Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home

Current Essay Contest


Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fnd.

Previous Contests

Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fnd.
read/discusswinners

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discusswinners

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discusswinners

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discusswinners

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Vladimir Fedorov: on 4/9/17 at 12:28pm UTC, wrote I think now there is a lot of time to think about the past discussion. In...

Daniel Rocha: on 4/9/17 at 9:05am UTC, wrote I didn't know I could post after April 7th... I guess I will be able to...

Vladimir Fedorov: on 4/9/17 at 7:03am UTC, wrote Dear Daniel, Many thanks for the kind words about my essay and high...

Vladimir Fedorov: on 4/9/17 at 5:55am UTC, wrote Dear Don, Many thanks for the kind words about my essay and high rating. ...

Vladimir Fedorov: on 4/8/17 at 6:46am UTC, wrote Dear David, Thank you for the good evaluation of my essay. I quickly...

Daniel Rocha: on 4/7/17 at 16:11pm UTC, wrote Dear Vladimir, due time constrains (besides, the voting ends today), I...

Don Foster: on 4/7/17 at 15:53pm UTC, wrote Well, strange. I rated your essay but you still have two rather than three...

Don Foster: on 4/7/17 at 15:49pm UTC, wrote Vladimir, Thank you so much for the interesting read. I am not qualified...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

adel sadeq: "Victor I think Tegmark had some theory in mind that resembles..." in What Is...

Joe Fisher: "Dear Anthony Aguirre, The mission of the Foundational Questions Institute..." in FQXi's New Large Grant...

Suhani Mahajan: "I am a attractive female for pleasurable and delight service in only on..." in Is the Past Infinite?

thuy lien: "9 THINGS WE WERE SEEN FROM RED DEAD REDEMPTION 2 TRAILER ROCKSTAR HAVE US..." in Collapsing Physics: Q&A...

Anthony Aguirre: "Our mission at FQXi has always been to push boundaries, and to try to focus..." in FQXi's New Large Grant...

John Cox: "Victor, I have reread your post and still find agreement. Realism vs...." in What Is...

Anonymous: "hello Bob" in The Complexity Conundrum

shery williams: "Office Setup is the full suite of Microsoft productivity software that..." in Are We Merging With Our...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

The Complexity Conundrum
Resolving the black hole firewall paradox—by calculating what a real astronaut would compute at the black hole's edge.

Quantum Dream Time
Defining a ‘quantum clock’ and a 'quantum ruler' could help those attempting to unify physics—and solve the mystery of vanishing time.

Our Place in the Multiverse
Calculating the odds that intelligent observers arise in parallel universes—and working out what they might see.

Sounding the Drums to Listen for Gravity’s Effect on Quantum Phenomena
A bench-top experiment could test the notion that gravity breaks delicate quantum superpositions.

Watching the Observers
Accounting for quantum fuzziness could help us measure space and time—and the cosmos—more accurately.


FQXi FORUM
December 17, 2017

CATEGORY: Wandering Towards a Goal Essay Contest (2016-2017) [back]
TOPIC: The reason of self-organization systems of matter is quantum parametric resonance and the formation of solitons by Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Author Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov wrote on Feb. 28, 2017 @ 20:29 GMT
Essay Abstract

How the ideal properties of matter and fields give rise to unfounded generalizations, to meaningless mathematical laws, to goals and to intentions. How are created self-organizing systems? Structure of electron and of de Broglie waves. How it works. Where are can observe real gravitational waves, strings and quantum loop. What do opened in projects LIGO and LISA.

Author Bio

Vladimir Fedorov graduated from the Krasnoyarsk Polytechnic Institute in Russia, the mechanical engineer, the radio engineer, Graduate School Research Institute of Intrascopy in Moscow, devices of non-destructive testing and structural analysis. Vladimir worked in the Siberian Federal University. He has developed the simple and effective device for the detection of gravitational waves and got very interesting results. His current research interests include the foundations of physics, cosmology and the theory of everything. Vladimir lives in Bulgaria and glad to meet with like-minded people for applications.

Download Essay PDF File




Joe Fisher wrote on Mar. 4, 2017 @ 15:50 GMT
Dear Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov,

Please excuse me for I have no intention of disparaging in any way any part of your essay.

I merely wish to point out that “Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler.” Albert Einstein (1879 - 1955) Physicist & Nobel Laureate.

Only nature could produce a reality so simple, a single cell amoeba could deal with it.

The real Universe must consist only of one unified visible infinite physical surface occurring in one infinite dimension, that am always illuminated by infinite non-surface light.

