Search FQXi


David Vognar: "Completeness theorem: If a system’s components can transduce, that system..." in The Entropic Price of...

Georgina Woodward: "On obtaining the singular, relative, measurement product it replaces the..." in The Present State of...

Steve Dufourny: "The paper of Wilczek of course is very relevant considering the idea about..." in The Noise of Gravitons

Georgina Woodward: "Material neuronal structure in which memory is encoded, physical records..." in Quantum Physics and the...

Steve Dufourny: "It is really how we consider the structure of the spacetime, and also how..." in The Noise of Gravitons

Aleksandr Maltsev: "Hi Georgina, Write a letter to" in Quantum Physics and the...

Georgina Woodward: "In quantum experiments using particles, there won't be swapping with a..." in The Present State of...

Aleksandr Maltsev: "I shortened the phrase Zeeya Merali  «Why does time flow….?    How..." in Time's Arrow, Black Holes...

click titles to read articles

The Entropic Price of Building the Perfect Clock: Q&A with Natalia Ares
Experiments investigating the thermodynamics of clocks can teach us about the origin of time's arrow.

Schrödinger’s A.I. Could Test the Foundations of Reality
Physicists lay out blueprints for running a 'Wigner's Friend' experiment using an artificial intelligence, built on a quantum computer, as an 'observer.'

Expanding the Mind (Literally): Q&A with Karim Jerbi and Jordan O'Byrne
Using a brain-computer interface to create a consciousness 'add-on' to help test Integrated Information Theory.

Quanthoven's Fifth
A quantum computer composes chart-topping music, programmed by physicists striving to understand consciousness.

The Math of Consciousness: Q&A with Kobi Kremnitzer
A meditating mathematician is developing a theory of conscious experience to help understand the boundary between the quantum and classical world.

February 6, 2023

Quantum Cybernetics
The quest for a meta-theory of quantum control that could one day explain physical systems, certain biological phenomena—and maybe even politics.
by Nathan Collins
October 1, 2015
Bookmark and Share

Gerardo Adesso and Davide Girolami
Quantum Controllers
Quantum cybernetics began, as so many interesting things do, on a Friday afternoon.

Gerardo Adesso, a physicist at the University of Nottingham, UK, recalls sitting in his office, a couple of years ago, thinking about "quantumness, in all its aspects," when his graduate student, Davide Girolami, walked in "and started talking apparent nonsense about a medical doctor who wrote a book in the 1960s."

The book, actually first published in 1956, was W. Ross Ashby’s An Introduction to Cybernetics, which outlined a framework for unifying the sciences—the classical disciplines, that is—in terms of how systems can be controlled. Ashby had not considered the quantum realm, in which subatomic particles are subjected to some very curious laws. But over half a century later, his ideas would lead Adesso, Girolami, and postdoctoral fellow Rebecca Schmidt to develop an entirely new perspective on the quantum world—research that, with the support of a $90,000 Foundational Questions Institute grant, could help change the way natural and maybe even social scientists think. The team hopes that the "meta-theory" that emerges will be able to collectively explain the behavior of physical as well as social and biological phenomena where quantum strategies play a fundamental role.

Cyber Control

To the extent it’s still in common use, the prefix "cyber" is associated with computers and the Internet. But the former was in its infancy and the latter not even conceived in 1948, when mathematician Norbert Weiner first used the word "cybernetics" to describe a new field he and colleagues were developing. Drawn from the Greek word for pilot or governor, cybernetics is a framework for analyzing any system in which information passes back and forth between any two entities, be they electrical components or members of Congress.

We have to radically
reassess what we had
believed to be the
- Gerardo Adesso
The framework is extremely useful. Core cybernetics concepts such as feedback and control have been essential to engineering and science since the days of the steam engine and the ’flyball governor’ that regulates it, says John Gough, an expert on quantum information at Aberystwyth University, UK. Today, many innovators believe that the next big technological revolution will utilize the potential of the subatomic world for building ever more powerful devices. These include quantum computers, which in principle would have capabilities that far surpass even the latest crop of their classical counterparts. (See "Quantum Computers Get Real.")

"The twenty-first century promises to be the century of quantum technology," says Gough. "My feeling is that the most profound ideas in quantum technology revolve around building quantum mechanical analogues of the flyball governor." So it makes perfect sense to try to extend the winning formula of cybernetics to the quantum realm, he says.

That brings us back to that pivotal Friday afternoon in Nottingham. In An Introduction to Cybernetics, Ashby laid out the Law of Requisite Variety, which states that to keep a system stable, a control mechanism must have at least as many states as the system does. For example, to adequately control a nuclear power plant, an automatic control system must have an appropriate response—the appropriate feedback—for every possible circumstance he or she may encounter, whether it’s normal operation, an earthquake-damaged reactor, or a complete meltdown. So the first task for Adesso, Girolami and others interested in extending cybernetics to microscopic systems is to find the quantum version of this law.

