Thank you for the nice essay on “ "
Your starting sentences, “It has recently been calculated that when the universe began, random gravitational waves were created by fluctuations of the inflation field”, probably need some rethinking…. If there is no Bigbang then there will not be any gravitational waves, is that so…? Novae and Supernovae also give...
view entire post
Thank you for the nice essay on “ "
Your starting sentences, “It has recently been calculated that when the universe began, random gravitational waves were created by fluctuations of the inflation field”, probably need some rethinking…. If there is no Bigbang then there will not be any gravitational waves, is that so…? Novae and Supernovae also give gravitational waves … In that case probably you will have to consider changing the word Bigbang, as that model considers 40 percent of Galaxies which are redshifted, but there are 60 percent of other Galaxies which are blue shifted or quasars etc.
Otherwise … your observations like “Whatever the answer as regards to whether mathematics being created or invented, the consequence of them is a voyage, whether by a computer or a human, prompting any necessary re.nement in the axioms and their results then explored further.” are very correct
For your information Dynamic Universe model is totally based on experimental results. Here in Dynamic Universe Model Space is Space and time is time in cosmology level or in any level. In the classical general relativity, space and time are convertible in to each other. That is one of the differences in both the models….
Many papers and books on Dynamic Universe Model were published by the author on unsolved problems of present day Physics, for example ‘Absolute Rest frame of reference is not necessary’ (1994) , ‘Multiple bending of light ray can create many images for one Galaxy: in our dynamic universe’, About “SITA” simulations, ‘Missing mass in Galaxy is NOT required’, “New mathematics tensors without Differential and Integral equations”, “Information, Reality and Relics of Cosmic Microwave Background”, “Dynamic Universe Model explains the Discrepancies of Very-Long-Baseline Interferometry Observations.”, in 2015 ‘Explaining Formation of Astronomical Jets Using Dynamic Universe Model, ‘Explaining Pioneer anomaly’, ‘Explaining Near luminal velocities in Astronomical jets’, ‘Observation of super luminal neutrinos’, ‘Process of quenching in Galaxies due to formation of hole at the center of Galaxy, as its central densemass dries up’, “Dynamic Universe Model Predicts the Trajectory of New Horizons Satellite Going to Pluto” etc., are some more papers from the Dynamic Universe model. Four Books also were published. Book1 shows Dynamic Universe Model is singularity free and body to collision free, Book 2, and Book 3 are explanation of equations of Dynamic Universe model. Book 4 deals about prediction and finding of Blue shifted Galaxies in the universe.
With axioms like… No Isotropy; No Homogeneity; No Space-time continuum; Non-uniform density of matter(Universe is lumpy); No singularities; No collisions between bodies; No Blackholes; No warm holes; No Bigbang; No repulsion between distant Galaxies; Non-empty Universe; No imaginary or negative time axis; No imaginary X, Y, Z axes; No differential and Integral Equations mathematically; No General Relativity and Model does not reduce to General Relativity on any condition; No Creation of matter like Bigbang or steady-state models; No many mini Bigbangs; No Missing Mass; No Dark matter; No Dark energy; No Bigbang generated CMB detected; No Multi-verses etc.
Many predictions of Dynamic Universe Model came true, like Blue shifted Galaxies and no dark matter. Dynamic Universe Model gave many results otherwise difficult to explain
Have a look at my essay on Dynamic Universe Model and its blog also where all my books and papers are available for free downloading…
st wishes to your essay.
For your blessings please…………….
view post as summary
I don't know that much physics. I have a background in pure mathematics. Pardon my ignorance. Even if I did, my position would still have been essentially nihilistic. Think of it this way. Suppose I'm going at a party. I might have some knowledge about its time, theme, host, social norms etc and decide to wear, say black. I turn up at the party and see people wearing a spectrum of colours. Some people have a shade that's black.
These people might have had similar knowledge to what I did and ended up with this decision. Others didn't.
What was this knowledge? Science? Let's stretch a slippery slope: is this our impression of the world?
That's what I call random. The data is random and we see some pattern because we want to. Are we reinforcing our biases when we're passing degrees? When we let people think clearly? Tell them this axiom or that?