Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home

Current Essay Contest


Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fnd.

Previous Contests

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discusswinners

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discusswinners

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discusswinners

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

steve krieger: on 3/21/17 at 11:57am UTC, wrote Hi Kigen, I was deeply impressed by your essay, which presents a paradigm...

Kigen Ekeson: on 3/13/17 at 17:20pm UTC, wrote Dear Karl, Thanks for the kind and encouraging words. To answer your...

Karl Coryat: on 3/13/17 at 4:17am UTC, wrote Hi Kigen: I found your essay to be quite brilliant — clearly written,...

Kigen Ekeson: on 3/5/17 at 10:09am UTC, wrote Dear David, Thank you so much for taking the time to read and comment on...

David Cosgrove: on 3/5/17 at 2:14am UTC, wrote William, I found your essay very interesting and quite thought provoking. ...

Joe Fisher: on 2/28/17 at 16:27pm UTC, wrote Dear Kigen William Ekeson, Please excuse me for I have no intention of...

Satyavarapu Gupta: on 2/27/17 at 21:08pm UTC, wrote Dear Ekeson, Thank you for the nice essay on “ a general model of...

Kigen Ekeson: on 2/24/17 at 21:45pm UTC, wrote Essay Abstract This essay will present a new way to think about the...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Eckard Blumschein: "Gary Simpson, While PHALLUS is an abreviantion, a phallus is a Willy, a..." in FQXi Essay Contest 2016:...

jay grey: "Thanks for the link, I believe it will be very useful for personal..." in Santa Barbara Gravity...

Lorraine Ford: "Good one Gary! Regards, Lorraine" in FQXi Essay Contest 2016:...

Joe Fisher: "Attempting to account for complex finite invisible particles will not help..." in Bohemian Reality:...

jany watson: "At we have a long list of similar http://www.essayhelperuk.co.uk/law-essay..." in Koalas, Quantum Mechanics...

James Putnam: ""The math time = 1/nu defines time ... " Nu is cycles/second. 1/nu is..." in Alternative Models of...

Steve Agnew: "Your work has shown how normal physics like S&Z mass, length, and time have..." in Alternative Models of...

kab: "The word is enternal magic. Hope all secret never has answer will be out..." in Does Quantum Weirdness...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

Bohemian Reality: Searching for a Quantum Connection to Consciousness
Is there are sweet spot where artificial intelligence systems could have the maximum amount of consciousness while retaining powerful quantum properties?

Quantum Replicants: Should future androids dream of quantum sheep?
To build the ultimate artificial mimics of real life systems, we may need to use quantum memory.

Painting a QBist Picture of Reality
A radical interpretation of physics makes quantum theory more personal.

The Spacetime Revolutionary
Carlo Rovelli describes how black holes may transition to "white holes," according to loop quantum gravity, a radical rewrite of fundamental physics.

Riding the Rogue Quantum Waves
Could giant sea swells help explain how the macroscopic world emerges from the quantum microworld? (Image credit: MIT News)


FQXi FORUM
March 28, 2017

CATEGORY: Wandering Towards a Goal Essay Contest (2016-2017) [back]
TOPIC: Telos and Complexity by Kigen William Ekeson [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

This essay's rating: Community = 3.7; Public = 5.7


Author Kigen William Ekeson wrote on Feb. 24, 2017 @ 21:45 GMT
Essay Abstract

This essay will present a new way to think about the natural world and the nature of telos using complexity. It is intended as an extended thought experiment: a chance to hypothetically wander “outside the box” of our current paradigms. In order to begin, I will first present a diagram suggesting a causal “common denominator” between all phenomenal conditioned states. In order to do this I will introduce ideas of the philosopher Nāgārjuna, and then develop a general model of causality, based on conditionality. From there, I will develop a topological hierarchy whereby distinct categories of natural phenomena are modeled according to their relative complexity. I contend that it is only in doing so that the function of telos can be convincingly discretized and defined relative to other phenomena that exhibit no teleological properties. I will then show how both quantitative and qualitative modes of describing conditioned states arise as expressions of teleological function. I will conclude by summarizing some of the broad implications of what the entire model suggests regarding telos and the human condition.

Author Bio

Kigen William Ekeson is a teacher and student of Buddhist Philosophy, as well as a fascinated spectator of ongoing evolutions in the Philosophy of Science. He currently resides in Vienna, Austria.

Download Essay PDF File




Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta wrote on Feb. 27, 2017 @ 21:08 GMT
Dear Ekeson,

Thank you for the nice essay on “ a general model of causality, based on conditionality and reality “

Your observations are excellent, with so many nice explanatory illustrations… very nice, for example your words..

“Ours is a universe of complexity, and telos is its highest expression. In order to show how this is indeed the case, a broad model of...

view entire post


report post as inappropriate


Joe Fisher wrote on Feb. 28, 2017 @ 16:27 GMT
Dear Kigen William Ekeson,

Please excuse me for I have no intention of disparaging in any way any part of your essay.

I merely wish to point out that “Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler.” Albert Einstein (1879 - 1955) Physicist & Nobel Laureate.

Only nature could produce a reality so simple, a single cell amoeba could deal with it.

