Essay Abstract

This whole universe is definitely not of `relativity'. The universe is hierarchical, absolutely. For example, the biosphere and all laboratorial experiments suffer the same effects of Earth's gravity. In the same time, gravity cannot be testified by scientists' laboratorial experiments, because the gravity between two protons is 10^40 times weaker than the electricity between the same two protons. The most independent system close to humans is the Solar system, which, however, is effectively an example of two-body system. All theories of gravity are derived from the two-body system. When applied to three or more bodies, the theories give chaotic results. This is similar to the situation that there exists no formula solution to any algebraic equation of order 5 or more. Scientists, however, use the two-body theories of Newton and Einstein to explain the whole universe. This is fundamentally wrong. Galaxies are relatively the independent many-body systems. Dr. He initiated the concept of rational structure and applied it to the study of galaxy structure in 2001. His result is neither a theory nor based on any two-body theory; it is based on the analysis of galaxy images.

Author Bio

Hope He is currently a high school student. She was born in China and came to the United States at the age of 5. She grew up in Alabama. Her main interests are math and science. She is the English editor of a new company in Wuhan, China. The company dedicated to the education and study on galaxies.

Download Essay PDF File

Dear Hope and Jin,

I really enyoyed your essay. Well done on such a nice piece of work. It's the best one I've read so far. I liked the Darwin Spiral idea and also firmly believe in the necessity to understand these golden galaxy spirals. I *do* have an alternative solution for the conundrum, which is waiting to be approved and posted, fingers crossed. You should both be interested with luck. Cheers

report post as inappropriate

Hi,

Your essay is interesting and enjoyable to read. But please explain how your essay addresses the theme of this competition: which of our basic physical assumptions are wrong? That was not made clear to me. Thank you.

jcns

report post as inappropriate

Why do you say "This whole universe is definitely not of 'relativity'."? Is there some evidence or argument that is contrary to relativity?

report post as inappropriate

Dear Hope and Jin

Barred spirals were indeed unexplained in any secular or classical evolutionary theory, and a major bizarre anomaly, until quite recently, the enigma resolved courtesy of the discrete field model (DFM).

http://vixra.org/pdf/1102.0016v3.pdf

I should of course say that although web archived at vixra and the RAS this is still not yet published in a mainstream journal as reviewers reject anything that may be conceived as different from the current ruling paradigm. In fact the DFM derives the observed effects of SR direct from a quantum mechanism, but it is none the less unfamiliar.

To explain; after AGN (disc) accretion and (quasar) jetting the re-ionized matter lies in a line, or splayed butterfly shape (from spiral jets) ave some 2,000 light years long (1M at M87).

Due to intrinsic rotation in space the central 'virial' radius starts to rotate (Google Hawk) propagating matter at the circumference and 'trailing the arms. Inside this the remains of the jet arms form the bar, which rotates bodily, or in 'lock step', just like all spirals. This is on a NEW perpendicular axis to the old galaxy, explaining They then evolve into a full spiral, merge into a disc, accrete into a lenticular as the AGN grows, and the cycle restarts. I recently posted to Singh's essay blog I think why the cycle seems to be around 10-12Gyr. There are good NASA shots of Centuarus A undergoing the rapid accretion and jetting process. (Previously thought o be a collision!)

There are many other anomalies explained by this.

Some papers with previous interpretations but good evidence here, the first of intrinsic rotation;

Parra, F.I., Barnes, M., Catto, P.J., RPCtr. Th.Phys. Ox. CCFE. N.Fusion. 2011. http://arxiv.org/pdf/1102.4613.pdf

Zoltan H. Jimenez R. Bernardire.M. Constructing the cosmic evolution of quasars from the age distribution of local early-type galaxieshttp://arxiv.org/PS_cache/astroph/pdf/0610/0610723v1
.pdf

Wold,I. et al. Host galaxies of luminous quasars population synthesis of optical off-axis spectra.RAS Vol.408,Issue2,pp.713-730. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.408..713W

Benton R, Metcalf, A. Constraints on Small-Scale Structures of Dark Matter from Flux Anomalies in Quasar Gravitational

Lenses http://arxiv/pdf/1007/1007.1599v1.pdf

DeBuhr, J., Quataert E., Ma, C.P., Galaxy-scale outflows driven by active galactic nuclei. MNRAS accepted. 30.10.2011

Martini ,P., Weinberg D.H.., Quasar Clustering and the Lifetime of Quasars 2001 ApJ 547 12 doi:10.1086/318331.

