Search FQXi



ABOUT THE FQXi PODCAST

The FQXi podcast brings you the latest ideas in foundational physics and cosmology—and includes interviews with our members and other leading scientists. It's hosted by Zeeya Merali and Brendan Foster. You can contact us at podcast@fqxi.org, and follow us on twitter: @FQXi. The podcast is produced by Zeeya, and music is provided by Baltimore-based Diefenbaker.
RECENT FORUM POSTS

Mike Witot: "Great. Thanks a lot for posting that info! click here" in A Self-Gravitational...

Mike Witot: "I really like to read this informations click here" in Dimensional Reduction in...

Mike Witot: "I think this is really interesting click here" in Chasing the black holes...

kurt stocklmeir: "em drive metamaterials at 1 end that create negative radiation pressure -..." in Alternative Models of...

jiya joseph: "I guess a workshop is conducted by the people that are favorable for the..." in Schrödinger’s Cat...

mono joli: "thanks a lot for such a great topic. Scary Maze Games Basketball Legends..." in The Race to Replace the...

Joe Fisher: "Dear Dr. Brendan Foster, Of course: “We Are All Connected .” My..." in We Are All Connected

Caroline v: "Thanks for informing us about FQXi-sponsored workshop which aim was to..." in Schrödinger’s Cat...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

Our Place in the Multiverse
Calculating the odds that intelligent observers arise in parallel universes—and working out what they might see.

Sounding the Drums to Listen for Gravity’s Effect on Quantum Phenomena
A bench-top experiment could test the notion that gravity breaks delicate quantum superpositions.

Watching the Observers
Accounting for quantum fuzziness could help us measure space and time—and the cosmos—more accurately.

Bohemian Reality: Searching for a Quantum Connection to Consciousness
Is there are sweet spot where artificial intelligence systems could have the maximum amount of consciousness while retaining powerful quantum properties?

Quantum Replicants: Should future androids dream of quantum sheep?
To build the ultimate artificial mimics of real life systems, we may need to use quantum memory.



PODCAST
October 18, 2017

Complete Podcast
 
The FQXi November 9, 2015 Podcast features:
  • FQXi Grant & Neutrino Prizes
  • A Cosmic Test for Time
  • Existential Risk
  • Thunderbirds Meets Quantum Physics
INFO: MP3 file / 41 minutes / 40 MB
DOWNLOAD (right-click Windows, control-click Mac)
LISTEN:
DISCUSS in the FQXi Community Forum
Bookmark and Share
Featured video in this podcast:
Individual Stories
FQXi Grant & Neutrino Prizes
In this week's news round-up, Zeeya & Brendan discuss the launch of FQXi's $2million grant round, Physics of the Observer, & the Nobel and Breakthrough Prizes in Physics for the discovery of neutrino oscillations--with help from astrophysicist Katie Mack.
INFO: MP3 file / 10 minutes / 10 MB
DOWNLOAD (right-click Windows, control-click Mac)
LISTEN:
A Cosmic Test for Time
A solar-system-sized experiment to test the nature of time: is time malleable, as general relativity suggests, or uncertain, as quantum mechanics asserts? SETI scientist Laurance Doyle describes his plans to bounce radar from the moons of Jupiter to reporter John Farrell.
INFO: MP3 file / 11 minutes / 11 MB
DOWNLOAD (right-click Windows, control-click Mac)
LISTEN:
Existential Risk
Nick Bostrom of the Future of Humanity Institute assesses the risks of a global catastrophe that could wipe out life, either from natural or human-induced environmental disasters or machine intelligence, synthetic biology, or nanotechnology that has got out of hand. With reporter Carinne Piekema.
INFO: MP3 file / 14 minutes / 14 MB
DOWNLOAD (right-click Windows, control-click Mac)
LISTEN:
Thunderbirds Meets Quantum Physics
Particle physicist Ben Still chats about his beginner's guide to understanding the subatomic world -- as told by Brains, of the 1960s science fiction series Thunderbirds -- with reporter Sophie Hebden.
INFO: MP3 file / 5 minutes / 5 MB
DOWNLOAD (right-click Windows, control-click Mac)
LISTEN:
Comment on this Podcast

Please read the important Introduction that governs your participation in this community. Inappropriate language will not be tolerated and posts containing such language will be deleted. Otherwise, this is a free speech Forum and all are welcome!
  • Please enter the text of your post, then click the "Submit New Post" button below. You may also optionally add file attachments below before submitting your edits.

  • HTML tags are not permitted in posts, and will automatically be stripped out. Links to other web sites are permitted. For instructions on how to add links, please read the link help page.

  • You may use superscript (10100) and subscript (A2) using [sup]...[/sup] and [sub]...[/sub] tags.

  • You may use bold (important) and italics (emphasize) using [b]...[/b] and [i]...[/i] tags.

  • You may also include LateX equations into your post.

Insert LaTeX Equation [hide]

LaTeX equations may be displayed in FQXi Forum posts by including them within [equation]...[/equation] tags. You may type your equation directly into your post, or use the LaTeX Equation Preview feature below to see how your equation will render (this is recommended).

For more help on LaTeX, please see the LaTeX Project Home Page.

LaTeX Equation Preview



preview equation
clear equation
insert equation into post at cursor


Your name: (optional)







Recent Comments


Yes : ), I have never tried the computer screen thing but I will take your word for it.


Steve and Georgina,

Colors, like "red", cannot be measured at all; they are purely subjective responses to the objective properties of light. The best that we can do is measure properties like amplitudes and frequencies, and then deduce, rather than measure, that a normal human visual system, will produce the perception of the color, in response to those objective properties.

The difference is important. When you see the color yellow, on your computer screen, you are not "seeing"...


Pentcho,

RE: "The Pound-Rebka experiment is compatible with Newton's emission theory of light", and "in general relativity, the speed of light falling towards the source of gravity idiotically DECREASES (in the gravitational field of the Earth the acceleration of falling photons is NEGATIVE, -2g)"

Have you actually read the paper? If you have not go to the second to the last paragraph and study the Plus and Minus signage before talking of compatibility or not with...

read all podcast comments

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.