Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home

Current Essay Contest


Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American

Previous Contests

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discusswinners

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discusswinners

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discusswinners

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Joachim Wlodarz: on 3/23/11 at 10:36am UTC, wrote Hello Paul, Thank you very much, your opinion is highly appreciated. Best...

Joachim Wlodarz: on 3/23/11 at 10:29am UTC, wrote Hello Peter, Thank you very much for the nice comment and apologies for...

Joachim Wlodarz: on 3/16/11 at 22:14pm UTC, wrote Hello Constantinos, Thank you very much for the reference to your recent...

Joachim Wlodarz: on 3/16/11 at 0:56am UTC, wrote Hi Jim, Yes, my prejudice is definitely for the latter, less general...

James Hoover: on 3/15/11 at 23:48pm UTC, wrote Joachim, At this late hour I am scanning those that I have not read and...

Constantinos Ragazas: on 3/14/11 at 2:00am UTC, wrote Hello again, Joachim Since our earlier exchanges I have posted on the web...

Paul Halpern: on 3/11/11 at 16:29pm UTC, wrote Dear Joachim, Interesting essay. I like how you distinguish between the...

Anonymous: on 3/8/11 at 19:18pm UTC, wrote Joachim Very interesting take on the subject. I particularly liked your; ...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Stefan Weckbach: "Dear Lorraine, although i believe in free will, i do not know for sure how..." in FQXi Essay Contest 2016:...

Lorraine Ford: "Hi Steve, I think that the "complexification of ...consciousness"..." in FQXi Essay Contest 2016:...

Quantum Antigravity: "EXPERIMENTAL quantum Anti-gravity —..." in The Myth of Gravity

Pentcho Valev: "Money for teleology and silly songs only? The teleology contest is a..." in Towards a Goal — Two...

Nina Marrian: "New binary options trading technology named Lazy Trader App is a dangerous..." in Are We Merging With Our...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

Bohemian Reality: Searching for a Quantum Connection to Consciousness
Is there are sweet spot where artificial intelligence systems could have the maximum amount of consciousness while retaining powerful quantum properties?

Quantum Replicants: Should future androids dream of quantum sheep?
To build the ultimate artificial mimics of real life systems, we may need to use quantum memory.

Painting a QBist Picture of Reality
A radical interpretation of physics makes quantum theory more personal.

The Spacetime Revolutionary
Carlo Rovelli describes how black holes may transition to "white holes," according to loop quantum gravity, a radical rewrite of fundamental physics.

Riding the Rogue Quantum Waves
Could giant sea swells help explain how the macroscopic world emerges from the quantum microworld? (Image credit: MIT News)


FQXi FORUM
April 24, 2017

CATEGORY: Is Reality Digital or Analog? Essay Contest (2010-2011) [back]
TOPIC: On Analog Measurements and The Digital Nature of Things by Joachim J. Wlodarz [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Author Joachim J. Wlodarz wrote on Feb. 15, 2011 @ 16:23 GMT
Essay Abstract

In this essay it is argued that the properties attributed to physical objects are inherently digital quantities, while their experimentally estimated values are rather analog quantities, as acquired indirectly in a measurement process, regardless if it is classical or quantum.

Author Bio

The Author got his PhD in 1991 from the University of Silesia, Poland. He is appointed since 2003 as Senior Lecturer at the Department of Theoretical Chemistry the same Alma Mater, and works also closely with the Computer Science Group at the Faculty of Mathematics, Physics and Chemistry.

Download Essay PDF File




Constantinos Ragazas wrote on Feb. 17, 2011 @ 02:00 GMT
Hello Joachim,

I find your claim that measurement is analog / continuous rather puzzling. Perhaps a closer reading of your essay may clarify this for me. But let me just provisionally point out that at least with measurements of energy (as in blackbody radiation) measurement involves an equilibrium which results in discrete absorption of energy (quanta). I am not sure how this is analog, in your view. In my paper “A World Without Quanta?” I show that Planck's Law for blackbody radiation is an exact mathematical truism that describes the interaction of measurement. Thou this derivation uses continuous processes and not energy quanta, I demonstrate how 'energy quanta' come about! Absorption of energy in discrete 'equal size sips' (quanta) explains also why the thermometer comes to a resting value rather than approaching that value asymptotically but never reaching it (as would be the case if measurement was analog/continuous).

Best wishing,

Constantinos

report post as inappropriate

Constantinos Ragazas replied on Feb. 17, 2011 @ 02:04 GMT
Just a final thought to my above post.

Reading the title to your essay, I have to strongly disagree. You have this backwards! Nature is continuous while our measurements of nature are discrete. In my view' "energy propagates continuously while interacts discretely".

Read my essay!

report post as inappropriate

Anonymous replied on Feb. 17, 2011 @ 17:51 GMT
Hello Constantinos,

What is analog and what is digital depends of course on the respective definitions.

