Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home


Previous Contests

Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fnd.
read/discusswinners

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discusswinners

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discusswinners

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discusswinners

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Vladimir Tamari: on 4/8/17 at 2:55am UTC, wrote Dear Jayakar I read with interest your speculations about the Universe...

Dizhechko Semyonovich: on 4/7/17 at 8:17am UTC, wrote Dear Sirs! Physics of Descartes, which existed prior to the physics of...

Jayakar Joseph: on 3/24/17 at 15:22pm UTC, wrote Dear Gupta, Thank you for your interest in this essay. As per this...

Jayakar Joseph: on 3/23/17 at 3:28am UTC, wrote Error in the attached illustration: Arrow in the Circle to be on the other...

Jayakar Joseph: on 3/23/17 at 2:51am UTC, wrote To describe this statement, an illustration is attached herewith. Jayakar

Jayakar Joseph: on 3/22/17 at 8:28am UTC, wrote Dear Joe, Thank you for your interest in this article. I agree that...

Satyavarapu Gupta: on 3/12/17 at 0:14am UTC, wrote Nice essay cosmological essay dear Jayakar J Joseph, Your ideas and...

Joe Fisher: on 3/10/17 at 17:02pm UTC, wrote Dear Dr. Jayakar Johnson Joseph, Please excuse me for I have no...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Cristinel Stoica: "Dear Lorraine, I'm sorry to disappoint you, but QBism gives the humans..." in Wandering Towards a Goal:...

Steven Andresen: "I note your reservations. What I propose doesn’t change the observations..." in Alternative Models of...

Georgina Woodward: "Lorraine, did you read "Georgina Woodward replied on Jul. 22, 2017 @ 03:14..." in Wandering Towards a Goal:...

Georgina Woodward: "Hi Steven, I can only speak for myself. I am uncertain of my ability to..." in Alternative Models of...

sridattadev kancharla: "Dear All, Using Imaginary part of s in the e power yields correct..." in FQXi Essay Contest 2016:...

sridattadev kancharla: "Dear All, I am using Sign function to determine the direction of..." in FQXi Essay Contest 2016:...

Cohen Geoffrey: "The origin of life on planet Earth A "cosmic cloud" falls from infinite..." in Biological Creativity

Georgina Woodward: "In the example of a spinning ball that was given it should be assumed that..." in The Reality of the...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

Watching the Observers
Accounting for quantum fuzziness could help us measure space and time—and the cosmos—more accurately.

Bohemian Reality: Searching for a Quantum Connection to Consciousness
Is there are sweet spot where artificial intelligence systems could have the maximum amount of consciousness while retaining powerful quantum properties?

Quantum Replicants: Should future androids dream of quantum sheep?
To build the ultimate artificial mimics of real life systems, we may need to use quantum memory.

Painting a QBist Picture of Reality
A radical interpretation of physics makes quantum theory more personal.

The Spacetime Revolutionary
Carlo Rovelli describes how black holes may transition to "white holes," according to loop quantum gravity, a radical rewrite of fundamental physics.


FQXi FORUM
July 23, 2017

CATEGORY: Wandering Towards a Goal Essay Contest (2016-2017) [back]
TOPIC: Wandering Towards a Goal or Wandering for a Chance or No Wandering? by Jayakar Johnson Joseph [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Author Jayakar Johnson Joseph wrote on Mar. 3, 2017 @ 20:12 GMT
Essay Abstract

In this article, we argue that the Nature always have definite Goals that are not said to be achievable by Chance while Wandering. We claim that: Axioms not the Mathematical laws, gave raise to aims and intentions that went wrong. As per Standard Model with Standard Cosmology, we conclude that ‘Wandering Towards a Goal’ is not possible and it is only, ‘Wandering for a Chance’ is applicable. Thus, we have investigated this problem with ‘Wandering Towards an Observer as Goal’ in Standard Cosmology as well as in an Alternative cosmological paradigm; and inferred that there is nothing in the Universe, that Wander.

