Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home

Current Essay Contest


Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fnd.

Previous Contests

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discusswinners

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discusswinners

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discusswinners

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Peter Jackson: on 3/27/17 at 13:43pm UTC, wrote Richard, Nice approach and a welcome relief from the ever deeper confusion...

Alexey/Lev Burov: on 3/24/17 at 0:56am UTC, wrote Dear Richard, It's a lovely essay, suggesting a nice introduction to some...

Jonathan Khanlian: on 3/12/17 at 23:13pm UTC, wrote My new favorite quote from god: "As I said before, if it’s possible,...

Don Limuti: on 3/10/17 at 6:14am UTC, wrote Hi Dick, Nice refreshing essay. I like it very much even though I find the...

Sylvain Poirier: on 3/5/17 at 12:25pm UTC, wrote I just looked a little further at your writings and found your conception...

Richard Dolan: on 2/23/17 at 23:16pm UTC, wrote Hello Sylvain, Thanks for the compliment and for your thoughtful comments....

Sylvain Poirier: on 2/23/17 at 12:30pm UTC, wrote Hello. I see this as the best essay I saw so far in this year's contest;...

sridattadev kancharla: on 2/20/17 at 22:41pm UTC, wrote Oh my GOD, absolutely brilliant letter, loved it, i hope you will love this...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

kurt stocklmeir: "if space is expanding and if this makes positive energy particles have a..." in Alternative Models of...

nimit theeraleekul: "Dear friends, In my early post, I said that we could see detail of..." in Weinberg: Why quantum...

nimit theeraleekul: "Dear Administrator, I have tried to make several posts with an attachment,..." in Weinberg: Why quantum...

Gary Simpson: "Pentcho, I did not need the postulates of SR to propose the mechanism. In..." in Alternative Models of...

Pentcho Valev: "Gary, "I can propose a physical mechanism for length contraction" You..." in Alternative Models of...

Robert Martin: "Theories of everything, he contends, can be depicted as those which draw on..." in Theories of Everything,...

Gary Simpson: "Pentcho, I'm not asking for you to comment upon my essay. I am asking you..." in We Are All Connected

Pentcho Valev: "Gary, Einstein deduced his concept of time (spacetime) from two..." in We Are All Connected


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

Bohemian Reality: Searching for a Quantum Connection to Consciousness
Is there are sweet spot where artificial intelligence systems could have the maximum amount of consciousness while retaining powerful quantum properties?

Quantum Replicants: Should future androids dream of quantum sheep?
To build the ultimate artificial mimics of real life systems, we may need to use quantum memory.

Painting a QBist Picture of Reality
A radical interpretation of physics makes quantum theory more personal.

The Spacetime Revolutionary
Carlo Rovelli describes how black holes may transition to "white holes," according to loop quantum gravity, a radical rewrite of fundamental physics.

Riding the Rogue Quantum Waves
Could giant sea swells help explain how the macroscopic world emerges from the quantum microworld? (Image credit: MIT News)


FQXi FORUM
May 24, 2017

CATEGORY: Wandering Towards a Goal Essay Contest (2016-2017) [back]
TOPIC: A Letter from God by Richard P Dolan [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Author Richard P Dolan wrote on Feb. 17, 2017 @ 20:42 GMT
Essay Abstract

Fed up with physicists lamenting their inability to achieve the next big breakthrough while looking at the world backwards, God lets us know that it’s not mindless mathematical laws that give rise to everything, but consciousness, aka existence.

Author Bio

Richard P. Dolan Dick Dolan is a retired electrical engineer, former editor of the late Hewlett-Packard Journal, and author of Dick’s Reality—A Physics Blog (dicksreality.blogspot.com).

Download Essay PDF File




William Walker wrote on Feb. 17, 2017 @ 22:29 GMT
Hey Richard!.. I mean Dick (Breakfast Club... get it? ;)...

Loved the paper! especially the ending... just wait until you see my paper...;)

Will I AM Walker

report post as inappropriate


Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta wrote on Feb. 17, 2017 @ 23:40 GMT
Dear Richard P Dolan,

Good essay on Freewill...

Your (Gods) words are nice... "“What about free will? Don’t humans have free will?” Well, since I never change, free will is meaningless to me. "

Have look at my essay also…

Best Wishes..

=snp. gupta

report post as inappropriate


Edwin Eugene Klingman wrote on Feb. 18, 2017 @ 03:47 GMT
Dear Dick Dolan,

Very, very nice essay. You are right, of course, but on a higher level than is typically the content of these essays. If you haven't read Alan Watts (This is It, The Book, etc.) you might enjoy him. He wrote your essay in the 70s.

I think you say just about all it's possible to say, but since people here are looking for math or physics explanations, you probably won't win the big prize!

A number of us agree that "mindless mathematical laws don't give rise to anything", but a surprising number don't.

Welcome to the fray (or play as you more wisely put it.)

I invite you to read my essay, but you won't learn anything you don't already know.

Thanks for most informative and entertaining essay.

Best regards,

Edwin Eugene Klingman

report post as inappropriate


Joe Fisher wrote on Feb. 18, 2017 @ 15:54 GMT
Dear Editor Dolan,

Please excuse me for I have no intention of disparaging in any way any part of your essay.

I merely wish to point out that “Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler. Albert Einstein (1879 - 1955) Physicist & Nobel Laureate.”

Only nature could produce a reality so simple, a single cell amoeba could deal with it.

