Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home

Current Essay Contest


Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fnd.

Previous Contests

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discusswinners

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discusswinners

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discusswinners

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Ken Seto: on 2/20/17 at 21:48pm UTC, wrote Dear Mr. Walker, I suggest that you write a paper on your theory and...

Ken Seto: on 2/20/17 at 21:42pm UTC, wrote Hi Peter, Nice to hear from you again. An excerpt from my book: "In the...

Peter Jackson: on 2/20/17 at 20:33pm UTC, wrote Hi Ken, Nice to read about your interesting theory again, written in such...

Steve Dufourny: on 2/20/17 at 19:14pm UTC, wrote Hi Ken, You are welcome.I liked it.It is nice, I am interested to know...

Ken Seto: on 2/20/17 at 14:27pm UTC, wrote Hi Steve, Thank you for reading my paper. If you are interested I can...

Ken Seto: on 2/20/17 at 14:06pm UTC, wrote Dear Jeff, Thank you for reading my paper. I read your paper. It is...

Steve Dufourny: on 2/20/17 at 9:48am UTC, wrote Hello Mr Hon Seto, congratulations.You had analysed this emergent...

Jeff Yee: on 2/18/17 at 4:31am UTC, wrote Ken, I read through the comments before reading your paper, encouraged by...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Jose Koshy: "James Putnam, What do you mean by the acceleration of light? Do you mean..." in Alternative Models of...

Jose Koshy: "Steven, Because we are not sitting face to face, I may not be replying..." in Alternative Models of...

Algernon kk: "Steve Agnew is a legend for doing that. A lot of people at online resume..." in Weinberg: Why quantum...

Mohan rao: "Voot app free download Flash Recovery" in Time in Physics & Entropy...

Mohan rao: "My partner and I stumbled over here different website and thought I might..." in Time in Physics & Entropy...

Gary Simpson: "Ted, BTW, it is the community vote that matters ... not the public vote...." in FQXi Essay Contest 2016:...

Gary Simpson: "Ted, You statement regarding your score does not make any sense. You..." in FQXi Essay Contest 2016:...

Algernon kk: "Steve Agnew is a legend for doing that. A lot of people at custom..." in Weinberg: Why quantum...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

Quantum Replicants: Should future androids dream of quantum sheep?
To build the ultimate artificial mimics of real life systems, we may need to use quantum memory.

Painting a QBist Picture of Reality
A radical interpretation of physics makes quantum theory more personal.

The Spacetime Revolutionary
Carlo Rovelli describes how black holes may transition to "white holes," according to loop quantum gravity, a radical rewrite of fundamental physics.

Riding the Rogue Quantum Waves
Could giant sea swells help explain how the macroscopic world emerges from the quantum microworld? (Image credit: MIT News)

Rescuing Reality
A "retrocausal" rewrite of physics, in which influences from the future can affect the past, could solve some quantum quandaries—saving Einstein's view of reality along the way.


FQXi FORUM
February 28, 2017

CATEGORY: Wandering Towards a Goal Essay Contest (2016-2017) [back]
TOPIC: The Processes of Life from Model Mechanics by Ken Hon Seto [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

This essay's rating: Community = 4.3; Public = 4.4


Author Ken Hon Seto wrote on Jan. 27, 2017 @ 17:03 GMT
Essay Abstract

The content of this essay is lifted from my latest book entitled "Model Mechanics: The Final Theory". Model Mechanics posits that all the particles, all processes and all the forces of nature are the results of absolute motions of fundamental mass bearing particles called the "S-Particle" in a stationary, structured and elastic medium called the E-Matrix. Model Mechanics leads to the discovery of a new fifth force called the CRE force. The CRE force is repulsive between objects moving in the same direction in the E-Matrix. The CRE force in combination with the electromagnetic force lead to a new theory of gravity. Most importantly they lead to all the processes of life including the ability of living cells to divide.

Author Bio

Ken H Seto is a graduate Chemical Engineer. He was a product manager for Protective Treatment company and he developed several major adhesive and sealant products for the automatic and construction industries. He obtained two patents on polymer technology. He published three books on physics and cosmology and the latest is entitled "Model Mechanics: The Final Theory".

Download Essay PDF File




Joe Fisher wrote on Jan. 30, 2017 @ 17:35 GMT
Dear Dr. Seto,

Please excuse me for I do not wish to be too critical of your fine essay.

Only nature could produce a reality so simple, a single cell amoeba could deal with it.

