Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home

Current Essay Contest


Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fnd.

Previous Contests

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discusswinners

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discusswinners

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discusswinners

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

lami leese: on 4/10/17 at 8:46am UTC, wrote Thank you for your post, There are good post! Developed the Common Rail ...

Dizhechko Semyonovich: on 4/7/17 at 8:22am UTC, wrote Dear Sirs! Physics of Descartes, which existed prior to the physics of...

Peter Jackson: on 4/1/17 at 17:53pm UTC, wrote Peter, I found that an interesting, valid and well organized review of...

peter wanjohi: on 3/22/17 at 11:30am UTC, wrote Thanks a lot , i sure have also read your essay

peter wanjohi: on 3/22/17 at 7:58am UTC, wrote Thanks ,sure will...

peter wanjohi: on 3/22/17 at 7:57am UTC, wrote Thanks alot

peter wanjohi: on 3/22/17 at 6:39am UTC, wrote Dear Sir, I totally agree that experimental work (physical, mental as well...

Donald Palmer: on 3/12/17 at 14:45pm UTC, wrote Dear Peter, An interesting history of mathematics as it applies to...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Jonathan Dickau: "As it turns out... My personal philosophy specifically treats the notion..." in FQXi Essay Contest 2016:...

Jonathan Dickau: "I agree Lorraine, I've never been so much a fan of the 'paragon of..." in FQXi Essay Contest 2016:...

Quantum Antigravity: "EXPERIMENTAL quantum Anti-gravity —..." in The Myth of Gravity

Pentcho Valev: "Money for teleology and silly songs only? The teleology contest is a..." in Towards a Goal — Two...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

Bohemian Reality: Searching for a Quantum Connection to Consciousness
Is there are sweet spot where artificial intelligence systems could have the maximum amount of consciousness while retaining powerful quantum properties?

Quantum Replicants: Should future androids dream of quantum sheep?
To build the ultimate artificial mimics of real life systems, we may need to use quantum memory.

Painting a QBist Picture of Reality
A radical interpretation of physics makes quantum theory more personal.

The Spacetime Revolutionary
Carlo Rovelli describes how black holes may transition to "white holes," according to loop quantum gravity, a radical rewrite of fundamental physics.

Riding the Rogue Quantum Waves
Could giant sea swells help explain how the macroscopic world emerges from the quantum microworld? (Image credit: MIT News)


FQXi FORUM
April 24, 2017

CATEGORY: Wandering Towards a Goal Essay Contest (2016-2017) [back]
TOPIC: SUBSTITUTING MATHEMATICS FOR NATURE by peter wamai wanjohi [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Author peter wamai wanjohi wrote on Mar. 3, 2017 @ 19:20 GMT
Essay Abstract

The axiom of extensionality states that two sets which contain the same elements are the same set; therefore the converse of the statement “substituting mathematics for nature” is also true. This essay, as the title suggests, is an attempt to show that the study of mathematics and that of nature, especially its physical descriptions, are intertwined.

Author Bio

Lives in Nairobi.Holds a masters in Public Health and working in public health administration as head of health research and coordination. Have written research papers in health in the course of official duty and researched physical questions privately in search of meaning. Married with four children

Download Essay PDF File




Chris Broski wrote on Mar. 7, 2017 @ 19:41 GMT
I was not clear how your thesis related to the topic: how mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention. Still, thank you for many interesting ideas in your essay. I enjoyed reading.

report post as inappropriate

Author peter wamai wanjohi replied on Mar. 22, 2017 @ 07:57 GMT
Thanks alot




Joe Fisher wrote on Mar. 10, 2017 @ 16:50 GMT
Dear peter wamai wanjohi,

Please excuse me for I have no intention of disparaging in any way any part of your essay.

I merely wish to point out that “Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler.” Albert Einstein (1879 - 1955) Physicist & Nobel Laureate.

Only nature could produce a reality so simple, a single cell amoeba could deal with it.

The real Universe must consist only of one unified visible infinite physical surface occurring in one infinite dimension, that am always illuminated by infinite non-surface light.

A more detailed explanation of natural reality can be found in my essay, SCORE ONE FOR SIMPLICITY. I do hope that you will read my essay and perhaps comment on its merit.

Joe Fisher, Realist

report post as inappropriate

Author peter wamai wanjohi replied on Mar. 22, 2017 @ 07:58 GMT
Thanks ,sure will...




Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta wrote on Mar. 11, 2017 @ 19:41 GMT
Nice essay Prof Wanjohi,

You have written a nice essay on mathematics telling mathematics and nature are not different from each other, very good idea indeed!