The real Universe must consist only of one unified visible infinite physical surface occurring in one infinite dimension, that am always illuminated by infinite non-surface light.

A more detailed explanation of natural reality can be found in my essay, SCORE ONE FOR SIMPLICITY. I do hope that you will read my essay and perhaps comment on its merit.

Joe Fisher, Realist

report post as inappropriate


sridattadev kancharla wrote on Feb. 20, 2017 @ 22:30 GMT
Dear Richard,

Yes indeed absolute consciousness is the GOD. Know thyself to know it all.

Love,

i.

report post as inappropriate


sridattadev kancharla wrote on Feb. 20, 2017 @ 22:41 GMT
Oh my GOD, absolutely brilliant letter, loved it, i hope you will love this one too from your alternate self, GOD there are no goals it's all play.

love,

atemporal i aka GOD.

report post as inappropriate


Sylvain Poirier wrote on Feb. 23, 2017 @ 12:30 GMT
Hello. I see this as the best essay I saw so far in this year's contest; still in details I have some disagreements (so yes this means I generally see others I looked at as rubbish; I won't even care to comment on details).

- It is a pity you just simply dismissed the topic of mathematics, hardly saying any word about the nature of mathematics and whether and how math may have anything to...

view entire post


report post as inappropriate


Author Richard P Dolan wrote on Feb. 23, 2017 @ 23:16 GMT
Hello Sylvain,

Thanks for the compliment and for your thoughtful comments. I’m sure you can appreciate that it’s impossible to anticipate every possible question about the universe in a short essay. For my thoughts on other points I refer you to my blog: < dicksreality.blogspot.com > and to my website: < http://home.earthlink.net/~dolascetta >.

Regards,

Dick




Sylvain Poirier wrote on Mar. 5, 2017 @ 12:25 GMT
I just looked a little further at your writings and found your conception completely incoherent (in the light of what I know): you claim "Mindless mathematical laws don’t give rise to anything" and yet your theory of everything is all about purely mathematical entities giving rise to everything. By lack of expertise in the foundations of mathematics you assumed that the ideas of "existence" "concepts" or even "self-reference" were things on the side of consciousness beyond mathematics and thus could suffice to characterize consciousness beyond mathematics. They are not. More precisely, the words "existence" and "concept" are ambiguous. Indeed there are completely mathematical versions of these: ideas of "mathematical existence", "mathematical concepts" and even some kind of self-reference, can be studied as purely mathematical structures as I did it my work, thus just like any mathematical structures they are devoid of any consciousness in themselves.

The conscious version of "existence" and "concepts", on the other hand, have their own independent source. They have always been, since the "very beginning" (which isn't anything clear) existence and concepts of non-mathematical stuff (at least, non purely mathematical stuff).

Just now I stumbled on a seemingly true revealed description of the creation. It confirmed what I said, that is, there is no such thing as atemporal existence (only somehow mathematical objects, and also any remembered event aquired a sort of permanent existence as part of memory once it occurred).

It seems the people who received this revelation are not scientists but I find it very coherent with my rational analysis of metaphysics, the foundations of maths, and quantum physics which I explained in my essay.

report post as inappropriate


Don Limuti wrote on Mar. 10, 2017 @ 06:14 GMT
Hi Dick,

Nice refreshing essay. I like it very much even though I find the term God awkward.

Personally, I like the triplet of Shankara:

1. Brahman alone is real 2. This world is an illusion 3. The individual person is no other than Brahman. Loopy enough to allow mathematics :)

Yes, you get a very good rating.

Thanks for your essay,

Don Limuti

report post as inappropriate


Jonathan Khanlian wrote on Mar. 12, 2017 @ 23:13 GMT
My new favorite quote from god:

"As I said before, if it’s possible, there’s a good chance I’ll create it. That’s what I do. If you don’t want to deal with something, you’ll have to make it impossible, or at least unlikely. Sorry, but that’s the way it is."

He/she doesn't seems like the kind of person who will get you out of bind, but more like a straight-shooting parent that prepares you for the real world. In fact, based on that last line about calling home, I'm guessing my mother actually wrote this letter just posing as god!

Please check out my essay and film. One is available on Amazon Prime and iTunes, and the other is available in this essay forum.

Thanks!

Jon

report post as inappropriate


Alexey/Lev Burov wrote on Mar. 24, 2017 @ 00:56 GMT
Dear Richard,

It's a lovely essay, suggesting a nice introduction to some Vedanta ideas, I would say. Since introduction to great ideas is the hardest part of showing them, I am giving you a good credit for that. As to the critical points, I have two of them: apparently, neither ethics, nor aesthetics play any role in your picture. It looks too tautological. I will discuss your composition with my son Lev and then come back with our score. Meanwhile, you are cordially invited to read and comment our essay.

See you on our page,

Alexey Burov.

report post as inappropriate


Peter Jackson wrote on Mar. 27, 2017 @ 13:43 GMT
Richard,

Nice approach and a welcome relief from the ever deeper confusion arising from looking the wrong way, which I agree most of science does. Particular favourite truths?

"it’s not mindless mathematical laws that give rise to everything, but consciousness" and "existence self-organizes".

I also identify self organization as causal in my essay, and also conclude we can't scientifically exclude a God or greater intelligence. I wouldn't have minded one that COULD grant 3 wishes, but we can't have everything... ..can we??

Best

Peter

report post as inappropriate


Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.