RECENT FORUM POSTS
Steve Dufourny: "Yes,I agree with Eckard,there it's totally to be frank crazzy and..." in First Things First: The...
Robert McEachern: ""I'd like to think it is more than one huge mistake." Indeed, so does..." in Schrödinger’s Zombie:...
Eckard Blumschein: ""Please Joe, stop to post Always the same". Perhaps you have almost nothing..." in First Things First: The...
Sydney Grimm: "Lorraine, You want to the bottom? ;-) In physics “unification” –..." in Measuring Free Will: Ian...
Georgina Woodward: "Lorraine, Who do you mean by "we"? I think your condescending attitude and..." in Schrödinger’s Zombie:...
Lorraine Ford: "Sydney, Re climate change: I’m more on the side of the QBism model, but..." in Measuring Free Will: Ian...
anna john: "It's a very good informative section. I appreciate the intelligence and..." in Gravity's Residue
Paul Henry: "Okay, that attachment link does not seem to work so here is the paper. The..." in Alternative Models of...
RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles
First Things First: The Physics of Causality
Why do we remember the past and not the future? Untangling the connections between cause and effect, choice, and entropy.
Can Time Be Saved From Physics?
Philosophers, physicists and neuroscientists discuss how our sense of time’s flow might arise through our interactions with external stimuli—despite suggestions from Einstein's relativity that our perception of the passage of time is an illusion.
Thermo-Demonics
A devilish new framework of thermodynamics that focuses on how we observe information could help illuminate our understanding of probability and rewrite quantum theory.
Gravity's Residue
An unusual approach to unifying the laws of physics could solve Hawking's black-hole information paradox—and its predicted gravitational "memory effect" could be picked up by LIGO.
Could Mind Forge the Universe?
Objective reality, and the laws of physics themselves, emerge from our observations, according to a new framework that turns what we think of as fundamental on its head.
Steve Dufourny: "Yes,I agree with Eckard,there it's totally to be frank crazzy and..." in First Things First: The...
Robert McEachern: ""I'd like to think it is more than one huge mistake." Indeed, so does..." in Schrödinger’s Zombie:...
Eckard Blumschein: ""Please Joe, stop to post Always the same". Perhaps you have almost nothing..." in First Things First: The...
Sydney Grimm: "Lorraine, You want to the bottom? ;-) In physics “unification” –..." in Measuring Free Will: Ian...
Georgina Woodward: "Lorraine, Who do you mean by "we"? I think your condescending attitude and..." in Schrödinger’s Zombie:...
Lorraine Ford: "Sydney, Re climate change: I’m more on the side of the QBism model, but..." in Measuring Free Will: Ian...
anna john: "It's a very good informative section. I appreciate the intelligence and..." in Gravity's Residue
Paul Henry: "Okay, that attachment link does not seem to work so here is the paper. The..." in Alternative Models of...
RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles
First Things First: The Physics of Causality
Why do we remember the past and not the future? Untangling the connections between cause and effect, choice, and entropy.
Can Time Be Saved From Physics?
Philosophers, physicists and neuroscientists discuss how our sense of time’s flow might arise through our interactions with external stimuli—despite suggestions from Einstein's relativity that our perception of the passage of time is an illusion.
Thermo-Demonics
A devilish new framework of thermodynamics that focuses on how we observe information could help illuminate our understanding of probability and rewrite quantum theory.
Gravity's Residue
An unusual approach to unifying the laws of physics could solve Hawking's black-hole information paradox—and its predicted gravitational "memory effect" could be picked up by LIGO.
Could Mind Forge the Universe?
Objective reality, and the laws of physics themselves, emerge from our observations, according to a new framework that turns what we think of as fundamental on its head.
FQXI ARTICLE
September 15, 2019
Comment on this Article
Please read the important Introduction that governs your participation in this community. Inappropriate language will not be tolerated and posts containing such language will be deleted. Otherwise, this is a free speech Forum and all are welcome!
Recent Comments
read all article comments
Please read the important Introduction that governs your participation in this community. Inappropriate language will not be tolerated and posts containing such language will be deleted. Otherwise, this is a free speech Forum and all are welcome!
Recent Comments
GEORGINA PARRY wrote on March 14, 2009
Space time is not infinity expanding, so there is no need to answer this question. There is a difference between the objective material universe that is coming together to form matter and structures and the electromagnetic image that is detected spreading out across space.
The image is interpreted to give a subjective reality of the universe that is not the same as its actual current objective material existence.
Its objective existence can not be seen. Its subjective existence is...
Space time is not infinity expanding, so there is no need to answer this question. There is a difference between the objective material universe that is coming together to form matter and structures and the electromagnetic image that is detected spreading out across space.
The image is interpreted to give a subjective reality of the universe that is not the same as its actual current objective material existence.
Its objective existence can not be seen. Its subjective existence is...
AMRIT wrote on January 17, 2009
there was no big bang, universe is a system in a permanent dynamic equilibrium, no beginning, no end, see
http://www.chronos.msu.ru/EREPORTS/sarli_the_theory.pdf
universe does not run in time as time is a measure of motion only, see file attached
there was no big bang, universe is a system in a permanent dynamic equilibrium, no beginning, no end, see
http://www.chronos.msu.ru/EREPORTS/sarli_the_theory.pdf
universe does not run in time as time is a measure of motion only, see file attached
ANONYMOUS wrote on March 27, 2008
read all article comments