Author Bio

Medical graduate by profession. Developer for a Real-time Healthcare System. Doing research in alternative cosmology and has developed a paradigm of, ‘Eigen-rotational Clusters of String-matter Universe (ECSU)’, and applied some of the postulates in, ‘Molecular Dynamics Synchronized Manipulator system to Repair Biomolecules’, that is one of the sub-system of instrumentations integrated with the Real-time healthcare system that is on development. Work abstract at, http://www.johnsonsmedicom.org and the biography at (ORCID ID): http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2936-8231

Download Essay PDF File




Author Jayakar Johnson Joseph wrote on Mar. 4, 2017 @ 06:07 GMT
Inviting discussions to develop further ..



Author Jayakar Johnson Joseph replied on Mar. 6, 2017 @ 07:19 GMT
Dear Reader,

In my essay there is an error in one of the statement, "As per this paradigm, ‘Matter’ existed as multiple static open strings, before the dynamics of the Universe began" under the subheading 'Origin of Universe or Origin of Dynamics of Universe?'. Kindly read it, as:

"As per this paradigm, ‘Matter’ existed as multiple two-dimensionally fluctuating (please replace 'static') open strings, before the dynamics of the Universe began"

Regretting for the inconvenience.

Jayakar




Vladimir Rogozhin wrote on Mar. 4, 2017 @ 15:20 GMT
Dear Jayakar,

I read with great interest your deep analytical essay, made in the spirit of the Cartesian doubt. You give very interesting ideas on the structure and the beginning of the universe, matter, space, time. These ideas are important for understanding the origins and causes of the crisis in basic science.

I have questions about your theory:

- What is the ontological status of the coordinates in your theory?

- Why "strings"? : «As per this paradigm, ‘Matter’ existed as multiple static open strings, before the dynamics of the Universe began.»

Yours faithfully,

Vladimir

report post as inappropriate

Author Jayakar Johnson Joseph replied on Mar. 4, 2017 @ 19:18 GMT
Dear Vladimir

1. As time emerges with the dynamics of ‘matter’, without the existence of 'matter' there is no origin of time. Thus 'matter' existed even before the origin of dynamics.

2. Transformation of zero-dimensional objects into three-dimensional structures, is not possible; whereas one-dimensional strings on eigen-rotation, transform into three-dimensional branes.

With best regards & Thanks

Jayakar




Branko L Zivlak wrote on Mar. 5, 2017 @ 08:58 GMT
Dear Mr. Jayakar Johnson Joseph

High quality essay, good illustrations. Great effort for nothing. You accept the Big Bang theory as fact. But it is a false theory. See why in my essay.

Best regards,

Branko

report post as inappropriate


Author Jayakar Johnson Joseph wrote on Mar. 5, 2017 @ 15:01 GMT
Thank you dear Branko,

Thank you for your appreciation.

I never say Big Bang theory is absolute. Actually this work contradicts Corpuscularianism, and seems to be applicable in your work, 'The Theory of Unity between the Whole and its Parts', as this describes the Universe in Continuum mechanics with Eigen-rotational string-matters.

I shall go through the detail of your work soon to analyse the integrations, as it sounds Holarchy.

With best regards & wishes

Jayakar




sridattadev kancharla wrote on Mar. 5, 2017 @ 20:48 GMT
Dear Jayakar,

Universe is an i-Sphere and we humans are capable of interpreting it as 4 dimensional dual torus inside a 3-Sphere, which consists of Riemann 2-sphere as Soul as depicted in S=BM^2 diagram in the attached doc. Soul is the simplest of the complex manifolds with in the 3-sphere, Mind and Body constitute the remaining complexity. Soul, Mind and Body are in a toroidal flux in human beings, exactly at the center of the 3-sphere one can experience the unity of the trinity and that is the now moment we experience. As there are 4 dimensions required for a 3-sphere, the regular 3 dimensions of space and the fourth dimension of time, it is obvious that the 2-sphere (Riemann sphere) of consciousness with in us is with out the time dimension and hence the saying "eternal soul". Poincare` conjecture implies that consciousness is homeomorphic (same or similar) in all beings manifested in all dimensions of the universe, as i have shown that Riemann sphere can serve as the fundamental unit of consciousness.

Love,

i.

attachments: 6_zero__i__infinity.docx

report post as inappropriate

Author Jayakar Johnson Joseph replied on Mar. 6, 2017 @ 06:12 GMT
Thank you dear Sridattadev.

I apologize that I'm not an expert in interpreting Science with Spiritually.

Science has limitations, as Human knowledge has limitations in exploring the Nature.

I think, Consciousness is the State of Awareness in Reality, in that, 'time' is integral of reality.

