Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home

Current Essay Contest


Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fnd.

Previous Contests

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discusswinners

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discusswinners

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discusswinners

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Dizhechko Semyonovich: on 4/7/17 at 4:37am UTC, wrote Dear Sirs! Physics of Descartes, which existed prior to the physics of...

Don Limuti: on 3/17/17 at 23:24pm UTC, wrote Hi James, You have my admiration. To say that the emperor (standard...

Satyavarapu Gupta: on 3/16/17 at 12:40pm UTC, wrote Nice essay Carter, Your ideas and thinking are excellent for eg… Any...

Joe Fisher: on 3/14/17 at 16:33pm UTC, wrote Dear James Carter, Please excuse me for I have no intention of...

Steve Dufourny: on 3/10/17 at 19:22pm UTC, wrote Hello Mr Carter, I didn't know this expermiment and resulst.It is...

Peter Jackson: on 3/10/17 at 10:36am UTC, wrote James, Excellent essay. Nicely written, set out and argued. Vladimir my...

Vladimir Tamari: on 3/10/17 at 1:55am UTC, wrote Dear James I enjoyed going over your essay but rather quickly - I realized...

James Carter: on 3/8/17 at 16:40pm UTC, wrote Essay Abstract When Einstein first used his equations to predict...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Steve Dufourny: "You are going to understand Lorraine :),I have simply encircled the..." in FQXi Essay Contest 2016:...

Stefan Weckbach: "Dear Lorraine, thanks again for the reply. Yes, i think we disagree. "I..." in FQXi Essay Contest 2016:...

Quantum Antigravity: "EXPERIMENTAL quantum Anti-gravity —..." in The Myth of Gravity

Pentcho Valev: "Money for teleology and silly songs only? The teleology contest is a..." in Towards a Goal — Two...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

Bohemian Reality: Searching for a Quantum Connection to Consciousness
Is there are sweet spot where artificial intelligence systems could have the maximum amount of consciousness while retaining powerful quantum properties?

Quantum Replicants: Should future androids dream of quantum sheep?
To build the ultimate artificial mimics of real life systems, we may need to use quantum memory.

Painting a QBist Picture of Reality
A radical interpretation of physics makes quantum theory more personal.

The Spacetime Revolutionary
Carlo Rovelli describes how black holes may transition to "white holes," according to loop quantum gravity, a radical rewrite of fundamental physics.

Riding the Rogue Quantum Waves
Could giant sea swells help explain how the macroscopic world emerges from the quantum microworld? (Image credit: MIT News)


FQXi FORUM
April 24, 2017

CATEGORY: Wandering Towards a Goal Essay Contest (2016-2017) [back]
TOPIC: How Einstein’s Mindless Mathematical Laws Fail to Lead to a Rational Explanation of the Pound-Rebka Experiment by James Carter [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Author James Carter wrote on Mar. 8, 2017 @ 16:40 GMT
Essay Abstract

When Einstein first used his equations to predict the transverse gravitational red shift of photons and the gravitational slowing of clocks, the effect was so small that it seemed impossible to measure. It was not until four years after his death that the effect was finally accurately measured in the laboratory. In 1959, Robert Pound and Glen Rebka made very accurate measurements of both red and blue transverse Doppler effects in the momentum of gamma ray photons produced by vertical differences in gravitational escape/surface velocity esV between the top and bottom of Harvard’s Jefferson Tower. The measured values of this experiment do not support Einstein’s downward pointing theory of gravity.

Author Bio

James Carter is a freelance theoretical physicists who specializes in theories of atoms, photons, gravity, and the Big Bang creation of matter.

Download Essay PDF File




Vladimir F. Tamari wrote on Mar. 10, 2017 @ 01:55 GMT
Dear James

I enjoyed going over your essay but rather quickly - I realized that I agree with you in general - that Einstein was right even though he was wrong ( perfect phrase may I use it in future?) However responding to the many cases you cite met with two difficulties - 1- you describe very specific experiments and results that require lengthy study, and 2- you use concepts such as the photon and I assume you regard it as a particle, not merely a quantum of wave energy an idea I am trying to refute. In my fqxi essay I have tried to show that Einstein, even though he was brillianty right, was simultaneously wrong on many counts and has led us now to a virtual dead end in physics.

