Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home

Current Essay Contest


Previous Contests

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discusswinners

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discusswinners

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discusswinners

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Linna Landau: on 3/16/17 at 11:46am UTC, wrote I decipher this as significance everybody accept . Quantum mechanics makes...

Don Limuti (www.zenophysics.com): on 1/22/09 at 8:04am UTC, wrote Amrit, Yes, the plank scale is where things get "interesting". And this...

amrit: on 1/21/09 at 15:49pm UTC, wrote Hi Don It seems that on Planck scale events run without time being...

Don Limuti: on 1/1/09 at 7:15am UTC, wrote In response to F. Le Rouge: 1. I have to agree that modern physics looks...

Anonymous: on 12/17/08 at 7:05am UTC, wrote Don, I am a student at Bellevue Community College and am going into...

Don Limuti: on 12/11/08 at 8:31am UTC, wrote Amrit, Thanks for taking the time to comment. I find there is merit in...

amrit: on 12/8/08 at 13:27pm UTC, wrote time is an observer effect it exists only when we measure it universe...

Don Limuti: on 11/15/08 at 7:39am UTC, wrote CKM, Thanks for your generous comments. It seems to me that your essay...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Joe Fisher: "Dear Steve, Please try to understand that infinite surface am not a..." in Watching the Observers

Steve Agnew: "Supposing the universe is infinite is simply another way of supposing the..." in Watching the Observers

kurt stocklmeir: "spring constant of time and space is not linear - this influences a lot of..." in Alternative Models of...

Kevin Adams: "Very interesting theme! Thanks a lot for this information. I just going to..." in Multiversal Journeys —...

Colin Richardson: ""According to quantum mechanics, a vacuum isn't empty at all. It's actually..." in Manipulating the Quantum...

Lorraine Ford: "Dear Rajiv, I have already addressed your 3 points, but I will put it to..." in FQXi Essay Contest 2016:...

Peter Morgan: "An e-mail sent to me by Springer Nature today tells me that because I am at..." in Manipulating the Quantum...

munized ward: "Variety exists inside all populaces of life forms. This happens somewhat in..." in Natural Selection in...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

Watching the Observers
Accounting for quantum fuzziness could help us measure space and time—and the cosmos—more accurately.

Bohemian Reality: Searching for a Quantum Connection to Consciousness
Is there are sweet spot where artificial intelligence systems could have the maximum amount of consciousness while retaining powerful quantum properties?

Quantum Replicants: Should future androids dream of quantum sheep?
To build the ultimate artificial mimics of real life systems, we may need to use quantum memory.

Painting a QBist Picture of Reality
A radical interpretation of physics makes quantum theory more personal.

The Spacetime Revolutionary
Carlo Rovelli describes how black holes may transition to "white holes," according to loop quantum gravity, a radical rewrite of fundamental physics.


FQXi FORUM
June 24, 2017

CATEGORY: The Nature of Time Essay Contest (2008) [back]
TOPIC: Making Time With Pretty Girls and Hot Stoves by Don Limuti [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Don Limuti wrote on Nov. 3, 2008 @ 10:38 GMT
Essay Abstract

Can Time Be Both Real and Unreal? We make appointments in time and pay our rent and mortgages in a more or less timely fashion. We know we have had birthdays in the past and expect a few more in the future. Time seems to be very solid and real. Yet we know that everything we experience is done in the present and the only real time we have is now. All our concepts of past and future are illusory. They are a kind of processing we do with stored "pictures" in something we call a mind. With this view time seems to be something ethereal and unreal. This essay will examine this split objectively and subjectively.

Author Bio

Don Limuti is the president of Communication Panels Co. and creator of www.zenophysics.com He obtained a BSEE degree from The City College of New York and has presented several technical papers at IEEE events. He has been awarded two patents and has several in process. He can be contacted via the website .

Download Essay PDF File




F. Le Rouge wrote on Nov. 6, 2008 @ 11:01 GMT
- The paradox is, and I think you pointed it, that modern Physics is giving BOTH the 'cognition' (thinking) and the matter up.

