Search FQXi

If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Forum Home
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the blogger are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help

atomiton1: on 2/10/09 at 3:49am UTC, wrote Life might very well be on the moon. In order for there to be life on the...

William Orem: on 8/18/08 at 18:03pm UTC, wrote Fascinating late-summer reading for FQXi-fans can be found here, in a Time...


Thomas Ray: "Come up with an example of a "law of nature equation" yet, Lorraine? How..." in Defining the Observer

Billy Milburn: "Very informative material on theoretical physics. Very accurate slides and..." in Santa Barbara Gravity...

adel sadeq: "Akinbo What problem EXACTLY are you trying to solve with your "harmonic"..." in Defining Existence

Akinbo Ojo: "Hi Gary, Looks impressive. Your calculation suggests energy conservation. ..." in Defining Existence

Lorraine Ford: "Unlike David Wolpert, Jim Hartle, Ian Durham and others at the August FQXi..." in Defining the Observer

Pentcho Valev: "Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics These are the second law of..." in Rescuing Reality

Ted Esaters: "Hi Georgina, Thanks for your remark. I did see some good articles and..." in Quantum Thermodynamics

Georgina Woodward: "Ted, you misrepresent the linked website, there is nothing there about..." in Quantum Thermodynamics

click titles to read articles

Rescuing Reality
A "retrocausal" rewrite of physics, in which influences from the future can affect the past, could solve some quantum quandaries—saving Einstein's view of reality along the way.

Untangling Quantum Causation
Figuring out if A causes B should help to write the rulebook for quantum physics.

In Search of a Quantum Spacetime
Finding the universe's wavefunction could be the key to understanding the emergence of reality.

Collapsing Physics: Q&A with Catalina Oana Curceanu
Tests of a rival to quantum theory, taking place in the belly of the Gran Sasso d'Italia mountain, could reveal how the fuzzy subatomic realm of possibilities comes into sharp macroscopic focus.

Dropping Schrödinger's Cat Into a Black Hole
Combining gravity with the process that transforms the fuzzy uncertainty of the quantum realm into the definite classical world we see around us could lead to a theory of quantum gravity.

October 27, 2016

CATEGORY: Blog [back]
TOPIC: Is the Moon Alive? [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Blogger William Orem wrote on Aug. 18, 2008 @ 18:03 GMT

Fascinating late-summer reading for FQXi-fans can be found here, in a Time magazine article from December . . . 1967. The article outlines the various precautions that our boys in the Apollo space program would be taking against inadvertently bringing moonlings back to Earth – that is, against accidentally transporting indigenous lunar bacteria home.

Most folks I talk to are...

view entire post

this post has been edited by the author since its original submission

report post as inappropriate

atomiton1 wrote on Feb. 10, 2009 @ 03:49 GMT
Life might very well be on the moon. In order for there to be life on the moon, there would have to be Oxygen, Hydrogen, and carbon. Life although would last only a few hours. It would be highly radioactive, and very basic. So Im guessing that the very worst that could possibly happen would be a strong and contageos cancer. Have a question. email at

report post as inappropriate

Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:

And select the letter between 'C' and 'E':

Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.