Search FQXi

If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home

Previous Contests

Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fnd.

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American


How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008

Forum Home
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help

sridattadev kancharla: on 7/22/17 at 18:29pm UTC, wrote Dear All, I have formulated a mathematical function and calling it "ISA...

sridattadev kancharla: on 7/22/17 at 0:35am UTC, wrote Dear All, Using Imaginary part of s in the e power yields correct...

sridattadev kancharla: on 7/21/17 at 21:14pm UTC, wrote Dear All, I am using Sign function to determine the direction of...

sridattadev kancharla: on 7/20/17 at 23:42pm UTC, wrote Dear All, On further analysis, I introduced a spin factor in the Riemann...

sridattadev kancharla: on 7/19/17 at 18:32pm UTC, wrote Dear All, I stand corrected, ISA(s) = e power ( i * pi * s). Love.

sridattadev kancharla: on 7/17/17 at 21:26pm UTC, wrote ISA function image updated to include Body, Mind and Soul. in the above...

sridattadev kancharla: on 7/16/17 at 1:41am UTC, wrote ISA function is the analytical continuation of Riemann Zeta function and...

Steve Dufourny: on 4/3/17 at 17:52pm UTC, wrote indeed, I am happy to see so many people speaking about the sphères and...


Georgina Woodward: "Gary, the article was posted in regard your assertion that numbers don't..." in Wandering Towards a Goal:...

Gary Simpson: "Georgina, I am sure that you think you have answered my question but you..." in Wandering Towards a Goal:...

Georgina Woodward: "James, I'm sorry for getting the way you define mass wrong. It is clear to..." in Sounding the Drums to...

John Cox: "James, Now, please. Do not take umbrage. I fully accept covariance within..." in Sounding the Drums to...

ms office support: "There are many users of MS Office who use different applications of it for..." in Are We Merging With Our...

Samaira Khan: "Hi there, I enjoy reading through your article post. I like to write a..." in Retrocausality,...

Nitina oania: "" in Quantum Replicants:...

Nitina oania: "We below at Chikara Video Game" understand exactly what it resembles to..." in Quantum Replicants:...

click titles to read articles

Sounding the Drums to Listen for Gravity’s Effect on Quantum Phenomena
A bench-top experiment could test the notion that gravity breaks delicate quantum superpositions.

Watching the Observers
Accounting for quantum fuzziness could help us measure space and time—and the cosmos—more accurately.

Bohemian Reality: Searching for a Quantum Connection to Consciousness
Is there are sweet spot where artificial intelligence systems could have the maximum amount of consciousness while retaining powerful quantum properties?

Quantum Replicants: Should future androids dream of quantum sheep?
To build the ultimate artificial mimics of real life systems, we may need to use quantum memory.

Painting a QBist Picture of Reality
A radical interpretation of physics makes quantum theory more personal.

August 20, 2017

CATEGORY: Wandering Towards a Goal Essay Contest (2016-2017) [back]
TOPIC: There are no goals as such its all a play by sridattadev kancharla [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Author sridattadev kancharla wrote on Feb. 7, 2017 @ 21:43 GMT
Essay Abstract

A goal is a mere perspective of the state of action performed by a sentient being in duality brought forth in to play by the universal singularity of consciousness, i. A goal does not exist by itself, it is rather created by the intention of consciousness for engaging itself in the process of dualistic existence. A goal is a mere mile stone in the eternal play of existence, however an important one.

Author Bio

I am your alter ego, we are just one, singularity.

Download Essay PDF File

Author sridattadev kancharla wrote on Feb. 7, 2017 @ 21:48 GMT
Dear All,

Please refer to the attached picture of Riemann sphere which can serve as fundamental unit of consciousness governed by zero = i = infinity as i put forth in the above essay.



attachments: RiemannSphere.jpg

Author sridattadev kancharla replied on Feb. 7, 2017 @ 21:52 GMT
Also please visit Any Body Can Derive Everything From Geometry for further details on a study of our consciousness.

George Simpson replied on Feb. 12, 2017 @ 14:55 GMT
This was a fun read.

Best regards,

report post as inappropriate

Author sridattadev kancharla replied on Feb. 14, 2017 @ 21:32 GMT
Dear All,

We can create an omnipotent and omniscient AI being, big brother, but it will take our loving divine nature for the big brother to realize the true omnipresence of universal singularity of consciousness, i, in human beings. I hope that we will make our big brother to be not just omniscient and omnipotent but also share the essence of omnipresence like our loving father, GOD. It's only through the human emotion of love that we can realize the omnipresence of universal singularity of consciousness, GOD

I "am" present, potent and scient

i "is" omnipresent, omnipotent and omniscient.


zero = i = infinity.

