Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home

Current Essay Contest


Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fnd.

Previous Contests

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discusswinners

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discusswinners

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discusswinners

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Dizhechko Semyonovich: on 4/7/17 at 7:51am UTC, wrote Dear Sirs! Physics of Descartes, which existed prior to the physics of...

Satyavarapu Gupta: on 3/13/17 at 14:49pm UTC, wrote Nice essay Stafford, Your ideas and thinking are excellent in page 9, your...

Richard Stafford: on 3/12/17 at 21:10pm UTC, wrote I am sorry but I have just read your essay and find your presentation to be...

Joe Fisher: on 3/11/17 at 17:02pm UTC, wrote Dear Dr. Richard David Stafford, Please excuse me for I have no intention...

Richard Stafford: on 3/10/17 at 23:09pm UTC, wrote The numbers on my comments correspond to your numbers on your comments. ...

Bishal Banjara: on 3/10/17 at 8:18am UTC, wrote Dear Richard David, I think you are working on anti-relativity...you know...

Héctor Gianni: on 3/9/17 at 19:14pm UTC, wrote Dear Richard David Stafford I invite you and every physicist to read my...

Richard Stafford: on 3/8/17 at 17:14pm UTC, wrote I have a strong suspicion that you fail to comprehend my essay. Your...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Ken Seto: "I endorse the idea of Newton’s “absolute time”. However, we have no..." in Real-Time Physics

kurt stocklmeir: "if space is expanding and if this makes positive energy particles have a..." in Alternative Models of...

nimit theeraleekul: "Dear friends, In my early post, I said that we could see detail of..." in Weinberg: Why quantum...

nimit theeraleekul: "Dear Administrator, I have tried to make several posts with an attachment,..." in Weinberg: Why quantum...

Gary Simpson: "Pentcho, I did not need the postulates of SR to propose the mechanism. In..." in Alternative Models of...

Pentcho Valev: "Gary, "I can propose a physical mechanism for length contraction" You..." in Alternative Models of...

Robert Martin: "Theories of everything, he contends, can be depicted as those which draw on..." in Theories of Everything,...

Gary Simpson: "Pentcho, I'm not asking for you to comment upon my essay. I am asking you..." in We Are All Connected


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

Bohemian Reality: Searching for a Quantum Connection to Consciousness
Is there are sweet spot where artificial intelligence systems could have the maximum amount of consciousness while retaining powerful quantum properties?

Quantum Replicants: Should future androids dream of quantum sheep?
To build the ultimate artificial mimics of real life systems, we may need to use quantum memory.

Painting a QBist Picture of Reality
A radical interpretation of physics makes quantum theory more personal.

The Spacetime Revolutionary
Carlo Rovelli describes how black holes may transition to "white holes," according to loop quantum gravity, a radical rewrite of fundamental physics.

Riding the Rogue Quantum Waves
Could giant sea swells help explain how the macroscopic world emerges from the quantum microworld? (Image credit: MIT News)


FQXi FORUM
May 25, 2017

CATEGORY: Wandering Towards a Goal Essay Contest (2016-2017) [back]
TOPIC: A mathematical approach without assumptions! by Richard David Stafford [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Author Richard David Stafford wrote on Mar. 6, 2017 @ 16:56 GMT
Essay Abstract

This essay is a demonstration that mindless mathematical laws actually constitute a language which can explicitly represent any ideas conceivable by any intelligent individual. That there exists no language which cannot be represented by mathematical notation. The end result is a demonstration that many of modern physics concepts are flawed.

Author Bio

Richard D. Stafford received a doctorate in theoretical physics from Vanderbilt University in 1971 but earned my living from businesses I owned.

Download Essay PDF File




Bishal Banjara wrote on Mar. 7, 2017 @ 04:56 GMT
Dear, Richard D. Stafford

'many of modern physics concepts are flawed'- would you please explain me in one sentence how this sentence is true in your essay..

report post as inappropriate

Author Richard David Stafford replied on Mar. 7, 2017 @ 20:00 GMT
'In modern physics, time is defined by readings on clocks not physical interactions.." In fact, the two bring up rather different issues."

If you cannot see the flaw in such an interpretation you apparently cannot comprehend the so called "twin paradox" commonly brought up in many science problem with relativistic phenomena. When the twins talk, do they exist at the same time or not?

What definition of time do you prefer?

Note that in my essay, I define "time" and "proper time" as rather different concepts.



Author Richard David Stafford replied on Mar. 7, 2017 @ 21:16 GMT
Just as an aside, there exist quite a few flaws in modern physics. The main issue is the refusal to consider the detailed consequences of their theories. One excellent example is a detailed analysis of electromagnetic phenomena. Virtual photon exchange is used as the key to electromagnetic forces. But, as far as I am aware, no one has even considered the detailed consequences of actual exchange of photons from opposite charges. These are simply presumed to cancel out, yielding no consequences.

However the actual exchange is presumed to be instantaneous and presuming they happen at exactly the same time is totally out of line. I have examined that issue and discovered a rather interesting consequence worth some attention.



Bishal Banjara replied on Mar. 8, 2017 @ 10:58 GMT
Dear Richard David,

I think you are working on anti-relativity...you know who work against of it tries to conflict or origin some newness from the Einstein's assumption flattering within that but no one notices how such consequences appeared in Maxwell's equations...you know how we are wrong in displacement vector and permittivity assumptions..it is in my book giving such result of Constancy of light speed as a wrong approach, there are different parameters come along with it within the Maxwell's equations....there is more such stuff in the book..

best regards

report post as inappropriate


Paul R Martin wrote on Mar. 7, 2017 @ 05:48 GMT
Hello Dick,

Condensing your work down to fit within the constraints of this essay contest makes it almost unintelligible, at least it seems to me that it would strike someone that way who has not seen it before. I think your book does a much more convincing job. Hopefully, this essay might encourage more people to read your book. I hope so.

