Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home

Current Essay Contest


Previous Contests

What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018
Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discuss

Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fnd.
read/discusswinners

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discusswinners

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discusswinners

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discusswinners

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Dimi Chakalov: on 12/12/08 at 15:58pm UTC, wrote P.S. I tried to vote for your Essay, but somehow the system didn't like it,...

Dimi Chakalov: on 12/11/08 at 20:14pm UTC, wrote Adam: Glad to learn that the ideas in your Essay are related to the...

Adam Helfer: on 12/10/08 at 4:03am UTC, wrote Carl, Thanks for yor comments. I recall the Schwinger measurement...

Dr. E (The Real McCoy): on 12/3/08 at 4:30am UTC, wrote Hello Adam. Nice paper! Love the focus on meausrement, for without...

Dimi Chakalov: on 12/3/08 at 3:37am UTC, wrote Dear Adam, You claim (p. 2) that "the main unanswered question in quantum...

Venerando: on 12/2/08 at 22:53pm UTC, wrote I think that it is a great job. I not only agree with the exposed ideas,...

Carl Brannen: on 12/2/08 at 22:11pm UTC, wrote I like this idea. You might be interested in Julian Schwinger's version of...

Adam Daniel Helfer: on 12/2/08 at 14:43pm UTC, wrote Essay Abstract I suggest that measurement in quantum theory should...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Georgina Woodward: "Joe, sensory products are what is seen. Illumination matters because it..." in The Sudoku Universe, Why...

fally jonash: "It is a well-maintained site where people can learn about various topics. I..." in A Wonderful Outcome

fally jonash: "Your article is very interesting and fantastic, at the same time the theme..." in In Search Of Other Earths

Joe Fisher: "Dear Georgina, The (INVISIBLE) “sensory products” you keep writing..." in The Sudoku Universe, Why...

Joe Fisher: "Dear Georgina, I failed to mention that although conventional chess game..." in The Complexity Conundrum

Joe Fisher: "Dear Steve Agnew, On December 7, 2017, I have emailed : “Dear..." in The Complexity Conundrum

Lena Smith: "All HP printers carry a unique qualities. if the product is still under..." in Conjuring a Neutron Star...

Lena Smith: "All HP printers carry a unique qualities. if the product is still under..." in Conjuring a Neutron Star...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

The Complexity Conundrum
Resolving the black hole firewall paradox—by calculating what a real astronaut would compute at the black hole's edge.

Quantum Dream Time
Defining a ‘quantum clock’ and a 'quantum ruler' could help those attempting to unify physics—and solve the mystery of vanishing time.

Our Place in the Multiverse
Calculating the odds that intelligent observers arise in parallel universes—and working out what they might see.

Sounding the Drums to Listen for Gravity’s Effect on Quantum Phenomena
A bench-top experiment could test the notion that gravity breaks delicate quantum superpositions.

Watching the Observers
Accounting for quantum fuzziness could help us measure space and time—and the cosmos—more accurately.


FQXi FORUM
December 11, 2017

CATEGORY: The Nature of Time Essay Contest (2008) [back]
TOPIC: The Production of Time by Adam Daniel Helfer [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Adam Daniel Helfer wrote on Dec. 2, 2008 @ 14:43 GMT
Essay Abstract

I suggest that measurement in quantum theory should be regarded as a sense of time (of things *happening*), which is as important as the conventional relativistic notion of time. A key question -- of basic physical interest whether one accepts the arguments here or not -- is, What physical criteria determine when a measurement takes place? I suggest a way in which the answer to this may be bound up with the resolution of some pathologies associated with the stress-energy operator, and may at the same time determine the cosmic flow of time. The problem of reconciling the quantum sense of time (measurement) and the conventional relativistic one gives some indication that the the correct "quantization" of gravity is essentially different from that of other fields.

Author Bio

Adam Helfer works on general relativity and quantum field theory.

Download Essay PDF File




Carl Brannen wrote on Dec. 2, 2008 @ 22:11 GMT
I like this idea. You might be interested in Julian Schwinger's version of QM devoted to measurements. Do a google search for "measurement algebra"+Schwinger and see what comes up.




Venerando wrote on Dec. 2, 2008 @ 22:53 GMT
I think that it is a great job. I not only agree with the exposed ideas, but also think they are well exposed, even for a low level degree in physics knowledge as mine. I’ve enjoyed this phrase:

“Is it really plausible that the Universe was in a gross macroscopic superposition of states until consciousness developed?”

:DDD

Good luck with your job and in the contest.




Dimi Chakalov wrote on Dec. 3, 2008 @ 03:37 GMT
Dear Adam,

You claim (p. 2) that "the main unanswered question in quantum theory is, When does a measurement occur?", and stressed (Sec. 5) that "a natural approach to understanding time in quantum theory is via its classically conjugate variable, energy." All this reminded me of the invisible cat, Macavity, which shows up only when no one is looking at it, just like the negative energy density in QFT (arXiv:gr-qc/9709047v2). Perhaps Macavity is always unobservable or gauge-dependent, and can be "located" only with a Gedankenexperiment from Wikipedia here.

I like your essay very much. The more I read it, the more I learn from you. Thank you.

Best regards -- Dimi




Dr. E (The Real McCoy) wrote on Dec. 3, 2008 @ 04:30 GMT
Hello Adam.

Nice paper! Love the focus on meausrement, for without meausrement, there is no time, nor physics!

You write, "A key question -- of basic physical interest whether one accepts the arguments here or not -- is, What physical criteria determine when a measurement takes place?"

Consider the irreversible collapse of the photon's wave funcation in an act of...

view entire post





Adam Helfer wrote on Dec. 10, 2008 @ 04:03 GMT
Carl,

Thanks for yor comments. I recall the Schwinger measurement algebrea as an attempt to formalize the ideas of probability and interference.

Venerando, Dimi and Dr. E.,

Thanks for your comments. Yes, Dimi, the ideas here are related to those I figuratively associated with Macavity.




Dimi Chakalov wrote on Dec. 11, 2008 @ 20:14 GMT
Adam:

Glad to learn that the ideas in your Essay are related to the "invisible" (gauge-dependent?) cat Macavity (arXiv:gr-qc/9709047v2).

Please check out the so-called Buridan donkey paradox. Perhaps Macavity facilitates all "negotiations" between the donkeys. As you conjectured in your Essay (p. 3), "perhaps time is not merely a parameter, but another sort of thing, in quantum theory."

To the best of my knowledge, you are the first person to propose a new sort of time-energy uncertainty relation (Sec. 5.3, p. 8). I hope you will be awarded 10xFirst Prize in this contest.

Best - Dimi




Dimi Chakalov wrote on Dec. 12, 2008 @ 15:58 GMT
P.S. I tried to vote for your Essay, but somehow the system didn't like it, and you still don't have any votes. Perhaps it will be a good idea if you elaborate more on your time-energy uncertainty relation (Sec. 5.3) and its implication to GR (Sec. 5.4), and then submit your research manuscript to PRL.

If there is anything I can do, just whistle.

Dimi




Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.