The...

view entire post


report post as inappropriate


David C Cosgrove wrote on Mar. 5, 2017 @ 02:14 GMT
William,

I found your essay very interesting and quite thought provoking. Despite our ways of looking at things (e.g. regarding the fundamental form of universal reality) being qualitatively rather different, I think there could be a fair amount of philosophical commonality between our proposed world-views, esp. in various respects…

E.g. you discuss the constancy of the speed of light (being possibly related to a fastest rate of fundamental change) and reasons for its universal nature – a topic I have often wondered about. And my rough operating hypothesis is perhaps not all that disconsonant with your proposition – where I wonder if the speed of light limit is related to the minimum information transmission time possible between fundamental ‘beables’ (that encode the messages passing along them, akin to cellular automata, of which I imagine our macro-reality is composed?) of a presumed pre-space.

Your hierarchy for different levels of complexity also seems to have relevance towards another question I often wonder about, “Why is every electron fundamentally identical in nature? “

Who told the universe (at the apparently wide-spread macro level) how to make them (and each photon, proton, quark etc) all the same?

In my picture, this could be a consequence of our (partially non-local) macro-level reality being dependent on the (fully local) lower-level structures of pre-space. That is, every ‘fundamental’ particle at our level (such as an electron) is the result of a basic, singular piece of information/code (subsequently transmitted and/or copied) on the underlying patch of pre-space (i.e. a patch using algorithms that have successfully preserved enough basic structure, from elemental change, to lead to universes like ours).

I will have to think further about some of your descriptions, and what implications they might have for my own perceptions of fundamental issues…

Regards,

David C.

report post as inappropriate

Author Kigen William Ekeson replied on Mar. 5, 2017 @ 10:09 GMT
Dear David,

Thank you so much for taking the time to read and comment on my essay. I've spent so many years working on the ideas, that it's a bit of a kick in the butt to not even warrant a valid negative criticism from anyone on here. That you at least found some 'food for thought' has made my day.

Yes, I agree that we both seem to be sniffing in similar directions...that everything is locked into 'change' and information is the key. That's why i found your essay worth reading and commenting on. As I mentioned in my comment to you, I just hold that there is a fundamental algorithm. Of course, things get really interesting once begins to think about the implications of such an algorithm. Still, I see your approach in starting from a 'turbulent sea of fluctuation' as certainly worthy of consideration and will be returning to your essay for another look.

Thanks again and best of luck.

Yours,

William




Karl H Coryat wrote on Mar. 13, 2017 @ 04:17 GMT
Hi Kigen:

I found your essay to be quite brilliant — clearly written, smoothly flowing, and well-researched. If I had a criticism, it's that you had too much ground to cover in only 9 pages (I too suffer from the same problem in these contests). I especially appreciate that you brought Eastern natural philosophy to bear on the current problems with Western natural philosophy, without sacrificing rigor.

I love that you describe the speed of light as the fastest rate that any cycle of change can occur. This shares obvious connections with the Planck constant as the smallest length (time, etc.) that can be measured in principle. Wheeler's "it from bit" essay urged unification of c and h — and I think you've found a way to do it.

I notice that you place advancing complexity as happening between polarization and unification phases. Are you familiar with cellular automata? These experiments find that complexity happens in "finely tuned" regions between order and choas, which could be represented in your models as polarization and unification, respectively. I discuss CA's on p. 253 of my book "The Simplest-Case Scenario" (http://simplestcasescenario.com), which is based on a previous prize-winning FQXi essay.

I'd like to ask, where does technology fit into your picture? Is technology capable of fourth-order complexity? I think there's something to be said for the fact that we humans create technology and thereby breathe ourselves into it in some respects, in ways that don't happen in the inanimate natural world.

I really enjoyed your essay, so best of luck in the competition!

Karl Coryat

report post as inappropriate

Author Kigen William Ekeson replied on Mar. 13, 2017 @ 17:20 GMT
Dear Karl,

Thanks for the kind and encouraging words. To answer your question about where technology fits into the picture, in my scheme of things, the fourth-order agency is not limited to a central agent. That is, the “agency-context” is system-wide a description that transforms/compounds lower-or-like order complexities (either intrinsically or extrinsically) into its own inner and outer content. Thus, if we would like to make a difficult calculation, we can create and use a computer in order to help us to do so.

If we would like to connect our inner and outer environs by moving dirt, we can create mechanical extensions (e.g. bulldozers) to do just that. Things really get interesting we incorporate other human fourth-order complexities (or their corresponding extensions) into our own agency-context. In such instances, family, society, economics, religions, et al, all become part of our own content. All of these ‘technologies’ are thus always oriented to the ultimate survival of some specific central inner/outer agency-context but in so doing, multiple discrete centers-of-agency necessarily overlap and are co-transformed into each other’s fourth-order agencies.

So, the short answer to your question is that fourth-order agency-contexts necessarily include any and all technologies that they either create or are exposed to, either consciously or unconsciously, as part of their fourth-order content.

Yours,

Kigen




steve krieger wrote on Mar. 21, 2017 @ 11:57 GMT
Hi Kigen,

I was deeply impressed by your essay, which presents a paradigm shift in our thinking around consciousness.

report post as inappropriate


Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:

And select the letter between 'K' and 'M':


Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.