Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the blogger are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Kamilla Kamilla: on 4/10/16 at 17:04pm UTC, wrote This is really good information I have visited this blog to read something...

Steve Dufourny: on 2/5/11 at 13:55pm UTC, wrote thanks Tom,it's cool. Regards Steev

T H Ray: on 2/3/11 at 17:37pm UTC, wrote Steve, Personally, I use MathType with MS Office. But those are programs...

Steve Dufourny: on 2/3/11 at 16:44pm UTC, wrote Dear Tom, Have you an other program please for the signs and symbols, easy...

Steve Dufourny: on 2/2/11 at 12:58pm UTC, wrote Hi all, Dear anomymous.......to be or not to be , that is the question!!! ...

T H Ray: on 2/1/11 at 11:53am UTC, wrote Remember, the award is given to a postdoc, not to an established practicing...

Anonymous: on 1/31/11 at 0:57am UTC, wrote Is "a physicist who works part-time as an analyst at an investment bank"...

Graham: on 1/28/11 at 20:54pm UTC, wrote well done The Rutherford of our time Keep up the original thinking and...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Georgina Woodward: "Eckard, yes I understand your t=0. t=0 is start of motion from d=0 to d=x..." in The Disintegration of the...

Eckard Blumschein: "Pentcho, What feature of the observer does your "speed of light (relative..." in The Disintegration of the...

Georgina Woodward: "Hi Anon, The Venn diagram is showing something distinct from just..." in Alternative Models of...

Steve Dufourny: "Helo to both of you, Mr Hosein, Siddartha Gottam Buddah d say that after..." in Understanding, artificial...

Georgina Woodward: "Hi Anonymous, thank you so much for your feedback "It does what it..." in Alternative Models of...

Georgina Woodward: "Hi Nicholas, the probabilities may be to do with measurement outcomes which..." in Understanding, artificial...

Steve Dufourny: "It is true you know Marcel,here I have been destroyed.I am a nursery man..." in What Happens Inside the...

Steve Dufourny: "Hi Marcel, I d like to immigrate to Canada.Here I am destroyed and I cannot..." in What Happens Inside the...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

Riding the Rogue Quantum Waves
Could giant sea swells help explain how the macroscopic world emerges from the quantum microworld? (Image credit: MIT News)

Rescuing Reality
A "retrocausal" rewrite of physics, in which influences from the future can affect the past, could solve some quantum quandaries—saving Einstein's view of reality along the way.

Untangling Quantum Causation
Figuring out if A causes B should help to write the rulebook for quantum physics.

In Search of a Quantum Spacetime
Finding the universe's wavefunction could be the key to understanding the emergence of reality.

Collapsing Physics: Q&A with Catalina Oana Curceanu
Tests of a rival to quantum theory, taking place in the belly of the Gran Sasso d'Italia mountain, could reveal how the fuzzy subatomic realm of possibilities comes into sharp macroscopic focus.


FQXi BLOGS
November 28, 2016

CATEGORY: Blog [back]
TOPIC: Most Courageous Postdoc Winner: Daniel Bedingham! [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

FQXi Administrator Zeeya Merali wrote on Jan. 28, 2011 @ 11:10 GMT
Daniel Bedingham
Last September, FQXi put out a call for nominations for a new award honoring the Most Courageous Postdoc conducting research on foundational physics or cosmology. An external panel of experts reviewed all the entries and unanimously selected Daniel Bedingham, a quantum physicist at Imperial College London, as the winner (pictured, right). You can read more about his research here.

The prize was the brainchild of FQXi member, Sabine Hossenfelder, an assistant professor at the Nordic Institute for Theoretical Physics. Sabine won an FQXi mini-grant and requested that it be used to establish an award that would "encourage young people to not passively swim with the mainstream, but to take a risk and try something genuinely novel."

The winner, Daniel Bedingham, is a physicist who works part-time as an analyst at an investment bank while carrying out research at Imperial. He was nominated by Philip Pearle, at Hamilton College in Clinton, New York , who commended the quality of Bedingham’s research on quasi-relativistic dynamical collapse theories and his dedication to foundational research, despite the financial sacrifice.

Daniel Bedingham wins an award of $1000 and FQXi membership. Congratulations Daniel!

Q&A with Daniel Bedingham.

this post has been edited by the forum administrator

report post as inappropriate


Steve Dufourny wrote on Jan. 28, 2011 @ 15:29 GMT
Hi dear Zeeya ,all,

Happy to see this article.

Congratulations Daniel.

Best

Steve

report post as inappropriate


laura wrote on Jan. 28, 2011 @ 17:28 GMT
congrats dude xx

report post as inappropriate


Graham wrote on Jan. 28, 2011 @ 20:54 GMT
well done

The Rutherford of our time

Keep up the original thinking and testing the establishment

report post as inappropriate


Anonymous wrote on Jan. 31, 2011 @ 00:57 GMT
Is "a physicist who works part-time as an analyst at an investment bank" the most courageous postdoc? This rather is a choice of money and very "helpful to one’s career".... not very courageous for a physicist. Moreover doing quantum physics in the quantum physicist institute of the Imperial College London is not exactly what I mean for ... "local environment being unsupportive or even outright discouraging".

Postdocs, don't loose your time in foundation of physics. Be brave and go to work in a bank!

FQXi .... please!

report post as inappropriate

T H Ray replied on Feb. 1, 2011 @ 11:53 GMT
Remember, the award is given to a postdoc, not to an established practicing physicist. As I read the article, I get that the individual was nominated for the quality of his research output. Such quality is usually only possible for one with the luxury of devoting his time to research alone.

If one doubts that it takes a great deal of grit and determination (I think that's what "courage" means in this context) to research and publish quality work while holding down a day job, one should give it a try.

Tom

report post as inappropriate

Steve Dufourny replied on Feb. 2, 2011 @ 12:58 GMT
Hi all,

Dear anomymous.......to be or not to be , that is the question!!!

Regards

Steve

report post as inappropriate

Steve Dufourny replied on Feb. 3, 2011 @ 16:44 GMT
Dear Tom,

Have you an other program please for the signs and symbols, easy of utilization?

Regards

Steve

report post as inappropriate


Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:

And select the letter between 'J' and 'L':


Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.