Search FQXi


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Jason Wolfe: "Many years ago, I learned a difficult truth to practice. I learned that..." in The Nature of Time

Jason Wolfe: "The speed of light is both a clock and a ruler. Speed of light c=..." in The Nature of Time

Zeeya Merali: "You're invited to a special free film screening and panel discussion event,..." in Film Screening: "Infinite...

Georgina Woodward: "How we identified brain patterns of consciousness,the conversation.com" in Searching for Physical...

jim hughes: "I'm not a mathematician, so the math part is mostly lost on me. And I'm..." in Structure Invention by...

Charles Harrow: "The AI only works really well in the "comfort zone", i.e. under test..." in Is Causality Fundamental?

Jason Wolfe: "In all honesty, I'm not even sure what intelligent and educated people..." in Generalised Integrated...

Jason Wolfe: "It would be nice to imagine that the Germans are working on gravity..." in Generalised Integrated...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

Lockdown Lab Life
Grounded physicists are exploring the use of online and virtual-reality conferencing, and AI-controlled experiments, to maintain social distancing. Post-pandemic, these positive innovations could make science more accessible and environmentally-friendly.

Is Causality Fundamental?
Untangling how the human perception of cause-and-effect might arise from quantum physics, may help us understand the limits and the potential of AI.

Building Agency in the Biology Lab
Physicists are using optogenetics techniques to make a rudimentary agent, from cellular components, which can convert measurements into actions using light.

Think Quantum to Build Better AI
Investigating how quantum memory storage could aid machine learning and how quantum interactions with the environment may have played a role in evolution.

Outside the Box
A proposed quantum set-up that could predict your game-playing strategy resurrects Newcomb’s classic quiz show paradox.


FQXI ARTICLE
July 15, 2020

Untangling Quantum Causation
Figuring out if A causes B should help to write the rulebook for quantum physics.
by Nicola Jones
FQXi Awardees: Robert Spekkens, Kevin Resch
March 31, 2016
Bookmark and Share


Kevin Resch, Robert Spekkens and students Katja Ried and Jean-Philippe MacLean
Waterloo, Ontario
Some have the motto "Follow the money" or "Cherchez la femme." For theoretical physicist Robert Spekkens, it’s "Causarum Investigatio"—investigate the causes. The words are written on the ornate ceiling of the Austrian Academy of Sciences and Spekkens often uses a photo of it in his talks.

In the everyday world it’s obvious that one thing can cause another, but it can still be heinously difficult to untangle the paths of causation. Cigarettes cause cancer. But are clusters of cancer in people living under power lines due to the power lines themselves, or because poor people, who may be more inclined to smoke, tend to live under them? Statisticians have devised all sorts of rules, equations, and experimental designs to untangle these problems in the classical world, especially in the field of medicine and drug trials.

Spekkens and his colleagues at Ontario’s Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics are now trying to come up with a proper account of causality in the quantum world, which Spekkens argues, "is critical to the progress of modern physics." It could also help those trying to build speedy quantum computers. "We’re basically doing the analog of a randomized drug trial in a quantum photon experiment," says Spekkens.

The quantum world, as usual, doesn’t behave exactly like the classical one. In the everyday world, if you have a situation where either A causes B (living under power lines cause cancer) or some common cause (like poverty) is triggering both, you can’t tell from a simple dataset of observations of A and B what’s going on. You need more information.

We’re basically doing the
analog of a randomized
drug trial in a quantum
photon experiment
- Robert Spekkens
In the quantum realm this isn’t necessarily true. Say you’re looking at the polarization of photons along a bunch of different directions. If A causes B you can have perfect positive correlations of the polarizations for all those directions (where the polarization of A is always the same as that of B), but you can’t have perfect anti-correlations of the polarizations for all directions (where the polarization of A is always the opposite of that of B). If there is a common cause for A and B, however, then the opposite is true: you can have a set of perfect anti-correlations, but never a set of perfect positive correlations. Nobody really knows why that is so. "It’s interesting to think of the deeper significance of that fact, and I think we don’t quite have a handle on that," says Spekkens. But Spekkens’ team has shown this at work in a quantum photon setup, built by their lead experimentalist Kevin Resch at the University of Waterloo, Ontario (Nature Physics 11, 414–420 (2015)).

Now, with the help of an FQXi grant of almost $100,000, they have gone a step further.

