Search FQXi


Georgina Woodward: "I should add to the list of influences on whether a photon passes through a..." in Schrödinger’s Zombie:...

Georgina Woodward: "Bell's inequalities: Members of the population have fixed characteristics..." in Schrödinger’s Zombie:...

Lorraine Ford: "Thanks Sydney! Have a good holiday! :-)" in Measuring Free Will: Ian...

Lorraine Ford: "(continued) Seemingly algorithmic representations are not entirely “new..." in The Demon in the Machine...

Lorraine Ford: "Re “I think this can only be explained by … a new KIND of physical..." in The Demon in the Machine...

Joe Fisher: "After I had inserted the word causality into the Google Search Engine, a..." in First Things First: The...

Sydney Grimm: "Lorraine, If I interpret your comment well, you are convinced that reality..." in Measuring Free Will: Ian...

Joe Fisher: "It am all very well for Professor Carroll to be awarded funds for adding to..." in First Things First: The...

click titles to read articles

First Things First: The Physics of Causality
Why do we remember the past and not the future? Untangling the connections between cause and effect, choice, and entropy.

Can Time Be Saved From Physics?
Philosophers, physicists and neuroscientists discuss how our sense of time’s flow might arise through our interactions with external stimuli—despite suggestions from Einstein's relativity that our perception of the passage of time is an illusion.

A devilish new framework of thermodynamics that focuses on how we observe information could help illuminate our understanding of probability and rewrite quantum theory.

Gravity's Residue
An unusual approach to unifying the laws of physics could solve Hawking's black-hole information paradox—and its predicted gravitational "memory effect" could be picked up by LIGO.

Could Mind Forge the Universe?
Objective reality, and the laws of physics themselves, emerge from our observations, according to a new framework that turns what we think of as fundamental on its head.

September 23, 2019

Bookmark and Share

Comment on this Article

Please read the important Introduction that governs your participation in this community. Inappropriate language will not be tolerated and posts containing such language will be deleted. Otherwise, this is a free speech Forum and all are welcome!
  • Please enter the text of your post, then click the "Submit New Post" button below. You may also optionally add file attachments below before submitting your edits.

  • HTML tags are not permitted in posts, and will automatically be stripped out. Links to other web sites are permitted. For instructions on how to add links, please read the link help page.

  • You may use superscript (10100) and subscript (A2) using [sup]...[/sup] and [sub]...[/sub] tags.

  • You may use bold (important) and italics (emphasize) using [b]...[/b] and [i]...[/i] tags.

  • You may also include LateX equations into your post.

Insert LaTeX Equation [hide]

LaTeX equations may be displayed in FQXi Forum posts by including them within [equation]...[/equation] tags. You may type your equation directly into your post, or use the LaTeX Equation Preview feature below to see how your equation will render (this is recommended).

For more help on LaTeX, please see the LaTeX Project Home Page.

LaTeX Equation Preview

preview equation
clear equation
insert equation into post at cursor

Your name: (optional)

Recent Comments

Amrit, if gravity is nothing to do with time, how do you explain gravitational time dilation?

The unknowable objective reality within the void of space and its disturbance due to motion of matter along the 4th spatio-energetic dimension (currently imagined as the abstract deformation of empty space itself) gives rise to gravity and subjective time. Motion, structure, gravity and time are all linked together in The Prime Quaternion model and observation of time dilation is thus predicted...

I first came across the idea of topological fields in relation to biological development over 20 years ago in a Book by Brian Leith called The descent of Darwin. It was my favourite book for some time.It asks interesting questions, such as can we separate pattern from process? Topology may be used to identify the pattern but the process gives rise to that pattern.

It was a pity that the article was mostly about the couple getting along well together and their personalities complementing...

Hi all,

I also agree, the quantum structure implies the gravity, I remain persuaded that the coded ultimate particle implies the rest, and its rotation speed on itself even is directly bound with the gravity and thus the mass.All turns and implies the gravity. Combinations are numerous .Imagine an ultimate spherical system with its codes and its rotations implying the gravities or the gravity.

read all article comments

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.