Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home


Previous Contests

What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018
Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discusswinners

Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.
read/discusswinners

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discusswinners

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discusswinners

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discusswinners

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

sridattadev kancharla: on 2/21/16 at 16:46pm UTC, wrote Dear All, Please enjoy the theory of everything @ Any Body Can Derive...

sridattadev: on 2/26/13 at 15:30pm UTC, wrote Dear All, "Consciousness is the sphere of universal schwarzschild radius...

Sridattadev: on 10/8/12 at 15:30pm UTC, wrote Dear Sergey, Nice formulation on how the relative ratings work. I am in...

Sridattadev: on 10/8/12 at 15:25pm UTC, wrote Dear Paul, Set your self free and only you can do this to your self and...

Sergey Fedosin: on 10/4/12 at 9:46am UTC, wrote If you do not understand why your rating dropped down. As I found ratings...

Paul Reed: on 10/3/12 at 8:26am UTC, wrote Sridattadev We cannot know what the absolute truth is, because we cannot...

Sridattadev: on 10/2/12 at 20:41pm UTC, wrote Dear Paul, Conscience or soul is the reality or absolute truth and...

Paul Reed: on 10/1/12 at 7:39am UTC, wrote Sridattadev I noticed your comment on Hoang's blog. Reality exists...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Georgina Woodward: "'Sharp comb" and 'shredder' are used as similes and metaphors because the..." in Schrödinger’s Zombie:...

Sydney Grimm: "Lorraine, Let’s take an example: E= mc[sup]2[/sup]. It is an equation..." in Measuring Free Will: Ian...

Jason Wolfe: "I cannot say that I am enthusiastic about where philosophy has led us. We..." in The Demon in the Machine...

Jason Wolfe: "How can there be any talk of determinism when the real world is built upon..." in Measuring Free Will: Ian...

Georgina Woodward: "I might be able to improve on that description. It's early days.If it is a..." in Schrödinger’s Zombie:...

Robert McEachern: ""do you agree with Davies that these questions will need new physics?" It..." in The Demon in the Machine...

Zeeya Merali: "Joe, You appear to really want to contact Dr Kuhn about his Closer to..." in First Things First: The...

Joe Fisher: "(Zeeya's note: Joe I've deleted the text of this post. It appears to be..." in First Things First: The...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

First Things First: The Physics of Causality
Why do we remember the past and not the future? Untangling the connections between cause and effect, choice, and entropy.

Can Time Be Saved From Physics?
Philosophers, physicists and neuroscientists discuss how our sense of time’s flow might arise through our interactions with external stimuli—despite suggestions from Einstein's relativity that our perception of the passage of time is an illusion.

Thermo-Demonics
A devilish new framework of thermodynamics that focuses on how we observe information could help illuminate our understanding of probability and rewrite quantum theory.

Gravity's Residue
An unusual approach to unifying the laws of physics could solve Hawking's black-hole information paradox—and its predicted gravitational "memory effect" could be picked up by LIGO.

Could Mind Forge the Universe?
Objective reality, and the laws of physics themselves, emerge from our observations, according to a new framework that turns what we think of as fundamental on its head.


FQXi FORUM
September 21, 2019

CATEGORY: Questioning the Foundations Essay Contest (2012) [back]
TOPIC: Conscience Is the Cosmological Constant by Sridattadev Kancharla [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Author sridattadev kancharla wrote on Jun. 15, 2012 @ 12:24 GMT
Essay Abstract

Purpose of this essay is to prove mathematically that conscience is the cosmological constant and in doing so to unite science and spirituality and for uplifting human consciousness to cosmic consciousness.

Author Bio

Sridattadev considers to be a human manifestation of the universal I, which in fact we all are different manifestations of the same universal truth. He is a son of medical doctor's and husband to a molecular biologist and currently working as a software engineer. He is father of three wonderful small boys and is in absolute love of his existence and would like to share that love with the rest of his alter egos, which is you all.