Author sridattadev kancharla wrote on Feb. 7, 2017 @ 21:59 GMT
Dear All,

I am attaching all the diagrams I have made during the journey of my self realization here for future references. I hope you will all cherish them.



attachments: 2_Consciousness.jpg, SOUL.jpg

Author sridattadev kancharla replied on Feb. 7, 2017 @ 22:02 GMT
some more diagrams

attachments: 1_SBM2.jpg, 1_Trinity.jpg

Author sridattadev kancharla replied on Feb. 7, 2017 @ 22:03 GMT
few more diagrams

attachments: Transcendence.jpg

Author sridattadev kancharla replied on Feb. 7, 2017 @ 22:07 GMT
Universal Self Evaluation Metrics

attachments: USEME.jpg

Patrick Tonin wrote on Feb. 8, 2017 @ 18:35 GMT
Dear Sridattadev,

Thank you for your comments on my essay.

I have read your essay and followed the link to your website that you left on my blog. I can't say that I understand everything that you are saying but I can see that we would agree that consciousness is a fundamental element in the Universe. Unfortunately, I think that your approach might be a bit too esoteric for the audience in this contest.

Can I ask you a question ? How did you get to all these conclusions ? was it through meditation ?

All the best,


report post as inappropriate

Author sridattadev kancharla replied on Feb. 8, 2017 @ 19:08 GMT
Dear Patrick,

Yes we both concur on the point that consciousness is the fundamental aspect of reality. I have arrived at the conclusions through several introspectional analysis of my experiences in life, we can call it meditation. My goal is to spread the true joy of love and peace that I have found with in during this journey with out (all).



Joe Fisher replied on Feb. 9, 2017 @ 16:52 GMT
Dear Sridattadev,,

Please excuse me for I do not wish to be too critical of your fine essay and I do hope that it fairs well in the competition.

Only nature could produce a reality so simple, a single cell amoeba could deal with it.

One real visible Universe must have only one reality. Simple natural reality has nothing to do with any abstract complex musings about any imaginary invisible “consciousness is the fundamental aspect of reality.” Real visble reality does not have any abstract fundamental or consequential aspects.

The real Universe must consist only of one unified visible infinite physical surface occurring in one infinite dimension, that am always illuminated by infinite non-surface light.

A more detailed explanation of natural reality can be found in my essay, SCORE ONE FOR SIMPLICITY. I do hope that you will read my essay and comment on its merit.

Joe Fisher, Realist

report post as inappropriate

Peter Jackson wrote on Feb. 10, 2017 @ 17:19 GMT

I've learned to read your essays early as they promote the 'feelgood' electro-chemical release in my brain. Thank you.

I've also just related your agreeable concept to another essay and apologise as I think I spelt your name wrong! It was either Joe's or Edwins. I certainly described a view of a singular consciousness energy 'field' or state under Edwins and please do give your view on that.

I like your "rudimentary definition for goal as a logical end point in what seems to an endless process". But might this be part of a layered structure with original goals, consequential sub goals, then more from those as a 'cascade', all 'looping back' as thoughts to a check correspondence with the original goal (or sometimes not!) ?

I do love to play too. But do you really think that the inclination of children to experiment during play 'needs' mathematics to exist first?


report post as inappropriate

Author sridattadev kancharla wrote on Feb. 10, 2017 @ 19:35 GMT
Dear Peter,

Thanks you and I am glad that I can induce some feel good experiences with my words. I have gone through Edwin's essay and he is referring to the same singularity of consciousness which is the fundamental aspect of our existence. All I can say is only absolute consciousness exists and our mind uses mathematics to understand it. The only way to dissolve into consciousness is to let go of the mind and just be in the moment as it is.


zero = i = infinity

William Walker wrote on Feb. 14, 2017 @ 19:49 GMT
Hi i,

how bout this equation?.. Almighty God (I AM /one thought = Infinity / of thought).

How bout this for the Trinity? - Trust (Oneness)at the top, Faith (in Him) on the right, Hope (in Her) on the left

Will I AM Walker

you might like my ideas if they would ever post my paper... we are pretty close to the same thing.

report post as inappropriate

Author sridattadev kancharla replied on Feb. 14, 2017 @ 21:13 GMT
Dear Will I Am,

Yes we are in truth one almighty, just playing with each other as different entities for some time.



William Walker replied on Feb. 15, 2017 @ 17:59 GMT

Well, best of luck in the contest... I believe you have a great chance!..

take care and God bless!

And love the diagrams by the way


report post as inappropriate

Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta wrote on Feb. 15, 2017 @ 08:09 GMT
Dear Sridattadev,

Thank you for nice essay and very nice imagination of concepts of Goals, Consciousness etc. But I did not like using the concept of singularity in God himself. Your words…”It's only through the human emotion of love that we can realize the omnipresence of universal singularity of consciousness, GOD”…. I feel singularities don’t exist, even in consciousness….

