Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home

Current Essay Contest


Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fnd.

Previous Contests

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discusswinners

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discusswinners

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discusswinners

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Dizhechko Semyonovich: on 4/7/17 at 5:08am UTC, wrote Dear Sirs! Physics of Descartes, which existed prior to the physics of...

Gary Simpson: on 4/4/17 at 2:53am UTC, wrote Adel, I'm not sure what to think here. The first thing I must do is ask a...

Cristinel Stoica: on 3/29/17 at 18:06pm UTC, wrote Dear Adel, Interesting usage of the Helmann type potential and the...

Klee Irwin: on 3/20/17 at 22:45pm UTC, wrote Adel, good essay. Where do you have your work posted? Cheers! Klee

Lawrence Crowell: on 3/20/17 at 9:54am UTC, wrote Thanks for your comments on my essay page. The Yukawa equation is used to...

adel sadeq: on 3/15/17 at 15:23pm UTC, wrote Hi Gupta, This equation only holds for a < r otherwise you...

Satyavarapu Gupta: on 3/15/17 at 5:31am UTC, wrote Nice essay Sadeq, Your ideas and thinking are excellent to avoid...

Joe Fisher: on 3/13/17 at 16:28pm UTC, wrote Dear Dr. Adel Sadeq, Please excuse me for I have no intention of...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Steve Agnew: "The universe is finite and not infinite. The notion of infinity or..." in Watching the Observers

Anonymous: ""According to quantum mechanics, a vacuum isn't empty at all. It's actually..." in Manipulating the Quantum...

Lorraine Ford: "Dear Rajiv, I have already addressed your 3 points, but I will put it to..." in FQXi Essay Contest 2016:...

Joe Fisher: "Dear Georgina, That is very interesting, but please remember that the..." in Watching the Observers

Peter Morgan: "An e-mail sent to me by Springer Nature today tells me that because I am at..." in Manipulating the Quantum...

munized ward: "Variety exists inside all populaces of life forms. This happens somewhat in..." in Natural Selection in...

Pentcho Valev: "Not Even Wrong Concepts in Physics: Entropy The following argument is..." in We Are All Connected

Rajiv Singh: "Dear Lorraine, Oh! I did not check your recent responses. Let me address..." in FQXi Essay Contest 2016:...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

Watching the Observers
Accounting for quantum fuzziness could help us measure space and time—and the cosmos—more accurately.

Bohemian Reality: Searching for a Quantum Connection to Consciousness
Is there are sweet spot where artificial intelligence systems could have the maximum amount of consciousness while retaining powerful quantum properties?

Quantum Replicants: Should future androids dream of quantum sheep?
To build the ultimate artificial mimics of real life systems, we may need to use quantum memory.

Painting a QBist Picture of Reality
A radical interpretation of physics makes quantum theory more personal.

The Spacetime Revolutionary
Carlo Rovelli describes how black holes may transition to "white holes," according to loop quantum gravity, a radical rewrite of fundamental physics.


FQXi FORUM
June 23, 2017

CATEGORY: Wandering Towards a Goal Essay Contest (2016-2017) [back]
TOPIC: Fundamental Theory of reality, revisted by Adel Sadeq [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Author adel sadeq wrote on Mar. 7, 2017 @ 16:35 GMT
Essay Abstract

n last year's contest I presented a simple mathematical system( structure) that reproduced many of the results of Quantum Mechanics, including QFT. This time I will show more connections to the standard physics including path integral and similar QFT techniques. Also, I will present the simulation for gravity where Newton's law is generated from the same system. In this essay I have no discussion regarding "goals and intentions" , that is because I believe these questions cannot be satisfactorily be answered unless we get to the bottom of the main question. That is, what exactly is reality.

Author Bio

Degrees: B.S. E.E. university of Wyoming 1979 MPHIL E.E. University of Sussex 1987

Download Essay PDF File




Daniel de França Diniz Rocha wrote on Mar. 8, 2017 @ 01:50 GMT
So, what you have here it is that mathematics itself have an impulse to create things. So, it is like we live in a reality based on abstract relations, with some sort of will to create. A kind of Platonic world, with will to manifest itself.

report post as inappropriate

Author adel sadeq replied on Mar. 8, 2017 @ 02:18 GMT
Yes, Daniel, You can walk into a university library and go the mathematics section and browse all the books, you could already see how math produces almost unlimited plethora of structures, really no limit. so naturally, one such structure was bound to create our weird reality, although it amazes me( I really don't know how to put it in words) how such a simple but general structure lead to our reality that we can be aware of.

Like I have said in my essays. We are forced to use use math to describe reality and how wonderfully does that. THAT WAS A BIG HINT, Wigner wrote his masterpiece

"The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics in the Natural Sciences"

Normal physics is clear on that. MY theory makes the idea even more clearer. I think it will not be long before I fully explain the present physics in the language of my theory which I believe IS the fundamental theory of reality. I have given a very good taste of that for those who are WILLING to listen.