Download Essay PDF File

Bookmark and Share



Author sridattadev kancharla wrote on Jun. 18, 2012 @ 14:13 GMT
Dear All,

If you have followed the "zero = i = infinity" mathematical representation of the universal truth closely, we will realize that universe is an "individual" entity literally. All that we percieve of the universe with our senses is only partial truth, as is the first half statements in the mathematical deduction.

Conscience is the cosmological constant, consciousness is the cosmological variant. I is the constant, I am the variant. I am a relative being, i is the absolute.

As scientific world is all about relativity, I want every one to realize the simple truth that there can be no relativity with out an "absolute".

Love,

Sridattadev.

Bookmark and Share



Joe Fisher wrote on Jun. 19, 2012 @ 21:43 GMT
Dear Sridattadev,

Thank you for taking the time and the trouble to post your thoughtful comment about my essay SEQUENCE CONSEQUENCE. Whereas you also expressed the essential point of my essay about current singular individual knowledge far more eloquently in your splendid essay, Conscience is the Cosmological Constant, you appear to have more faith in the utility of mathematics than I do.

Joe Fisher

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Sridattadev replied on Jun. 20, 2012 @ 13:43 GMT
Dear Joe,

Thank you for reading the essay and sharing your supportive thoughts on it. I hope that all of us can cherish the truth that we are enjoying with in. All I am trying to convey to scientific community is to not be limited by their own tools of intelligence (mathematics and theoritical physics), but rather know that they are the makers of the tools as well and that is the truth.

Love,

Sridattadev.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Sridattadev wrote on Jun. 21, 2012 @ 18:41 GMT
Dear All,



i dwells in all and all dwells in i.

Love,

Sridattadev.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Russ Otter wrote on Jun. 22, 2012 @ 14:50 GMT
Dear Sridattadev,

You are a kindred soul. Your mathematical view of the singularity, the infinity, speaks to the truth. A truth, I think your programing skills, will forever keep both local and non-local all within the same moment.

I especially was taken with you phasing that neither infinity nor truth is part of the human experience, sort to speak… A humorist and truth teller in one!

As the Cosmological Constant survives…

As we ponder, the physics of the universe(s), I just wrote the following that relates somewhat to you theme, or so I believe so: So I will share my draft with you. It is a paradox, which is our cosmological constant, forever and a day…

Motion equals Mass

Motion is Mass. So it goes that all things are in motion; so the idea of a massless particle is flawed exponentially so. Yet we keep asserting such particles, such as protons and gravitons, as massless? Show me a proton without motion and I will show you a world without form or electromagnetism, as we know it. It does not exist.

Now, I will surmise that dark matter and dark energy, may be of a motionless nature, which defies identification or form in a traditional sense. Such a motionless mathematical formula tied to our motion based world, may be the balance and genesis that makes sense, and will lead to new vistas of knowledge, along with a new vista of questions.

Time will tell.

Still, my presumption for dark matter and dark energy. Is just that. A random leap into the possibilities, without a scrap of knowledge, only presumptions for the speculative mind to ponder. More central to my theme is that Motion produces Mass, and we are captives to that mass based world… In all we do or know today.

Show me a massless particle and I will show you a measurement system that is lacking.

Further on this subject: Is that enigmatic world of a black hole, which, exudes to me, the impression of density so great as to imply no motion or the restriction thereof. However it takes the opposite to achieve a black hole, which has a motion quotient that is faster than the speed of light, to reflect its own existence. Hence once again, Motion equals Mass on a weighted particle scale relative to its motion.

So the question arises: At an ultimate Density, if that were possible, does motion cease. And if it ceases, what transpires at that moment? A Big-Bang, a new dimension, or even dark matter or dark energy?

These are the quests I find of intriguing interest.

