Search FQXi


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Lorraine Ford: "Tom, don’t ask a question: you need to go to the trouble of making a..." in The Present State of...

Lorraine Ford: "(cont.) The equations that represent the laws of nature do not represent..." in The Present State of...

Steve Dufourny: "Hi , I have tried to understand the actual global reality and its..." in Global Collaboration

Jim Snowdon: "Hi Amrit, You can find my views expressed under the article, "The..." in The Nature of Time

Jim Snowdon: "Our conscious minds experience duration elapsing as time passing. We use..." in The Nature of Time

Jim Snowdon: "If our planet did not rotate, we would have a sunny side and a dark side of..." in The Quantum Clock-Maker...

Jim Snowdon: "In Alice Springs it`s 1530 kilometers per hour." in The Quantum Clock-Maker...

Volodymyr Druzhshchienshkyj: "Hello Everyone: The more fundamental question is being part of any system,..." in Is Causality Fundamental?


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

Good Vibrations
Microbead 'motor' exploits natural fluctuations for power.

Reconstructing Physics
New photon experiment gives new meta-framework, 'constructor theory,' a boost.

The Quantum Engineer: Q&A with Alexia Auffèves
Experiments seek to use quantum observations as fuel to power mini motors.

The Quantum Clock-Maker Investigating COVID-19, Causality, and the Trouble with AI
Sally Shrapnel, a quantum physicist and medical practitioner, on her experiments into cause-and-effect that could help us understand time’s arrow—and build better healthcare algorithms.

Connect the Quantum Dots for a New Kind of Fuel
'Artificial atoms' allow physicists to manipulate individual electrons—and could help to reduce energy wastage in electronic devices.


FQXI ARTICLE
November 28, 2021

Dropping Schrödinger’s Cat Into a Black Hole
Combining gravity with the process that transforms the fuzzy uncertainty of the quantum realm into the definite classical world we see around us could lead to a theory of quantum gravity.
by Anil Ananthaswamy
FQXi Awardees: Raphael Bousso
May 5, 2016
Bookmark and Share


Raphael Bousso
University of California, Berkeley
Google the phrase "What happened" and you get some 530 million results. Humans, it seems, are pathologically curious. Raphael Bousso is no different—except he has a physicist’s penchant for precision. He wants to quantify just how much "happened" within a region of spacetime.

That goal is tougher than it sounds because when physicists usually attempt this feat, their quantum calculations tell them that an infinite amount of stuff happens within every tiny portion of spacetime—even though common sense tells them this is nonsense. So now Bousso, at the University of California, Berkeley, is trying to use gravity to tame those unwieldy quantum equations, potentially leading to a theory of quantum gravity, which could in turn help explain the physics of the early cosmos and black holes.

"We want to know how to describe our universe, we want to know how did that start," says Bousso. His work is even more pressing since the LIGO collaboration announced the first detection of gravitational waves—ripples through spacetime that were set off when two black holes collided—in February 2016. "What happens inside the black holes that we now know happily merge somewhere far away and make gravitational waves?" Bousso asks.

As the world evolves
it branches into a
monstrous network
of entanglement
- Leonard Susskind
Before tackling events on the grand cosmic scale, we need to get to grips with how things happen in much smaller settings, where quantum laws hold sway. Consider, for instance, Schrödinger’s infamous cat. We all know the drill. A cat’s in a box, along with a radioactive atom and a vial of poison. When the atom decays spontaneously—a quantum mechanical process—it triggers a contraption that breaks the vial, killing the cat. The standard tale argues that, while the box is shut, the radioactive atom’s state is not definite, but rather it exists in a superposition of having decayed and not-decayed, putting the cat in a superposition of being dead and alive.

It’s often said that this superposition only collapses once the box is opened and someone peers inside, sealing the precarious feline’s fate. But it’s not quite that simple. In the 1980s, physicist and FQXi member Wojciech Zurek, now at Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico, and others suggested that superpositions can be snapped if the quantum object—in this case, the cat—interacts with the environment, without the need for a conscious observer. It turns out that just a few photons of heat jostling the cat are enough to do the job. This process is called "quantum decoherence." But what exactly happens in the box is still something of a mystery, and one with which Bousso is now grappling.

