Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Display:
 all posts
 member posts highlighted
 member posts only

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Nina Marrian: on 4/20/17 at 10:23am UTC, wrote New binary options trading technology named Lazy Trader App is a dangerous...

Georgina Woodward: on 3/15/17 at 19:41pm UTC, wrote Good point and well written, (unlike your appallingly written advert for a...

Richard Spillers: on 3/15/17 at 13:00pm UTC, wrote WWW.GOOGLE.COM

Richard Spillers: on 3/15/17 at 12:58pm UTC, wrote New technology can enhance the possibility of learning and it is the...

jane caror: on 8/13/16 at 7:35am UTC, wrote Thank you for this useful information... Assignment Help

Georgina Woodward: on 3/25/14 at 22:36pm UTC, wrote Junk DNA not so Junky Epigenetic's and non-coding RNA research Where long...

Alice lewis: on 3/25/14 at 9:53am UTC, wrote Well! All information here is new for me. I think Really strange. I think...

Georgina Parry: on 3/15/11 at 6:07am UTC, wrote Telomeres



FQXi FORUM
April 29, 2017

CATEGORY: Technology [back]
TOPIC: Are We Merging With Our Technology? [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

William Orem wrote on Jun. 28, 2007 @ 20:15 GMT
Put this one in the Strange New World file: is it possible to use junk DNA as a repository for secret messages? The idea cropped up in science fiction some time ago, but as of now, it's also reality.

Japanese researchers at Keio University, led by Masaru Tomita, recently wrote the sequence "E=mc2 1905" into the genome of a bacterium. The idea is as simple as the execution is complex: your four choices are C, G, A, and T; regard these as base keys in a translation code; type away. As long as a suitable reading mechanism exists that knows the translation code, the bacterium has just been turned into a communication device. Or, more precisely, its natural code-bearing potential has been hijacked to carry a secondary level of "meaning."

All of us are repositories of huge numbers of terabytes worth of junk DNA anyway, just waiting to be turned to advantage. Or perhaps, as the article speculates, our junk DNA already has been turned to this purpose: perhaps the search for communication from alien species should be proceeding inward rather than outward. We might be partly their autographed handiwork, the way Bach wrote his name into his cantatas on occasion. Maybe the stuff that doesn't code for any proteins is carrying greetings, along with instructions on how to manipulate the physical world around us effectively, once we reach the point of being able to recognize and decode the message . . .

Question: science or fantasy? And, more generally: is this the beginning of the merging point between biology and technology? How long before the distinction between organism and machine becomes irrelevant . . . or is it already?

image: jurvetson


this post has been edited by the author since its original submission

report post as inappropriate


Josh Cuppett wrote on Jan. 12, 2009 @ 21:11 GMT
If we throw DNA into a black hole, is the information lost?

report post as inappropriate


atomiton1 wrote on Jan. 25, 2009 @ 03:47 GMT
To Josh. YES

report post as inappropriate


atomiton1 wrote on Jan. 25, 2009 @ 04:02 GMT
The one achiement that is my lifes goal is to create androids we are able to program our minds to. To chat my email address is atomiton1@yahoo.com

report post as inappropriate


Georgina Parry wrote on Feb. 24, 2009 @ 20:36 GMT
Junk DNA is an unfortunate choice of name, since it immediately devalues this portion of DNA because of its as yet un-ascertained purpose.

It is prejudice to assume that, just because we do not know what purpose it serves, it is of no value and can be tampered with and manipulated to serve short sighted aims of a few individuals.

Investigation of its purpose and any coding within it is however a useful scientific endeavour, as we may be wiser as a result.

Very often human technology which should benefit mankind has been found to have unforeseen detrimental effects.

The distinction between life and machine, biology and technology, must always be preserved because when life is devalued its very survival is threatened. This is of primary importance.

Unfortunately it is the distinction between science and fantasy that is becoming blurred.

Economics and technology (and a certain percentage of human beings) are devoid of morality.

Question? Shouldn't common sense, foresight and moral values hold tight to the reins of technological development?

report post as inappropriate

Georgina Parry replied on Mar. 15, 2011 @ 06:07 GMT
Telomeres

report post as inappropriate

Georgina Woodward replied on Mar. 25, 2014 @ 22:36 GMT
Junk DNA not so Junky

Epigenetic's and non-coding RNA research

Where long noncoding RNAs meet DNA methylation

report post as inappropriate


Marshall Barnes wrote on Mar. 17, 2010 @ 01:15 GMT
I am working on a number of projects now that deal with merging technology with the human consciousness or mind (as opposed to brain). This is another aspect of the same issue and one that is happening now as opposed to sci fi speculation.

report post as inappropriate


re castel wrote on May. 25, 2010 @ 13:41 GMT
strange...

report post as inappropriate


re castel wrote on May. 25, 2010 @ 13:45 GMT
human beings are devoid of morality? strange indeed.

report post as inappropriate


re castel wrote on May. 25, 2010 @ 13:50 GMT
merge tech with human consciousness? how else do you merge tech with human consciousness? aren't you supposed to go through the brain?

report post as inappropriate


re castel wrote on May. 25, 2010 @ 13:52 GMT
are humans ever conscious without the mind in the body?

report post as inappropriate


re castel wrote on May. 25, 2010 @ 13:57 GMT
economics and technology influence the morality of human beings. and human beings always have morality - it's just that a sizable part of it is junk morality - must be because of junk DNA.

report post as inappropriate


Anonymous wrote on Nov. 4, 2010 @ 06:40 GMT
Really strange but thanks to share it.

report post as inappropriate


Mr. Magoo wrote on Jan. 23, 2011 @ 01:03 GMT
Just because Japanese biologists can train cells on the side of a fish to produce a corporate logo does not certify the fish as CEO material.

The age spots on my wife's left wrist could probably become the model for encoded wonders from another world that no one recognizes because WHY SHOULD THEY...

unless they are simply looking for weird research projects to suck in federal grants?

Please give me some more of dat stuff!

report post as inappropriate


Alice lewis wrote on Mar. 25, 2014 @ 09:53 GMT
Well! All information here is new for me. I think Really strange. I think you have great collection regarding it. I would like to say Thanks for sharing it.

report post as inappropriate


Richard Spillers wrote on Mar. 15, 2017 @ 13:00 GMT
WWW.GOOGLE.COM

report post as inappropriate

Georgina Woodward replied on Mar. 15, 2017 @ 19:41 GMT
Good point and well written, (unlike your appallingly written advert for a writing service; not appreciated and reported as inappropriate. Please don't abuse this site.)

report post as inappropriate


Nina Marrian wrote on Apr. 20, 2017 @ 10:23 GMT
New binary options trading technology named Lazy Trader App is a dangerous scam that steals money from innocent people. Stay away!

report post as inappropriate


Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.