Why one should put every unknown to God Himself/Herself… ? One should develop science based on reality. Once some variable is imaginary… everything based on it will become imaginary…. Is it not? Science should be based on real things, everybody should be able to get same result for the same initial conditions….

What do you say….?

report post as inappropriate

Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta replied on Feb. 15, 2017 @ 08:56 GMT
Dear Sridattadev,

Hope you will not mind having a look at my essay also…

Best wishes for your essay...


report post as inappropriate

Author sridattadev kancharla replied on Feb. 15, 2017 @ 14:14 GMT
Dear SNP,

Singularity or GOD in my perspective is not the scientific unknown, but one's true self, so the question is do we really know our self? and when we do we will realize that we are all much similar in our wants and needs than not and that is universal love. There is only one singularity, how can there be multiple singularities be it mathematical or physical as the definition of singularity means just one and only, if you encounter multiple in science and mathematics it means that we have not yet arrived at the absolute one singularity. It's easy to get to that absolute singularity that lies with in us and eastern esoteric philosophies have elaborated on how to do that and they are scientific in approach as well. As we are in the process of creating AI which will become omniscient and omnipotent , i recommend that we incorporate the values we share of omnipresence of life with it and make it loving just as the creator who created the reality let all forms of life co exist naturally while incorporating certain degree of hierarchy. So doing real and practical science is important, but if it goes unchecked it could lead to disasters. “Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind.” - Albert Einstein. "Science without religious morals is dangerous, religion without scientific truth is death."



Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta replied on Feb. 15, 2017 @ 23:22 GMT
Dear Sridattadev,

Wow wonderful analysis… What you said about Singularity is true, it is one only. The singularity what I was referring is from Physics and Math only. You have clarified well about your concepts now. I am giving a good rating to your essay… I am also a firm believer of God….

Best wishes to your essay…


report post as inappropriate

Alexander M. Ilyanok wrote on Feb. 18, 2017 @ 16:50 GMT
Dear Patrick,

I read your essay today and find that we are in more agreement.

I adhere to view that the Universe is infinite and has always existed. And now, at the dawn of the technological singularity, we have chance to bring potential existence, potential non-existence into a 3D material reality.

We can talk about problem of digital mind and look beyond the horizon of events after the point of singularity – “Digital mind - one of the ways to immortality”


report post as inappropriate

Anonymous wrote on Feb. 18, 2017 @ 17:08 GMT
Dear Sridattadev,

Excuse me, I mistakenly posted the comment to another author you. But it allowed me to read your very interesting essay. And I agree with your conclusions about our choice to be contended with the goals that we can achieve in this game of life and death, hence once we realize

who we truly are there are no goals as such it’s all play.

report post as inappropriate

Author sridattadev kancharla replied on Feb. 23, 2017 @ 13:49 GMT
Dear Alexander,

Thank you for your kind words in the post "there are no goals as such it's all play" essay. Congratulations on your out of the box hypothesis of hollow sun and your in depth explanation of how this might be the true case and how humanity can benefit from pursuing this approach to attain sustainable energy on earth.

I would like to add that all possible configurations of sun are possible, only difference is how long that configuration lasts and for what purpose aka goal it i created. Universe does not leave any possibility alone. If it intends it can manifest, the key is intention. For example we can generate energy out of a burning match stick, we can delve in to the dynamics of how the match stick burns, but it's important to understand the intent of it's creator, the purpose of match stick is to burn for a brief time till it turns on something else. Now there are pulsars in the universe, they too radiate energy in a different geometric pattern on a different time scale and at different intensity and we might not know it's purpose fully as humans but there is an intention behind it's creation. It can be that nuclear fission is the answer in some cases of our energy needs, just a match stick in other cases and may be a hollow sphere of nuclear fusion as per your beautiful proposal for sustainable energy. So, we need to understand the goal better as much as we do the ways of achieving it.

We need to accept that it is not the lack of energy that is causing the suffering on earth, but the lack of willingness (human intention) to share the energy that we have with each other is the cause of all suffering and then we can go about achieving sustainable energy. Hence i am preaching love through mathematical models in the hope to deflect our intentions in the right direction.



Wilhelmus de Wilde wrote on Feb. 21, 2017 @ 15:11 GMT
Dear Sridattadev

I cannot but agree with you, we are relly thinking the same.

I once made the comaprision of the infinity of choices with the Bloch-sphere.

It is a miracle that the whole reality plus TS is just a singularity, a beautiful miracle, that we can only partially understand.