A more detailed explanation of natural reality can be found in my essay, SCORE ONE FOR SIMPLICITY. I do hope that you will read my essay and perhaps comment on its merit.

Joe Fisher, Realist

report post as inappropriate

Author Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov replied on Apr. 2, 2017 @ 12:21 GMT
Ladies and gentlemen,

In the course of the discussion it became clear that the addresses mentioned in the reference [20], in the text of my essay, do not always adequately reflect the entire text of my article "The deterministic gravitational waves". Therefore, I give two direct links to download the file in pdf format.

Gravitational waves v01.pdf

Gravitational waves v01.pdf

I apologize for the inconvenience, and hope for understanding.

Vladimir Fedorov



Author Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov replied on Apr. 4, 2017 @ 04:39 GMT
Ladies and gentlemen,

In the course of the discussion it became clear that the addresses mentioned in the reference [20], in the text of my essay, do not always adequately reflect the entire text of my article "The deterministic gravitational waves". Therefore, I give two direct links to download the file in pdf format.

Hyperlinks are distorted by the system, so I give symbolic link addresses

https://drive.google.com/uc?export=download&confirm=no_antiv
irus&id=0B1MvF-AefpMmU3hTSWtQTWUtRTg

https://drive.google.com/uc?export=download&id=0B1MvF-AefpMm
U3hTSWtQTWUtRTg

I apologize for the inconvenience, and hope for understanding.

Vladimir Fedorov




Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta wrote on Mar. 5, 2017 @ 11:10 GMT
Nice essay Fedorov,

Your ideas and thinking are excellent , “1. If to use the analogies instead of abstractions and do not use ideal properties of matter and fields, we will have not abstract vacuum, but viscous medium of the physical vacuum with turbulence.

………………….. You are correct, Aether was not found.

2. The vortices of turbulence there are the toroidal...

view entire post


report post as inappropriate


John-Erik Persson wrote on Mar. 5, 2017 @ 12:32 GMT
Vladimir

Your essay seems very interesting. However, as an amateur, I only can understand a small part of it, but I like that part.

Regards _______________ John-Erik

report post as inappropriate


Dizhechko Boris Semyonovich wrote on Mar. 5, 2017 @ 18:53 GMT
Dear Vladimir, great! Vortices and more time Vortices!

This essentially Photons are solitons which forcibly moving in its own wave of elasticity like a warp-engine.

It means that there are no fundamental particles of electronic level of matter with a greater mass than the electron. Therefore, the Planck mass and Planck length waves, the event horizon and the black holes are not sufficiently substantiated the abstract generalizations, which have no physical meaning. – Excellent!

I agree with your idea of the fractal matter, it is in good agreement with the densest hexagonal packing. However, New Cartesian Physic, which is based on the equivalence of space-matter, considers that the physical vacuum is the state of moving space. The concept is Very Good (ether) are not required.

The concept of moving space-matter helped me:

- To transform the uncertainty principle Heisenberg in the principle of definiteness of points of space-matter;

- Open the law of the constancy of the flow of forces through a closed surface space-matter;

- To formulate the law of gravitation Lorentz;

- Give the formula for the pressure of the Universe;

- To reveal the essence of gravitational mass as the flow vector of the centrifugal acceleration across the surface of the corpuscles, etc.

From New Cartesian Physic great potential in understanding the world. To show this potential in his essay I gave materialistic explanations of the paranormal and supernatural. Inmay, I made a mistake that has bound New Cartesian physiks with the paranormal and supernatural, because it does not attract the attention of others. Visit my essay and you will find something in it about New Cartesian Physic. Note the drawing of the geometric ratios of the s atom.

Sincerely, Boris Dizhechko.

report post as inappropriate


Koorosh Shahdaei wrote on Mar. 5, 2017 @ 21:28 GMT
Dear Vladimir,

I have been very interested in LIGO and LISA projects, I read an article last year from Russian scientist that predicted that the gravitational waves that were detected recently, would happen about couple of hundred times per year,

As Japanese, Chinese German and Italian scientist are building or improving their antennas to be more sensitive for gravitational waves, and I really hope that all these stations would grab these waves simultaneously, what is your opinion??



Kind regards

Koorosh

report post as inappropriate


George Kirakosyan wrote on Mar. 6, 2017 @ 06:00 GMT
Thank you, Dear Vladimir Nikolayevich, for your kindly attention on my work and for favorable words.

I have read your nice article also and fully agreed with you in many points. I especially like your vortex - toroidal structures that can form elementary particles. So, we can welcome each to other as realistically thinking engineers.