Porciani, C., Magliocchetti P., Norberg P., 2004 MNRAS 355 Issue 3, p1010-1030.

I do hope that is all enlightening. There is much more of course. Main paper now in review for 3rd time!

Best wishes

Please do also read my essay and comment. Thanks

Peter

report post as inappropriate

hope he

See my essay http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1413

Specially post about the Universe as a logarithmic spiral.

report post as inappropriate

Dear

Very interesting to see your essay.

Perhaps all of us are convinced that: the choice of yourself is right!That of course is reasonable.

So may be we should work together to let's the consider clearly defined for the basis foundations theoretical as the most challenging with intellectual of all of us.

Why we do not try to start with a real challenge is very close and are the focus of interest of the human science: it is a matter of mass and grain Higg boson of the standard model.

Knowledge and belief reasoning of you will to express an opinion on this matter:

You have think that: the Mass is the expression of the impact force to material - so no impact force, we do not feel the Higg boson - similar to the case of no weight outside the Earth's atmosphere.

Does there need to be a particle with mass for everything have volume? If so, then why the mass of everything change when moving from the Earth to the Moon? Higg boson is lighter by the Moon's gravity is weaker than of Earth?

The LHC particle accelerator used to "Smashed" until "Ejected" Higg boson, but why only when the "Smashed" can see it,and when off then not see it ?

Can be "locked" Higg particles? so when "released" if we do not force to it by any the Force, how to know that it is "out" or not?

You are should be boldly to give a definition of weight that you think is right for us to enjoy, or oppose my opinion.

Because in the process of research, the value of "failure" or "success" is the similar with science. The purpose of a correct theory be must is without any a wrong point ?

Glad to see from you comments soon,because still have too many of the same problems.

Regards !

Hải.Caohoàng of THE INCORRECT ASSUMPTIONS AND A CORRECT THEORY

August 23, 2012 - 11:51 GMT on this essay contest.

report post as inappropriate

Dear Jin He,

Your cosmic breasts discovery is breathtaking. The FQXi community loves this kind of science. Your community rating is much greater than mine even now but I expect you to go to the top of the rating list.

Good luck, Pentcho Valev

report post as inappropriate

Dear Pentcho Valev,

Thanks for your kind words.

In fact I learned about varying light speed etc on internet during 2007 when I found your posts and I sill remember your name.

report post as inappropriate

If you do not understand why your rating dropped down. As I found ratings in the contest are calculated in the next way. Suppose your rating is and was the quantity of people which gave you ratings. Then you have of points. After it anyone give you of points so you have of points and is the common quantity of the people which gave you ratings. At the same time you will have of points. From here, if you want to be R2 > R1 there must be: or or In other words if you want to increase rating of anyone you must give him more points then the participant`s rating was at the moment you rated him. From here it is seen that in the contest are special rules for ratings. And from here there are misunderstanding of some participants what is happened with their ratings. Moreover since community ratings are hided some participants do not sure how increase ratings of others and gives them maximum 10 points. But in the case the scale from 1 to 10 of points do not work, and some essays are overestimated and some essays are drop down. In my opinion it is a bad problem with this Contest rating process. I hope the FQXI community will change the rating process.

Sergey Fedosin

report post as inappropriate

Dears Hope and Jin,

I enjoied in reading your interesting Essay.

I am going to give you a score 10.

Cheers,

Ch.

report post as inappropriate

Dear Hope and Jin,

I think your essay is interesting, although I don't know much about galaxies. I hope you will find the recognition you deserve.

Best regards,

Cristi Stoica

report post as inappropriate