Dear Ekeson,
Thank you for the nice essay on " a general model of causality, based on conditionality and reality "
Your observations are excellent, with so many nice explanatory illustrations... very nice, for example your words..
"Ours is a universe of complexity, and telos is its highest expression. In order to show how this is indeed the case, a broad model of causality based on the ideas of the Indian philosopher NДЃgДЃrjuna will be presented "
And ...
"Circa 250 CE, the Indian Mahayana Buddhist philosopher NДЃgДЃrjuna introduced the doctrine of Dependent Co-origination (PratД«tya-samutpДЃda)[1]. Through this doctrine he asserted that all phenomena are completely conditional and therefore empty (ЕљЕ«nyatДЃ)[2] of any unconditioned reality, character, or characteristics (svabhДЃva). This position stands in general contrast to Western-style empirical approaches, where either".....
I have a small observation here...Either was used in Physics, as well as in Philosophy... But Either was not found till now . There was a fruitless search of Either even a year back or so...
So will that matter in Philosophy also.....?
Even-though not related to your essay, I request to have a look at my essay also
For your information Dynamic Universe model is totally based on experimental results. Here in Dynamic Universe Model Space is Space and time is time in cosmology level or in any level. In the classical general relativity, space and time are convertible in to each other. That is one of the differences in both the models....
Many papers and books on Dynamic Universe Model were published by the author on unsolved problems of present day Physics, for example 'Absolute Rest frame of reference is not necessary' (1994) , 'Multiple bending of light ray can create many images for one Galaxy: in our dynamic universe', About "SITA" simulations, 'Missing mass in Galaxy is NOT required', "New mathematics tensors without Differential and Integral equations", "Information, Reality and Relics of Cosmic Microwave Background", "Dynamic Universe Model explains the Discrepancies of Very-Long-Baseline Interferometry Observations.", in 2015 'Explaining Formation of Astronomical Jets Using Dynamic Universe Model, 'Explaining Pioneer anomaly', 'Explaining Near luminal velocities in Astronomical jets', 'Observation of super luminal neutrinos', 'Process of quenching in Galaxies due to formation of hole at the center of Galaxy, as its central densemass dries up', "Dynamic Universe Model Predicts the Trajectory of New Horizons Satellite Going to Pluto" etc., are some more papers from the Dynamic Universe model. Four Books also were published. Book1 shows Dynamic Universe Model is singularity free and body to collision free, Book 2, and Book 3 are explanation of equations of Dynamic Universe model. Book 4 deals about prediction and finding of Blue shifted Galaxies in the universe.
With axioms like... No Isotropy; No Homogeneity; No Space-time continuum; Non-uniform density of matter(Universe is lumpy); No singularities; No collisions between bodies; No Blackholes; No warm holes; No Bigbang; No repulsion between distant Galaxies; Non-empty Universe; No imaginary or negative time axis; No imaginary X, Y, Z axes; No differential and Integral Equations mathematically; No General Relativity and Model does not reduce to General Relativity on any condition; No Creation of matter like Bigbang or steady-state models; No many mini Bigbangs; No Missing Mass; No Dark matter; No Dark energy; No Bigbang generated CMB detected; No Multi-verses etc.
Many predictions of Dynamic Universe Model came true, like Blue shifted Galaxies and no dark matter. Dynamic Universe Model gave many results otherwise difficult to explain
Have a look at my essay on Dynamic Universe Model and blog also where all my books and available for free downloading...
http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.in/
Best wishes to your essay.
For your blessings please................
=snp. gupta