Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home


Previous Contests

Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fnd.
read/discusswinners

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discusswinners

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discusswinners

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discusswinners

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

George Ellis: on 2/25/17 at 19:45pm UTC, wrote Dear Muder H. Moldier, Your essay does a great job in presenting...

George Ellis: on 2/25/17 at 16:37pm UTC, wrote Dear Muder H. Moldier, Your essay does a great job in presenting...

Harry Ricker III: on 2/22/17 at 0:19am UTC, wrote Hi, I liked this essay a lot, and one reason is that I think yours and and...

Satyavarapu Gupta: on 2/19/17 at 10:34am UTC, wrote Dear Moldier, Good essay on Philosophy. You discussed nicely about...

Mohamed Haj Yousef: on 2/17/17 at 7:35am UTC, wrote “ - Destiny finds those who listen, and fate finds the rest.” Author:...

Joe Fisher: on 2/16/17 at 16:56pm UTC, wrote Dear Philosopher Muldier, Please excuse me for I do not wish to be too...

Muder Moldier: on 2/14/17 at 16:21pm UTC, wrote Essay Abstract When evaluating morality, there are two principals...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

mono joli: "thanks a lot for such a great topic. Scary Maze Games Basketball Legends..." in The Race to Replace the...

Joe Fisher: "Dear Dr. Brendan Foster, Of course: “We Are All Connected .” My..." in We Are All Connected

Caroline v: "Thanks for informing us about FQXi-sponsored workshop which aim was to..." in Schrödinger’s Cat...

Caroline v: "thanks" in Schrödinger’s Cat...

Yelena Hopper: "Training is the way toward encouraging learning, or the procurement of..." in Wandering Towards a Goal:...

Yelena Hopper: "This article is such a pleasant and intriguing one, I'm exceptionally happy..." in We Are All Connected

Yelena Hopper: "Pushing the points of confinement of hypothesis and creative energy in..." in Review of “A Big Bang...

George Manner: "This is very interesting thing to know about Comment on hand" in Multiversal Journeys'...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

Our Place in the Multiverse
Calculating the odds that intelligent observers arise in parallel universes—and working out what they might see.

Sounding the Drums to Listen for Gravity’s Effect on Quantum Phenomena
A bench-top experiment could test the notion that gravity breaks delicate quantum superpositions.

Watching the Observers
Accounting for quantum fuzziness could help us measure space and time—and the cosmos—more accurately.

Bohemian Reality: Searching for a Quantum Connection to Consciousness
Is there are sweet spot where artificial intelligence systems could have the maximum amount of consciousness while retaining powerful quantum properties?

Quantum Replicants: Should future androids dream of quantum sheep?
To build the ultimate artificial mimics of real life systems, we may need to use quantum memory.


FQXi FORUM
October 17, 2017

CATEGORY: Wandering Towards a Goal Essay Contest (2016-2017) [back]
TOPIC: The Character between Teleology and Deontology by Muder H. Moldier [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Author Muder H. Moldier wrote on Feb. 14, 2017 @ 16:21 GMT
Essay Abstract

When evaluating morality, there are two principals of ethical theories that can be contrasted. These theories are deontological ethics and teleological ethics. While teleological ethics focuses on moral acts in order to achieve some sort of end, deontological ethics argues that morality is an obligation and is not reducible to a creation of good consequences. Given these distinctively opposite characteristics, it is obvious that when viewing morally relevant situations that the methods of approaching them will conflict as well. Not only will these differences depend on the deontological or the teleological ethicist point of view, but opinions will also vary when surreptitiously observing the egoist, the altruist, and the universalist.

Author Bio

Just an amateur philosopher who believe that the reality take ever new forms, as soon as you feel that you know the reality it will change.

Download Essay PDF File




Joe Fisher wrote on Feb. 16, 2017 @ 16:56 GMT
Dear Philosopher Muldier,

Please excuse me for I do not wish to be too critical of your fine essay and I do hope that it fairs well in the competition.

Only nature could produce a reality so simple, a single cell amoeba could deal with it.

The real Universe must consist only of one unified visible infinite physical surface occurring in one infinite dimension, that am always illuminated by infinite non-surface light.

A more detailed explanation of natural reality can be found in my essay, SCORE ONE FOR SIMPLICITY. I do hope that you will read my essay and comment on its merit.

Joe Fisher, Realist

report post as inappropriate


Mohamed Ali Haj Yousef wrote on Feb. 17, 2017 @ 07:35 GMT
“ - Destiny finds those who listen, and fate finds the rest.”

Author: Marshall Masters

quotinq

report post as inappropriate


Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta wrote on Feb. 19, 2017 @ 10:34 GMT
Dear Moldier,

Good essay on Philosophy. You discussed nicely about character, Ethics, Altruists, Fate and destiny etc…. Good…

Request you to have a look at my essay also…

Best wishes…………….

=snp. gupta

report post as inappropriate


Harry Hamlin Ricker III wrote on Feb. 22, 2017 @ 00:19 GMT
Hi, I liked this essay a lot, and one reason is that I think yours and and mine are complementary in many ways. The presentation is excellent. Thanks for the great job on it.

report post as inappropriate


Member George F. R. Ellis wrote on Feb. 25, 2017 @ 16:37 GMT
Dear Muder H. Moldier,

Your essay does a great job in presenting alternative approaches to ethics. It ought to be required reading for all those neuroscientists, psychologists, and evolutionary theorists who are busy trying to derives ethics from science. However it does not seem to relate closely to the FQXI essay theme: how can this arise out of physics?

That link is provided by the fact that ethical stances act in a top down way to affect all lower level thought processes by setting the limits of what can be regarded as acceptable and non-acceptable actions (I outline how this happens in my book How Can Physics Underlie the Mind?), which psychological processes are then instantiated at the lowest level through ion and electron flows mediated by biomolecules, as I describe on my essay.

Thus I believe your essay fits in nicely with my own, in terms of providing an analysis of key higher level thoughts and concepts that drive the whole.

George Ellis

report post as inappropriate


Member George F. R. Ellis wrote on Feb. 25, 2017 @ 19:45 GMT
Dear Muder H. Moldier,

Your essay does a great job in presenting alternative approaches to ethics. It ought to be required reading for all those neuroscientists, psychologists, and evolutionary theorists who are busy trying to derives ethics from science. However it does not seem to relate closely to the FQXI essay theme: how can this arise out of physics?

That link is provided by the fact that ethical stances act in a top down way to affect all lower level thought processes by setting the limits of what can be regarded as acceptable and non-acceptable actions (I outline how this happens in my book How Can Physics Underlie the Mind?), which psychological processes are then instantiated at the lowest level through ion and electron flows mediated by biomolecules, as I describe on my essay.

Thus I believe your essay fits in nicely with my own, in terms of providing an analysis of key higher level thoughts and concepts that drive the whole.

George Ellis

report post as inappropriate


Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.