Of course, we can have some disagreements also what we have actually. The matter is you are a mechanical engineer and I am a poor electrical engineer only. That is why we must always to fight on the question - which principles should be in the base of formation the primordial substance of matter - is this should be mechanical or the electrical?

I see you are silently - intuitively inclined on the mechanical side that is why you cannot be free from the environment (I mean the physical vacuum with its special, different properties).

Here I have nothing to tell you, but only I will ask to you to listening advice of old man - try to build everything from the beginning without using any of hypothetical (unproven) things. (Let me tell only that it is really is possible!)

To help you somewhat, I will tell you that the physical vacuum is the same undetectable ether that was silently renamed, to be solve the huge problems in the microcosm for this time. You and I have big respects to Einstein. His first greatest merit was that he realized whole unnecessary of physical environment (that we can call the ether, physical vacuum or other) and he try remove it out from physics. Moreover, there is the proven kind of physical reality that can exist and work itself – without any environment, which are the electromagnetic field. The second greatest merit of Einstein (in my view) is that he says; everything can be build from this single kind of reality only that is the electromagnetic field! So, try please to work without physical vacuum!

With all this, I see your work as a good significant.

I wish you successes!

report post as inappropriate


Author Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov wrote on Mar. 6, 2017 @ 10:48 GMT
Dear Gupta

«………………….. Do you mean these ‘vortices of deeper level of matter’ have no relation with Gravitational waves….?»

Yes, you are right, vortices rotate in pairs in opposite directions. Pairs of vortexes are formed simultaneously, to compensate for the torque. They are only in pairs can quantum-parametrically converted, often through a phase of photons....

view entire post





Author Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov wrote on Mar. 6, 2017 @ 11:32 GMT
Dear Boris Semyonovich

Thank you for your kind words.

With regard to the supernatural, it is necessary to call all their names. And Einstein's theory of relativity and the quantum mechanics are using abstract and ideal (supernatural) properties of matter and fields. I would have called the theories as "general the Bible of relativity, " and "the bible of quantum mechanics", this is, in my opinion, better reflects their nature. This is what would smile.

My comments about your essay will be on your forum thread.

Kind regards,

Vladimir Fedorov




Author Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov wrote on Mar. 7, 2017 @ 08:30 GMT
Dear Koorosh

I apologize for the delay in the response, I havenot enough time to process the information.

It's great that you are interested in a very interesting topic about LIGO and LISA.

In the Earth's magnetosphere often occur conversion powerful toroidal gravitational waves. In this case, there are intense bursts of electromagnetic radiation over a wide frequency...

view entire post





Author Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov wrote on Mar. 7, 2017 @ 11:52 GMT
Dear George Kirakosyan

Many thanks for the criticism, for me it is very important.

I have no doubt in the big importance of your work.

I agree with you that there are significant differences between our views, but that's okay.

I do not think that we can achieve full understanding now, now is important exchang of information and a long process of reflection. Each of us must move by a parallel course in chosen direction.

Kind regards,

Vladimir Fedorov




Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta wrote on Mar. 10, 2017 @ 08:52 GMT
1

Dear Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov

Thank you for such nice post on my paper.

Thank you for all observations...

Thank you very much for your encouraging support.....

You wrote a big post with large number of different subjects! So I am dividing the whole post into 15 small posts, so that individual posts can be discussed separately and easily. Probably you will not mind it.

2

Your words……………

Excellent essay about the dynamic universe, it is so close to me.

You very correctly said that

«Ours is single universe and is a closed one. In other words, our Universe reproduces its Galaxies, as and when light and other electromagnetic radiation condenses to form enough matter».

I completely agree with you, although we use different terms.

Reply……….

Thank you for your Blessings…. Lets Discuss….

3

……… Your words……….………………..

The energy of gravitational waves is circulating in the Dynamic Universe. ……

………….. Reply ……The concept of Gravitational waves is not required in dynamic Universe Model

…………….Your words……..Galaxies emit electromagnetic waves, and the intergalactic medium…………..Reply……………….

Aether was not found

I am giving 3 posts here for your information

Best regards

=snp.

report post as inappropriate


Héctor Daniel Gianni wrote on Mar. 11, 2017 @ 23:54 GMT
Dear Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov

I invite you and every physicist to read my work “TIME ORIGIN,DEFINITION AND EMPIRICAL MEANING FOR PHYSICISTS, Héctor Daniel Gianni ,I’m not a physicist.

How people interested in “Time” could feel about related things to the subject.

1) Intellectuals interested in Time issues usually have a nice and creative wander for the unknown.

2) They usually enjoy this wander of their searches around it.

3) For millenniums this wander has been shared by a lot of creative people around the world.

