Search FQXi


If you have an idea for a blog post or a new forum thread, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org, with a summary of the topic and its source (e.g., an academic paper, conference talk, external blog post or news item).
Contests Home

Current Essay Contest


Previous Contests

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discusswinners

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discusswinners

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

James Putnam: on 1/11/09 at 21:17pm UTC, wrote Dear Robert Sadykov, Thank you for your message. I posted a response in...

Robert Sadykov: on 1/8/09 at 12:23pm UTC, wrote Dear James A. Putnam, Speed of light plays the important role in...

James Putnam: on 12/16/08 at 1:01am UTC, wrote Mr. Blumschein, In my answer to you, that extraneous 9 should be a ( as...

James Putnam: on 12/15/08 at 17:56pm UTC, wrote Dear Mr. Blumschein, From Einstein’s Theory of Relativity by Max Born: ...

Eckard Blumschein: on 12/15/08 at 6:01am UTC, wrote James Putnam, If a quantity is called a absolute one like for instance...

James A. Putnam: on 12/1/08 at 14:21pm UTC, wrote Essay Abstract This essay presents a few examples of the...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Pentcho Valev: "Did Einstein Tell Einsteinians How to Leapfrog into the Future? Brian..." in Time Dilation Gets a...

Georgina Woodward: "I should have said - Also the potential states are not independently..." in The Reality of the...

Matthew Leifer: "I used to be a QBist, but then I recovered. QBists are sticklers for..." in The Reality of the...

Zeeya Merali: "Just to let you know that after a couple of special podcast editions from..." in In Praise of Physics...

Pentcho Valev: "Did NASA Accelerate Light? Sean Caroll: "The folks in this particular..." in Real-Time Physics

James Putnam: "Akinbo, I think that I have made it very clear repeatedly what it means to..." in Q&A with David Rideout:...

Akinbo Ojo: "Pentcho, et al I found the translation of "Einstein Relativity Happiest..." in Faster than Light

Pentcho Valev: "Reductio ad Absurdum in Einstein's Relativity It follows from Einstein's..." in Time Dilation Gets a...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

The Quantum Thermodynamic Revolution
Combining theories of quantum information with the science of heat and energy transfer could lead to new technologies.

Face Off: Building a Toy Universe to Pit Quantum Theory Against Gravity
Using superconducting circuits to create a curved-spacetime analog with stronger gravity than our cosmos.

Is Gravity Time's Archer?
A new model argues the forces between particles in the early universe loosed time's arrow, creating temporal order from chaos.

Purifying Physics: The Quest to Explain Why the “Quantum” Exists
A new framework for the laws underlying reality could explain why nature obeys quantum rules, the origin of time’s arrow, and the power of quantum computing.

Searching for the Impossible
A quest to discover which computational tasks can never be resolved.


FQXi FORUM
May 29, 2015

CATEGORY: The Nature of Time Essay Contest [back]
TOPIC: The Absoluteness of Time by James A. Putnam [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

James A. Putnam wrote on Dec. 1, 2008 @ 14:21 GMT
Essay Abstract

This essay presents a few examples of the theoretical use of absolute time. It points to a universal, constant value of a fundamental measure of time. It demonstrates the role that this exceptionally useful constant can play in achieving theoretical unity beginning with the fundamentals of physics theory. The constant time period is used in an analysis of the fine structure constant. New equations are derived to further clarify the nature of electromagnetic theory. The mathematics is algebraic manipulation of differential and incremental values. The analysis is on the level of introductory theory. The conclusion emphasizes an expanded role for absolute time in physics theory.

Author Bio

I am the author the websites http://newphysicstheory.com and its mirror site http://humansignificance.com. They present a new physics theory and several essays on physics, life and intelligence. The goal is to establish continuity beginning with fundamental physics and ending with human free will.

Download Essay PDF File




Eckard Blumschein wrote on Dec. 15, 2008 @ 06:01 GMT
James Putnam,

If a quantity is called a absolute one like for instance absolute temperature, then it should have a reference point zero. Do you believe that Christ's birth is appropriate for physics?

Eckard Blumschein




James Putnam wrote on Dec. 15, 2008 @ 17:56 GMT
Dear Mr. Blumschein,

From Einstein’s Theory of Relativity by Max Born:

“In this way Newton came to the conclusion that there is an absolute space and an absolute time. It will be best to give the substance of his own words (the quotations are from the translation of the original Latin by Newton’s contemporary, Andrew Motte, 1729). Concerning time he says:

‘Absolute, True, and Mathematical Time, of itself, and from its own nature flows equably without regard to any thing external, and by another name is called Duration: Relative, Apparent, and Common Time is some sensible and external 9whether accurate or unequable) measure of Duration by the means of motion, which is commonly used instead of True time; such as an Hour, a Day, a Month, a Year….

For the natural days are truly unequal, though they are commonly consider’d as equal, and used for a measure of time: Astronomers correct this inequality for their more accurate deducing of the celestial motions. It may be, that there is no such thing as an equable motion, whereby time may be accurately measured. All motions may be accelerated and retarded, but the True, or equable progress, of Absolute time is liable to no change. The duration or perseverance of the existence of things remains the same, whether the motions are swift or slow, or none at all….’”

As soon as I find out when time began, I will let you know. Thank you for your message.

James




James Putnam wrote on Dec. 16, 2008 @ 01:01 GMT
Mr. Blumschein,

In my answer to you, that extraneous 9 should be a ( as in: ...external (whether accurate or unequable) measure...

James




Robert Sadykov wrote on Jan. 8, 2009 @ 12:23 GMT
Dear James A. Putnam,

Speed of light plays the important role in understanding of the nature of time. Three possible reasons exist for an explanation of the observable constancy of speed of light:

1. Feature of propagation of light in the vacuum;

2. Feature of propagation of light in the luminiferous ether;

3. Feature of propagation of light in the gravitational field.

The first reason is considered in the special theory of relativity, where speed of light in vacuum is the constant for any inertial observer. The second item is presented in different variants of the ether theory. The third reason is researched in the essay The Theory of Time, Space and Gravitation, where the constancy of speed of light is consequence of action of gravitation. In this theory it is proved, that the time dilation and increase in inertial mass are gravitational effects. The inconsistent effect of longitudinal length contraction in the new theory is absent. Any contradictions typical for the special theory relativity, for example, the clock paradox are absent also. As is well known, in the general theory of relativity a problem of gravitational energy still remains not solved. In the new theory gravitational energy is precisely localized.

Regards,

Robert Sadykov




James Putnam wrote on Jan. 11, 2009 @ 21:17 GMT
Dear Robert Sadykov,

Thank you for your message. I posted a response in your forum.

Regards,

James




Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:

And select the letter between 'W' and 'Y':


Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.