Search FQXi


Thomas Ray: "(reposted in correct thread) Lorraine, Nah. That's nothing like my view...." in 2015 in Review: New...

Lorraine Ford: "Clearly “law-of-nature” relationships and associated numbers represent..." in Physics of the Observer -...

Lee Bloomquist: "Information Channel. An example from Jon Barwise. At the workshop..." in Physics of the Observer -...

Lee Bloomquist: "Please clarify. I just tried to put a simple model of an observer in the..." in Alternative Models of...

Lee Bloomquist: "Footnote...for the above post, the one with the equation existence =..." in Alternative Models of...

Thomas Ray: "In fact, symmetry is the most pervasive physical principle that exists. ..." in “Spookiness”...

Thomas Ray: "It's easy to get wound around the axle with black hole thermodynamics,..." in “Spookiness”...

Joe Fisher: "It seems to have escaped Wolpert’s somewhat limited attention that no two..." in Inferring the Limits on...

click titles to read articles

The Complexity Conundrum
Resolving the black hole firewall paradox—by calculating what a real astronaut would compute at the black hole's edge.

Quantum Dream Time
Defining a ‘quantum clock’ and a 'quantum ruler' could help those attempting to unify physics—and solve the mystery of vanishing time.

Our Place in the Multiverse
Calculating the odds that intelligent observers arise in parallel universes—and working out what they might see.

Sounding the Drums to Listen for Gravity’s Effect on Quantum Phenomena
A bench-top experiment could test the notion that gravity breaks delicate quantum superpositions.

Watching the Observers
Accounting for quantum fuzziness could help us measure space and time—and the cosmos—more accurately.

January 19, 2018

Wrinkles in Spacetime
Searching for defects in the fabric of the cosmos could help physicists home in on the correct theory of quantum gravity.
by Colin Stuart
FQXi Awardees: Sabine Hossenfelder
March 31, 2016
Bookmark and Share

Sabine Hossenfelder
Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies
Sabine Hossenfelder, a theoretical physicist at the Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies, in Germany, is widely known within the physics community for speaking her mind. A prolific blogger, she writes under the pseudonym "bee." As she has recounted, it was a nickname given to her by her mother because the last two syllables of Sabine sound like the German word for the insect, and she admits that a creature which stings is an apt moniker for her words.

Her characteristic sharpness and no-nonsense attitude may well give Hossenfelder just the right qualities for discerning which research avenue is best for physicists to follow, when faced with many competing options. In particular, Hossenfelder is searching for a good theory of quantum gravity—a framework that would bring together Einstein’s theory of gravity, general relativity, which describes how cosmic bodies move, and quantum theory, which governs the behaviour of particles on the smallest scales. "Some people work on problems that I don’t think are problems at all," she says. "But the question of how to find a consistent theory that combines gravity with quantum field theory is one that everyone agrees is a problem—and one that has to have a solution."

A working theory of quantum gravity is needed to explain events in the very early universe and within the core of black holes, which are both instances where strong gravity is confined in a small region. So far, describing what happens in these regimes has defied physicists. "We know the theories we have right now are inconsistent—when you combine them the answer is nonsense," she says. "It is clearly not how nature works, there has to be a better answer."

Shooting Down Theories

The trouble is that there are many contenders for that better answer. Hossenfelder—who has worked on black holes, particle physics beyond the standard model, cosmology, quantum foundations and, most recently, condensed matter physics—is hoping she can shoot some of them down, leaving a smaller range of possibilities to pursue further. The key to unlocking these mysteries of quantum gravity could involve investigating whether spacetime is continuous or discrete, when you zoom in to look at it closely. This is a question that she will spend the next two years investigating thanks to an FQXi grant of $126,000.

People like to talk
about ’atoms of
- Sabine Hossenfelder
Spacetime is the four dimensional fabric conceived of by Albert Einstein in his theories of relativity. Before relativity, the standard picture of gravity said that, for example, the planets in our solar system orbit the Sun because the latter pulls on them with a gravitational force. But Einstein argued that the Sun’s presence warps spacetime around it and the Earth is simply following the curvature of the fabric. Various attempts at a theory of quantum gravity treat this spacetime differently, with around half a dozen suggesting that space is discrete, just as ordinary matter is made up of individual building blocks. "People like to talk about ’atoms of spacetime,’" says Hossenfelder.

