply, a few hundred spare parts etc..etc. and of course the craft would have to have some stealth technology for the craft it would be easily visible in the pure vacuum of space between Galaxies, and would be really easy to detect?.. I mean, a friendly civilized planet such as Earth may be uncommon !

I tend to think that wormhole propagation would be the likeliest mode of travel, doing away with huge crafts, lots of supllies and replacements, plus it would partly explain the lack of exhuast trace, or thermal trace, most sightings appear to "appear" out of nowhere, there is no traceable aspects of crafts over great distances?

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


FQXi Administrator Christopher E. Gronbeck wrote on Feb. 29, 2008 @ 20:10 GMT
Christopher's test post



Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Tim wrote on Mar. 5, 2008 @ 03:45 GMT
Perhaps we make too many assumptions when considering the possibility of interstellar visitors.(Or interstellar travel by something like our species) Is there any 'a priori' reason why an alien species would be limited by our current lifespans:consider a species that lived 1000 earth years; or 1,000,000 yrs. Trips of a mere 100 or 1000 years may not seem so extraordinary! What are the ultimate limits, if any exist?

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Anonymous wrote on Mar. 26, 2008 @ 16:45 GMT
Having read your "dark energy" blog and now this one on UFO's, I can't help but suggest: perhaps all of these putative civilizations have built Dyson spheres around 90% of the stars, or 90% of the galaxies, which is why we don't see 90 % of the matter! Ha! How's that for two birds with one stone?

;-)

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Blogger William Orem wrote on Mar. 29, 2008 @ 19:58 GMT
Anonymous,

I laughed out loud when I read this--you have correctly anticipated my April 1st posting! You know what they say about great minds . . .

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.