4) What if suddenly, something considered quasi impossible to be found or discovered such as “Time” definition and experimental meaning confronts them?

5) Their reaction would be like, something unbelievable,… a kind of disappointment, probably interpreted as a loss of wander…..

6) ….worst than that, if we say that what was found or discovered wasn’t a viable theory, but a proved fact.

7) Then it would become offensive to be part of the millenary problem solution, instead of being a reason for happiness and satisfaction.

8) The reader approach to the news would be paradoxically adverse.

9) Instead, I think it should be a nice welcome to discovery, to be received with opened arms and considered to be read with full attention.

11)Time “existence” is exclusive as a “measuring system”, its physical existence can’t be proved by science, as the “time system” is. Experimentally “time” is “movement”, we can prove that, showing that with clocks we measure “constant and uniform” movement and not “the so called Time”.

12)The original “time manuscript” has 23 pages, my manuscript in this contest has only 9 pages.

I share this brief with people interested in “time” and with physicists who have been in sore need of this issue for the last 50 or 60 years.

Héctor

report post as inappropriate

Author Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov replied on Mar. 12, 2017 @ 12:22 GMT
Dear Héctor,

Thank you for the invitation to your essey, I posted the answer on your forum thread.

I liked your essay, especially the phrase

«I can easily explain that “time dilation” is a physically inexistent phenomenon, because is just inertia or gravity “clocks slowing” and also can show in detail that twin paradox».

I congratulate you with interesting thoughts and wish you every success in the contest.

Kind regards,

Vladimir




Vladimir Rogozhin wrote on Mar. 12, 2017 @ 09:10 GMT
Dear Vladimir,

I read with great interest your deep analytical essay with ideas and conclusions that will help us overcome the crisis of understanding in fundamental science through the creation of a new comprehensive picture of the world, uniform for physicists and lyrics filled with meanings of the "LifeWorld" (E.Husserl). FQXI Contests are first of all new ideas - "crazy ideas" (N.Bohr). You give such ideas. I have one question: What is the ontological status of "the physical vacuum medium"? Yours faithfully, Vladimir

report post as inappropriate

Author Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov replied on Mar. 13, 2017 @ 11:55 GMT
Dear Vladimir Rogozhin

Thank you very much for evaluating my essay and an interesting question.

"Scientists consider physical vacuum to be a special state of matter that claims to be the foundation of the world."

When I write about the environment of a physical vacuum, from an ontological point of view, I emphasize its real energy and material basis of the world, instead...

view entire post





Vladimir F. Tamari wrote on Mar. 14, 2017 @ 08:06 GMT
Dear Vladimir

I have read your fascinating essay full of your confident statements and calculations. I liked the small icons links to full size illustrations I should try that method in my future essays! The idea of hydrodynamical-like vortices forming matter in a universal fluid is intriguing. In my Beautiful Universe Model the universal lattice is formed of rotating dielectric nodes. A vortex has opposite spin direction if you look at its axis from different direction, and these spins may be the equivelant of the + and - poles of the proposed dipole building blocks. The electromagnetic right- hand rule must derive from such primitive spins. You frequently mention deBroglie waves surroundng matter. I totally agree that such wave constitute the gravitational field. Beyond these remarks I am not technically qualified to comment on your essay. For example of the many equations you present I am not sure which are your own proposals and which are commonly accepted ones.I wish you good luck! Have fun with physics.

Vladimir

report post as inappropriate


Author Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov wrote on Mar. 15, 2017 @ 12:11 GMT
Dear Vladimir F. Tamari

Many thanks for the kind words about my essay.

My equation for the de Broglie waves is derived from the conventional equation and the momentum conservation law. In the conventional equation, it is unreasonably assumed that one can put any mass in the denominator and obtain, for example, the Planck mass and the Planck wavelength, as a de Broglie wave....

view entire post





Christian Corda wrote on Mar. 20, 2017 @ 10:33 GMT
Dear Vladimir,

You wrote an interesting and provocative Essay. Despite I disagree with some of your claims, in particular the ones on gravitation and gravitational waves, I feel that some of your ideas deserve more attention by the scientific community. Thus, I will give you the highest score in order to help you to better spread them. Good luck in the Contest, I hope that you will have a chance to read our Essay, which, instead, discusses "traditional" gravitational waves.

Cheers, Ch.

http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/2862

report post as inappropriate


Author Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov wrote on Mar. 22, 2017 @ 07:00 GMT
Dear Christian,

I pleasure read your essay, gave him high mark, and understood why many people have questions to him.

But I'm not embarrassed «confused about the relevance of this essay».

This dispute about gravity and gravitational waves has the deep roots of the dispute between Descartes and Newton and the dispute is still not resolved.