All the very best to you,

Russ

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Sridattadev replied on Jun. 22, 2012 @ 17:56 GMT
Dear Russ,

Thank you for your kind and supportive thoughts on the truth that I experienced and shared here. Your approach on motion equals mass is very relevant in relative existence. Only a live being or being in motion can experience mass. Hence a dead person cannot. But what is death? something in that being stopped to be in motion and came to an absolute rest, that is the conscience. Some scientists may argue that a biological death is not complete, untill all the cells of the body disintegrate completely, but to which extent is that point complete, till all the atoms, electrons, protons and quarks and so on cease to move? There are only two possible states for the entire universe to be in. Absolute rest or relative motion. That point of absolute rest is the singularity. As you know anything can be brought to that point of absolute rest and hence singularity is every where (virtually). Now to explain the concept of black hole, when that absolute resting state (singularity or universal i or conscience) starts to vibrate (think or wish), the vibrations are faster than the speed of light and eventually the vibration slows down to the point of speed of light and matter (slower vibrating version of the same energy, and hence e=mc^2) and becomes the sentient being and tries to realize it self. In truth black hole is a white hole and vice versa. This is the mechanism by which the universe goes to absolute rest and back to relative motion. So scientists are not wrong in saying that God is dead as i consider god is that state of absolute rest. May be that is how the phrase Rest In peace was coined as people have known of the existence of this absolute state of rest which is peaceful. Enlightenment is the realization of the existence of this absolute resting state and mastering the way to reach to that state at will. God exists in those who are enlightened. This state is very peaceful. Loving everything you are is the best way to attain that peace. All I wish for humanity is to realize this absolute truth and be blissfull.

Love,

Sridattadev.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Sridattadev replied on Jun. 23, 2012 @ 13:29 GMT
Dear Russ,



Absolute rest = singularity = infinite motion

zero = i = infinity

A further explanation of the dynamics of black hole / white hole is as follows,

In the journey of self realization, one's ego is the event horizon. On one side of this ego is the duality of existence where one sees one self to be a separate entity from everything else and there is no other side but singularity, you will know what i mean shortly. When one starts questioning ones existence absolutely is when one begins the journey to the univeral truth. This is like jumping into a black hole or going beyond one's ego, from there one searches for one self every where (infinite thoughts go through ones mind, this is like that infinite motion that occurs inside a black hole and hence the density increases tremendously towards infinity) and ultimately finds the self in everything (phenomenon of superposition in quantum mechanics) and this is attaining singularity. To the one realized all the black holes and white holes are connected and there is only one singularity, one absolute eternal infinite immortal being or the universal i. Multi verse interpretations of the scientific community is an outcome of relativistic quantum view of the singular universe. If universe is the question, i is the answer. Great many have manifested on this planet from this universal i as human masters to enlighten the rest of the sentient human beings and will continue to do so. As the human being is a sensory being, universal i has aided in the advent of scientific experimentation as a means of understanding and getting closer to the truth. This is universe conversing with thy self.

Love,

Sridattadev.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Wilhelmus de Wilde de Wilde wrote on Jun. 22, 2012 @ 15:17 GMT
Dear Sri: As always with your texts philosophy and science are hand in hand. You introduce now mathematics, which in my opinion is an imaginairy way of thinking that we human beings are utilising in order to understand things that we cannot understand. All entities like singulairity, infinity and zero are not existing as matter, only spiritual. The center of this spirituality is always the I, this is a singulairity (non-material) around this center is the subjective sphere of "reality". I am going to treat this in my new essay (under construction). I wish you more luck in this contest as in the one before, but even that does not matter the luck is already in the being accepted and published here on this site.

Wilhelmus

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Sridattadev replied on Jun. 22, 2012 @ 18:17 GMT
Dear Wil,

Thank you for the words of appreciation as you very well know what I intend"s" with these essays. Universal I is trying to enlighten the humanity with knowledge and wisdom for ensuring the continuity of the human form of sentient beings on this planet in relative motion and hence the invent of internet, and work of several great thinkers being collected in discussions and contests for all us who are and who ever will be taking form in this plane of existence. I chose to be sri and I chose to be wil and I chose to be every body there ever is, this is the phenomenon of superposition of quantum mechanics. There is only one true I underneath it all and I loves thy self and hence taking care of thy self for ever.