……………… Dynamic Universe Model is a mathematical model for Universe. These mathematics show the bodies movement will be having a purpose…just have a look at my essay… “Distances, Locations, Ages and...

view entire post


report post as inappropriate

Author peter wamai wanjohi replied on Mar. 22, 2017 @ 11:30 GMT
Thanks a lot , i sure have also read your essay




Donald G Palmer wrote on Mar. 12, 2017 @ 14:45 GMT
Dear Peter,

An interesting history of mathematics as it applies to physical reality.

Not sure how this relates to 'aims and intentions' unless it is your final statement that "mathematics produces a representation of physical reality."

I would disagree with this conclusion since no mathematical equation gives precisely and exactly the measurements of any experiment, to any degree of accuracy.

I will suggest mathematics is a generalizing science, which takes what is the same between objects or situations - between two sticks and two sheep and two stars (the concept of 'two' comes from this). It is the ability to generalize across many apparently different situations that gives mathematics great power, when applied to reality. However this same generalizing ability suggests it may not provide the uniqueness we find everywhere in reality.

You also leave out a number of issues with mathematics over history. Decimals did not appear in general use until about 500 years ago and the Pythagorean did not count sqrt(2) as an irrational number, as irrational numbers were not considered numbers until much more recently. There is also the 300 year discussion of how an infinity of infinitely small non-numbers can become a number (or value) that raged against the calculus. Mathematicians do not agree on many things, especially when infinity is involved (which comes into play with calculus and many more recent aspects).

Mathematics is not as pure nor as exact as you make it appear.

A good read about a number of aspects of mathematics and physics, just need to keep perspective that mathematics is another human endeavor with it's own problems and failures.

Don

report post as inappropriate

Author peter wamai wanjohi replied on Mar. 22, 2017 @ 06:39 GMT
Dear Sir,

I totally agree that experimental work (physical, mental as well as innovation) usually does it for man's quest in generating new knowledge ,solving problems and advancing technology.The argument i tried to present is that mathematical law often also lead to specific aims and intentions. This interchangeability between general and particular lawfulness means mathematics is an underlying principle. It is mostly the measurement that fails,not the mathematic e.g at the quantum scale due to uncertainty and at relativistic scale due to the distances involved.In those boundary conditions mathematics becomes the only viable option ;for example using differential equations to make physical predictions and thereby generate new physical laws.




Peter Jackson wrote on Apr. 1, 2017 @ 17:53 GMT
Peter,

I found that an interesting, valid and well organized review of what seems like the yin and yang of the universe.

Do you think the real universal link here may be what we term 'geometry'?

I identify dynamic geometry a very valuable in decoding nature at ALL scales (me essay identifying an apparent important 3D dynamic extension of Pythagoras' theorem!)

I think your essay deserves a rather higher place and my score will help.

Best wishes

Peter

report post as inappropriate


Dizhechko Boris Semyonovich wrote on Apr. 7, 2017 @ 08:22 GMT
Dear Sirs!

Physics of Descartes, which existed prior to the physics of Newton returned as the New Cartesian Physic and promises to be a theory of everything. To tell you this good news I use «spam».

New Cartesian Physic based on the identity of space and matter. It showed that the formula of mass-energy equivalence comes from the pressure of the Universe, the flow of force which on the corpuscle is equal to the product of Planck's constant to the speed of light.

New Cartesian Physic has great potential for understanding the world. To show it, I ventured to give "materialistic explanations of the paranormal and supernatural" is the title of my essay.

Visit my essay, you will find there the New Cartesian Physic and make a short entry: "I believe that space is a matter" I will answer you in return. Can put me 1.

Sincerely,

Dizhechko Boris

report post as inappropriate


lami leese wrote on Apr. 10, 2017 @ 08:46 GMT
Thank you for your post, There are good post! Developed the Common Rail fuel system for heavy duty vehicles and turned it into practical use on their ECD-U2 common-rail system.Modern common rail systems, whilst working on the same principle sensor are governed by an engine control unit (ECU). The design was acquired by the German Common Rail Shim & Gasket kit companyRobert Bosch GmbH for completion of development and refinement for mass-production Common Rail Nozzle . In hindsight,As the new technology proved to be highly profitable. The Common Rail Injector Valve had little choice but to sell, however,In 1997 they extended its use for passenger cars Common Rail Injector .The first passenger car that used the common rail system.

report post as inappropriate


Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.