"Today it is hard to believe, but contemporaries accused Newton that his theory "returns science in the Middle Ages" Thomas S. Kuhn The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. (1970) . If the bodies are attracted one toonher, then they should spend energy, but from the theory it is not visible, where does the energy come from and how does it replenish? ... There was no (and is no now) a cycle of energy in the theory, and this happened after Descartes, After Descartes introduced the principle of conservation of momentum, which natural science took literally as a life-giving sip of water." L.E. Fedulayev (2009).

The dispute that you raised about the gravitational waves will allow adequately answer the questions of this contest. The theory of gravitational waves is the key theory of self-organization of matter, therefore we observe gravitational attraction as a mechanism for its realization, which is still to be understood in detail.

I wish you success in the contest.

Kind regards,

Vladimir




Gary D. Simpson wrote on Mar. 24, 2017 @ 03:10 GMT
Vladimir,

There are a lot of Vladimirs in this contest:-)

This is an interesting essay. You present many novel ideas, perhaps even too many for a single essay. I suspect you could go into greater detail and make 3 or 4 essays from this subject matter. This is not a bad thing. It simply means you are very enthusiastic about your work.

Some of your ideas I am agreeable with....

view entire post


report post as inappropriate


Gary D. Simpson wrote on Mar. 24, 2017 @ 03:15 GMT
Vladimir,

BTW, I rated your essay after a cursory reading several weeks ago ... The score was between a 5 and 10 ... I don't want to tell you too much because people should not trade votes.

Best Regards and Good Luck,

Gary Simpson

report post as inappropriate


Vladimir Rodin wrote on Mar. 25, 2017 @ 12:06 GMT
Dear Vladimir Nikolaevich,

First of all I'd like to notice that it's very worthy work deserving undoubtedly high score.

I've found a lot of interesting and deep thoughts in your essay, some of which correspond to my approach in an explanation of space, time, a matter etc. With some I don't agree. For example I have other conception about the electron structuring or atom formation. Nevertheless, I've found in you more an adherent than the opponent.

I wish you the further creative successes!

Vladimir Rodin

http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/2752

report post as inappropriate


Bayarsaikhan Bayarsaikhan Choisuren wrote on Mar. 27, 2017 @ 06:05 GMT
Dear Dr. Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov,

As you said “The physical vacuum medium - there is the material, non-linear, multi-level and fractal medium.” I agree with it, but to my opinion, it is that

Ultimate foundation of the nature of the large scale structure of the Universe is that elementary particles or a physical vacuum medium?

I think, you should to define it in more detail.

If someone consider whether the foundation of the nature is a physical vacuum medium or an elementary particle, it must be defined more definitely, as close as possible to the reality of nature.

Of course, it is a big question.

“Law of gravity is valid only near the surfaces of celestial bodies of the solar system”, but it is impossible to be definable at plank scale and around supermassive black holes in the center of many galaxies, unless an exact mechanism of gravitational interaction is discovered.

As taking into consideration the electron–positron annihilation and the de Broglie wave, your hypothetical helicoidal vortex ring and vortex ball rotating may cause to produce elementary particles and virtual particles. But, I think that there a cause to generate the vortices is that a “critical flow speed” of the physical vacuum medium. In other words, the speed of light may become a key property for this.

“Unfounded generalizations and frequency of parametric resonance” is very interesting for me, while associating with an equilibrium condition and being without energy dissipation.

For that “The medium of physical vacuum, together with the earth, is moving at a speed in spherical gravisphere of sun”, I think “The medium of physical vacuum, together with the earth" may take a place only within the Hill sphere.

With Best Regards,

Ch.Bayarsaikhan

report post as inappropriate


Author Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov wrote on Mar. 27, 2017 @ 07:40 GMT
Dear Vladimir Rodin,

Thank you for your kind words.

With great interest I read your essay.

Your essay allowed to consider us like-minded people.

I'm going to write a comment on your work in your forum thread.

I wish you success in the contest.

Kind regards,

Vladimir Fedorov




Anonymous wrote on Mar. 27, 2017 @ 12:23 GMT
Dear Gary,

Thank you very much for a very large and interesting comment in my forum thread. I do not think that now there is time for lengthy discussions, time will come in the middle of April.

Nevertheless, I will try to briefly answer the questions that have arisen with you.

With "tired light" is associated one of my recommended research principles is associated...

view entire post


report post as inappropriate


Author Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov wrote on Mar. 28, 2017 @ 13:42 GMT
Dear Bayarsaikhan,

Thank you very much for comment to my essay.

