DO NOT DELETE THIS POST UNDER PENALTY OF LAW!
THIS POST TO BE DELETED ONLY BY THE CONSUMER!
THIS POSTING HAS EVERYTHING TO DO WITH THE SLOWING OF LIGHT:
SEE ATTACHED THEORY
It's me again.
The below June 19, 2011 post this site referenced a June 15, 2011 posting on Out Of The Darkness & Real-Time Physics, also this same FQXi site.Those posts have since been deleted, and so are repeated here to put into context my June 19th post.
Partial repeat of June 19th post: When you slow down light, can you conduct at the same time the double slit experiment. I would like to confirm that the "slow" version of light will act as a particle, while the fast version of light, a wave.
This request to be taken in full context with CIG Theory as follows and attached:
I hope that you have taken the time to attempt a throrough understanding of The Coney Island Green Theory, as attached to my prior June 15, 2011 posting.
A small request to those inclined:
My theory introduces a new science of pressure (newly created space based on traveling masssive particles).
Could you calculate that it [ ] is [ x ] is not possible for (in our example, a deflated balloon) a deflated balloon to enlarge when heated, based on the current view of particle bombardment against the balloon walls as the sole cause for expansion. Does the particle mass and acceleration (F=ma) , when taken in its accumulated form, create enough force to actually press outward on the balloon's wall, to inflate it? Please take a worst case scenario (e.g. a heavy walled balloon). My guess is it doesn't, and therefore another explanation would be necessary to explain the phenomenom (Enter CIG theory!).
I know that there is a lot of math involved, and, for professors, maybe this could be for your students, as a project. Perhaps give it to three separate groups of students, and compare their independent results.
Can you investigate, please.
The confirmation of CIG Theory may be at stake!
I looked at the following wonderful site from Dr. Ranzan:
Upon reading about the Homgeniety Paradox, if I understand it correctly, I can add this paradox to the list of unanswered questions that CIG Theory suggests to answer.
This homogeniety, since the expansion comes from independent pieces of mass matter everywhere. Remember, what we see as the past (billions of years out), they see as the present, and what we see as the present, they see as the past. Therefore, taken into context, we see the same thing. So of course, it will look the same
The attached represents my theory.
I have named my own model of the Universe, the Minverse Model (previously Coney Island Green, the name of the theory). See all below & attached.
I would be much greatful if the community consider this new model.
It is named Minverse (miniverse) because each mass entity acts as its own Universe, capable of creating space from mass.
Here are its claims (see also attached):
To Cosmologists and Theoretical Physicists,
The attached theory welcomes intense scrutiny and comment by experts.
Though the paper remains in need of further revision, nonetheless its current content is sufficient to promulgate research directed toward its firm confirmation. It is a "new model" of the Universe/Multiverse. The suggested term is the: "The Minverse Model" (short for miniverse, while at the same time in honor of my grandmother, Minerva).
The theory includes a mass to space quantification. Time is a dynamic feature of the theory. It should be noted that the great physicist Faramarz Ghassemi was pursuing a similar mass to space view of nature. It is time other physicists take a serious look.
The theory offers in a "single view of nature", and "simultaneously", the following:
Varying Cosmological Constant
Possible explanation of Virtual Particles
Combination of the Spacetime Continuum with the Mass-energy equation
Quantification of mass to a spatial quantity
Solution to Dark Matter
Solution to Dark Energy
Solution to Horizon Problem
Solution to Red Shift Anomalies
Solution to Double Slit (Young's) Wave-Particle Duality Quantum Confusion
Physical explanation as to what E=mc² actually represents
New Interpretation of Einstein's Field Equations
True reason for Hubble expansion
Fourth Law of Motion Equating Gravity to Other Forces
Possible meaning of Plancks Constant
Lipps Law of Proportionality
Offers a New Explanation of Pressure
Is Relativitivistic in nature and therefore builds upon current science
Does not rely on extra dimensions
Does not rely on speeds greater than "c" as does current inflationary theory
Combines the Fundamentals (Matter, Time, Space)
Coherently respects conservation of energy (current view of expansion of space does not)
Above all else, the theory is experimentally verifiable.
Comments are welcome and can be delivered here or to firstname.lastname@example.org
For a hard copy, please email the author.
Once again, the author apologizes for what appears to be a paper not altogether written in scientific/academic protocol.
Enjoy the "Fun" section as well.
Please open the attached to find: "The Coney Island Green Theory".
& this for a group that was "slowing down light": (not too slow, after all it is light!)
For the John Howell group & other experimenters along this line.
When you slow down light, can you conduct at the same time the double slit experiment. I would like to confirm that the "slow" version of light will act as a particle, while the fast version of light, a wave.
CIG Theory (posted on Out Of The Darkness & Real-Time Physics this same FQXi site - see June 15, 2011 posting) suggests that mass becomes spatial when it travels at or near "c" rates. My guess is, that if you can actually slow light down, it will lose this spatiality. Conducting this experiment will confirm Coney Island Green Theory.
Could you try, and send me results. If I am wrong, I will have to rescind my theory, or at the very least revisit it in its entirety.
Thank You Kindly
view post as summary