One real visible Universe must have only one reality. Simple natural reality has nothing to do with any abstract complex musings about imaginary invisible quantum particles.

The real Universe must consist only of one unified visible infinite physical surface occurring in one infinite dimension, that am always illuminated by infinite non-surface light.

A more detailed explanation of natural reality can be found in my essay, SCORE ONE FOR SIMPLICITY. I do hope that you will read my essay and comment on its merit.

Joe Fisher, Realist

report post as inappropriate


Author Ken Hon Seto wrote on Feb. 1, 2017 @ 13:26 GMT
Dear Reader,

As far as I know my essay is the first ever to connect physics and physical interactions to life processes. The discovery of the fifth repulsive "CRE" force is the reason I make this claim. Therefore my essay deserves a fair evaluation. Thank you.

Ken Seto




Vladimir Rogozhin wrote on Feb. 9, 2017 @ 12:29 GMT
Dear Ken Hon Seto,

The contest FQXi is a competition of ideas. You give original ideas. It's the most important.Yours faithfully,

Vladimir

report post as inappropriate

Author Ken Hon Seto replied on Feb. 14, 2017 @ 14:22 GMT
Dear Vladimir,

Thank you for your post.

Current physics needs new ideas and I believe that I have provided some new ideas for consideration.

Sincerely,

Ken Seto




Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta wrote on Feb. 13, 2017 @ 05:58 GMT
Dear Seto

Your concept “Cosmological Repulsive Effect (CRE) Force” is good for explaining attractive and repulsive forces at electron proton levels. But at distant Galaxy level it is not required.

Lets do a small experiment which we did in our school days. Take a bucket and half fill it water. Tie a string to the handle; hold it with your hand. Now spin around yourself. As you...

view entire post


report post as inappropriate


Larry Rosen wrote on Feb. 13, 2017 @ 18:46 GMT
Dear Mr. Seto,

I enjoyed this essay, as I have other essays of yours. I find your work stunningly original. I can't myself determine whether your theories are correct. But I am so pleased that there are scientists approaching old problems from new angles. A unified theory is a worthy goal--and few minds are able to propose one. Thanks for your inspiring work.

report post as inappropriate

Author Ken Hon Seto replied on Feb. 14, 2017 @ 14:39 GMT
Dear Mr. Rosen,

Thank you for your kind post.

I hope that mainstream scientists will give my ideas consideration.

Sincerely,

Ken Seto




William Walker wrote on Feb. 13, 2017 @ 23:30 GMT
I thought your paper was really cool. I have a hard time understanding some of the math but I believe I got most of the big ideas. I have a few questions for you to answer if you like...

Do you think gravity is sound vibrations?

Are the e strings laid out in a mesh pattern (like a window screen)?

Is the evolution that God (and I believe it is he and she - light and darkness) designed for consciousness (I AM / one thought = Infinite thoughts) evolving back to Oneness... that split apart in the beginning to create the physical universe? Could it simply be the division of conscious light that created everything we perceive from our senses?

Good luck with your essay,

William Walker

report post as inappropriate

Author Ken Hon Seto replied on Feb. 14, 2017 @ 15:28 GMT
Dear Mr. Walker,

Thank you for your post.

No, I don't believe that gravity is sound vibrations. It is a combination of two opposing forces--an attractive EM force caused by the gravitating objects moving in the same direction in the E-Matrix and a repulsive force caused by the gravitating objects are confined to the divergent structure of the E-Matrix.

There is only one equation in the essay--what part of it that your don't understand?

The E-Strings are arranged like window screen in two dimensions.

The consciousness processes involve the recognition of geometric patterns stored in the E-Matrix and the neurons in the brain through previously learning processes.

I hope that I answered your questions adequately.

Sincerely,

Ken Seto




William Walker wrote on Feb. 15, 2017 @ 17:52 GMT
Hey Ken,

Thanks for the response...

yes that one equation... I am just horrible at math formulas so you probably won't be able to explain it so that I could understand it. Plus I have no formal training beyond H.S. math / physics, so I am trying to learn :)

That's what I thought too with the stings laid out with a vertical axis and a horizontal axis. X & Y

I guess my theory is that all forces whether they attract or repel are frequencies - which I'm assuming is the f in your equation. And if everything is a frequency - then wouldn't everything be some form of sound vibration? Even gravity?