«but to my opinion, it is that Ultimate foundation of the nature of the large scale structure of the Universe is that elementary particles or a physical vacuum medium?»

The separation of matter on the medium of the physical vacuum and a particle is conditional. On the one hand, the medium of the...

view entire post





Alexander M. Ilyanok wrote on Mar. 30, 2017 @ 09:59 GMT
Dear Vladimir,

Thank you for the warm feedback on my essay.

With pleasure I read your essay and voted. I found that we are in even more agreement than usual.

I have considered a number of similar problems in my articles «Fundamental atom-molecular engineering». Part 1. Model of electron

Metagalactic

Galactic Internet

Good luck and victory.

Best wishes

report post as inappropriate

Author Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov replied on Apr. 1, 2017 @ 08:20 GMT
Dear Alexander,

Also thank you for the warm response about my essay.

I will certainly read your articles in mid-April and of course there are already questions.

You can also read more in my work "Deterministic Gravitational Waves" .

I wish you success in the contest.

Kind regards,

Vladimir




Robert Groess wrote on Mar. 31, 2017 @ 17:51 GMT
Dear Vladimir Fedorov,

Thank you for your kind comments on my essay. I wanted to let you know I have in the meantime also read your detailed and wide reaching treatise on fundamental physics, complete with delightful thumbnail illustrations. I am intrigued if there is a specific link you make connecting our physical world with the notion of intentionality? Perhaps I have missed something important while enjoying your essay.

Regards,

Robert

report post as inappropriate


Author Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov wrote on Apr. 1, 2017 @ 07:11 GMT
Dear Robert,

Thank you very much for your interest in my modest work.

You asked

«I am intrigued if there is a specific link you make connecting our physical world with the notion of intentionality?»

You, basically, answered this question

«We consider as an example the case of irreversible free expansion and inject intent in form of Maxwell’s...

view entire post





James Lee Hoover wrote on Apr. 1, 2017 @ 17:47 GMT
Vladimir,

My essay also relates to the fallacy of an abstract laboratory description of matter: "How the ideal properties of matter and fields give rise to unfounded generalizations, to meaningless mathematical laws, to goals and to intentions."

To dispel the abstract theoretical ideas of lab models and look at matter in the field of galaxies, I speculate about a dark matter interaction in galactic space. My speculation also relates to your "The vortexes of turbulence formed in accordance with the laws of hydrodynamics." I mention studies by Philip Marcus whose research described "vortices in turbulent fluids" and Michael Brenner (I misprinted Breemer) who spoke of "optimizing interaction energies to destabilize kinetic traps."

Your area of study regarding gravitational waves could be put to use near -- in our own galaxy -- and far -- to detect BB waves. Quite interesting.

Hope you get a chance to read and discharge your ideas on my essay.

Jim Hoover

report post as inappropriate

Author Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov replied on Apr. 2, 2017 @ 04:58 GMT
Dear James,

Thank you for taking the time to read my essay as well as for your kind comments. I wanted to let you know I have in the meantime also read and rated your detailed essay and have posted a reply on your forum. Good luck in the contest.

Kind regards,

Vladimir




Colin Walker wrote on Apr. 1, 2017 @ 19:30 GMT
Dear Vladimir,

Your essay touches on many aspects of physics that I would like to learn more about, especially solitons and resonance.

Having read some of the material you cite, I think you are on to something fundamental - the vortexes you describe being related to the phenomenon of turbulence.

It all looks plausible to me, except for your home-made gravitational variometer. That's crazy for sure, but it is a craziness I share and appreciate, as someone who once tried to build a mechanical anti-gravity machine using gyroscopes. Whatever the outcome, these projects are fun.

Best to you,

Colin

report post as inappropriate

Author Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov replied on Apr. 2, 2017 @ 12:43 GMT
Dear Colin,

Many thanks for the kind words about my essay .

Of course, the experiment with gravity variometer was primarily intended for me, that would sort out the mechanism of gravity and answer the question, where to move in research?

I specifically gave a simple description of the gravity vario, that it would be of interest to someone to repeat this simple experiment on registering the variations of graviton fluxes that were discovered by Michelson and Morley.

This experiment seems insane, because is generally accepted that gravitational attraction is the "magic" property of the mass. And I'm interested in the physical mechanism of gravity and self-organization, which is actually devoted to my essay.

In my opinion, attraction is the property of moving bodies, similar to the attraction of repulsive electrons moving along parallel wires.

The bodies are attracted to each other on the Earth because there is a turbulent gravitational shell near the surface of the Earth. The bodies are pierced by gravitons fluxes in toroidal gravitational waves with an equivalent velocity of 8 km/s. Those. In fact, the stationary bodies on the Earth move parallel relatively to the environment of the physical vacuum at a speed of 8 km/s, and therefore attracted.