Hossenfelder is working on identifying experiments that may be able to probe whether spacetime is indeed discrete, allowing physicists to rule out rival theories that have it pinned as continuous. She’s particularly focussing in on potential imperfections in the discreteness. "If spacetime is not fundamentally continuous, then the smoothness we use in general relativity must have defects in it due to quantum effects in its discrete structure," she says. It is a bit like the defects you find within the lattice of a crystal such as a diamond—the underlying structure does not repeat perfectly. And if a particle travelling through spacetime encounters one of these defects then its energy and momentum will be altered. It is these changes that Hossenfelder is hoping to find experimental evidence for. (See also, "Journeying Through the Quantum Froth.")

Defect Detectors
Particles traveling from distant quasars could reveal whether spacetime is
continuous or discrete.

Credit: ESO/M. Kornmesser
So far she has been working on models involving flat spacetime because it is easier to do the math (arXiv:1401.0276v1). Now she is using the FQXi grant to extend her research into looking at defects in spacetime that is curved. "We don’t live in flat spacetime—we know that the universe expands and that spacetime is curved in the solar system. So if you really want to compare the model to data then you need to get the curved case right," says Hossenfelder. Once the model is in place, experimental physicists could look for particles that have travelled a very long way across the universe—perhaps from distant quasars or the cosmic microwave background radiation, the afterglow of the big bang—to see if their behaviour matches what you’d expect if they’d encountered spacetime defects along the way.

According to Frans Klinkhamer, a theoretical physicist from the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology in Germany, Hossenfelder is taking a "healthy approach" to the problem. He also adds a word of caution, however. "How much progress can be made remains to be seen," he says. But if successful, the pay off would be huge. Measurements that reveal the size and spacing of the defects could tell us much about the underlying theory of quantum gravity, says Klinkhamer. "It would show how classical spacetime emerges from quantum theory."

Comment on this Article

Please read the important Introduction that governs your participation in this community. Inappropriate language will not be tolerated and posts containing such language will be deleted. Otherwise, this is a free speech Forum and all are welcome!
  • Please enter the text of your post, then click the "Submit New Post" button below. You may also optionally add file attachments below before submitting your edits.

  • HTML tags are not permitted in posts, and will automatically be stripped out. Links to other web sites are permitted. For instructions on how to add links, please read the link help page.

  • You may use superscript (10100) and subscript (A2) using [sup]...[/sup] and [sub]...[/sub] tags.

  • You may use bold (important) and italics (emphasize) using [b]...[/b] and [i]...[/i] tags.

  • You may also include LateX equations into your post.

Insert LaTeX Equation [hide]

LaTeX equations may be displayed in FQXi Forum posts by including them within [equation]...[/equation] tags. You may type your equation directly into your post, or use the LaTeX Equation Preview feature below to see how your equation will render (this is recommended).

For more help on LaTeX, please see the LaTeX Project Home Page.

LaTeX Equation Preview

preview equation
clear equation
insert equation into post at cursor

Your name: (optional)

Recent Comments

EXPERIMENTAL quantum Anti-gravity —

I have made a theoretical as well as an empirical scientific discovery

of quantum gravity and quantum antigravity.

Present day quantum gravity theories suffer from

too many mathematical space dimensions, and from

too few conclusive experimental results.

My hypothesis is simple, clear,

and subject to easy empirical verification :...

Hello,theproblem isthat gravitons are bosons.And that we have a problem of equivalence.This weakest quantum force cannot be bosonic.That is not really dterministic universally speaking.You think really that if an infinite entropy above our simple human understanding ,above our physicality,has created an universewith intrisic laws.I am doubting that the special relativity ,heat and thermo and standard model are the only one is not really logic philosophically speaking, nor...

Thank you, Sir. Gravity is due to gravitons and we have so far discussed at molecular level from observation that all molecules fall equally due to M/R.R is constant. This is classical gravity we observe is fall of an apple due to flow of gravitons like arrows towards center of earth. But planets rotate in orbits due to swirling of gravitoetherton super fluid and by directional tangential push of gravitons. This is what Einstein described as following space-time curvature. ...

read all article comments

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.