To understand what they have done, consider the odd phenomenon called Berkson’s paradox. Imagine a world where a scientist’s research ability both puts them in the running for faculty positions and gets them more citations. Their teaching skills also help them to get a faculty position. In this imaginary population, teaching and citations are unconnected. Nevertheless, if you look at just the subset of scientists who won faculty positions—where those who are both bad at teaching and have poor citations have been excluded—you’ll see a strange inverse relationship: on average, faculty with high citations are poor teachers and vice versa. Such information, though just an artefact resulting from squinting at the data in a certain way, can be useful in untangling causal relationships: the induced relationship between citations and teaching tells us that both were somehow relevant to hiring decisions.

Quantum Mix

This is the scenario that Spekkens’ team has been investigating in the quantum world. They created some photons and sent them through a circuit and a logic gate, checking on their status at various points. Then they looked just at a subset of their data—say where the final photon has horizontal rather than vertical polarization (the equivalent of looking at ’just faculty’)—and checked for polarization correlations between two points in the experiment that aren’t causally related (like teaching and citations). They found them. Moreover they found that these polarizations were quantumly entangled. Not only did the experiment show that both a direct and common cause were at work, but also that these causes were mixed in a characteristically quantum kind of way (arXiv:1606.04523v1 (2016)).

"’Correlation does not imply causation’ is a mantra of all statisticians to which Rob Spekkens and his colleagues added a quantum twist," says Artur Ekert, director of the Centre for Quantum Technologies in Singapore. "It turns out that in the quantum world certain types of correlation do imply causation. This is a nice surprise."


Austrian Inspiration
Scene from the ceiling of the Austrian Academy of Sciences.
Credit: Photo courtesy of Howard Wiseman
Other teams are similarly exploring quantum causality. FQXi member Caslav Brukner at the University of Vienna, Austria, and Ognyan Oreshkov at the Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium, have devised an experiment that could be interpreted as showing how you can have a weird, quantum, space-time mashup where A causes B, and B causes A, says Spekkens. (See "Blurring Causal Lines.")

Oreshkov is similarly appreciative of Spekkens’ investigation. "Spekkens’ perspective is original and important," he says. "It is no doubt one of the forefront directions in this growing new field."

It’s also possible that such entangled causality could be used in quantum technologies, such as for building superfast computers. "People are using quantum weirdness as a resource," says Spekkens. "I wouldn’t be at all surprised if quantum causation leads to something too."

Comment on this Article

Please read the important Introduction that governs your participation in this community. Inappropriate language will not be tolerated and posts containing such language will be deleted. Otherwise, this is a free speech Forum and all are welcome!
  • Please enter the text of your post, then click the "Submit New Post" button below. You may also optionally add file attachments below before submitting your edits.

  • HTML tags are not permitted in posts, and will automatically be stripped out. Links to other web sites are permitted. For instructions on how to add links, please read the link help page.

  • You may use superscript (10100) and subscript (A2) using [sup]...[/sup] and [sub]...[/sub] tags.

  • You may use bold (important) and italics (emphasize) using [b]...[/b] and [i]...[/i] tags.

  • You may also include LateX equations into your post.

Insert LaTeX Equation [hide]

LaTeX equations may be displayed in FQXi Forum posts by including them within [equation]...[/equation] tags. You may type your equation directly into your post, or use the LaTeX Equation Preview feature below to see how your equation will render (this is recommended).

For more help on LaTeX, please see the LaTeX Project Home Page.

LaTeX Equation Preview



preview equation
clear equation
insert equation into post at cursor


Your name: (optional)






Recent Comments


At 9:00 PM EST, on August 29, 1966, I stepped off a Pan American 707 jetliner that had landed at John F Kennedy Airport in Queens NY, and I started living as a resident alien in the great country of America. I wish to thank all Americans for the way they have treated me for the past fifty years. I especially want to thank all of the Americans who have been kind and patient enough to read my Facebook

and FQXi.org posts.

Joe Fisher, Realist


Hello Mr Simpson,

You are welcome.It is indeed relevant.I asked me why the products of octonions are not both commutative and associative.Is it due to complexs and imaginaries ?If the complexs converge so it is commutatif and associatif no?

If the quaternion are not commutatif with its reals and complexs.And that the associativity is the chief orchestra.I see these quaternions like simple rotations permitting applications in physics in several calculs for example if and only if...


Oh Dear! Joe.

You are entirely mistaken, I was only allowing for your contention that it was not you whom deleted posts, the contention itself lacks qualification. As to you wanting free money as a grant from a proprietary source while demanding that all security protocols should be dropped to permit you as an open source identity to gain access to proprietary channels...

When they close the lid on me, Yank.... when they close the lid.

an with that

)|>!

read all article comments

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.