Love,

Sridattadev.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Russ Otter replied on Jun. 23, 2012 @ 16:51 GMT
Dear Sridattadev,

By now, you do know that you are on to something…

Your inner peace is a transparent element of your focus in a world of chatter and distractions that you keep within context, and understanding. You should write a book, to solidify the paradox’s you have come to realize, as the core of what we are.

I am impressed, with your dissertation on my “Motion is Mass” draft. I usually do not sense being trumped, but you know the subject matter as and better than I. I find traditional knowledge, lacking in so much, when it involves infinities, which seems obvious to me. But you have taken it a step further, by mathematical formula’s, and a consciousness which, understands what I am speaking about. Few ever do…

Keep working on your path… So much is left to the unknowns, and the potentials science can bring to us, will change the world for the better. It will unify us from our disparate forms, and communication will become the key to our better understandings of each other.

I have a BLOG www.otterthink.wordpress.com with some essays, you may find of interest. Prehaps, “Everything is Nothing and Nothing is Everything”, or “It Only Takes One Thing”, will be of interest.

With Love and Peace my friend,

Russ

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Sridattadev replied on Jun. 25, 2012 @ 17:40 GMT
Dear Russ,

Thank you.

Love,

Sridattadev.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Sridattadev wrote on Jul. 18, 2012 @ 15:02 GMT
Dear All,

For every action there is equal and opposite reaction, there is also inaction at the point of their interaction. It is this inaction (singualrity or coscience or soul) that is in all of us that causes all the actions and consequent reactions.

Positive numbers on the number scale are like the matter particles, and negative numbers on the number scale are like antimatter particles. If we were to sum all the numbers from negative infinity to postitive infinity the sum would be absolute zero.

The answer lies in zero, and hence zero divided by zero equals everything including nothing, which means the relativity we percieve in the physical universe is non existent or an illusion and the universe is just an absolute singularity.

Love,

Sridattadev.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


James Lee Hoover wrote on Jul. 29, 2012 @ 19:07 GMT
Sridattadev,

To further clarify your concept, mathematically derived -- higher math being my weakness, how do mass and distance intermingle with the universal I in your statement, "Gravity is the will of conscience to shape things as i chooses

them to be at any level, quantum to cosmic."?

Jim

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Sridattadev replied on Jul. 30, 2012 @ 14:42 GMT
Dear Jim / Marcoen,

Nothing is heavier nor lighter than "i", nothing is closer nor farther from "i". There is only "i" in the entire cosmos and all else (mass and distance) is an illusion.

That is where 0 = i = infinity comes into picture, mathematical representation of metaphysical truth about S=BM^2. Mathematicians may say that inverse mutliple of zero does not exist in the current mathematical field theory, we are the ones who put that limitation for ourself, then it is time to revisit the fundamentals of mathematics and change our underlying assumptions. The truth is inverse of nothing (0) is infact everything (infinity) and their multiple is singularity (i).

Love,

Sridattadev

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Wilhelmus de Wilde de Wilde wrote on Aug. 25, 2012 @ 14:57 GMT
Dear Sri, I invite you to read THE CONSCIOUSNESS CONNECTION", where "I" also try to explain my singulairity.

thanks

Wilhelmus

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Sridattadev replied on Aug. 27, 2012 @ 19:45 GMT
Dear Wil,

I am glad to have been entagling with you through the inner "i" in us.

Wonderfully explained the true meaning and functioning of consciousness. As always my deepest regards and wishes are with you.

Love,

Sridattadev.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Sridattadev replied on Aug. 27, 2012 @ 19:52 GMT
Dear Wil,

Realization of truth in words is as follows

"I am your self and you are my self."

Love,

Sridattadev.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Frank Martin DiMeglio wrote on Aug. 27, 2012 @ 18:20 GMT
SRIDATTADEV, INTERESTING ESSAY. THE STABILITY OF DISTANCE IN/OF SPACE IS IMPOSSIBLE APART FROM BALANCED AND EQUIVALENT GRAVITY AND INERTIA AND EQUIVALENT AND BALANCED GRAVITY AND ELECTROMAGNETISM.

