If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home

Current Essay Contest

Previous Contests

**Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics**

*Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation*

Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discuss • winners

**How Should Humanity Steer the Future?**

*January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014*

*Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American*

read/discuss • winners

**It From Bit or Bit From It**

*March 25 - June 28, 2013*

*Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American*

read/discuss • winners

**Questioning the Foundations**

Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?

*May 24 - August 31, 2012*

*Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American*

read/discuss • winners

**Is Reality Digital or Analog?**

*November 2010 - February 2011*

*Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American*

read/discuss • winners

**What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?**

*May - October 2009*

*Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams*

read/discuss • winners

**The Nature of Time**

*August - December 2008*

read/discuss • winners

Current Essay Contest

Previous Contests

Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discuss • winners

read/discuss • winners

read/discuss • winners

Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?

read/discuss • winners

read/discuss • winners

read/discuss • winners

read/discuss • winners

Forum Home

Introduction

Terms of Use

RSS feed | RSS help

Introduction

Terms of Use

*Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.*

RSS feed | RSS help

RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

**Angela Maria**: *on* 4/20/17 at 7:24am UTC, wrote Good information...Zellmeonline

**Angela Maria**: *on* 4/20/17 at 7:22am UTC, wrote Good post..Zellmeonline

**Alberta Martin**: *on* 8/22/16 at 11:05am UTC, wrote I have been interested in this topic for quite some time. I have been...

**Kamilla Kamilla**: *on* 4/10/16 at 17:15pm UTC, wrote Wow, cool post. I’d like to write like this too – taking time and real...

**amrit**: *on* 1/6/09 at 17:24pm UTC, wrote Dear Prof. Finkelstein Reading your article on FQXi I would like to...

**T H Ray**: *on* 12/4/08 at 14:58pm UTC, wrote David, "Emerge. Simplify. Stratify. Localize." What a marvelous way to...

**Chi Ming Hung**: *on* 12/3/08 at 0:09am UTC, wrote Prof. Finkelstein, I've been following your work since I read your...

**David Ritz Finkelstein**: *on* 12/1/08 at 17:02pm UTC, wrote **Essay Abstract** A deep-quantum model of time is described. It...

RECENT FORUM POSTS

**Rajiv Singh**: "Hi Lorraine, This time, before submitting, I noted that the web page did..."
*in* FQXi Essay Contest 2016:...

**Anonymous**: "Dear Lorraine, Thank you, not only for your responses, but also for a..."
*in* FQXi Essay Contest 2016:...

**sussan betcher**: "Such ventures helping to raise public awareness and interest in theoretical..."
*in* Multiversal Journeys —...

**sabir rao**: "We are looking for the ways how to hack instagram password online and..."
*in* Purifying Physics: The...

**sabir rao**: "If you don't know a little bit about the free psn plus codes then here is..."
*in* Towards a Goal — Two...

**Anonymous**: "From the perspective of field theory, the only difference that arises..."
*in* Rescuing Reality

**Georgina Woodward**: "Hi Community, I could probably have done something better but it gets the..."
*in* Alternative Models of...

**appzoro Technologies **: "Informative post and all threads. I am new here and wants to share me..."
*in* New Podcast: A MICROSCOPE...

RECENT ARTICLES

*click titles to read articles*

**Bohemian Reality: Searching for a Quantum Connection to Consciousness**

Is there are sweet spot where artificial intelligence systems could have the maximum amount of consciousness while retaining powerful quantum properties?

**Quantum Replicants: Should future androids dream of quantum sheep?**

To build the ultimate artificial mimics of real life systems, we may need to use quantum memory.

**Painting a QBist Picture of Reality**

A radical interpretation of physics makes quantum theory more personal.

**The Spacetime Revolutionary**

Carlo Rovelli describes how black holes may transition to "white holes," according to loop quantum gravity, a radical rewrite of fundamental physics.

**Riding the Rogue Quantum Waves**

Could giant sea swells help explain how the macroscopic world emerges from the quantum microworld? (Image credit: MIT News)

RECENT FORUM POSTS

RECENT ARTICLES

Is there are sweet spot where artificial intelligence systems could have the maximum amount of consciousness while retaining powerful quantum properties?

To build the ultimate artificial mimics of real life systems, we may need to use quantum memory.

A radical interpretation of physics makes quantum theory more personal.

Carlo Rovelli describes how black holes may transition to "white holes," according to loop quantum gravity, a radical rewrite of fundamental physics.

Could giant sea swells help explain how the macroscopic world emerges from the quantum microworld? (Image credit: MIT News)

FQXi FORUM

April 30, 2017

CATEGORY:
The Nature of Time Essay Contest (2008)
[back]

TOPIC: Deep quantum time by David Ritz Finkelstein [refresh]

TOPIC: Deep quantum time by David Ritz Finkelstein [refresh]

A deep-quantum model of time is described. It begins with a stratified state-vector space without space-time and gauge fields. These emerge from contact exchange interactions and vacuum condensation. The model is an imbedding of the existing singular theories of gravity and GUT within a simple (Clifford) algebra with strata used to represent those of physics. This results in a model that is regular as well as simple. Its phenomenological vacuum is a finite quantum cellular shell truss one cell thick and cosmologically-many cells long, whose struts are quantum trits (three-state elements). Each cell has 10 dimensions transverse to the shell, giving rise to the GUT fermions, and 4 along the shell, giving rise to spin on one stratum and space-time on another. The great anisotropy of the shell results in the great differences between internal and external variables, and between GUT and gravity. For each frame, the longitudinal shell dimension of negative signature is time.

