If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.
Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.
Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.
Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use
RSS feed | RSS help
Introduction
Terms of Use
Posts by the blogger are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.
By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC
Antony Lisi: on 5/14/07 at 19:04pm UTC, wrote I am poor, but hunting down errors is important to me -- and I could use...
Antony Lisi: on 5/3/07 at 20:34pm UTC, wrote Throughout his or her tortured existence, a mathematical physicist has two...
RECENT FORUM POSTS
Georgina Woodward: "Here's a thought. I don't know if you will think it at all relevant. What..." in Schrödinger’s Cat...
Gary Simpson: "Tom, I understand that both Alice and Bob have their own clocks. However,..." in Alternative Models of...
Georgina Woodward: "John, there is a problem with applying the truth values [true or false] to..." in Wandering Towards a Goal:...
Georgina Woodward: "I think this is better for the Map variables - (sorry was just too keen to..." in Wandering Towards a Goal:...
Steve Agnew: "Somehow I love it when a very important topic gets very very comments...we..." in Schrödinger’s Cat...
Thomas Ray: "Gary, I believe that the property of quantum entanglement is merely an..." in Alternative Models of...
RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles
Sounding the Drums to Listen for Gravity’s Effect on Quantum Phenomena
A bench-top experiment could test the notion that gravity breaks delicate quantum superpositions.
Watching the Observers
Accounting for quantum fuzziness could help us measure space and time—and the cosmos—more accurately.
Bohemian Reality: Searching for a Quantum Connection to Consciousness
Is there are sweet spot where artificial intelligence systems could have the maximum amount of consciousness while retaining powerful quantum properties?
Quantum Replicants: Should future androids dream of quantum sheep?
To build the ultimate artificial mimics of real life systems, we may need to use quantum memory.
Painting a QBist Picture of Reality
A radical interpretation of physics makes quantum theory more personal.
Antony Lisi: on 5/14/07 at 19:04pm UTC, wrote I am poor, but hunting down errors is important to me -- and I could use...
Antony Lisi: on 5/3/07 at 20:34pm UTC, wrote Throughout his or her tortured existence, a mathematical physicist has two...
RECENT FORUM POSTS
Georgina Woodward: "Here's a thought. I don't know if you will think it at all relevant. What..." in Schrödinger’s Cat...
Gary Simpson: "Tom, I understand that both Alice and Bob have their own clocks. However,..." in Alternative Models of...
Georgina Woodward: "John, there is a problem with applying the truth values [true or false] to..." in Wandering Towards a Goal:...
Georgina Woodward: "I think this is better for the Map variables - (sorry was just too keen to..." in Wandering Towards a Goal:...
Steve Agnew: "Somehow I love it when a very important topic gets very very comments...we..." in Schrödinger’s Cat...
Thomas Ray: "Gary, I believe that the property of quantum entanglement is merely an..." in Alternative Models of...
RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles
Sounding the Drums to Listen for Gravity’s Effect on Quantum Phenomena
A bench-top experiment could test the notion that gravity breaks delicate quantum superpositions.
Watching the Observers
Accounting for quantum fuzziness could help us measure space and time—and the cosmos—more accurately.
Bohemian Reality: Searching for a Quantum Connection to Consciousness
Is there are sweet spot where artificial intelligence systems could have the maximum amount of consciousness while retaining powerful quantum properties?
Quantum Replicants: Should future androids dream of quantum sheep?
To build the ultimate artificial mimics of real life systems, we may need to use quantum memory.
Painting a QBist Picture of Reality
A radical interpretation of physics makes quantum theory more personal.
FQXi BLOGS
August 11, 2017
Throughout his or her tortured existence, a mathematical physicist has two mortal enemies. These enemies are battled constantly, strike at any moment, and can merely wound or actually kill vast swaths of calculations. Here is one:
2
and here is the other:
-
Yes, they are small. But they are mighty. It is their tiny stature that often leads to their deadly effectiveness -- for they are sneaky. And they must be controlled. If one appears in the wrong place, or disappears from the right place, it spawns errors in every subsequent expression until its victory over the theorist is immortalized in publication.
OK, so, big deal, a few "-" here and there can't be that hard to keep track of, even if one does tend to juggle several in the head at once during a calculation, right? How many are we talking about? I just did a search through my notes at Deferential Geometry... There are currently 2,277 "-" living there.
=:-o
Sure, some of these are hyphens so they don't count. But still, that's a lot of potential evil, lurking. The odds of 2,277 irascible "-" all being in the right place at the right time... well, it saddens me to think about how small (or even negative?) that probability is.
So I'm offering a bounty!
$100 to the first person to find three initial appearances (or disappearances ) of a malicious "-" at Deferential Geometry.
The restrictions:
1) You have to correctly identify the root cause, where a mistaken sign first occurs -- its dependents don't count.
2) It has to be an actual mistake, not due to a difference of opinion or convention.
3) A mistake in a note tagged with a "0" is only worth half, since those are often rough or incomplete calculations.
Please post a comment here if you think you've spotted one or several of the enemy. (Describe the note and the erroneous expression in it.) If it's a mistake, you get the credit for finding it first even if you weren't sure about it. The victor will be heralded and sent $100 from me via paypal.
A suggestion: If you have to argue to make your case, you're probably wasting time. Out of 2,277 signs, I'm sure I just plain dropped some in calculations. But feel free to ask.
Once this bounty is claimed, we'll talk about the 2,428 2's...
this post has been edited by the author since its original submission
report post as inappropriate
2
and here is the other:
-
Yes, they are small. But they are mighty. It is their tiny stature that often leads to their deadly effectiveness -- for they are sneaky. And they must be controlled. If one appears in the wrong place, or disappears from the right place, it spawns errors in every subsequent expression until its victory over the theorist is immortalized in publication.
OK, so, big deal, a few "-" here and there can't be that hard to keep track of, even if one does tend to juggle several in the head at once during a calculation, right? How many are we talking about? I just did a search through my notes at Deferential Geometry... There are currently 2,277 "-" living there.
=:-o
Sure, some of these are hyphens so they don't count. But still, that's a lot of potential evil, lurking. The odds of 2,277 irascible "-" all being in the right place at the right time... well, it saddens me to think about how small (or even negative?) that probability is.
So I'm offering a bounty!
$100 to the first person to find three initial appearances (or disappearances ) of a malicious "-" at Deferential Geometry.
The restrictions:
1) You have to correctly identify the root cause, where a mistaken sign first occurs -- its dependents don't count.
2) It has to be an actual mistake, not due to a difference of opinion or convention.
3) A mistake in a note tagged with a "0" is only worth half, since those are often rough or incomplete calculations.
Please post a comment here if you think you've spotted one or several of the enemy. (Describe the note and the erroneous expression in it.) If it's a mistake, you get the credit for finding it first even if you weren't sure about it. The victor will be heralded and sent $100 from me via paypal.
A suggestion: If you have to argue to make your case, you're probably wasting time. Out of 2,277 signs, I'm sure I just plain dropped some in calculations. But feel free to ask.
Once this bounty is claimed, we'll talk about the 2,428 2's...
this post has been edited by the author since its original submission
report post as inappropriate
I am poor, but hunting down errors is important to me -- and I could use the help. So I just upped the bounty to $100.
report post as inappropriate
report post as inappropriate
Login or create account to post reply or comment.