So God (consciousness) in my estimation is all sound frequencies... and God went from one frequency (I AM)...in the beginning... to all frequencies (Infinity)... which was TMI... but then balanced them out by separating these frequencies into visible light and hiding a lot of the frequencies in dark matter creating the spatial universe we see today dominated by darkness.

And I promise not to bug you after this... I'm sure we could continue to infinity and beyond ;)

Best of luck in the contest!

report post as inappropriate

Author Ken Hon Seto replied on Feb. 20, 2017 @ 21:48 GMT
Dear Mr. Walker,

I suggest that you write a paper on your theory and submit it to FQXi so that the community can evaluate it.

Thank you for your interest.

Regards,

Ken Seto




Jeff Yee wrote on Feb. 18, 2017 @ 04:31 GMT
Ken,

I read through the comments before reading your paper, encouraged by the feedback of its originality. It's very true, you've put considerable work into a fresh idea.

I'm at the tip of the iceberg reading through some of the entries in this community (new to it), but it is refreshing to see unique approaches to problems. And the problem that you are trying to tackle - finding cracks in the Standard Model of particles and forces - is the same one that I've been tackling as well. It's fun to see new ideas.

I admit that our approaches are quite different, but there were two similarities that I found in your paper. I do agree that there is a medium (your E-matrix) for light to travel across the universe. It still amazes me that the aether was disregarded long ago. And I also agree with you that there is a fundamental particle (what you called the S-particle) if we continue to dig deeper.

On that last note of finding a fundamental particle, you might have interest in some work that I've been doing with my colleagues:

http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/2765

Regards
,

Jeff

report post as inappropriate

Author Ken Hon Seto replied on Feb. 20, 2017 @ 14:06 GMT
Dear Jeff,

Thank you for reading my paper.

I read your paper. It is good that we have a common goal of finding the one fundamental physical description of our universe that can account for all the particles, all the forces and all the processes of nature.

My physical model of the E-Matrix, the S-Particles and the absolute motions of the S-particles in the E-Matrix give rise to all the elementary particles, all the forces and all the processes of nature is one such possible candidate. if you are interested please send me your email address so I can send you a copy of my ebook.

Regards,

Ken.




Steve Dufourny wrote on Feb. 20, 2017 @ 09:48 GMT
Hello Mr Hon Seto,

congratulations.You had analysed this emergent consciousness with a wonderful creativity playing with strings and this infinite entropical potential if I can say.The matrix of informations and how you interpret it was a relevant reading.

Thanks for sharing and good luck in this contest.

report post as inappropriate

Author Ken Hon Seto replied on Feb. 20, 2017 @ 14:27 GMT
Hi Steve,

Thank you for reading my paper.

If you are interested I can send you a copy of my latest ebook.

Regards,

Ken.



Steve Dufourny replied on Feb. 20, 2017 @ 19:14 GMT
Hi Ken,

You are welcome.I liked it.It is nice, I am interested to know more ,it seems relevant in a general point of vue.

you can send me it. my mail is dufournybionature@gmail.com

Regards

report post as inappropriate


Peter Jackson wrote on Feb. 20, 2017 @ 20:33 GMT
Hi Ken,

Nice to read about your interesting theory again, written in such a clear and well organized way and modified to address the topic. The 'geometrical pattern imprint' solution to memory and consciousness is in agreement with my own.

Indeed I think and hope you'll enjoy reading mine as it shows that the mechanistic solutions we both promote can remove all the weirdness and confusion in quantum mechanics. I also address why it's so difficult for new theoretical approaches to get more that glimpsed by mainstream. I think mankind must learn to employ more rational organised thinking as opposed to the primevally evolved 'instant' pattern matching we agree on.

Very well done.

Peter

report post as inappropriate

Author Ken Hon Seto replied on Feb. 20, 2017 @ 21:42 GMT
Hi Peter,

Nice to hear from you again.

An excerpt from my book:

"In the past 100 years theoretical physics and cosmology development have been conducted almost exclusively on a mathematical basis, leading to abstract mathematical objects or processes such as fields, space-time, curvature in space-time, time dilation, length contraction, virtual particles, action at a distance, curled-up dimensions, Entanglement, Dark Energy, Dark Matter....etc. It is posited that these abstract mathematical objects may not have existence in our physical universe. This led me to formulate a physical model of our universe that can be used to replace these abstract mathematical objects."

If you are interested I can send you a copy of my ebook.

Regards,

Ken




Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:

And select the letter between 'R' and 'T':


Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.