OUTER SPACE DESTROYS AND PRECLUDES THOUGHT AND OUR ACTUAL AND NATURAL PHYSICAL EXPERIENCE. IT CANNOT BE FUNDAMENTALLY UNDERSTOOD.

THE FUNDAMENTAL UNITY AND GROUNDING OF OUR THEORETICAL UNIFICATIONS IN PHYSICS CANNOT, AND DO NOT, FUNDAMENTALLY APPLY/PERTAIN TO OUTER SPACE.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Constantinos Ragazas wrote on Sep. 3, 2012 @ 17:33 GMT
Dear Sri,

Thank you for your unique awareness. And for your willingness to share this with us. You 'see' while others 'calculate'. And because you 'see' what you see in my essay, “The Metaphysics of Physics”, is especially important to me. I feel we have much in common. And hope my essay reflects that. Please read and rate it.

Love and peace always,

Constantinos

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Sridattadev replied on Sep. 4, 2012 @ 20:18 GMT
Dear Constantinos,

I see several valid points you made in your essay about how the scientific community will always find what it seeks by making adjustments to the methods of measurement it uses. Answer to the question "what is universe?" is what we want it to be. Answer to the question "Why does universe exist?" can be experienced by the one who is self realized, and the answer is love. It is out of love a mother brings forth a child in to this world and thus creates a universe for the child. These are purely metaphysical aspects of our being, but they shape the physical realm of our existence. We are not only real on a sensory basis, we are also real on the spiritual or conscience basis. Eta that you propose is like the radius of the sphere of consciousness. It can vary from zero to infinity in a relative existence. And for the realized, one who experiences absolute singularity, both (zero and infinity) are the same and hence Eta is a constant.

Love,

Sridattadev.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Constantinos Ragazas replied on Sep. 4, 2012 @ 22:56 GMT
Dear Sridattadev,

Thank you for your thoughts. You write, “We are not only real on a sensory basis, we are also real on the spiritual or conscience basis.” I would say we are more real as 'spiritual beings' than 'physical beings'. All knowledge is self-knowledge. Thus, to know the universe we need to know ourselves. It is in that sense I understand and agree with you when you write, “... for the realized, one who experiences absolute singularity, both (zero and infinity) are the same...”

Though the 'quantity eta' in my essay is the basis for defining the physical quantities like energy, momentum, force, temperature, and entropy, 'eta' is undefined. It can be thought as 'being' or as 'ether'. Thus, built into my mathematical formulation of Basic Law of Physics, is both 'spiritual existence' (being) and 'physical existence' (energy, etc.)

love and peace,

Constantinos

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Sridattadev replied on Sep. 5, 2012 @ 13:34 GMT
Dear Constantinos,

I absolutely resonate with you. Wish you all the best.

Love,

Sridattadev.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Frank Martin DiMeglio wrote on Sep. 14, 2012 @ 02:24 GMT
Hi Sridattadev, I reviewed and rated your essay. Nice job. The I is transcendent, and I like how you correctly put us at the center of what is the integrated, extensive, and ordered natural reality that WE experience. My essay also discusses the very core nature of being, thought, physics, and experience. With your fine and open mind, I would appreciate it if you could review and rate my essay.

Our mastery of physics, including thoughtful/theoretical, is ultimately inseparable from our mastery/command/experience of physics and our growth and becoming other than we are -- as dreams illustrate/prove. I think that you will love my essay. Take care, and have a great day. Best of luck in the contest!

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Sridattadev replied on Sep. 17, 2012 @ 17:44 GMT
Dear Frank,

To the truly awakened, one who experiences the singularity, there are no more dreams but the reality of the self. For those who are still in duality, dreams are alternative possible realities (multi verses and parallel worlds) if they really wish to make them realize.

Love,

Sridattadev.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Sreenath BN wrote on Sep. 17, 2012 @ 05:33 GMT
Dear Sridattadev,

Thanks for your enlightening essay on human (or Universal) spiritualism. You have reflected very well the philosophy of great 'Adi Shankara' in terms of our modern-day-wisdom of the universe.

If you have time,please, go through my essay too and express your views on it in my forum ( http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1543--Sreenath B N.).