Analog quantities are defined in my essay as "medium dependent" quantities. Their values have to be measured, i.e. some interactions are necessary, and the measurement outcomes are indirect values, "read out" as proportional/relative values. Analog need not necessarily mean continuous here.

Digital quantities are defined as quantities attributed to objects in an "act of recognition", as "object properties". E.g., at some point we may discover a new fundamental particle, as different from other fundamental particles and irreducible to any combination of them. This particle is then named, and their properties are also identified and possibly named if unknown previously. The particle name or identification, and the particle properties are digital by definition as such. The particle as an object is identified by their attributed properties, so in a sense, "the properties make the particle".

The fundamental particles at te lowest level are assumed to have no internal structure, therefore "the matter they are built of" is unknown. Fundamental particles are therefore rather abstract objects, digital as abstract from the unknown "medium".

Therefore, the Reality may be seen as a layered structure, where the lowest layer is the "Unknown", the layer above is the digital "Fundamental Particles Level", and the next layers may be then regarded as analog/digital, depending on the "building blocks" we need (atoms, molecules, etc.). This structure is build up like a virtual machine structure in a computer system, you may take a look at my somewhat dated slides/paper on Virtualization

I wrote my essay in a hurry to meet the deadline, as "one shot text", with almost no structure, figures, etc., therefore it may be a bit hard to read, my apologies.

I'll certainly read your essay, and possible also comment on it.

Best regards,

-Joachim.

report post as inappropriate

Author Joachim J. Wlodarz replied on Feb. 17, 2011 @ 17:56 GMT
Oops, this Anonymous fellow above is me, the poor Author :-)

I was logged on for sure before I started the writing, so maybe there is a timeout, or so.




Anonymous wrote on Mar. 8, 2011 @ 19:18 GMT
Joachim

Very interesting take on the subject. I particularly liked your;

"In consequence, analog data are always medium-dependent, while their digital incarnations may exist as abstractions, enjoing the independendence from any physical medium."

I think there is more behind that than first vibrates the brain cells! I agree entirely. Best of luck.

Peter

report post as inappropriate

Author Joachim J. Wlodarz replied on Mar. 23, 2011 @ 10:29 GMT
Hello Peter,

Thank you very much for the nice comment and apologies for my late reaction, it seems that I simply overlooked two consecutive short postings while answering to the next two late in the night, probably not without some unwanted help from the browser I've used :-)

Indeed, such passages may sound metaphysical, if not religious at the first sight, but such abstractions are in everyday use now in digital technology.

Best regards,

-Joachim.




Paul Halpern wrote on Mar. 11, 2011 @ 16:29 GMT
Dear Joachim,

Interesting essay. I like how you distinguish between the process of measurement and descriptions of nature itself.

Best regards,

Paul

report post as inappropriate

Author Joachim J. Wlodarz replied on Mar. 23, 2011 @ 10:36 GMT
Hello Paul,

Thank you very much, your opinion is highly appreciated.

Best regards,

-Joachim




Constantinos Ragazas wrote on Mar. 14, 2011 @ 02:00 GMT
Hello again, Joachim

Since our earlier exchanges I have posted on the web a result which I think will interest you. It goes directly to the question of whether light is a particle or a wave. And, of course, this does directly to the question of the digital/analog nature of Nature. Please read “If the speed of light is constant, then light is a wave” if you have the time, and support my efforts as I seek to place the results in my essay before the panel for review.

All the best,

Constantinos

report post as inappropriate

Author Joachim J. Wlodarz replied on Mar. 16, 2011 @ 22:14 GMT
Hello Constantinos,

Thank you very much for the reference to your recent paper, I'm definitely interested in any classical/quantum or digital/analog questions and results.

In the meantime, I've tried to collect and read all of your previous papers on these subjects, to get the complete picture of your essay. I'll post my comments soon.

Best regards,

-Joachim.




James Lee Hoover wrote on Mar. 15, 2011 @ 23:48 GMT
Joachim,

At this late hour I am scanning those that I have not read and found yours more readable and logical. I liked it that you provided definitions of reality, giving something to start with because definitions can vary widely.

I wonder if your prejudice is for the latter definition in your argument? It seems to be but as I said, I skimmed.

the state of things as they actually exist

i.e everything at all scales, from fundamental particles up to the whole Universe.

In the less general meaning, reality could be also assumed as

a thing that is actually experienced or seen

I will give a rating.

Jim

report post as inappropriate

Author Joachim J. Wlodarz replied on Mar. 16, 2011 @ 00:56 GMT
Hi Jim,

Yes, my prejudice is definitely for the latter, less general definition of reality.

Best regards,

-Joachim.




Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:

And select the letter between 'T' and 'V':


Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.