Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home

Current Essay Contest


Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fnd.

Previous Contests

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discusswinners

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discusswinners

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discusswinners

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Ewan Fallon: on 4/28/17 at 5:10am UTC, wrote More Higgs field details

Ewan Fallon: on 4/27/17 at 21:00pm UTC, wrote Higgs and Dynamic Ether

Ewan Fallon: on 4/26/17 at 19:45pm UTC, wrote Positive for the Ether

Ewan Fallon: on 4/26/17 at 19:38pm UTC, wrote Another positive for the Ether

Don Limuti: on 3/28/17 at 7:18am UTC, wrote Dear Ewan, I will agree with your statement: Gravity does not seem to be a...

Dizhechko Boris: on 3/25/17 at 9:08am UTC, wrote Dear Ewan, we are talking about the same and should support each other. ...

Bayarsaikhan Choisuren: on 3/18/17 at 14:19pm UTC, wrote Dear Ewan Sutherland Fallon, I agree with you, I think that the aether...

Ewan Fallon: on 3/15/17 at 10:45am UTC, wrote The dynamic ether concept well supports the Paul Dirac theories of...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Steve Dufourny: "It is even very intriguing and troubling when we consider this matter not..." in The Multiverse - Part 2...

Steve Dufourny: "If we consider that the main quantum of E is a finite serie, a fractal.And..." in The Multiverse - Part 2...

Georgina Woodward: "Evidence favour of quantum vibration rather than quantum spin.(I'd like to..." in Alternative Models of...

Pentcho Valev: "Compatibility of Quantum Mechanics and Relativity: Impossible A Priori ..." in We Are All Connected

kurt stocklmeir: "neutrinos are tachyons - neutrinos flying around the universe would have an..." in Alternative Models of...

Gary Simpson: "All, Is there any empirical evidence that the electron orbitals of an..." in Real-Time Physics

Georgina Woodward: "Hi William, Thanks for your answer. The motivation for the vibration..." in Alternative Models of...

Ken Seto: "I endorse the idea of Newton’s “absolute time”. However, we have no..." in Real-Time Physics


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

Bohemian Reality: Searching for a Quantum Connection to Consciousness
Is there are sweet spot where artificial intelligence systems could have the maximum amount of consciousness while retaining powerful quantum properties?

Quantum Replicants: Should future androids dream of quantum sheep?
To build the ultimate artificial mimics of real life systems, we may need to use quantum memory.

Painting a QBist Picture of Reality
A radical interpretation of physics makes quantum theory more personal.

The Spacetime Revolutionary
Carlo Rovelli describes how black holes may transition to "white holes," according to loop quantum gravity, a radical rewrite of fundamental physics.

Riding the Rogue Quantum Waves
Could giant sea swells help explain how the macroscopic world emerges from the quantum microworld? (Image credit: MIT News)


FQXi FORUM
May 30, 2017

CATEGORY: Wandering Towards a Goal Essay Contest (2016-2017) [back]
TOPIC: A Dynamic Ether by Ewan Sutherland Fallon [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Author Ewan Sutherland Fallon wrote on Feb. 28, 2017 @ 20:47 GMT
Essay Abstract

A look at the universe through the lens of Fluid Dynamics. Pursues the problems of Gravity, Missing Mass, Black Holes and Dark Energy.

Author Bio

Mechanical Engineering career. Licensed Ship's Engineer. Inventor of the Hydroglider ( a form of which is widely used by Oceanographers) The Author of published treatises - The Dynamic Ether, Plane Golf and Marine Energy

Download Essay PDF File




Branko L Zivlak wrote on Feb. 28, 2017 @ 23:15 GMT
Yes Mr. Ewan Sutherland Fallon

Gravity does not seem to be a characteristic of matter; matter seems to be a characteristic of “gravity”.

In my essay, formula (17) can be found confirmation of your attitude.

Although, you uncritically accept erroneous theories of others (Big Bang). Observations related to your profession have been much more acceptable. This is enough to think that your work is good.

Best regards,

Branko Zivlak

report post as inappropriate


Thomas Howard Ray wrote on Mar. 1, 2017 @ 16:11 GMT
Ewan,

I feel you, as the current expression goes. I agree that a field theory solves the matter problem, though the spacetime field eliminates the need of an ether. I understand the desire to have two interactive fields, though spacetime is sufficient as my essay argues.

Hope to discuss more. When my voting code is assigned, I also hope to help counteract the effect of moronic "peers".

report post as inappropriate

Author Ewan Sutherland Fallon replied on Mar. 4, 2017 @ 23:54 GMT
Thomas, thanks for your interest. It's my understanding that space/time came about when Michelson/Morley were unable to find an ether during their iconic experiment. The returning halves of the split beam projected at right angle to each other reflected back at the identical time. However it was assumed that the experiment was carried out in an open system, and that not only was there no ether, but that evidently time itself had to vary for the beam segments to arrive back simultaneously. In the Dynamic Ether conjecture the Earth is moving in a closed system of converging energy flows from all points of the compass, Thusly the projected 1/2 beams no matter in which direction projected, would always return simultaneously. Although any such experiment could not prove or disprove an ether, it does show that time taken would always be the same. In other words, time is a constant measure of events, - should the conjecture prove to be true. I realize the effect of this on modern Einstein-in theory, but that is where the logic would take us in this particular case.