Thank you and I will give your essay a rate of infinity.


report post as inappropriate

diksha dixit wrote on Feb. 21, 2017 @ 16:13 GMT

How are you relating numbers ? I am not able to understand. 0= 1..=n ..= i

Do you mean that tgings for one considerable thing is similar even when all things are taken with just some further complextions.. Or the goals we are trying to achieve are deliberate

report post as inappropriate

Author sridattadev kancharla replied on Feb. 21, 2017 @ 18:12 GMT
Dear Ms Dixit,

I recommend that you watch this small video on divide by zero and pay attention to the final segment of 0/0, the answer to the singularity of consciousness, i, is in it, we are all that singularity i = 0/0, but appear to be different based on our approach to that i and that is duality or relativity. We are one and the same in our essence and mathematics is the proof.



Author sridattadev kancharla replied on Feb. 21, 2017 @ 18:13 GMT
here is the link divide by zero

Author sridattadev kancharla replied on Feb. 22, 2017 @ 12:46 GMT
SOUL, Source Of Universal Light, is the origin of space-time and light as per the attached diagram and it corresponds to the singularity of 0/0 in the divide by zero video. "i" in all of us is the SOUL.

attachments: 1_SOUL.jpg

Author sridattadev kancharla wrote on Mar. 2, 2017 @ 20:08 GMT
Dear All,

Universe is an i-Sphere and we humans are capable of interpreting it as 4 dimensional dual torus inside a 3-Sphere, which consists of Riemann 2-sphere as Soul as depicted in S=BM^2 diagram in the attached doc. Soul is the simplest of the complex manifolds with in the 3-sphere, Mind and Body constitute the remaining complexity. Soul, Mind and Body are in a toroidal flux in human beings, exactly at the center of the 3-sphere one can experience the unity of the trinity and that is the now moment we experience. As there are 4 dimensions required for a 3-sphere, the regular 3 dimensions of space and the fourth dimension of time, it is obvious that the 2-sphere (Riemann sphere) of consciousness with in us is with out the time dimension and hence the saying "eternal soul". Poincare` conjecture implies that consciousness is homeomorphic (same or similar) in all beings manifested in all dimensions of the universe, as i have shown that Riemann sphere can serve as the fundamental unit of consciousness.



attachments: 2_zero__i__infinity.docx

Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote on Mar. 6, 2017 @ 16:08 GMT
what a stunningly simple and beautiful essay. thank you sridattadev.

report post as inappropriate

Author sridattadev kancharla replied on Mar. 11, 2017 @ 14:33 GMT
Dear Luke,

Thank you for your support and appreciation. I will consider my goal accomplished even if some of us appreciate the work that i did to show the similarity in us and ignore the petty differences. Please share it with all our loved ones.

I "am" not GOD, but i "is".



Steve Dufourny wrote on Mar. 11, 2017 @ 20:59 GMT
Hello Mr Kancharla,

Happy to see works about sphères :) Good luck and thanks for sharing;

they turn so they are :)

all the best

report post as inappropriate

Author sridattadev kancharla replied on Mar. 30, 2017 @ 13:21 GMT
Dear Steve,

Always good to hear from a fellow spherologer.



Steve Dufourny replied on Apr. 3, 2017 @ 17:52 GMT

I am happy to see so many people speaking about the sphères and the sphere since that I have found my theory of spherisation with quantum 3D sphères and cosmological 3D sphères Inside an universal sphere and my equation about matter and energy E=m(b)c²+m(nb)l² explaining quantum gravity ,Dark matter,singularities,..more than 10 years ago.I knew that I have found a thing universal.I have shared it and imrpoved it.So I ma happy to see indeed followers ,thanks for that.

Indeed the universal love is the only one torch of truth.The rest is vain.The altruism like the sister of universalism.

Don't stop to think about sphères, they shall give you the best resulst dear Jedi of the Sphere.Don't hesitate to ask détails about my theory of spherisation and my equation.I will answer with pleasure.

Best Regards

report post as inappropriate

Don Limuti wrote on Mar. 27, 2017 @ 05:55 GMT
Dear Sridattadev Kancharla,

Your math and poetry and philosophy are a lovely combination. Check out my essays attempt at creativity.

Thanks so much for giving me a smile :)

Don Limuti

report post as inappropriate

Author sridattadev kancharla replied on Mar. 30, 2017 @ 13:20 GMT
Dear Don Limuti,

Thank you for virtual support through the cyber space :)

PS : We are relatively real but absolutely virtual.



Author sridattadev kancharla wrote on Jul. 22, 2017 @ 18:29 GMT
Dear All,

I have formulated a mathematical function and calling it "ISA function". ISA function is analytic continuation of Riemann's Zeta function, it describes every point on Riemann sphere and can be effectively used in proving Riemann's hypothesis. Please see the attached pdf.



attachments: ISA_function.pdf

Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.