In relevant to this I would like to refer the talk, The Reality of Consciousness, by Peter Russell.

While we analyse Biological Consciousness with this paradigm, we may infer that it is the dominance in number of Propagating T-branes over the Oscillating T-branes, that are distributed in specific localities in a Biological System. This may be applicable to the existing Universe also, while we describe the Consciousness of existing Universe.

Thus I revise my statement in my essay, "As per this paradigm, ‘Matter’ existed as multiple static open strings, before the dynamics of the Universe began" under the subheading 'Origin of Universe or Origin of Dynamics of Universe?', as:

"As per this paradigm, ‘Matter’ existed as multiple two dimensionally fluctuating ('static' to be removed) open strings, before the dynamics of the Universe began"

With best regards & thanks,

Jayakar



Joe Fisher replied on Mar. 10, 2017 @ 17:02 GMT
Dear Dr. Jayakar Johnson Joseph,

Please excuse me for I have no intention of disparaging in any way any part of your essay.

I merely wish to point out that “Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler.” Albert Einstein (1879 - 1955) Physicist & Nobel Laureate.

Only nature could produce a reality so simple, a single cell amoeba could deal with it.

The real Universe must consist only of one unified visible infinite physical surface occurring in one infinite dimension, that am always illuminated by infinite non-surface light.

A more detailed explanation of natural reality can be found in my essay, SCORE ONE FOR SIMPLICITY. I do hope that you will read my essay and perhaps comment on its merit.

Joe Fisher, Realist

report post as inappropriate

Author Jayakar Johnson Joseph replied on Mar. 22, 2017 @ 08:28 GMT
Dear Joe,

Thank you for your interest in this article. I agree that mathematical simplicity is imperative for abstraction. In this paradigm, trigonometry is the tool for simplification following the quantisation of each change of eigen-rotational state with variable arc length of eigen-rotational path in a string segment, while T-branes and TBP-branes are the abstracts. As per this scenario we may claim that, infinite two dimension is foundational, while time emerges from eigen-rotation of infinite One-dimensional structure.

With best regards & thanks,

Jayakar




Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta wrote on Mar. 12, 2017 @ 00:14 GMT
Nice essay cosmological essay dear Jayakar J Joseph,

Your ideas and thinking are good, for example, in the abstract itself you said…. “ In this article, we argue that the Nature always have definite Goals that are not said to be achievable by Chance while Wandering. We claim that: Axioms not the Mathematical laws, gave raise to aims and intentions that went wrong. As per Standard...

view entire post


report post as inappropriate

Author Jayakar Johnson Joseph replied on Mar. 24, 2017 @ 15:22 GMT
Dear Gupta,

Thank you for your interest in this essay. As per this paradigm, age of Dynamic universe is infinite; while the origin of linear time emerges with the beginning of eigen-rotation of a string-matter in the Universe. Axiom of this paradigm is that the fundamental matter is string like structure rather than point like particle; while mass-energy equivalence corresponds to matter-energy equivalence, that is variable.

With best regards & thanks,

Jayakar




Dizhechko Boris Semyonovich wrote on Apr. 7, 2017 @ 08:17 GMT
Dear Sirs!

Physics of Descartes, which existed prior to the physics of Newton returned as the New Cartesian Physic and promises to be a theory of everything. To tell you this good news I use «spam».

New Cartesian Physic based on the identity of space and matter. It showed that the formula of mass-energy equivalence comes from the pressure of the Universe, the flow of force which on the corpuscle is equal to the product of Planck's constant to the speed of light.

New Cartesian Physic has great potential for understanding the world. To show it, I ventured to give "materialistic explanations of the paranormal and supernatural" is the title of my essay.

Visit my essay, you will find there the New Cartesian Physic and make a short entry: "I believe that space is a matter" I will answer you in return. Can put me 1.

Sincerely,

Dizhechko Boris

report post as inappropriate


Vladimir F. Tamari wrote on Apr. 8, 2017 @ 02:55 GMT
Dear Jayakar

I read with interest your speculations about the Universe and how you examined three scenarios to determine cause and effect. In that sense you have adhered wonderfully to the question posed by the essay contest.

I was not that interested in that question which I thought ill-posed, but here is my fqxi essay

Best wishes,

Vladimir

report post as inappropriate


Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.