Thanking you and best of luck in the essay contest (ofcourse which you never care for).

Sincerely,

Sreenath.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Sridattadev wrote on Sep. 17, 2012 @ 18:35 GMT
Dear Sreenath,

Gravity is the inherent nature of the space-time fabric as in GR (duality) and pulls on things in that fabric accordingly. Yes gravity gets twisted along with the space-time inside the black hole (moment of death) and hence EVAF as you have beautifully explained. Space-time is the inherent nature of the conscience (singularity) and hence the realization that there is no more gravity to the realized one who experiences singularity as it is everywhere (immortality or nirvana or enlightenment or moksha).

Yes indeed, the singularity that I am referring to is the Advaita experience of Adi Shankaracharya.

Love,

Sridattadev.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Hoang cao Hai wrote on Sep. 28, 2012 @ 06:05 GMT
Dear sridattadev kancharla

Especially interesting!

Because that's my opinion, and has developed into a theory without boundaries.

I appreciate "10" for your special.

Kind Regards !

Hải.Caohoàng of THE INCORRECT ASSUMPTIONS AND A CORRECT THEORY

August 23, 2012 - 11:51 GMT on this essay contest.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Sridattadev replied on Sep. 28, 2012 @ 14:22 GMT
Dear Hai,

Thank you for reading the essay

Conscience is the cosmological constant and resonating it with the absolute truth with in us in your essay.

What we believe in does not matter, what matters is the belief itself.

Love,

Sridattadev.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Paul Reed replied on Oct. 1, 2012 @ 07:39 GMT
Sridattadev

I noticed your comment on Hoang's blog. Reality exists independently of us. But we can only know of it via the sensory systems (which you could refer to as consciousness). The point is, we are not creating it, but can only attain one objective perspective within an inescapable confine.

Paul

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Sridattadev replied on Oct. 2, 2012 @ 20:41 GMT
Dear Paul,

Conscience or soul is the reality or absolute truth and hence the cosmological constant. Consciousness as you mentioned is the extent to which we realize that truth. You are right again by saying that we are not creating that "absolute" reality, which is eternal, rather just gaining a perspective of it through our sensory existence.

I "am" born to die, but i lives for ever.

Love,

Sridattadev.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Sergey G Fedosin wrote on Oct. 4, 2012 @ 09:46 GMT
If you do not understand why your rating dropped down. As I found ratings in the contest are calculated in the next way. Suppose your rating is
and
was the quantity of people which gave you ratings. Then you have
of points. After it anyone give you
of points so you have
of points and
is the common quantity of the people which gave you ratings. At the same time you will have
of points. From here, if you want to be R2 > R1 there must be:
or
or
In other words if you want to increase rating of anyone you must give him more points
then the participant`s rating
was at the moment you rated him. From here it is seen that in the contest are special rules for ratings. And from here there are misunderstanding of some participants what is happened with their ratings. Moreover since community ratings are hided some participants do not sure how increase ratings of others and gives them maximum 10 points. But in the case the scale from 1 to 10 of points do not work, and some essays are overestimated and some essays are drop down. In my opinion it is a bad problem with this Contest rating process. I hope the FQXI community will change the rating process.

Sergey Fedosin

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Sridattadev replied on Oct. 8, 2012 @ 15:30 GMT
Dear Sergey,

Nice formulation on how the relative ratings work. I am in this contest for sharing the truth that I experienced with all the humanity. All numbers are equal to me absolutely as per zero = i = infinity. Ratings are applicable only to the relative reality and so be it. I wish you all the best with your work.

Love,

Sridattadev.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


sridattadev wrote on Feb. 26, 2013 @ 15:30 GMT
Dear All,

"Consciousness is the sphere of universal schwarzschild radius with a central cosmological constant of conscience." - iSphere.

Love,

Sridattadev.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Author sridattadev kancharla wrote on Feb. 21, 2016 @ 16:46 GMT
Dear All,

Please enjoy the theory of everything @ Any Body Can Derive Everything From Geometry

Love,

Sridattadev.

Bookmark and Share



Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.