To this end, and with the aid of an FQXi grant of over $140,000, Bousso is now examining a quantity that changes during decoherence called "entanglement entropy." This provides a mathematical measure of how strongly regions within a quantum system—say Schrödinger’s boxed cat—are connected to, and interact with, regions in the system’s environment.

Massaging Infinity

The calculations are tricky because when you try to conscientiously add up all the connections between the regions inside and outside the system in question, the answer hits infinity—because you can divide up the spacetime on either side of the boundary a countless number of times. But physicists have worked out ways to massage away these infinities in situations where gravity is extremely weak, allowing them to get sensible answers for the level of entanglement entropy and, hence, decoherence.


Heart of Darkness
What would happen to a cat, or anything else, that fell into a black hole?
Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech
But, asks Bousso, "what if gravity becomes strong?" That would be the case if Schrödinger’s unlucky cat-in-a-box was approaching the centre of a black hole, for instance, where gravity is immense. In this case, the same tricks cannot be used to get rid of those pesky infinities. However, Bousso argues, physicists may be able to ease their calculations by combining the entanglement entropy with another quantity known as "gravitational entropy," which is proportional to the surface area of the black hole’s event horizon.

Bousso is now investigating whether taken together entanglement entropy and gravitational entropy can be used to quantify how much happens in cosmological settings, without giving ridiculous, infinite answers. For Bousso, this isn’t just about imagining ever more gruesome deaths of pets, but about understanding black hole physics, in general, and potentially even developing a theory of quantum gravity.

Leonard Susskind, an FQXi member and physicist at Stanford University, in Palo Alto, California, is impressed by Bousso’s approach. "As the world evolves it branches into a monstrous network of entanglement," he says. "I strongly applaud Bousso’s bold attempt to quantify this network." Though Susskind adds that entanglement may not turn out to be the only ingredient necessary to quantify what happens, it is certainly an important one. "It will surely lead to new insights into gravity and quantum mechanics," says Susskind.

Comment on this Article

Please read the important Introduction that governs your participation in this community. Inappropriate language will not be tolerated and posts containing such language will be deleted. Otherwise, this is a free speech Forum and all are welcome!
  • Please enter the text of your post, then click the "Submit New Post" button below. You may also optionally add file attachments below before submitting your edits.

  • HTML tags are not permitted in posts, and will automatically be stripped out. Links to other web sites are permitted. For instructions on how to add links, please read the link help page.

  • You may use superscript (10100) and subscript (A2) using [sup]...[/sup] and [sub]...[/sub] tags.

  • You may use bold (important) and italics (emphasize) using [b]...[/b] and [i]...[/i] tags.

  • You may also include LateX equations into your post.

Insert LaTeX Equation [hide]

LaTeX equations may be displayed in FQXi Forum posts by including them within [equation]...[/equation] tags. You may type your equation directly into your post, or use the LaTeX Equation Preview feature below to see how your equation will render (this is recommended).

For more help on LaTeX, please see the LaTeX Project Home Page.

LaTeX Equation Preview



preview equation
clear equation
insert equation into post at cursor


Your name: (optional)






Recent Comments


There is still a long way to the good understanding of the surrounding world. I'm not quite sure if human beings will ever be able to grasp the essence of the universe, but we can at least trying to with such theories as Schrodinger's Cat being tossed into a black hole. Thanks for this interesting article.

Best wishes,

George


We are assuming all electrons and protons etc etc are exactly equal. We assume radioactive decay is just statistical average. We cannot specify which but we can give a statistical average. We think of cat may be alive or dead at the same time until we observe. Because we do not know if any decay of radio activity taken place. These are all our probabilistic quantum physics and we say there is no cause and effect . The biggest mistake in quantum physics that we treat all elementary...


Leicester City won the Premier League Championship title for the first time in 132 years. Hibernians won the Scottish Football Association Scottish Cup for the first time in 114 years. Perhaps my infinite surface assertion will replace the Einstein utterly unrealistic Theory of Relativity: General and Special that is now 107 years old. I hope so.

read all article comments

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.