- Don't you think it is strange that Einstein, as he was interested in the Light 'phenomenon' did not use a sun-dial instead of a mechanical clock?




Clinton "Kyle" Miller wrote on Nov. 9, 2008 @ 08:57 GMT
Don Limuti,

I love the essay! I really like the section about what societies' "time" is based on. One of the most illuminating passages I have seen thus far. (Check out Peter Lynd's essay if you haven't already, really good stuff.)

CKM




Don Limuti wrote on Nov. 15, 2008 @ 07:39 GMT
CKM,

Thanks for your generous comments. It seems to me that your essay and Peter Lynd's essay and my essay have similar conclusions arrived at in different ways.

What a great idea to have this contest!

Don L.




amrit wrote on Dec. 8, 2008 @ 13:27 GMT
time is an observer effect

it exists only when we measure it

universe itself s atemporal

time is born into the human mind

Albert Einstein sad:

»Space and time are modes by which we think,

not conditions under which we live«.

Time--the time that we know through clocks and calendars--was invented. http://www.britannica.com/clockworks/article.html

attachments: 2_The_Concept_of_Atemporality_into_The_Theory_of_Relativity__amrit_2008.pdf




Don Limuti wrote on Dec. 11, 2008 @ 08:31 GMT
Amrit,

Thanks for taking the time to comment.

I find there is merit in much of what you say.




Anonymous wrote on Dec. 17, 2008 @ 07:05 GMT
Don,

I am a student at Bellevue Community College and am going into nursing. I found it really interesting how you talked about the way humans store pictures in their minds. You had some fascinating things to say about that. Also, you furthered my knowledge of how there is a universal understanding of the clock, and how everything is related to it. Very well written essay, thank you!

report post as inappropriate


Don Limuti wrote on Jan. 1, 2009 @ 07:15 GMT
In response to F. Le Rouge:

1. I have to agree that modern physics looks like metaphysics in spite of its claims that it is presenting reality and avoiding superstitions like cognition.

2. A sundial is much like a mechanical clock. The difference is that a mechanical clock has very distinct tics and durations. Einstein needed those sharp tics and durations to develop relativity. Einstein made the offhand definition of time as: that which is measured by clocks.

I believe he could have expanded the definition to: Time is the sequential tics and durations of a clock as recorded by an instrument. The recording instrument can have many forms including human senses. The important point is that time is not just a duration. Durations and tics are required to have time and thus clocks are required.

3. Your essay submission using the point of view of art and aesthetics is most refreshing.




amrit wrote on Jan. 21, 2009 @ 15:49 GMT
Hi Don

It seems that on Planck scale events run without time being needed.

yours amrit

attachments: Indirect_and_Direct_Quantum_Information_and_Quantum_Energy_Transfer_Sorli__2009.pdf




Don Limuti (www.zenophysics.com) wrote on Jan. 22, 2009 @ 08:04 GMT
Amrit,

Yes, the plank scale is where things get "interesting". And this is the area where physicists become very defensive. I'm thinking of Einstein and Heisenberg and just about everyone that followed.

Vlatko Vedral in his FQXi blog summed it up with the statement: All physicists are realists deep down.

I interpret this as meaning everyone assumes the continuity of "stuff" (particles and matter and energy). Quantum mechanics makes this view hard to support. And yet we make "nutty" theories like multiple worlds so that we can have continuity of stuff.

I read your attachment and find I am in agreement with a lot of it, particularly you conclusion that gravity is an entanglement phenomena.

I would say that on the Planck scale everything is a clock (a mass that appears and disappears following the rules of quantum mechanics) and that this clock contains the primordial space and time for the object.

Thanks for you input.

Don L.




Linna Landau wrote on Mar. 16, 2017 @ 11:46 GMT
I decipher this as significance everybody accept . Quantum mechanics makes this view hard to bolster. But then we make "nutty" speculations like numerous universes with the goal that we can have progression of stuff.

cheapessaywriter can provide further details.

report post as inappropriate


Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.