Author adel sadeq wrote on Mar. 8, 2017 @ 08:36 GMT
PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING:

YOU CAN CLICK ON THESE WORDS TO GO THE APPROPRIATE LINK (PDF did not give them colors)

1. ABSTRACT

In last year's contest I presented : click on contest

2. Links to standard physics

I showed the simulations that seemed :click on simulations

3. Gravity

previous simulation I was getting : click on simulation




Shaikh Raisuddin wrote on Mar. 13, 2017 @ 05:09 GMT
The difference between physics and mathematics is that matter of Physics has INERTIA. While numbers and formula have no inertia.

report post as inappropriate


Joe Fisher wrote on Mar. 13, 2017 @ 16:28 GMT
Dear Dr. Adel Sadeq,

Please excuse me for I have no intention of disparaging in any way any part of your essay.

I merely wish to point out that “Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler.” Albert Einstein (1879 - 1955) Physicist & Nobel Laureate.

Only nature could produce a reality so simple, a single cell amoeba could deal with it.

The real Universe must consist only of one unified visible infinite physical surface occurring in one infinite dimension, that am always illuminated by infinite non-surface light.

A more detailed explanation of natural reality can be found in my essay, SCORE ONE FOR SIMPLICITY. I do hope that you will read my essay and perhaps comment on its merit.

Joe Fisher, Realist

report post as inappropriate


Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta wrote on Mar. 15, 2017 @ 05:31 GMT
Nice essay Sadeq,

Your ideas and thinking are excellent to avoid singularities, but have a look at your equation…

e^2/r-(e^2/r)*EXP(-1*r/a)

= e^2/r-(e^2/r)*e^(-1*r/a)

=e^2/r-e^(2/r-1*r/a)

= e^2/r-e^(2a-r)/ar)

Will be infinity or undefined at r=0;

Will be Undefined at r = infinity…..

You can very easily avoid all these singularities if...

view entire post


report post as inappropriate

Author adel sadeq replied on Mar. 15, 2017 @ 15:23 GMT
Hi Gupta,

This equation only holds for a < r otherwise you will get interaction or particle antiparticle as in standard relativistic theory since it means the distance is less than the Compton wavelength.

I will read your essay.

Thanks

Adel




Lawrence B. Crowell wrote on Mar. 20, 2017 @ 09:54 GMT
Thanks for your comments on my essay page. The Yukawa equation is used to look at forces that fall off faster than the inverse square law. This is usually the nuclear interaction. These equations with appropriate choice of constants are involved with the masses of hadrons.

Cheers LC

report post as inappropriate


Klee Irwin wrote on Mar. 20, 2017 @ 22:45 GMT
Adel, good essay. Where do you have your work posted?

Cheers!

Klee

report post as inappropriate


Cristinel Stoica wrote on Mar. 29, 2017 @ 18:06 GMT
Dear Adel,

Interesting usage of the Helmann type potential and the connections you make in the essay to obtain Newton's gravity law. I hope this will lead you to something interesting, and I wish you good luck in the contest!

Best regards,

Cristi

report post as inappropriate


Gary D. Simpson wrote on Apr. 4, 2017 @ 02:53 GMT
Adel,

I'm not sure what to think here. The first thing I must do is ask a question. Do you carry units through your calculations? For example, you put in a length and then convert the result into a dimensionless value (Mp/Me). I'm not familiar with the Helmann potential or the Yukawa potential, but the Coloumb potential is in volts.

I think what you are seeing may simply be that these potentials have a functional form that satisfies a certain type of differential equation. For example, in engineering it is possible to formulate fluid dynamic problems and heat transfer problems in such a way that they mimic electrical potential problems ... the form of the differential equations is the same. So, if you have a solution for one type then you can solve the other types as well.

Best Regards and Good Luck,

Gary Simpson

report post as inappropriate


Dizhechko Boris Semyonovich wrote on Apr. 7, 2017 @ 05:08 GMT
Dear Sirs!

Physics of Descartes, which existed prior to the physics of Newton returned as the New Cartesian Physic and promises to be a theory of everything. To tell you this good news I use «spam».

New Cartesian Physic based on the identity of space and matter. It showed that the formula of mass-energy equivalence comes from the pressure of the Universe, the flow of force which on the corpuscle is equal to the product of Planck's constant to the speed of light.

New Cartesian Physic has great potential for understanding the world. To show it, I ventured to give "materialistic explanations of the paranormal and supernatural" is the title of my essay.

Visit my essay, you will find there the New Cartesian Physic and make a short entry: "I believe that space is a matter" I will answer you in return. Can put me 1.

Sincerely,

Dizhechko Boris

report post as inappropriate


Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.