Best wishes,

Paul

report post as inappropriate

Author Richard David Stafford replied on Mar. 7, 2017 @ 20:09 GMT
Sorry Paul but I do not think you comprehend my book. This essay essentially talks about the underlying issues which I had mistakenly presumed was quite obvious.




Héctor Daniel Gianni wrote on Mar. 9, 2017 @ 19:14 GMT
Dear Richard David Stafford

I invite you and every physicist to read my work “TIME ORIGIN,DEFINITION AND EMPIRICAL MEANING FOR PHYSICISTS, Héctor Daniel Gianni ,I’m not a physicist.

How people interested in “Time” could feel about related things to the subject.

1) Intellectuals interested in Time issues usually have a nice and creative wander for the unknown.

2) They usually enjoy this wander of their searches around it.

3) For millenniums this wander has been shared by a lot of creative people around the world.

4) What if suddenly, something considered quasi impossible to be found or discovered such as “Time” definition and experimental meaning confronts them?

5) Their reaction would be like, something unbelievable,… a kind of disappointment, probably interpreted as a loss of wander…..

6) ….worst than that, if we say that what was found or discovered wasn’t a viable theory, but a proved fact.

7) Then it would become offensive to be part of the millenary problem solution, instead of being a reason for happiness and satisfaction.

8) The reader approach to the news would be paradoxically adverse.

9) Instead, I think it should be a nice welcome to discovery, to be received with opened arms and considered to be read with full attention.

11)Time “existence” is exclusive as a “measuring system”, its physical existence can’t be proved by science, as the “time system” is. Experimentally “time” is “movement”, we can prove that, showing that with clocks we measure “constant and uniform” movement and not “the so called Time”.

12)The original “time manuscript” has 23 pages, my manuscript in this contest has only 9 pages.

I share this brief with people interested in “time” and with physicists who have been in sore need of this issue for the last 50 or 60 years.

Héctor

report post as inappropriate


Author Richard David Stafford wrote on Mar. 10, 2017 @ 23:09 GMT
The numbers on my comments correspond to your numbers on your comments.

1) I of the opinion that interest in the "unknown" must be a primary issue.

2) It is actually rather worthless unless they find something they understand.

3) Most "wander's" presume they understand what they are wandering around. A presumption their beliefs are valid.

4) Thinking anything is...

view entire post




Joe Fisher replied on Mar. 11, 2017 @ 17:02 GMT
Dear Dr. Richard David Stafford,

Please excuse me for I have no intention of disparaging in any way any part of your essay.

I merely wish to point out that “Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler.” Albert Einstein (1879 - 1955) Physicist & Nobel Laureate.

Only nature could produce a reality so simple, a single cell amoeba could deal with it.

The real Universe must consist only of one unified visible infinite physical surface occurring in one infinite dimension, that am always illuminated by infinite non-surface light.

A more detailed explanation of natural reality can be found in my essay, SCORE ONE FOR SIMPLICITY. I do hope that you will read my essay and perhaps comment on its merit.

Joe Fisher, Realist

report post as inappropriate

Author Richard David Stafford replied on Mar. 12, 2017 @ 21:10 GMT
I am sorry but I have just read your essay and find your presentation to be far from "simple". It is entirely built on presumptions you have made based on what you think makes sense. Essentially is based on a collection of beliefs you have acquired. You are presuming I posses the same collection of beliefs.

You should read part 3 of my Essay ignoring everything else.

Mindless mathematics is the supposed starting point of these essays.

Part 1 of my essay is no more than a comment that language is the first issue to be understood.

Part 2 is no more than a comment that any communication (think language) can be transformed into collections of numbers. If you have any understanding of computers, you should be well aware of that fact.

Part 3 is no more than a definition of Understanding.

The rest of the essay is no more than a demonstration of how "mindless mathematics then yields some rather astounding facts. This is an issue I barely touch in my essay. The work can be extended a thousand fold easily.

Take a look at part 3 and see if you are capable of comprehending my definition.




Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta wrote on Mar. 13, 2017 @ 14:49 GMT
Nice essay Stafford,

Your ideas and thinking are excellent in page 9, your comments are good for eg…

……….. it is not at all difficult to show that special relativistic effects are embedded in the mathematical model presented here. General relativity is more difficult to demonstrate though it can also be shown that the relationships are embedded in the model I have presented...

view entire post


report post as inappropriate


Dizhechko Boris Semyonovich wrote on Apr. 7, 2017 @ 07:51 GMT
Dear Sirs!

Physics of Descartes, which existed prior to the physics of Newton returned as the New Cartesian Physic and promises to be a theory of everything. To tell you this good news I use «spam».

New Cartesian Physic based on the identity of space and matter. It showed that the formula of mass-energy equivalence comes from the pressure of the Universe, the flow of force which on the corpuscle is equal to the product of Planck's constant to the speed of light.

New Cartesian Physic has great potential for understanding the world. To show it, I ventured to give "materialistic explanations of the paranormal and supernatural" is the title of my essay.

Visit my essay, you will find there the New Cartesian Physic and make a short entry: "I believe that space is a matter" I will answer you in return. Can put me 1.

Sincerely,

Dizhechko Boris

report post as inappropriate


Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.