Search FQXi

If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Forum Home
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help

Marshall Barnes: on 3/25/10 at 22:24pm UTC, wrote Amrit: Space and time are inextricably connected. You can't have one...

amrit: on 1/5/09 at 17:32pm UTC, wrote you discuss in your article about space-time being physical reality myself...

Uncle Al: on 10/1/08 at 17:29pm UTC, wrote ...

paul valletta: on 9/30/08 at 11:07am UTC, wrote I have been very interested in the authors work for some time (no pun...

March 25, 2017

ARTICLE: A Stitch in Quantum Time [back to article]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

paul valletta wrote on Sep. 30, 2008 @ 11:07 GMT
I have been very interested in the authors work for some time (no pun intended), while reading some of their paprrs in 99 I happen to watch the Royal Intitutions Lecture about time, and there was an experiment that involved two identical ticking "cesium" devices.

They were brought together and wired up to a calibration devise, which showed a minute difference in both clocks ticks. One devise remained at the RI lecture hall, whilst the othre was transported to Hong Kong, and then back to UK. When both clock were re-calibrated, there was a definate variation of the clock that "travelled" to Hong Kong and back, I believe this was a repeat of an experiment from the early 1970's.

What I asked at the time was this, the calibrated figure prior to separation over great distance was so many billionths of a second, but this was limited by the apperatus size, the cesium atoms were effectivly in two separate far off locations, by the devise size.

If they were smaller devises, then the initial data would be more decimal points to the right!..and thus when one devise was extended farther away by travel, and then brought to a nearby vicinity to be re-calibrated the difference would be greater, much greater infact.

The smaller the divice, the closer they can be initially, and the "more-like" they can be thoguht to be. This is essentially what occurs in QM superpositions, a single extended field is what there be?

To find a similar Relative example, just find a shoal of guppy fish for instance, they have all been born very close in time to each other, they have been part of an extended spacetime (superposition, many guppies) they are a collection of many "twins", nature has, in relativity many objects that are near-by proximity clones, human twins fr instance are another relative examples

(which some have placed their emotional experiences "entanglement" as a scaled up similar process of QM entanglement) time and it's consequences is very much present in QM and GR !..its just there are different clicks at different locations.

report post as inappropriate

Uncle Al wrote on Oct. 1, 2008 @ 17:29 GMT

Hafele-Keating experiment

report post as inappropriate

amrit wrote on Jan. 5, 2009 @ 17:32 GMT
you discuss in your article about space-time being physical reality

myself I see space-time as a math model only

space itself is atemporal and time is a coordinate of motion in space, see more on file attached

yours amrit

attachments: 1_The_Theory_of_Atemporality_Scientific_Way_to_Peace_and_Prosperity__Sorli__2009.pdf, 3_In_The_Theory_of_Relativity__Time_is_a_Coordinate_of_Motion__Sorli__FOUNDATIONS_OF_PHYSICS_2009.doc

report post as inappropriate

Marshall Barnes replied on Mar. 25, 2010 @ 22:24 GMT

Space and time are inextricably connected. You can't have one without the other. If time is a coordinate of motion in space, then time must stop in a sealed, empty box...

report post as inappropriate

Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:

And select the letter between 'G' and 'I':

Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.