David Ritz Finkelstein is professor emer. of physics at Georgia Tech, where he does research and teaches. He was educated at City College of New York and Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and did early work on quantum logic, black holes, gravitational skyrmeons, the electroweak unification, and quantum-computer models of space-time. He suspects that the universe is a kind of quantum cellular neural network, and has been hunting the chronon, the quantum of time, since college. His book Quantum Relativity described this work up to 1996.

Prof. Finkelstein, I've been following your work since I read your "Space-time code" papers in Phys.Rev. years ago. Unfortunately I soon got lost somewhere down the mathematical/logical rabbit hole you led us, no doubt due to my own shortcomings... Glad to see the rabbit hole is getting deeper still...

David,

"Emerge. Simplify. Stratify. Localize."

What a marvelous way to organize a theory of time in which quantum events drive local observation.

Sea Time and Queue Time appear to be a true unification of relativistic time--where time is a simple continuous and reversible parameter--and quantum momenta, which appear as real-valued outcomes, positive, negative and zero. I love the metaphor of Sea time as a continuous knob and Queue time as many single pole, triple-throw switches. One imagines that the continuous and infinitely orientable "knob" outputs values at every chronon increment that correspond to one of the triple posiitions. Maybe the answer, somewhere in time, really is 42. :-) The model answers Einstein's challenge to discrete physical functions (The Meaning of Relativity), in that although one can give good reasons why reality cannot be represented in a continuous field theory, if quantum theory is correct, one should have a theory that completely describes the world in quantum numbers.

On a personal note, the "truss shell model" spoke to me on an issue I have struggled over in my own research. To arrive at a 10-dimension limit of 4-dimension spacetime, I summed the cardinal points of discrete spatial dimensions up to non-redundant points of the Riemann tensor metric. Though I found the sum useful, I could never identify any good physical reason to do it. Your model ("...the spacetime process itself ...") is exactly what I had in mind and was never so bold to express. The cardinal totality of points in the tensor field (16) with 6 redundant points, results, as you say, in 10 dimensions transverse to each cell. In my model, as in your cold graphene macro-molecule, emergent waves carry away energy. I have generalized to the result:

The 4-dimension horizon is identical to the 10-dimension boundary.

As in your model, this obviates a compactification problem in my model as well. I do hope you can make time to read my FQXI essay, "Time counts."

David Finkelstein, may your tribe increase.

Tom

"Emerge. Simplify. Stratify. Localize."

What a marvelous way to organize a theory of time in which quantum events drive local observation.

Sea Time and Queue Time appear to be a true unification of relativistic time--where time is a simple continuous and reversible parameter--and quantum momenta, which appear as real-valued outcomes, positive, negative and zero. I love the metaphor of Sea time as a continuous knob and Queue time as many single pole, triple-throw switches. One imagines that the continuous and infinitely orientable "knob" outputs values at every chronon increment that correspond to one of the triple posiitions. Maybe the answer, somewhere in time, really is 42. :-) The model answers Einstein's challenge to discrete physical functions (The Meaning of Relativity), in that although one can give good reasons why reality cannot be represented in a continuous field theory, if quantum theory is correct, one should have a theory that completely describes the world in quantum numbers.

On a personal note, the "truss shell model" spoke to me on an issue I have struggled over in my own research. To arrive at a 10-dimension limit of 4-dimension spacetime, I summed the cardinal points of discrete spatial dimensions up to non-redundant points of the Riemann tensor metric. Though I found the sum useful, I could never identify any good physical reason to do it. Your model ("...the spacetime process itself ...") is exactly what I had in mind and was never so bold to express. The cardinal totality of points in the tensor field (16) with 6 redundant points, results, as you say, in 10 dimensions transverse to each cell. In my model, as in your cold graphene macro-molecule, emergent waves carry away energy. I have generalized to the result:

The 4-dimension horizon is identical to the 10-dimension boundary.

As in your model, this obviates a compactification problem in my model as well. I do hope you can make time to read my FQXI essay, "Time counts."

David Finkelstein, may your tribe increase.

Tom

Dear Prof. Finkelstein

Reading your article on FQXi I would like to inform you I have solution for your idea on:

Time does not give birth to such a vacuum but emerges from it.

Vacuum, we can say cosmic space is atemporal. Time emerges from it when we measure duration of material change runing in vacuum-space.

see

-Sorli A. (2008) The Theory of Atemporality

http://www.fqxi.org/data/forum-attachments/THE_THEORY_OF_ATE

MOPORALITY.pdf

- Sorli A. (2008) The Concept of Atemporality into The Theory of Relativity

http://www.fqxi.org/data/forum-attachments/1_The_Concept_of_

Atemporality_into_The_Theory_of_Relativity__amrit_2008.pdf

yo

urs amrit

Reading your article on FQXi I would like to inform you I have solution for your idea on:

Time does not give birth to such a vacuum but emerges from it.

Vacuum, we can say cosmic space is atemporal. Time emerges from it when we measure duration of material change runing in vacuum-space.

see

-Sorli A. (2008) The Theory of Atemporality

http://www.fqxi.org/data/forum-attachments/THE_THEORY_OF_ATE

MOPORALITY.pdf

- Sorli A. (2008) The Concept of Atemporality into The Theory of Relativity

http://www.fqxi.org/data/forum-attachments/1_The_Concept_of_

Atemporality_into_The_Theory_of_Relativity__amrit_2008.pdf

yo

urs amrit

Wow, cool post. I’d like to write like this too – taking time and real hard work to make a great article… but I put things off too much and never seem to get started. Thanks though.

192.168.1.254

report post as inappropriate

192.168.1.254

report post as inappropriate

I have been interested in this topic for quite some time. I have been researching it for a couple of hours and found your post to be very interesting. Cheers! energieaudit

report post as inappropriate

report post as inappropriate

Login or create account to post reply or comment.