Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home

Current Essay Contest


Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fnd.

Previous Contests

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discusswinners

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discusswinners

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discusswinners

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

David Pinyana: on 3/21/17 at 22:43pm UTC, wrote Thus,

Bayarsaikhan Choisuren: on 3/17/17 at 15:01pm UTC, wrote Dear Bishal Banjara, Your idea makes something interesting. “the real...

Bishal Banjara: on 3/9/17 at 11:36am UTC, wrote Dear Branko, Here the people are with more philosophy not with...

Branko Zivlak: on 3/9/17 at 10:35am UTC, wrote I am surprised with the score. Now its better. Regards

Bishal Banjara: on 3/8/17 at 10:16am UTC, wrote Dear snp, "when there are multiple n-bodies the simple centrifugal force...

Bishal Banjara: on 3/8/17 at 9:55am UTC, wrote dear joe, your sense is highly philosophic, my hard-disk is incapable to...

Satyavarapu Gupta: on 3/7/17 at 20:28pm UTC, wrote Nice essay Banajara, Your ideas and thinking are excellent and matching...

Joe Fisher: on 3/7/17 at 16:02pm UTC, wrote Dear Bishal Banjara, I merely wish to point out that “Everything should...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

leonae gonzales: "This seems to be very interesting site. Professionally i am a writer at the..." in Quantum Replicants:...

James Putnam: "Quoting Gary D. Simpson: "If you disapprove of one-bombing and wish to..." in FQXi Essay Contest 2016:...

Steven Andresen: "It might be that I have come to know where the hidden variable is, to..." in 80 Years of EPR —...

Lawrence Crowell: "The choice for anonymous commenting is a good idea. A person scoring less..." in FQXi Essay Contest 2016:...

dieu le: "The Creation of Momentum From the gigantic Milky Way Galaxy to the..." in Alternative Models of...

dieu le: "What causes Things Move in Universe? Things move when encountering a..." in Alternative Models of...

leonae gonzales: "I would like to prepare a review of this topic with the help of research..." in Quantum Replicants:...

Thewitcher: "Đến với dịch vụ chữ ký số giachukyso.net bạn sẽ được..." in Riding the Rogue Quantum...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

Quantum Replicants: Should future androids dream of quantum sheep?
To build the ultimate artificial mimics of real life systems, we may need to use quantum memory.

Painting a QBist Picture of Reality
A radical interpretation of physics makes quantum theory more personal.

The Spacetime Revolutionary
Carlo Rovelli describes how black holes may transition to "white holes," according to loop quantum gravity, a radical rewrite of fundamental physics.

Riding the Rogue Quantum Waves
Could giant sea swells help explain how the macroscopic world emerges from the quantum microworld? (Image credit: MIT News)

Rescuing Reality
A "retrocausal" rewrite of physics, in which influences from the future can affect the past, could solve some quantum quandaries—saving Einstein's view of reality along the way.


FQXi FORUM
March 23, 2017

CATEGORY: Wandering Towards a Goal Essay Contest (2016-2017) [back]
TOPIC: Newtonian Dynamics: An explicit diversion from Reality by Bishal Banjara [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

This essay's rating: Community = 2.9; Public = 1.0


Author Bishal Banjara wrote on Mar. 2, 2017 @ 20:20 GMT
Essay Abstract

This essay is all about the validation of ω^2 r ( v^2/r) as a real mathematical as well the physical form that corresponds to both radial centripetal acceleration, ω^2 rr ̃ and real tangential acceleration,ω^2 rθ ̃ in circular motion within the uniform magnitude of tangential velocity verifying the centrifugal acceleration/force but varying in both magnitude and direction.

Author Bio

Mr. Bishal Banjara is an Independent Researcher, researching in the foundational aspects of whole Physics. And the author of the book entitled as 'Unique Perceptions on Physics: Commentaries with Solutions Papers on Physics', a different perceptive angled vision on Physics. Also,he is the author of different research papers published in www.ijser.org website contradicting GR with real observable fact, predicting the cause for elliptical motion of planets, notifying the defect in two-body reduction and so on.

Download Essay PDF File




Branko L Zivlak wrote on Mar. 3, 2017 @ 08:35 GMT
Dear Mr. Bandjara

Nice analysis. Maby, the third force is Coriolis force.