It is possible that such an explanation would not satisfy someone, for example, LIGO employees.

I wish you success in the contest.

Kind regards,

Vladimir




Peter Jackson wrote on Apr. 1, 2017 @ 21:40 GMT
Vladimir,

Great essay. I'd made notes and thought I'd commented but I can't see it above.

Quite apart from self organizing systems the following is also so profound I wished I'd written it myself! (actually I have written similar or equivalent in papers and previous essays)

"The Earth's atmosphere is a transition layer with a variable speed of the physical vacuum medium relative to the Earth. Near of the surface of the Earth, where the turbulent gravitational shell is forming, the physical vacuum medium, practically, is stationary relative to the Earth",

AND; "It should be note that the speed of movement of elements of matter on the ring of each toroidal vortex gravitational wave de Broglie and Compton of electron is equal to the speed of light"


Super job, top score coming now. Well derived and written.

Very best

Peter

report post as inappropriate

Author Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov replied on Apr. 4, 2017 @ 04:26 GMT
Dear Peter,

Thanks for the positive assessment.

When there is time, I will certainly analyze the your interesting work.

I wish you success in the contest.

Kind regards,

Vladimir




Declan Andrew Traill wrote on Apr. 1, 2017 @ 21:55 GMT
Hi Vladimir,

Thanks for leaving a comment on my essay. Your essay looks good and interesting. For some reason when I downloaded it using the link you provided in your comment, many of the equations in the essay displayed black or other types of graphic squares, making it difficult to read - I will try again later from the main site. I will give you a good rating too - thanks...

Regards,

Declan

report post as inappropriate


Author Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov wrote on Apr. 3, 2017 @ 13:15 GMT
Dear Declan,

Many thanks for the kind words about my essay .

I give two direct links to download the file in pdf format with text of my article "The deterministic gravitational waves".

Gravitational waves v01.pdf

Gravitational waves v01.pdf

I apologize for the inconvenience, and hope for understanding.

I wish you success in the contest.

Kind regards,

Vladimir



Author Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov replied on Apr. 4, 2017 @ 04:43 GMT
Dear Declan,

Many thanks for the kind words about my essay .

I give two direct links to download the file in pdf format with text of my article "The deterministic gravitational waves".

Hyperlinks are distorted by the system, so I give symbolic link addresses

https://drive.google.com/uc?export=download&confirm=no_antiv
irus&id=0B1MvF-AefpMmU3hTSWtQTWUtRTg

https://drive.google.com/uc?export=download&id=0B1MvF-AefpMm
U3hTSWtQTWUtRTg

I apologize for the inconvenience, and hope for understanding.

I wish you success in the contest.

Kind regards,

Vladimir




Edwin Eugene Klingman wrote on Apr. 3, 2017 @ 22:15 GMT
Dear Vladimir Fedorov,

Thank you for your kind comments. Having now read your essay I see that we agree on much. I agree that vortical action plays a much greater role than is commonly recognized, and also that the deBroglie model is the correct basis of QM. What you label "soliton potential wells of stability", I tend to think of as a 'self-sustaining soliton', and relate this to deBroglie waves induced by ultradense particle momentum. After the contest is over you might find time to look at The Nature of Quantum Gravity, which I think you will find interesting. But it does lead to a different model for the elementary particles than your model.

I believe that the density-based formulation of GR is a flat-space equivalent to curved space-time, which you seem to imply as well. However, you say that there are no particles with greater 'mass' then the electron, while I think that there are no particles with greater 'mass density' than the electron.

I am focused more on particles, so I cannot follow all your astronomical calculations, although I am impressed with the data set you have assembled and with your calculations. At this point I am still not entirely sure of your conception of gravity. In short, I agree with the essentials of vortical action, deBroglie-like solitons induced by particles, and gravity as fundamental, but our models of these particles diverge.

I think both of us wish to push mystical quantum mechanics in the direction of intuitive classical physics, which I address to some degree in my essay.

Thanks again for your comments and for contributing your ideas to the FQXi community.

My very best regards,

Edwin Eugene Klingman

report post as inappropriate


Author Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov wrote on Apr. 4, 2017 @ 09:41 GMT
Dear Edwin,

Thank you for your kind comments.

You understood me correctly

«that the density-based formulation of GR is a flat-space equivalent to curved space-time»

The change in the propagation velocity of the gravitational interaction in the gravisphere (the derivative of spatial coordinates in time) corresponds to the distortion of space-time in Einstein's theory of relativity.