A Quantum Law of Requisite Variety?
In the search for a quantum theory of cybernetics, physicists must account for the weirdness
of the microscopic realm.

Credit: agsandrew
The trouble with extending the existing principles of cybernetics to quantum physics, however, is that things on the microscopic scale seem to defy classical logic. Take quantum entanglement, the phenomenon in which the properties of one atom or some other miniscule object are bound up in the properties of another. For example, if experimenters entangle the quantum spins—akin to the orientations of spinning balls—of two atoms, then as soon as someone measures one atom’s spin, the other’s spin is immediately determined. That kind of correlation can’t happen in the classical world—once set in motion, one ball’s spin doesn’t affect any other’s—suggesting the need for a new, quantum cybernetics to understand quantum systems.

"Developing a quantum law of requisite variety…is crucial because quantum systems can be correlated in ways which are different from classical ones," says Girolami. Once that has been achieved, the team can begin to calculate how quantum correlations contribute to the control and controllability of quantum systems.

Gough admires the team’s strategy, describing it as an "excellent opportunity" for eventually developing better quantum technologies and for bringing the ideas of quantum cybernetics to a wide audience.

"I really like the direction of quantum cybernetics, as it extends the usual notion of quantum information processing," agrees Vlatko Vedral, a physicist at the University of Oxford. Usually, quantum information processing is concerned with storing and transmitting information according to quantum mechanical laws, "but cybernetics also implies being able to use this information for self-regulation of the system." Vedral is such a fan that he recently hired Girolami as a postdoctoral researcher, in fact.

Quantum Biology

If Adesso’s team can create a solid mathematical formalism, Vedral says, it could shed light on some mysterious biological processes that appear to be using a sprinkling of quantum magic to improve efficiency. Until recently, physicists had assumed that quantum effects were too fragile to survive in the warm and wet environments of cells, let alone that they could play a crucial role in macroscopic biological systems. However, over the past decade, there has been increasing evidence that plants and some algae exploit quantum effects to speed up photosynthesis, the process for converting sunlight to energy. Some physicists have also suggested that birds use quantum entanglement to help navigate magnetic fields. (See "Quantum Biology: Making Waves in the Natural World.")

Such examples of quantum biology have already blurred the line between the quantum and classical worlds. "We have to radically reassess what we had believed to be the quantum/classical divide," Adesso says. By bringing various scientific disciplines together under one umbrella and describing them with one mathematical language, quantum cybernetics could help researchers figure out just where the cut-off truly lies. "The hope we have is that we will be able to provide compelling evidence that quantum mechanical effects cannot be ignored in a range of phenomena occurring in other disciplines," Adesso says.

So where does Adesso think this line will be drawn? Will we one day describe politics in terms of quantum cybernetics? It’s not as crazy a question as it might sound—political scientists and economists have for years known that just as quantum particles don’t always behave independently, neither do voters or stock traders. "As Davide likes to say, in 20 to 50 years we hope to give an affirmative answer to the question whether biologists and social scientists should learn quantum mechanics," says Adesso.

Comment on this Article

Please read the important Introduction that governs your participation in this community. Inappropriate language will not be tolerated and posts containing such language will be deleted. Otherwise, this is a free speech Forum and all are welcome!
  • Please enter the text of your post, then click the "Submit New Post" button below. You may also optionally add file attachments below before submitting your edits.

  • HTML tags are not permitted in posts, and will automatically be stripped out. Links to other web sites are permitted. For instructions on how to add links, please read the link help page.

  • You may use superscript (10100) and subscript (A2) using [sup]...[/sup] and [sub]...[/sub] tags.

  • You may use bold (important) and italics (emphasize) using [b]...[/b] and [i]...[/i] tags.

  • You may also include LateX equations into your post.

Insert LaTeX Equation [hide]

LaTeX equations may be displayed in FQXi Forum posts by including them within [equation]...[/equation] tags. You may type your equation directly into your post, or use the LaTeX Equation Preview feature below to see how your equation will render (this is recommended).

For more help on LaTeX, please see the LaTeX Project Home Page.

LaTeX Equation Preview

preview equation
clear equation
insert equation into post at cursor

Your name: (optional)

Recent Comments

Diederik Aerts and his colleagues at the VUB and elsewhere have been pursuing a not dissimilar approach (applying QM principles isomorphically to macroworld social and other issues) for a couple of decades. Just noting.

One concern. All this seems to be edging fairly close to a ToE or -- not contradictory -- something akin to empirical proof that P=NP. Or am I fundamentally misreading?

seems related to the work on top down causation of sara walker and paul davies. fascinating stuff.

Some of the reasoning you have in play there, seems - on the face of things anyway - problematic. Cybernetics, when it first came out, had the new distinctiveness on its own terms, yes, but well below any 'stand alone' standard. It did not stand on its own in terms of new value. But it was an excellent illustration, for the 1950's audience, of the possibilities in the 'shape of things to come'. In that co-dependent combination cybernetics was a development with a degree of historical import....

read all article comments

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.