Regards,

Branko Zivlak

report post as inappropriate

Author Bishal Banjara replied on Mar. 3, 2017 @ 10:22 GMT
Hi,Branko!

I, at first supposed like you but as Coriolis force is effective for the body which lies just above the rotating mass (say earth) without the contact touch (it is well illustrated in my book (see ref.2, chapter 2)) but my equation search a real applied force that would acts against gravity and gives the tangential acceleration.....Thank you for your best comment(which I was hoping may probably asked),thank you so much!!!!




Author Bishal Banjara wrote on Mar. 3, 2017 @ 10:33 GMT
what this means is, if you applied a force to a mass to move it (in any direction), the real force you applied in against gravity is not seen or no direct visualization rather you will see only the consequence that these forces produced as a resultant.....so, every kind of moving body is not directly linked to the direct effect of force ( as how Newtonian F=ma law treats) but as a consequence...



Author Bishal Banjara replied on Mar. 3, 2017 @ 11:07 GMT
And why i called it as centrifugal is because, we are trying to answer for the cause of such motion from the kind of centrifugal word....see ref. 1 in detail




Joe Fisher wrote on Mar. 7, 2017 @ 16:02 GMT
Dear Bishal Banjara,

I merely wish to point out that “Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler.” Albert Einstein (1879 - 1955) Physicist & Nobel Laureate.

Only nature could produce a reality so simple, a single cell amoeba could deal with it.

The real Universe must consist only of one unified visible infinite physical surface occurring in one infinite dimension, that am always illuminated by infinite non-surface light.

This means that all of the physicists who have ever lived have been completely wrong about the singular real visible physical condition of the real Universe.

Joe Fisher, Realist

Joe Fisher, Realist

report post as inappropriate

Author Bishal Banjara replied on Mar. 8, 2017 @ 09:55 GMT
dear joe,

your sense is highly philosophic, my hard-disk is incapable to load it..

best regards




Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta wrote on Mar. 7, 2017 @ 20:28 GMT
Nice essay Banajara,

Your ideas and thinking are excellent and matching with mine…. For example in your Bio you said “he is the author of different research papers published in www.ijser.org website contradicting GR with real observable fact, predicting the cause for elliptical motion of planets, notifying the defect in two-body reduction and so on.”...

view entire post


report post as inappropriate


Author Bishal Banjara wrote on Mar. 8, 2017 @ 10:16 GMT
Dear snp,

"when there are multiple n-bodies the simple centrifugal force will not work. Probably Dynamic Universe Model is the only solution available now……”-I think you need to know a bit more background in the history of physics...you know if there was no Newton's second law, the General relativity would not be theorized...so, like the second law, my formulation is like this but exists in against of it....a real need in physics to pillar-up new foundation...so,to say like yours is quite inadequate as it is not exact form of whole unification but it will guide the path to follow...and In my essay, i have not mentioned such words, do I?.....more, you don't understood or you didn't generalized my essay, the centrifugal force is just 'a grain in the whole bucket' from where one could extract different forms of force dealing with mass nature...for more detail you need to see chappter 2 of reference 2..

best regards from Nepal




Branko L Zivlak wrote on Mar. 9, 2017 @ 10:35 GMT
I am surprised with the score. Now its better.

Regards

report post as inappropriate


Author Bishal Banjara wrote on Mar. 9, 2017 @ 11:36 GMT
Dear Branko,

Here the people are with more philosophy not with physics...my essay deals with real physics than philosophy, it may be the reason...anyway thank you for your rating but only if you really understood my essay..thank you!




Bayarsaikhan Bayarsaikhan Choisuren wrote on Mar. 17, 2017 @ 15:01 GMT
Dear Bishal Banjara,

Your idea makes something interesting.

“the real liveliness of any interacting systems could be stimulated within the Relational mechanics only such that the isolated system is really not a functional one, as how the theme is comforted by this whole essay.” This phrase is interesting.

I invite you to read my essay “A SPACE-TIME AS A PERFECT FLUID SINK FLOW” at the site of essay contest of FQXi, when you have a free time.

Ch.Bayarsaikhan

report post as inappropriate


David Pinyana wrote on Mar. 21, 2017 @ 22:43 GMT
Thus,

report post as inappropriate


Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:

And select the letter between 'S' and 'U':


Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.