The square of this velocity is equal to the gravitational potential. This is very convenient for calculations and for an intuitive understanding of the mechanisms of gravity. Particularly contributing to the understanding of the mechanisms of gravity is the representation of the de Broglie and Compton waves as Wheeler's geons (waves closed by their own gravitational field), whose idea was formed by Wheeler as a result of disputes with Einstein.

I wish you success in the contest.

Kind regards,

Vladimir




David Pinyana wrote on Apr. 6, 2017 @ 21:46 GMT
Vladimir,

I consider very interesting your conclusions:

- The physical vacuum medium - there is the material, non-linear, multi-level and fractal medium. All transformations and interactions of matter in the classical world are carriing out with help of the main universal process - with help of quantum parametric resonance in the physical vacuum medium - with forming soliton.

-The mass does not distort space-time, but it changes the spatial coordinates derived with respect to the velocity-time of propagation of the gravitational interaction and the speed of the physical processes in the vortex of the physical vacuum medium.

- Newton's law of gravity is valid only near the surfaces of celestial bodies of the solar system, similar to the Casimir effect, near the surfaces of the bodies. Newton's law of gravity is a particular solution of the general law of gravitation in the fundamental gravitational interaction, which has property to form the potential well of stability, as the strong interaction.

We should discuss and join our essays... I sent you my book by email... we are in contact !!

report post as inappropriate

Author Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov replied on Apr. 8, 2017 @ 06:46 GMT
Dear David,

Thank you for the good evaluation of my essay.

I quickly read your book. I think that it is very useful and makes think differently about the universe.

I think that right now it is necessary to think about the next step - to fill the subsequent work by models, calculations, examples, experimental proofs and practical applications.

Kind regards,

Vladimir Fedorov




Jonathan J. Dickau wrote on Apr. 7, 2017 @ 06:18 GMT
Wow!

A lot of good content in the essay. It perhaps tried to squeeze in a bit too much general information on your work, but the parts that dealt with the assigned topic directly made a lot of sense. Overall; I liked this paper a lot, but it is decidedly not written in a conventional style. I like the fractal connection, and I too think DeBroglie has answers others often overlook. You bring so much to the table, Vlad, and it's easy to miss seeing which detail you want the reader to notice. These are first impressions and I'll have to leave a detailed comment after reading a few more. Good work!

All the Best,

Jonathan

report post as inappropriate


Don C Foster wrote on Apr. 7, 2017 @ 15:49 GMT
Vladimir,

Thank you so much for the interesting read. I am not qualified to judge the finer points of the physics, but appreciate the way you approach the questions. as you recall from conic sections, what you get depends on how you slice it. At some point we will find the right angle of approach and a new pattern will emerge.

Perhaps the pieces of the answer are all here in these essays and they simply require assembly.

Buoyancy,

Don Foster

report post as inappropriate

Don C Foster replied on Apr. 7, 2017 @ 15:53 GMT
Well, strange. I rated your essay but you still have two rather than three ratings. Maybe it needs to percolate. Hope it comes through. Best.

report post as inappropriate

Author Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov replied on Apr. 9, 2017 @ 05:55 GMT
Dear Don,

Many thanks for the kind words about my essay and high rating.

I really hope that you are right

«At some point we will find the right angle of approach and a new pattern will emerge.»

My very best regards,

Vladimir




Daniel de França Diniz Rocha wrote on Apr. 7, 2017 @ 16:11 GMT
Dear Vladimir,

due time constrains (besides, the voting ends today), I won't be able to properly comment your essay. It would take me a few more days for that, since right now By "properly", I mean, sharing some ideas and thoughts. I really enjoyed your essay. I hope we can keep in touch.

report post as inappropriate

Author Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov replied on Apr. 9, 2017 @ 07:03 GMT
Dear Daniel,

Many thanks for the kind words about my essay and high rating.

Congratulations on the successful completion of the next stage of the contest.

I also «hope we can keep in touch.»

I wish you success in the contest.

Vladimir



Daniel de França Diniz Rocha replied on Apr. 9, 2017 @ 09:05 GMT
I didn't know I could post after April 7th... I guess I will be able to tell you something useful! :)

report post as inappropriate


Author Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov wrote on Apr. 9, 2017 @ 12:28 GMT
I think now there is a lot of time to think about the past discussion. In the course of the discussion, several tasks were realized, but there were no questions of principle to my work.

I felt that many did not agree with my point of view on the universe, but no one asked serious questions and did not explain why my point of view does not correspond to the theme of the contest.

I think that the format of the contest does not allow to discuss effectively the results until April 8.




Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.