Joe Fisher wrote on Mar. 4, 2017 @ 15:52 GMT
Dear Ewan Sutherland Fallon,

Please excuse me for I have no intention of disparaging in any way any part of your essay.

I merely wish to point out that “Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler.” Albert Einstein (1879 - 1955) Physicist & Nobel Laureate.

Only nature could produce a reality so simple, a single cell amoeba could deal with it.

The real Universe must consist only of one unified visible infinite physical surface occurring in one infinite dimension, that am always illuminated by infinite non-surface light.

A more detailed explanation of natural reality can be found in my essay, SCORE ONE FOR SIMPLICITY. I do hope that you will read my essay and perhaps comment on its merit.

Joe Fisher, Realist

report post as inappropriate


Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta wrote on Mar. 5, 2017 @ 11:33 GMT
Nice essay Fallon,

Your ideas and thinking are excellent. There are many Universe models which require Aether in some form. But this Aether was not found till now. What is your opinion…?

For your information Dynamic Universe model does not require Aether, it is totally based on experimental results. Here in Dynamic Universe Model Space is Space and time is time in cosmology...

view entire post


report post as inappropriate


Dizhechko Boris Semyonovich wrote on Mar. 9, 2017 @ 07:06 GMT
Уважаемый Ewan Sutherland Fallon, вы смелый человек, когда вспомнили про отвергнутый современной физикой эфир. В вашем эссе мне нравится вот это: Presumably the process would be universal, which could lead one to believe that maybe the atom has a minuscule black hole at its core and follows the...

view entire post


report post as inappropriate


Author Ewan Sutherland Fallon wrote on Mar. 15, 2017 @ 10:45 GMT
The dynamic ether concept well supports the Paul Dirac theories of particles appearing and disappearing momentarily. In this case the energy disturbance failed to achieve a balanced form, and reverted to its potential form.

The conjectured energy stream into a star, could logically displace an otherwise passing beam of light from a hidden body in that it became visible. It has to be noted that this would replace the observable effect attributed to Einstein's body-curving space.

Ocean tides may be formed as the passing Moon/Earth energy shadow causes a swelling of the thinnest part of the Earth shell (deep ocean bottom)towards the shadow. The moving resultant bulge of water dissipates land wise, in the form of tides. As the shadow passes the bulge becomes a depression withdrawing water from the shores. The foregoing provides a driving force instead of a "pull" of gravity to generate tides.



Dizhechko Boris replied on Mar. 25, 2017 @ 09:08 GMT
Dear Ewan, we are talking about the same and should support each other.

The dynamic space-matter concept well supports the Paul Dirac theories of particles appearing and disappearing momentarily. In this case the energy transforming space no failed to achieve a balanced form, and reverted to its potential form.

The conjectured space-matter stream into a star, could logically displace an otherwise passing beam of light from a hidden body in that it became visible. It has to be noted that this would replace the observable effect attributed to Einstein's body-curving space.

Ocean tides may be formed as the passing Moon/Earth energy moving space-matter, which creates shadow causes a swelling of the thinnest part of the Earth shell (deep ocean bottom)towards the shadow. The moving resultant bulge of water dissipates land wise, in the form of tides. As the shadow passes the bulge becomes a depression withdrawing water from the shores. The foregoing provides a driving force instead of a "pull" of gravity to generate tides.

ДОБРО ПОЖАЛОВАТЬ В NEW CARTESIAN PHYSIK!

report post as inappropriate


Bayarsaikhan Bayarsaikhan Choisuren wrote on Mar. 18, 2017 @ 14:19 GMT
Dear Ewan Sutherland Fallon,

I agree with you,

I think that the aether came from ancient Creek was proposed by the greatest philosophers. We should remember they established the foundation of now day's science. I cannot think that the greatest philosophers said completely wrong.

I think that at the foundation of the natural structure (Foundations of Hierarchy), there might not be any energy dissipation, while being perfect.

Your essay is something very interesting for me.

Because your idea is somewhat similar with my idea in my essay in the Essay contest.

I invite you to read my essay “A SPACE-TIME AS A PERFECT FLUID SINK FLOW” at the site of essay contest of FQXi, when you have a free time.

at http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/2826

If you send an email to me, we would have a discuss more about the aether dynamics.

Ch.Bayarsaikhan

report post as inappropriate

Author Ewan Sutherland Fallon replied on Apr. 26, 2017 @ 19:45 GMT
Positive for the Ether

attachments: Field_Higgs.docx




Don Limuti wrote on Mar. 28, 2017 @ 07:18 GMT
Dear Ewan,

I will agree with your statement: Gravity does not seem to be a characteristic of matter; matter seems to be a characteristic of “gravity”.

Gravity mostly consists of dark energy and dark matter 96%. Therefore matter (ordinary matter) is only 4%. And it would not be false to consider the dark matter and energy as the source of matter (observable matter).

Thanks for your essay. Come visit my blog and take a look at my essay.

Don Limuti

report post as inappropriate

Author Ewan Sutherland Fallon replied on Apr. 26, 2017 @ 19:38 GMT
Another positive for the Ether




Author Ewan Sutherland Fallon wrote on Apr. 27, 2017 @ 21:00 GMT
Higgs and Dynamic Ether



Author Ewan Sutherland Fallon replied on Apr. 28, 2017 @ 05:10 GMT
More Higgs field details




Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.