Best wishes,

Vladimir

report post as inappropriate


Peter Jackson wrote on Mar. 10, 2017 @ 10:36 GMT
James,

Excellent essay. Nicely written, set out and argued. Vladimir my have missed your comment re 'photons'. I agree it would have benefited from an earlier disclaimer of 'ballistic particles' but that's always a dilemma, and largely semantic.

Most importantly I agree your arguments are substantially correct. If you've followed fqxi for a while you might have seen essays and blog...

view entire post


report post as inappropriate


Steve Dufourny wrote on Mar. 10, 2017 @ 19:22 GMT
Hello Mr Carter,

I didn't know this expermiment and resulst.It is intriguing indeed.I consider this weakest quantum force in the cold.Dark matter not bbaryonic seems the aswer and BHs also.I have inserted quantum BHs also and particles of gravitation encircling this standard model permitting the equilibrium between thermo and cold.Harvard seems wanting ti find this quantum gravity?I found in all humility.Here is my equation E=m(b)c²+m(nb)l² with quant and cosm 3D sphères Inside an universal 3D sphere in spherisation optimisation of matter energy.See that we have a gravitational aether instead of a luminiferous aether from the centralm sphre, the biggest spherical cosmological volume,the biggest BH producing the speedest spherons, particles of gravitation.This gravitation seems the main primoridal chief orchestra.The photons are in fact spherons coded possessing a serie primordial of uniqueness.Probably the same serie that our cosm finite serie.The primes seems relevant for the groups.The paradox is that this weakest force is in the same time the strongest with these quant BHs farer than nuclear gluonic forces.Spherons them are encoded weaker in forces than electrom forces of photons.These photons are just a fuel coded by this gravity.Don't hesistate to ask détails,I will answer with pleasure.We must explain this quant gravity after all :)

ps they turn so they are these 3D sphères....

Regards

report post as inappropriate


Joe Fisher wrote on Mar. 14, 2017 @ 16:33 GMT
Dear James Carter,

Please excuse me for I have no intention of disparaging in any way any part of your essay.

I merely wish to point out that “Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler.” Albert Einstein (1879 - 1955) Physicist & Nobel Laureate.

Only nature could produce a reality so simple, a single cell amoeba could deal with it.

The real Universe must consist only of one unified visible infinite physical surface occurring in one infinite dimension, that am always illuminated by infinite non-surface light.

A more detailed explanation of natural reality can be found in my essay, SCORE ONE FOR SIMPLICITY. I do hope that you will read my essay and perhaps comment on its merit.

Joe Fisher, Realist

report post as inappropriate


Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta wrote on Mar. 16, 2017 @ 12:40 GMT
Nice essay Carter,

Your ideas and thinking are excellent for eg…

Any “theory” of gravity must present metaphysical assumptions to show the physical measurements of upward gravitational motion and force to be false. Gravitational expansion is a principle of measurement that details how we feel the force of gravity with our bodies and what gravity does and looks like when we...

view entire post


report post as inappropriate


Don Limuti wrote on Mar. 17, 2017 @ 23:24 GMT
Hi James,

You have my admiration. To say that the emperor (standard physics) has no clothes (is not quite right) takes a lot of courage. This keeps physics alive and kicking in spite of the Mad Max's of this world. The second ref below shows a way for attractive gravity can imitate repulsive gravity.

Check out my website:

1. http://www.digitalwavetheory.com/21_Nitpicking_General_Relat
ivity.html

2. http://www.digitalwavetheory.com/19_Dark_Energy-Curved_Space
Time.html

Thanks for your essay.

Don Limuti

report post as inappropriate


Dizhechko Boris Semyonovich wrote on Apr. 7, 2017 @ 04:37 GMT
Dear Sirs!

Physics of Descartes, which existed prior to the physics of Newton returned as the New Cartesian Physic and promises to be a theory of everything. To tell you this good news I use spam.

New Cartesian Physic based on the identity of space and matter. It showed that the formula of mass-energy equivalence comes from the pressure of the Universe, the flow of force which on the corpuscle is equal to the product of Planck's constant to the speed of light.

New Cartesian Physic has great potential for understanding the world. To show it, I ventured to give "materialistic explanations of the paranormal and supernatural" is the title of my essay.

Visit my essay, you will find there the New Cartesian Physic and make a short entry: "I believe that space is a matter" I will answer you in return. Can put me 1.

Sincerely,

Dizhechko Boris

report post as inappropriate


Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:

And select the letter between 'C' and 'E':


Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.