Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Georgina Parry: on 3/24/09 at 9:09am UTC, wrote Amrit, if gravity is nothing to do with time, how do you explain...

Georgina Parry: on 3/7/09 at 5:29am UTC, wrote I first came across the idea of topological fields in relation to...

Steve Dufourny: on 2/18/09 at 19:33pm UTC, wrote Hi all, I also agree, the quantum structure implies the gravity, I remain...

amrit: on 1/17/09 at 9:44am UTC, wrote you are right, gravity is a result of quantum structure of space and has...

Plato: on 7/11/08 at 0:26am UTC, wrote http://eskesthai.blogspot.com/2008/07/intellectual-defeatism.html?showCommen...



FQXi FORUM
March 23, 2017

ARTICLE: Two for the Road [back to article]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Plato wrote on Jul. 11, 2008 @ 00:26 GMT
http://eskesthai.blogspot.com/2008/07/intellectual-defeatism
.html?showComment=1215704040000#c6917934854461833434

While this is of course some interest to me, I thought any description that would give us some more information about what exists in the valleys, is a furthering of what work is considered in relation to Stanley Mandelstam and topos.

An interesting and furthering of the understanding currently held by those who had thought it contained limitions to a genus 2 figure, has been moved now to included a genus three consideration.

While the relationship is more friendly, I would see them in context of Poincare and Klein in the development of topology.

I find resonance with this effort.

report post as inappropriate


amrit wrote on Jan. 17, 2009 @ 09:44 GMT
you are right, gravity is a result of quantum structure of space and has nothing to do with time

attachments: 1_Time_is_a_measure_of_motion_in_Space_Sorli__2009__arXiv.doc

report post as inappropriate


Steve Dufourny wrote on Feb. 18, 2009 @ 19:33 GMT
Hi all,

I also agree, the quantum structure implies the gravity, I remain persuaded that the coded ultimate particle implies the rest, and its rotation speed on itself even is directly bound with the gravity and thus the mass.All turns and implies the gravity. Combinations are numerous .Imagine an ultimate spherical system with its codes and its rotations implying the gravities or the gravity.

report post as inappropriate


Georgina Parry wrote on Mar. 7, 2009 @ 05:29 GMT
I first came across the idea of topological fields in relation to biological development over 20 years ago in a Book by Brian Leith called The descent of Darwin. It was my favourite book for some time.It asks interesting questions, such as can we separate pattern from process? Topology may be used to identify the pattern but the process gives rise to that pattern.

It was a pity that the article was mostly about the couple getting along well together and their personalities complementing each other, which I hope long continues. Rather than actually talking in any depth about their work.

report post as inappropriate


Georgina Parry wrote on Mar. 24, 2009 @ 09:09 GMT
Amrit, if gravity is nothing to do with time, how do you explain gravitational time dilation?

The unknowable objective reality within the void of space and its disturbance due to motion of matter along the 4th spatio-energetic dimension (currently imagined as the abstract deformation of empty space itself) gives rise to gravity and subjective time. Motion, structure, gravity and time are all linked together in The Prime Quaternion model and observation of time dilation is thus predicted by it.

report post as inappropriate


Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:

And select the letter between 'K' and 'M':


Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.